Anyone Still Believing in the Evolution Fraud Should Watch This

[alang1216]

I never said the 'first life' was a cell. I know what it isn't and that is some random folding action in some primordial soup.

Like I never said the 'first life' was some random folding action in some primordial soup.

 

[progressive hunter]

You certainly like that word, 'proof'. You must be a mathematician because there is no such thing in the real world. If that is your standard, how can you believe anything?

and yet you still claim evo as fact,,

you sir are proof if you repeat something enough times the simple minded will believe it,,

 

[Leo123]

Like I never said the 'first life' was some random folding action in some primordial soup.

Well then, where did 'first life' come from in your opinion? Where is your proof? So far, no one has been able to replicate the origin of life.

 

[alang1216]

and yet you still claim evo as fact,,

you sir are proof if you repeat something enough times the simple minded will believe it,,

Again you confuse 'evidence' with 'proof'. And yes, evolution/descent from a common ancestor is a scientific fact.

 

[alang1216]

Well then, where did 'first life' come from in your opinion? Where is your proof? So far, no one has been able to replicate the origin of life.

We don't know and may never know. We have plausible theories but will never have proof. Still puts science one up on creationism, it doesn't even have a working theory or evidence, let alone proof.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Well then, where did 'first life' come from in your opinion?

What is "first life"?

Pick anything you like. It will be arbitrary.

What you are asking is like asking when "the first chimpanzee" was born. It's a question without any real meaning.

 

[Leo123]

Again you confuse 'evidence' with 'proof'. And yes, evolution/descent from a common ancestor is a scientific fact.

Yes but, you are citing evolution AFTER the creation of a living organism. Evolution requires something to evolve FROM. What evolved to create life? Can you prove it?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yes but, you are citing evolution AFTER the creation of a living organism. Evolution requires something to evolve FROM. What evolved to create life? Can you prove it?

What would such "proof" look like?

 

[progressive hunter]

Again you confuse 'evidence' with 'proof'. And yes, evolution/descent from a common ancestor is a scientific fact.

and that evidence is opinions based on assumptions with a predetermined outcome,,

just because we may have the same genes,dna or any of the other chemical markers you may bring up is not proof or evidence of anything but we were created form the same box of parts,,

when you can show how that common ancestor gave birth to two different things to split the lineage then we can talk,,

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

and that evidence is opinions based on assumptions with a predetermined outcome,,

Hey look, a little red meat to chew on.

So, when we analyze mRNA... and it shows exactly what the fossil record shows, and what physiology shows....

What is the opinion or aassumpotion they are operating on? Commonality between two mRNA samples is a chemical fact that we can measure. There is no assumption in a measurement. The degree of commonality is a measurement.

So, what gives? Why does the mRNA evidence show all of it?