Delta4Embassy
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #41
This is stupid. If a 19 year old has consensual sex with a 17 year old, their is nothing wrong with that.
Many states have close-in-age exceptions. Though if a state doesn't that 19 n 17 could be stat rape. In which case, ya it's stupid. Esepcially if another state wouldn't have it illegal.
Problem with our country's ages of consent is they're arbitrary, varied, and saying that a 17 year old in California isn't responsible enough to have sex, but is responsible enough to drive on a freeway and join the military, but a 17 year-old in Missouri is responsible enough, and a 16 year-old is in which ever states have it at that age.
We need to come up with a uniform age for things involving life and limb like driving,s ex, military, etc. that doesn't make it look like legislators were blindfolded and tossed a dart at the wall hitting the ages in question.