Papageorgio
The Ultimate Winner
You are right, you are being silly. The time a radio bulletin goes out,,it is time stamped, the officer calls in, it is time stamped. No need to get the story straight, an investigation checks out the timelines and you are being pissed because you are dead wrong and the DOJ that wanted so badly to hang Wilson could not do it because he went by the book. Keep crying, bitching and moaning, the side you desperately want to win was shown in error. Even this thread is based on a falsehood. However, you will believe whatever you need to believe regardless of the truth that is in front you.No, the Chief was obviously mistaken, if that is what he said. There is a lot of confusion around at the time, people misspeak, see the WH for their mistakes.I don't care what the Chief said, I don't find him to be believable. Wilson's story with all the evidence and forensics in, stood up. I have no reason not to believe him. All the stories out there, a few witnesses were telling the truth, the majority lied, the forensics and ballistics stood up for Wilson's story. If he was going to lie at the beginning. I would think reason would tell you he lied else where to cover the first time lie, that didn't occur, his story was consistent with the evidence, otherwise the DOJ would have been all over it, they had an agenda.
So basically we're just dismissing any information we dont like and embrassing the ones we do
The DOJ believe the evidence that was presented that said Wilson knew about the robbery because the timeline fits the story. The radio bulletin, again went off BEFORE Wilson met up with Brown. So, you still have nothing.
Yeah, obviously...Of course the robbery fits the timeline silly...Do you think that they wouldnt have their story together after 2 months? LOL....I mean come on...this is silly
If the times are stamped then why didnt the Chief know about this stamping record? If they didnt need to get the story straight then how did the story change after 2 months. What? He found out about time stamping 2 months later?
I mean, what is the best reason you can think of of how the Chief told two different stories? Both true? Both lies?
He was mistaken, look at the White House on Benghazi, they had so many stories, no one knew what to think. There is confusion and things that are inaccurate are said. Liberals after defending liberals should know this.
He probably never check the time stamps immediately after it occurred. You might want to contact the DOJ and ask them how they came to their conclusions. Now quit being silly, you are now moving into looking stupid. Again, believe what you want the facts are not agreeing with you.