Moonglow
Diamond Member
I heard we all have black DNA from our ancestors in Africa...I do tan well...Are you black by any chance?No, it's the usual amount they survey..They don't ask every single person in the USA...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I heard we all have black DNA from our ancestors in Africa...I do tan well...Are you black by any chance?No, it's the usual amount they survey..They don't ask every single person in the USA...
Clinton is "a good candidate and a good person"?!
Clinton is "a good candidate and a good person"?!
Your masters appreciate your loyal service in their legion of Useful Idiots.
The law is indeed different for the Clintons. How did you think she got off? Had she been a mid-level munchkin, it would have been much different.Some people want the law to be different for the Clintons than everyone else.
SIMPLY NOT TRUEThe law is indeed different for the Clintons. How did you think she got off? Had she been a mid-level munchkin, it would have been much different.Some people want the law to be different for the Clintons than everyone else.
Is that why he's pursuing perjury charges???So Trey found no criminal activity...The law is indeed different for the Clintons. How did you think she got off? Had she been a mid-level munchkin, it wold have been much different.Some people want the law to be different for the Clintons than everyone else.
He seems to be running in slow motion, if he is at all...Is that why he's pursuing perjury charges???So Trey found no criminal activity...The law is indeed different for the Clintons. How did you think she got off? Had she been a mid-level munchkin, it wold have been much different.Some people want the law to be different for the Clintons than everyone else.
Well, Comey suggested that Congress request an investigation into the perjury charge, and it might take a little bit of time to make the case...He seems to be running in slow motion, if he is at all...Is that why he's pursuing perjury charges???So Trey found no criminal activity...The law is indeed different for the Clintons. How did you think she got off? Had she been a mid-level munchkin, it wold have been much different.Some people want the law to be different for the Clintons than everyone else.
At least 5 million and a couple of years....Well, Comey suggested that Congress request an investigation into the perjury charge, and it might take a little bit of time to make the case...He seems to be running in slow motion, if he is at all...Is that why he's pursuing perjury charges???So Trey found no criminal activity...The law is indeed different for the Clintons. How did you think she got off? Had she been a mid-level munchkin, it wold have been much different.Some people want the law to be different for the Clintons than everyone else.
Take that up with the FBI...
It looks a little more "cut and dried" than that, unless the video of her testimony before Congress (under oath) can be proven to be faked...At least 5 million and a couple of years....Well, Comey suggested that Congress request an investigation into the perjury charge, and it might take a little bit of time to make the case...He seems to be running in slow motion, if he is at all...Is that why he's pursuing perjury charges???So Trey found no criminal activity...The law is indeed different for the Clintons. How did you think she got off? Had she been a mid-level munchkin, it wold have been much different.
Take that up with the FBI...
What specifically do you believe Clinton lied about under oath to Congress?It looks a little more "cut and dried" than that, unless the video of her testimony before Congress (under oath) can be proven to be faked...At least 5 million and a couple of years....Well, Comey suggested that Congress request an investigation into the perjury charge, and it might take a little bit of time to make the case...He seems to be running in slow motion, if he is at all...Is that why he's pursuing perjury charges???So Trey found no criminal activity...
Take that up with the FBI...
And all the networks aired the "highlights"....
Watch the video of Comey's testimony before Congress, and you can watch him admit that the evidence confirms she committed perjury....What specifically do you believe Clinton lied about under oath to Congress?It looks a little more "cut and dried" than that, unless the video of her testimony before Congress (under oath) can be proven to be faked...At least 5 million and a couple of years....Well, Comey suggested that Congress request an investigation into the perjury charge, and it might take a little bit of time to make the case...He seems to be running in slow motion, if he is at all...Is that why he's pursuing perjury charges???
Take that up with the FBI...
And all the networks aired the "highlights"....
What's this ''perjury'' that you speak of....Obiwan?
I watched it live.... no such thing happened.... he said outright she did NOT lie to the FBI, then congress critters said, what about to congress and he said he didn't know, he had no request to investigate that and Congress critter said he would send him a request by the end of the day....Watch the video of Comey's testimony before Congress, and you can watch him admit that the evidence confirms she committed perjury....What specifically do you believe Clinton lied about under oath to Congress?It looks a little more "cut and dried" than that, unless the video of her testimony before Congress (under oath) can be proven to be faked...At least 5 million and a couple of years....Well, Comey suggested that Congress request an investigation into the perjury charge, and it might take a little bit of time to make the case...He seems to be running in slow motion, if he is at all...
Take that up with the FBI...
And all the networks aired the "highlights"....
What's this ''perjury'' that you speak of....Obiwan?
Perhaps you would have understood better with more of a grasp of the English language.I watched it live.... no such thing happened.... he aid outright she did NOT lie to the FBI, then congress critters said, what about to congress and he said he didn't know, he had no request to investigate that and Congress critter said he would send him a request by the end of the day....
You are the one saying she perjured herself...what do you claim was the lie?
or are you just spouting talking points from the right wing and have no idea what this is about or what she did for you to make such a claim?
I watched it live.... no such thing happened.... he said outright she did NOT lie to the FBI, then congress critters said, what about to congress and he said he didn't know, he had no request to investigate that and Congress critter said he would send him a request by the end of the day....Watch the video of Comey's testimony before Congress, and you can watch him admit that the evidence confirms she committed perjury....What specifically do you believe Clinton lied about under oath to Congress?It looks a little more "cut and dried" than that, unless the video of her testimony before Congress (under oath) can be proven to be faked...At least 5 million and a couple of years....Well, Comey suggested that Congress request an investigation into the perjury charge, and it might take a little bit of time to make the case...
Take that up with the FBI...
And all the networks aired the "highlights"....
What's this ''perjury'' that you speak of....Obiwan?
You are the one saying she perjured herself...what do you claim was the lie?
or are you just spouting talking points from the right wing and have no idea what this is about or what she did for you to make such a claim?
Would those be the same lawyers that Comey said she gave access to classified information (in some of the emails) to, in spite of the fact that they didn't have the necessary security clearances???I watched it live.... no such thing happened.... he said outright she did NOT lie to the FBI, then congress critters said, what about to congress and he said he didn't know, he had no request to investigate that and Congress critter said he would send him a request by the end of the day....Watch the video of Comey's testimony before Congress, and you can watch him admit that the evidence confirms she committed perjury....What specifically do you believe Clinton lied about under oath to Congress?It looks a little more "cut and dried" than that, unless the video of her testimony before Congress (under oath) can be proven to be faked...At least 5 million and a couple of years....
And all the networks aired the "highlights"....
What's this ''perjury'' that you speak of....Obiwan?
You are the one saying she perjured herself...what do you claim was the lie?
or are you just spouting talking points from the right wing and have no idea what this is about or what she did for you to make such a claim?
This is what I was told:
She instructed her lawyers to release all work related emails and they, based on the headings, separated out all of those that seemed to be work related. They then told her that they had released all her work related emails.
A couple of points for those who didn’t pay attention the last time a Clinton was baselessly charged: Lying is not perjury. It has to be material to the investigation in order to be perjury. Obviously this didn’t meet that standard since none of her emails were informative to the case. The second is that being mistaken is not a lie. If a New York Times reader believed that there were extant weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, they would be mistaken, but their statements would not knowingly be false. When the British politicians stated that, however, they were lying.
- Apparently the Lawyers did the job competently but not thoroughly, as the FBI did identify a few emails that should have been released.
- Since Hillary believed her Lawyers and their statements, she did not lie. She may have been mistaken, but it does not meet minimal standards for perjury.
Would those be the same lawyers that Comey said she gave access to classified information (in some of the emails) to, in spite of the fact that they didn't have the necessary security clearances???I watched it live.... no such thing happened.... he said outright she did NOT lie to the FBI, then congress critters said, what about to congress and he said he didn't know, he had no request to investigate that and Congress critter said he would send him a request by the end of the day....Watch the video of Comey's testimony before Congress, and you can watch him admit that the evidence confirms she committed perjury....What specifically do you believe Clinton lied about under oath to Congress?It looks a little more "cut and dried" than that, unless the video of her testimony before Congress (under oath) can be proven to be faked...
And all the networks aired the "highlights"....
What's this ''perjury'' that you speak of....Obiwan?
You are the one saying she perjured herself...what do you claim was the lie?
or are you just spouting talking points from the right wing and have no idea what this is about or what she did for you to make such a claim?
This is what I was told:
She instructed her lawyers to release all work related emails and they, based on the headings, separated out all of those that seemed to be work related. They then told her that they had released all her work related emails.
A couple of points for those who didn’t pay attention the last time a Clinton was baselessly charged: Lying is not perjury. It has to be material to the investigation in order to be perjury. Obviously this didn’t meet that standard since none of her emails were informative to the case. The second is that being mistaken is not a lie. If a New York Times reader believed that there were extant weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, they would be mistaken, but their statements would not knowingly be false. When the British politicians stated that, however, they were lying.
- Apparently the Lawyers did the job competently but not thoroughly, as the FBI did identify a few emails that should have been released.
- Since Hillary believed her Lawyers and their statements, she did not lie. She may have been mistaken, but it does not meet minimal standards for perjury.