Lets Play a Game of "Guess which party?": Lawmaker Says Internet Porn Violates First Amendment

[ClosedCaption]

The *Hidden State* lawmaker who introduced a state resolution declaring pronorgraphy a "public health crisis" has taken his opposition a step further. During a *redacted* talk radio appearance on Friday, state Rep. *Name and Party withheld* said that the internet, essentially, violates a person’s First Amendment rights by “delivering pornography” to people who don’t want to view it.

“Someone may have the First Amendment right, according to the U.S. Supreme Court, to view pornography,” “But what about my First Amendment right not to view it?”

This interview comes days after Gov. *Name withheld* signed *name redacted* bill into law.

At first, *name withheld* specifically blamed McDonald’s for having free WiFi that did not block porn sites. According to *name withheld* kids often go to McDonald’s or public libraries to watch porn on their WiFi networks — especially if it’s blocked on their home internet.

“If these libraries and McDonald’s were delivering cigarettes to our children, we’d be picketing them,” he said.


This guy is obviously a goof ball but from which party do you think he belongs? Cast your votes and the source will be revealed

 

[TheOldSchool]

I'm going with a republican and from Alabama

 

[whitehall]

You almost gotta laugh that the left doesn't seem to care that about a thousand people are murdered per year in a city (Chicago) dominated by democrat party politics but they want to punish a state for passing a law preventing men from using the ladies room. Now the sex on the brain left is apparently worried that their 1st Amendment right to porn is in jeopardy.

 

[ClosedCaption]

We have our first contestant! Great guesses, lets see if its a Zonk or the Big Deal of the Day!

 

[ClosedCaption]

You almost gotta laugh that the left doesn't seem to care that about a thousand people are murdered per year in a city (Chicago) dominated by democrat party politics but they want to punish a state for passing a law preventing men from using the ladies room. Now the sex on the brain left is apparently worried that their 1st Amendment right to porn is in jeopardy.

ZONK! Sorry, that is not on topic. Try again

 

[turzovka]

The *Hidden State* lawmaker who introduced a state resolution declaring pronorgraphy a "public health crisis" has taken his opposition a step further. During a *redacted* talk radio appearance on Friday, state Rep. *Name and Party withheld* said that the internet, essentially, violates a person’s First Amendment rights by “delivering pornography” to people who don’t want to view it.

“Someone may have the First Amendment right, according to the U.S. Supreme Court, to view pornography,” “But what about my First Amendment right not to view it?”

This interview comes days after Gov. *Name withheld* signed *name redacted* bill into law.

At first, *name withheld* specifically blamed McDonald’s for having free WiFi that did not block porn sites. According to *name withheld* kids often go to McDonald’s or public libraries to watch porn on their WiFi networks — especially if it’s blocked on their home internet.

“If these libraries and McDonald’s were delivering cigarettes to our children, we’d be picketing them,” he said.


This guy is obviously a goof ball but from which party do you think he belongs? Cast your votes and the source will be revealed

Why is he obviously a goof ball?

Is that on topic enough for you?

Or are you content to stay in a "if it feels good do it" world that has no perceived troubles?

 

[ClosedCaption]

The *Hidden State* lawmaker who introduced a state resolution declaring pronorgraphy a "public health crisis" has taken his opposition a step further. During a *redacted* talk radio appearance on Friday, state Rep. *Name and Party withheld* said that the internet, essentially, violates a person’s First Amendment rights by “delivering pornography” to people who don’t want to view it.

“Someone may have the First Amendment right, according to the U.S. Supreme Court, to view pornography,” “But what about my First Amendment right not to view it?”

This interview comes days after Gov. *Name withheld* signed *name redacted* bill into law.

At first, *name withheld* specifically blamed McDonald’s for having free WiFi that did not block porn sites. According to *name withheld* kids often go to McDonald’s or public libraries to watch porn on their WiFi networks — especially if it’s blocked on their home internet.

“If these libraries and McDonald’s were delivering cigarettes to our children, we’d be picketing them,” he said.


This guy is obviously a goof ball but from which party do you think he belongs? Cast your votes and the source will be revealed

Why is he obviously a goof ball?

Is that on topic enough for you?

Or are you content to stay in a "if it feels good do it" world that has no perceived troubles?

 

[bucs90]

Hmmmmm.

Yes....this is as absurd as the millions of leftists declaring safe spaces because of their right to not have to hear other people's free speech.

Ooooh....you weren't ready for that one huh?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Hmmmmm.

Yes....this is as absurd as the millions of leftists declaring safe spaces because of their right to not have to hear other people's free speech.

Ooooh....you weren't ready for that one huh?

Sorry, off topic replies are automatic zonks

 

[edthecynic]

Obviously a Republican, I would guess a theocratic state like Utah.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Obviously a Republican, I would guess a theocratic state like Utah.

What is your business here?

 

[bucs90]

Hmmmmm.

Yes....this is as absurd as the millions of leftists declaring safe spaces because of their right to not have to hear other people's free speech.

Ooooh....you weren't ready for that one huh?

Sorry, off topic replies are automatic zonks

This isn't off topic.

What speech should we be protected FROM??

He just wants a porn free safe space. Safe spaces are ok right?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Hmmmmm.

Yes....this is as absurd as the millions of leftists declaring safe spaces because of their right to not have to hear other people's free speech.

Ooooh....you weren't ready for that one huh?

Sorry, off topic replies are automatic zonks

This isn't off topic.

What speech should we be protected FROM??

He just wants a porn free safe space. Safe spaces are ok right?

ZONK!

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Who gave CC hallucinogenic mushrooms ?

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

I find it intriguing that the republican party always screams about big government, yet wants to regulate what goes over the internet and get into women's sexual issues and religious issues, thus making themselves the equivalent of George Orwell's 1984, or Big Brother.
If they land in control, women of birthing age and traveling overseas to areas that allow abortions, would probably have to go through pregnancy testing going to and coming from those areas.
If they land in control, what goes on in your bedroom between consenting adults is the government's business.

 

[Katzndogz]

There is no right to view pornography. There is no right not to view pornography. The viewer is not the holder of the right. The one exercising the expression is the holder of the right.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Obviously a Republican, I would guess a theocratic state like Utah.

WINNER! The State Rep is Utah and is a member of the Republican Party! Bullseye!

 

[Silhouette]

The *Hidden State* lawmaker who introduced a state resolution declaring pronorgraphy a "public health crisis" has taken his opposition a step further. During a *redacted* talk radio appearance on Friday, state Rep. *Name and Party withheld* said that the internet, essentially, violates a person’s First Amendment rights by “delivering pornography” to people who don’t want to view it...

Not such a dead horse as the OP would like everyone to believe. If that unwanted delivery reaches minors, New York vs Ferber (USSC 1982) says that such adults engaged in distribution of the porn material arriving where children MIGHT be able to view it inadvertently means that those people's 1st Amendment protection is extinguishable. New York vs Ferber found that in any case of an adult civil right, including the right to distribute or sell pornography:

New York v. Ferber
458 U.S. 747 (1982)

First. It is evident beyond the need for elaboration that a State's interest in "safeguarding the physical and psychological wellbeing of a minor" is "compelling." Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, 457 U. S. 596, 457 U. S. 607 (1982)
"A democratic society rests, for its continuance, upon the healthy, well-rounded growth of young people into full maturity as citizens." Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U. S. 158, 321 U. S. 168 (1944). Accordingly, we have sustained legislation aimed at protecting the physical and emotional wellbeing of youth even when the laws have operated in the sensitive area of constitutionally protected rights.... New York v. Ferber 458 U.S. 747 (1982)

 

[AmericanFirst1]

The *Hidden State* lawmaker who introduced a state resolution declaring pronorgraphy a "public health crisis" has taken his opposition a step further. During a *redacted* talk radio appearance on Friday, state Rep. *Name and Party withheld* said that the internet, essentially, violates a person’s First Amendment rights by “delivering pornography” to people who don’t want to view it.

“Someone may have the First Amendment right, according to the U.S. Supreme Court, to view pornography,” “But what about my First Amendment right not to view it?”

This interview comes days after Gov. *Name withheld* signed *name redacted* bill into law.

At first, *name withheld* specifically blamed McDonald’s for having free WiFi that did not block porn sites. According to *name withheld* kids often go to McDonald’s or public libraries to watch porn on their WiFi networks — especially if it’s blocked on their home internet.

“If these libraries and McDonald’s were delivering cigarettes to our children, we’d be picketing them,” he said.


This guy is obviously a goof ball but from which party do you think he belongs? Cast your votes and the source will be revealed

Funny idiots like you support porn as free speech but hate the second Ammendment.