Edgetho
Platinum Member
- Mar 27, 2012
- 15,777
- 7,012
- 390
There's a new book out that is brilliant. Mostly because it affirms what I, and many other Patriotic Americans, have been saying for years.... liberals are snobs.
Good reading.
The Failure of Obama?s Aristocracy of Merit | National Review Online
Just because a lot of people in the liberal movement feel this way doesn't mean that they ALL feel this way.
But the leaders do. THAT is what's important. They set the tone for the entire party. Top to bottom, inside and out, through and through..... The leadership of the dimocrat party is elitist, snobbish, and not the least bit concerned with the working man.
Don't listen to what they say, look at what they do
Learn it, live it, love it.
It's just the way it is.
Some more links
[ame=http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1594036985/ref=nosim/nationalreviewon]The Revolt Against the Masses: How Liberalism Has Undermined the Middle Class: Fred Siegel: 9781594036989: Amazon.com: Books[/ame]
Ace of Spades HQ
Ace of Spades HQ
Good reading.
The Failure of Obama?s Aristocracy of Merit | National Review Online
The novels of Sinclair Lewis, the journalism of H. L. Mencken, and the literary criticism of Van Wyck Brooks heaped scorn on the vast and supposedly mindless Americans who worked hard at their jobs and joined civic groups Menckens booboisie.
These 1920s liberals idealized the noble aspiration and fine aristocratic pride in an imaginary Europe, and considered Americans, in the words of a Lewis character, a savorless people, gulping tasteless food, and listening to mechanical music, saying mechanical things about the excellence of Ford automobiles, and viewing themselves as the greatest race in the world.
This contempt for ordinary Americans mostly persisted in changing political environments. During the Great Depression, many liberals became Communists, proclaiming themselves tribunes of a virtuous oppressed proletariat that would have an enlightened rule.
For a moment, idealization of the working man, but not the middle-class striver, came into vogue. But in the postwar years, what Siegel calls the political and cultural snobbery of liberals returned.
Just because a lot of people in the liberal movement feel this way doesn't mean that they ALL feel this way.
But the leaders do. THAT is what's important. They set the tone for the entire party. Top to bottom, inside and out, through and through..... The leadership of the dimocrat party is elitist, snobbish, and not the least bit concerned with the working man.
Don't listen to what they say, look at what they do
Learn it, live it, love it.
It's just the way it is.
Some more links
[ame=http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1594036985/ref=nosim/nationalreviewon]The Revolt Against the Masses: How Liberalism Has Undermined the Middle Class: Fred Siegel: 9781594036989: Amazon.com: Books[/ame]
This short book rewrites the history of modern American liberalism. It shows that what we think of liberalism today the top and bottom coalition we associate with President Obama - began not with Progressivism or the New Deal but rather in the wake of the post-WWI disillusionment with American society. In the twenties, the first writers and thinkers to call themselves liberals adopted the hostility to bourgeois life that had long characterized European intellectuals of both the left and the right. The aim of liberalisms foundational writers and thinkers such as Herbert Croly, Randolph Bourne, H.G. Wells, Sinclair Lewis and H.L Mencken was to create an American aristocracy of sorts, to provide a sense of hierarchy and order associated with European statism.
Like communism, Fabianism, and fascism, modern liberalism, critical of both capitalism and democracy, was born of a new class of politically self-conscious intellectuals. They despised both the individual
Ace of Spades HQ
Ace of Spades HQ