Mueller admits it was a Witch Hunt

WEATHER53

Diamond Member
Apr 13, 2017
29,277
18,198
1,415
because he knew from the start the prohibitions of actions against a sitting President
Yet he dragged it on only to conclude “no criminality or charges but Trumps not pure” and the second part of that was his bullshit rambling part two of his report.
He may be corrupt enough to continue talking which is good because after yesterday both he and libs look even Worse.
 
It is good to see him put in writing that he knew his efforts would have no punitive effect on Trump anyway but he carried on the mud slinging witch hunt and caught a few guys on taxes from decades ago. Went deep see fishing for over two years and caught a few sunnies.
 
because he knew from the start the prohibitions of actions against a sitting President
Yet he dragged it on only to conclude “no criminality or charges but Trumps not pure” and the second part of that was his bullshit rambling part two of his report.
He may be corrupt enough to continue talking which is good because after yesterday both he and libs look even Worse.

NO LINK STATING HE KNEW THE INVESTIGATION WAS A WITCH HUNT.

YAWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN - ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
 
because he knew from the start the prohibitions of actions against a sitting President
Yet he dragged it on only to conclude “no criminality or charges but Trumps not pure” and the second part of that was his bullshit rambling part two of his report.
He may be corrupt enough to continue talking which is good because after yesterday both he and libs look even Worse.
Title is a blatant lie but whatever. We’re in the Trump era. Say whatever you want.
 
NO LINK STATING HE KNEW THE INVESTIGATION WAS A WITCH HUNT.
You want a link to the transcript of Mueller's press conference...the one his spokesman issued a 'correction' for just hours after he gave it?

:p

During the press conference Mueller stated that he and his team began the investigation aware that a sitting President could not be indicted...and claimed no report could be filed stating a President had committed a crime (According to snowflakes, which is a false statement).

Assuming this was true, that means Mueller wasted 2 years digging into every crevice - Trump's finances, business dealings, etc... , wasted MILLIONS of tax dollars, all the time knowing he could not file a report stating the President committed a crime - which snowflakes claim he did anyway - and inciting others to Impeach h
Trump, which is what Mueller has attempted to do twice now... !

According to Mueller in his presser the OCL'S decision had a direct impact on his final decision...but he told Barr 3 times it did not & his own spokesperson issued a correction to Mueller's press conference statements saying it never did....

Again, snowflakes, the only way to prove all of your conspiracy theories, false narratives, and false accusations is to have the Obama Administration's 'INSURANCE POLICY' subpoenaed and testify under oath before Congress....

That shouldn't be a problem, should it?

:p
 
because he knew from the start the prohibitions of actions against a sitting President
Yet he dragged it on only to conclude “no criminality or charges but Trumps not pure” and the second part of that was his bullshit rambling part two of his report.
He may be corrupt enough to continue talking which is good because after yesterday both he and libs look even Worse.
Just what color glasses do you have to use to see it that way?

Never mind, found them.

looking-through-trump-colored-glasses-1-d91.jpeg
 
because he knew from the start the prohibitions of actions against a sitting President
Yet he dragged it on only to conclude “no criminality or charges but Trumps not pure” and the second part of that was his bullshit rambling part two of his report.
He may be corrupt enough to continue talking which is good because after yesterday both he and libs look even Worse.

NO LINK STATING HE KNEW THE INVESTIGATION WAS A WITCH HUNT.

YAWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN - ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
His comments have been here in writing since last night. He of course does not reference it as a witch hunt but he did state that nothing could come from his efforts and he knew that when he started.
 
NO LINK STATING HE KNEW THE INVESTIGATION WAS A WITCH HUNT.
You want a link to the transcript of Mueller's press conference...the one his spokesman issued a 'correction' for just hours after he gave it?

:p

During the press conference Mueller stated that he and his team began the investigation aware that a sitting President could not be indicted...and claimed no report could be filed stating a President had committed a crime (According to snowflakes, which is a false statement).

Assuming this was true, that means Mueller wasted 2 years digging into every crevice - Trump's finances, business dealings, etc... , wasted MILLIONS of tax dollars, all the time knowing he could not file a report stating the President committed a crime - which snowflakes claim he did anyway - and inciting others to Impeach h
Trump, which is what Mueller has attempted to do twice now... !

According to Mueller in his presser the OCL'S decision had a direct impact on his final decision...but he told Barr 3 times it did not & his own spokesperson issued a correction to Mueller's press conference statements saying it never did....

Again, snowflakes, the only way to prove all of your conspiracy theories, false narratives, and false accusations is to have the Obama Administration's 'INSURANCE POLICY' subpoenaed and testify under oath before Congress....

That shouldn't be a problem, should it?

:p
You got it and he said it and libs want Very Little attention paid to Muellers Own Comments that his efforts had no potential concluding outcome that could remove Trump
He just did a research paper instead for two years and then presented his feelings in a 400 page testimony to himself.
 
Bwuhahaha....

The faux news crap read like a drama novel....

'Mueller drug himself to the podium, shoulder drooping and hunched over from the great toll his massive investigation had taken on him...'

:lmao:


"Like he did for 12 years as FBI director, Mueller offered only the facts. "

WHAT FACTS?

Mueller once again spewed innuendo and INSINUATION of potential crime that HE refused to call a crime either in his final report or in his ' drive-by'!

MUELLER declared in his report he had chosen not to come to a conclusion either way, that he was letting others make that call...

And to help them make that call he added the 2nd part of his report and held his ' drive-by' press conference....

How about you snowflakes ... and his own spokesperson / office ... stop issuing corrections and clarifications FOR Mueller and instead subpoena his big co-conspiring ass before Congress to declare under oath EXACTLY what he meant, to defend his investigation, and to answer some questions?!

WHY IS THAT SUCH AN UNPLEASANT THING FOR YOU AND ESPECISLLY FOR MUELLER, WHO IN HIS PRESS CONFERENCE DECLARED HE WOULD NEVER TESTIFY BEFORE CONGRESS?!
 
because he knew from the start the prohibitions of actions against a sitting President
Yet he dragged it on only to conclude “no criminality or charges but Trumps not pure” and the second part of that was his bullshit rambling part two of his report.
He may be corrupt enough to continue talking which is good because after yesterday both he and libs look even Worse.

NO LINK STATING HE KNEW THE INVESTIGATION WAS A WITCH HUNT.

YAWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN - ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
His comments have been here in writing since last night. He of course does not reference it as a witch hunt but he did state that nothing could come from his efforts and he knew that when he started.
That is what he claimed .... which again begs many questions he shod answer under oath before Congress...

I am still waiting for a damn good justification from snowflakes about why Mueller should not be brought before Congress to testify under oath and answer questions about his investigation under oath...

Mueller had over 100 people testify under oath during his investigation ... So why does he think he gets to write such a controvertial reported that is not clear - so much so that debate continues about what he says and even his own office has to issue 'clarifications' - without any need for him to testify under oath himself to clear up everything, defend his investigation / report / press conference, and answer a few simple questions?!?
 
Ole Muley spilled the beans on his very own charade.
Please, please, please talk some more.
 

Forum List

Back
Top