Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wikipedia saysNo. He wasn't. There never was a charity. The government called it a charity. It never was.
That's democrat persecution for you. In reality, there was no charity. The Trump Foundation was a bookkeeping function. Not a charity.Trump Pays Up One Month After Admitting He Misused Charitable Funds for Political Gain
It was a civil suit and the Foundation was not a charity.
A non-profit.Wikipedia says
The foundation was created to receive royalties from Trump's 1987 book Trump: The Art of the Deal as well as donations from others, for the stated purpose of distributing the funds to charitable causes.
Sounds like a charity to me. What was it instead?
No. He set up a tax-exempt foundation whose stated purpose was to distribute royalties from his book and contributed money to charitable organizations. It was a bookkeeping scam.That's democrat persecution for you. In reality, there was no charity. The Trump Foundation was a bookkeeping function. Not a charity.
It was a civil suit and the Foundation was not a charity.
It was a vehicle to hold the proceeds of the sale of the book The Art of the Deal. That those proceeds may have been distributed to a charitable cause, but it was still the Trump personal property. The government characterized it as a charity.Wikipedia says
The foundation was created to receive royalties from Trump's 1987 book Trump: The Art of the Deal as well as donations from others, for the stated purpose of distributing the funds to charitable causes.
Sounds like a charity to me. What was it instead?
It was a vehicle to hold the proceeds of the sale of the book The Art of the Deal. That those proceeds may have been distributed to a charitable cause, but it was still the Trump personal property. The government characterized it as a charity.
I repeat, it was a civil suit and the Foundation was not a charity.Trump Pays Up One Month After Admitting He Misused Charitable Funds for Political Gain
It was a civil suit and the Foundation was not a charity.Beat his ass.
Democrat lawfare.Trump Pays Up One Month After Admitting He Misused Charitable Funds for Political Gain
Beat his ass.
I repeat, it was a civil suit and the Foundation was not a charity.
The civil suit alleged improper coordination between the non-profit FOundation and Trump's campaign.
Repeating your ignorance doesn't help your cause.Trump Pays Up One Month After Admitting He Misused Charitable Funds for Political Gain
Repeating your ignorance doesn't help your cause.
Why did it qualify for tax free status as a non-profit? What do you think was the stated purpose of the non-profit.A non-profit.
That was the scam part. You don't get non-profit status just to avoid taxes.It was a vehicle to hold the proceeds of the sale of the book The Art of the Deal. That those proceeds may have been distributed to a charitable cause, but it was still the Trump personal property. The government characterized it as a charity.
You could quote Trump rather than spamming the headline from a loon website.Trump admitted it. Not sure what else to say.
how much did Briben and Harris give to charity during their last 4 yrs of being in power ?? Trump gave his entire salary for POTUS for 4 yrs to charity ..Wikipedia says
The foundation was created to receive royalties from Trump's 1987 book Trump: The Art of the Deal as well as donations from others, for the stated purpose of distributing the funds to charitable causes.
Sounds like a charity to me. What was it instead?
Sure you do. Until the money is actually spent.That was the scam part. You don't get non-profit status just to avoid taxes.
Because it was private foundation, not a public charity. Like the Ford Foundation.Why did it qualify for tax free status as a non-profit? What do you think was the stated purpose of the non-profit.
