Libs produce show in Canada to get you to empathize with pedophiles

Show us your evidence that the APA argued that pedophilia should be mainstreamed. Or where the APA has argued that the molestation of children should be mainstreamed.


They "admitted" to their mistake.....lol.

APA to correct manual: Pedophilia is not a ‘sexual orientation’

Mark

And this is the APA's position on pedophilia"

The APA said in its statement that “‘sexual orientation’ is not a term used in the diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder and its use in the DSM-5 text discussion is an error and should read ‘sexual interest.’”

“In fact, APA considers pedophilic disorder a ‘paraphilia,’ not a ‘sexual orientation.’ This error will be corrected in the electronic version of DSM-5 and the next printing of the manual,” the organization said. The error appeared on page 698, said a spokeswoman.

APA to correct manual: Pedophilia is not a ‘sexual orientation’

So when has the APA ever argued that pedophilia should be mainstreamed or that the molestation of children should be mainstreamed?

As the APA's argument on the matter is explicitly contrary to your claims.
The APA is waiting for it to become politically correct like homos, then they'll change their "science" on the matter.

Unless they don't and they never do.
Nonsense. They bowed to political correctness before, so they certainly can do so again.

Who says that molesting children or pedophilia is 'political correctness'?
 
Show us your evidence that the APA argued that pedophilia should be mainstreamed. Or where the APA has argued that the molestation of children should be mainstreamed.


They "admitted" to their mistake.....lol.

APA to correct manual: Pedophilia is not a ‘sexual orientation’

Mark

And this is the APA's position on pedophilia"

The APA said in its statement that “‘sexual orientation’ is not a term used in the diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder and its use in the DSM-5 text discussion is an error and should read ‘sexual interest.’”

“In fact, APA considers pedophilic disorder a ‘paraphilia,’ not a ‘sexual orientation.’ This error will be corrected in the electronic version of DSM-5 and the next printing of the manual,” the organization said. The error appeared on page 698, said a spokeswoman.

APA to correct manual: Pedophilia is not a ‘sexual orientation’

So when has the APA ever argued that pedophilia should be mainstreamed or that the molestation of children should be mainstreamed?

As the APA's argument on the matter is explicitly contrary to your claims.
The APA is waiting for it to become politically correct like homos, then they'll change their "science" on the matter.

Unless they don't and they never do.

They are already changing their attitude towards pedophilia.

Thats how it starts.

Mark

Unless it doesn't. See Interracial Marriage.
 
You owe a debt of gratitude to heterosexuality. You wouldn't exist without it.

Too bad you think its so extreme then. Who knew that someone dancing in a parade could condemn a whole sexual orientation?

Damn those beads!
WTF are you talking about?

What you're talking about. Using a few folks in a parade to condemn an entire sexual orientation as 'extreme'.

That was your argument regarding gays, was it not?
Shoving a cock up another man's ass in contravention to what both organs are designed for is very extreme.

Then head is totally extreme? No blow jobs for straight folks then.

And of course, plenty of straight couples like anal.

Wow.....with all the oral and anal among straights, you must really think that heterosexuality is extreme.
So when you "guys" have sex do you have anal intercourse and then the BJ or does the BJ come first?
 
Too bad you think its so extreme then. Who knew that someone dancing in a parade could condemn a whole sexual orientation?

Damn those beads!
WTF are you talking about?

What you're talking about. Using a few folks in a parade to condemn an entire sexual orientation as 'extreme'.

That was your argument regarding gays, was it not?
Shoving a cock up another man's ass in contravention to what both organs are designed for is very extreme.

Then head is totally extreme? No blow jobs for straight folks then.

And of course, plenty of straight couples like anal.

Wow.....with all the oral and anal among straights, you must really think that heterosexuality is extreme.
So when you "guys" have sex do you have anal intercourse and then the BJ or does the BJ come first?

Dude.....watch some porn or something if you want to know how sex works.
 
Why are they "sick" and the gays are not?

Mark

The outcomes. You know, the ones you insisted were 'logically irrelevant'. Abusing children horribly or not abusing them at all.....you insist should be treated identically.

A rational person wouldn't.

Lol. Gay sex was thought of as abuse as well. And while sex with minors is thought of today as abuse, they are working hard to change that perception as well.

Interracial sex was considered sexual deviancy. Are you arguing that since interracial sex was mainstreamed.....the same has to be true of pedophilia?

If not, why not?

Good point. I did not claim that society has always been right. This was an instance where what we changed was for the good of society.

I am not saying that the same "has to be true" of pedophilia. I am simply showing you that there is today a concerted effort to accomplish just that. And based on our recent history, I won't say it will never happen.

Mark

There is no such concerted effort regarding pedophilia.

This poster is . . . not very smart. I notice you like to engage these types. Why waste your time?
 

And this is the APA's position on pedophilia"

The APA said in its statement that “‘sexual orientation’ is not a term used in the diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder and its use in the DSM-5 text discussion is an error and should read ‘sexual interest.’”

“In fact, APA considers pedophilic disorder a ‘paraphilia,’ not a ‘sexual orientation.’ This error will be corrected in the electronic version of DSM-5 and the next printing of the manual,” the organization said. The error appeared on page 698, said a spokeswoman.

APA to correct manual: Pedophilia is not a ‘sexual orientation’

So when has the APA ever argued that pedophilia should be mainstreamed or that the molestation of children should be mainstreamed?

As the APA's argument on the matter is explicitly contrary to your claims.
The APA is waiting for it to become politically correct like homos, then they'll change their "science" on the matter.

Unless they don't and they never do.
Nonsense. They bowed to political correctness before, so they certainly can do so again.

Who says that molesting children or pedophilia is 'political correctness'?
It's your next "victim" class. Leftists will champion the "cause" of pedophiles. No doubt about that.
 
Do your own research. The APA did in fact try to mainstream pedophilia, but reversed course because of the outcry from the public. Their action was intentional and the response was expected. However, they understood that they had to go thru the process to get people used to the idea.

They are very good at what they do.

Mark

Show us your evidence that the APA argued that pedophilia should be mainstreamed. Or where the APA has argued that the molestation of children should be mainstreamed.


They "admitted" to their mistake.....lol.

APA to correct manual: Pedophilia is not a ‘sexual orientation’

Mark

And this is the APA's position on pedophilia"

The APA said in its statement that “‘sexual orientation’ is not a term used in the diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder and its use in the DSM-5 text discussion is an error and should read ‘sexual interest.’”

“In fact, APA considers pedophilic disorder a ‘paraphilia,’ not a ‘sexual orientation.’ This error will be corrected in the electronic version of DSM-5 and the next printing of the manual,” the organization said. The error appeared on page 698, said a spokeswoman.

APA to correct manual: Pedophilia is not a ‘sexual orientation’

So when has the APA ever argued that pedophilia should be mainstreamed or that the molestation of children should be mainstreamed?

As the APA's argument on the matter is explicitly contrary to your claims.

Where is their argument contrary to my claims?

Mark

Right in the quote:

“In fact, APA considers pedophilic disorder a ‘paraphilia,’ not a ‘sexual orientation.’ This error will be corrected in the electronic version of DSM-5 and the next printing of the manual,” the organization said. The error appeared on page 698, said a spokeswoman.

And nothing about 'mainstreaming' pedophilia or the molestation of children.

Why would I ignore the APA on their own position...and instead believe you?

Look around you. There is more and more exposure to this question. It is the reason the poster started the OP. In years past would there EVER had been anyone even suggesting that being a pedophile is OK because they were born that way? What does this process compare with in recent history? I have already mentioned that the APA declassified being gay as a sexual deviancy IF it was never acted on. It is the same thing they are now saying about pedophilia.

Draw your own conclusions, but logical, reasonable people can certainly see the parallels.

Mark
 
Lol. Gay sex was thought of as abuse as well. And while sex with minors is thought of today as abuse, they are working hard to change that perception as well.

Interracial sex was considered sexual deviancy. Are you arguing that since interracial sex was mainstreamed.....the same has to be true of pedophilia?

If not, why not?

Good point. I did not claim that society has always been right. This was an instance where what we changed was for the good of society.

I am not saying that the same "has to be true" of pedophilia. I am simply showing you that there is today a concerted effort to accomplish just that. And based on our recent history, I won't say it will never happen.

Mark

There is no such concerted effort regarding pedophilia.

Yes, there is. These things start out small, on the fringes, then....

Mark

There's as much 'concerted effort' to teach the flat earth theory in schools.

As of today, you would be correct. I noticed a thread was started about some school celebrating transsexuals.

10 years ago, that also would have been as popular as the flat earth theory, and yet, here we are.

Mark
 
The outcomes. You know, the ones you insisted were 'logically irrelevant'. Abusing children horribly or not abusing them at all.....you insist should be treated identically.

A rational person wouldn't.

Lol. Gay sex was thought of as abuse as well. And while sex with minors is thought of today as abuse, they are working hard to change that perception as well.

Interracial sex was considered sexual deviancy. Are you arguing that since interracial sex was mainstreamed.....the same has to be true of pedophilia?

If not, why not?

Good point. I did not claim that society has always been right. This was an instance where what we changed was for the good of society.

I am not saying that the same "has to be true" of pedophilia. I am simply showing you that there is today a concerted effort to accomplish just that. And based on our recent history, I won't say it will never happen.

Mark

There is no such concerted effort regarding pedophilia.

This poster is . . . not very smart. I notice you like to engage these types. Why waste your time?

Lady, I have more brains in my pinkie than you have in your head. Your posts show you don't understand higher thought. Shoo...

Mark
 

And this is the APA's position on pedophilia"

The APA said in its statement that “‘sexual orientation’ is not a term used in the diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder and its use in the DSM-5 text discussion is an error and should read ‘sexual interest.’”

“In fact, APA considers pedophilic disorder a ‘paraphilia,’ not a ‘sexual orientation.’ This error will be corrected in the electronic version of DSM-5 and the next printing of the manual,” the organization said. The error appeared on page 698, said a spokeswoman.

APA to correct manual: Pedophilia is not a ‘sexual orientation’

So when has the APA ever argued that pedophilia should be mainstreamed or that the molestation of children should be mainstreamed?

As the APA's argument on the matter is explicitly contrary to your claims.
The APA is waiting for it to become politically correct like homos, then they'll change their "science" on the matter.

Unless they don't and they never do.
Nonsense. They bowed to political correctness before, so they certainly can do so again.

Who says that molesting children or pedophilia is 'political correctness'?

No one...yet.

Mark
 

And this is the APA's position on pedophilia"

The APA said in its statement that “‘sexual orientation’ is not a term used in the diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder and its use in the DSM-5 text discussion is an error and should read ‘sexual interest.’”

“In fact, APA considers pedophilic disorder a ‘paraphilia,’ not a ‘sexual orientation.’ This error will be corrected in the electronic version of DSM-5 and the next printing of the manual,” the organization said. The error appeared on page 698, said a spokeswoman.

APA to correct manual: Pedophilia is not a ‘sexual orientation’

So when has the APA ever argued that pedophilia should be mainstreamed or that the molestation of children should be mainstreamed?

As the APA's argument on the matter is explicitly contrary to your claims.
The APA is waiting for it to become politically correct like homos, then they'll change their "science" on the matter.

Unless they don't and they never do.

They are already changing their attitude towards pedophilia.

Thats how it starts.

Mark

Unless it doesn't. See Interracial Marriage.

We didn't change our attitudes towards interracial marriage?

Mark
 

Forum List

Back
Top