Mueller issues subpoena to Deutsche Bank in Russia probe

[JBond]

Mueller issues subpoena to Deutsche Bank in Russia probe

Oh, shit!!

Here we go!

Orange pig-boy vomit PINO is going down, down, down...

Deutsche Bank had been one of Trump’s most reliable lenders. ABC News previously reported the bank helped finance the renovation of the Old Post Office in Washington, the purchase of the Doral golf course in Florida and the construction of an office building in Chicago.

It's obvious now, this about money laundering.

How could OrangeJackwad be so stupid to think he could get away with this...???

Hazlnut gets his info from the Russians. Or the msm. Same thing.

 

[Lewdog]

It would be a crime for the bank to confirm that.

Why would you think that?

This.

426. Prohibiting Banks from Notifying Customers of Grand Jury Subpoenas

There are two situations when banks and their personnel are prohibited from notifying their customers of a grand jury subpoena for their records. The first is when the government obtains a court order delaying notification by following the procedures set at § 3409(a) of the Act. See Delayed Notice at 11, 12 U.S.C. § 3413(i). The second situation is where the records are being subpoenaed to investigate crimes against a financial institution or supervisory agency, 12 U.S.C. § 3420(b) makes it a crime for the bank or its personnel to provide notice to the customer.

* It should also be noted that 18 U.S.C. § 1510(b) establishes criminal penalties for situations where an officer of a financial institution notifies, directly or indirectly, any person regarding the existence or contents of a subpoena with the intent to obstruct a judicial proceeding.

426. Prohibiting Banks from Notifying Customers of Grand Jury Subpoenas | USAM | Department of Justice

Irrelevant.. this is a special counsel not a grand jury..

The Special Counsel can't get a subpoena without a grand jury...

Wrong..

The special Counsel has been granted subpoena powers. You guys need to get some facts right..

No... they don't have that when it comes to getting information from other places, especially a foreign bank. You need to get your shit straight.

 

[OKTexas]

The reports say Mueller issued the subpoena, not a grand jury.

Christalmighty.

You're a dense fuck, aren't you?

Don't get pissy with me just because you have no proof of you claims.


.

No proof there are at least two Grand Juries empaneled by Meuller?

That the Mueller's Grand Jury is issuing this (as well as numerous other) subpoenas?

Are you off your crocker?

Show me in any link that says the subpoena mentioned in the OP was issued by a grand jury. I'm not interested in your assumptions.


.

Oh gawd.

There's a special kind of stupid down there OakyTexas, to be sure.

Think I'll just watch you dance around ballerina-like in your lil pink slippers as you exhibit for the readers how ignorant you are in your twirlies of i don't know nuthin' but how these theengs werk.

More fun this way. I can garan-darn-tee ya though, you'll end up looking pretty foolish.

Twirl, pinkette, twirl.

That's a awfully long admission that you got nothing but your own assumptions.


.

 

[OKTexas]

When the bank confirms they are sending Mueller Trumps records, get back to me. It's on you to prove a positive, not me to prove a negative.

It would be a crime for the bank to confirm that.

Why would you think that?

This.

426. Prohibiting Banks from Notifying Customers of Grand Jury Subpoenas

There are two situations when banks and their personnel are prohibited from notifying their customers of a grand jury subpoena for their records. The first is when the government obtains a court order delaying notification by following the procedures set at § 3409(a) of the Act. See Delayed Notice at 11, 12 U.S.C. § 3413(i). The second situation is where the records are being subpoenaed to investigate crimes against a financial institution or supervisory agency, 12 U.S.C. § 3420(b) makes it a crime for the bank or its personnel to provide notice to the customer.

* It should also be noted that 18 U.S.C. § 1510(b) establishes criminal penalties for situations where an officer of a financial institution notifies, directly or indirectly, any person regarding the existence or contents of a subpoena with the intent to obstruct a judicial proceeding.

426. Prohibiting Banks from Notifying Customers of Grand Jury Subpoenas | USAM | Department of Justice

Irrelevant.. this is a special counsel not a grand jury..

The Special Counsel can't get a subpoena without a grand jury...

Bullshit, all they have to do, just like any prosecutor, is apply to a judge with probable cause. You're not very smart are ya?


.

 

[paperview]

Christalmighty.

You're a dense fuck, aren't you?

Don't get pissy with me just because you have no proof of you claims.


.

No proof there are at least two Grand Juries empaneled by Meuller?

That the Mueller's Grand Jury is issuing this (as well as numerous other) subpoenas?

Are you off your crocker?

Show me in any link that says the subpoena mentioned in the OP was issued by a grand jury. I'm not interested in your assumptions.


.

Oh gawd.

There's a special kind of stupid down there OakyTexas, to be sure.

Think I'll just watch you dance around ballerina-like in your lil pink slippers as you exhibit for the readers how ignorant you are in your twirlies of i don't know nuthin' but how these theengs werk.

More fun this way. I can garan-darn-tee ya though, you'll end up looking pretty foolish.

Twirl, pinkette, twirl.

That's a awfully long admission that you got nothing but your own assumptions.


.

Dance ballerina boy, dance.

It's a joy -- and will even be more fun after you post over and over again how stoooooooopid you are -- then get the pie in your face and and all over your tinkerbell costume.

It'sa cummin'

:lolL

 

[paperview]

Gawd, I'm cracking up here.

Some cons are the most stupidest fucks on earth.

If only they knew: How. Shit. Works.

They never do.

And it always comes back to bite them.

 

[Lewdog]

It would be a crime for the bank to confirm that.

Why would you think that?

This.

426. Prohibiting Banks from Notifying Customers of Grand Jury Subpoenas

There are two situations when banks and their personnel are prohibited from notifying their customers of a grand jury subpoena for their records. The first is when the government obtains a court order delaying notification by following the procedures set at § 3409(a) of the Act. See Delayed Notice at 11, 12 U.S.C. § 3413(i). The second situation is where the records are being subpoenaed to investigate crimes against a financial institution or supervisory agency, 12 U.S.C. § 3420(b) makes it a crime for the bank or its personnel to provide notice to the customer.

* It should also be noted that 18 U.S.C. § 1510(b) establishes criminal penalties for situations where an officer of a financial institution notifies, directly or indirectly, any person regarding the existence or contents of a subpoena with the intent to obstruct a judicial proceeding.

426. Prohibiting Banks from Notifying Customers of Grand Jury Subpoenas | USAM | Department of Justice

Irrelevant.. this is a special counsel not a grand jury..

The Special Counsel can't get a subpoena without a grand jury...

Bullshit, all they have to do, just like any prosecutor, is apply to a judge with probable cause. You're not very smart are ya?


.

Mueller has been using a Grand Jury to get subpoenas since April. You aren't that bright are you?

 

[OKTexas]

Why would you think that?

This.

426. Prohibiting Banks from Notifying Customers of Grand Jury Subpoenas

There are two situations when banks and their personnel are prohibited from notifying their customers of a grand jury subpoena for their records. The first is when the government obtains a court order delaying notification by following the procedures set at § 3409(a) of the Act. See Delayed Notice at 11, 12 U.S.C. § 3413(i). The second situation is where the records are being subpoenaed to investigate crimes against a financial institution or supervisory agency, 12 U.S.C. § 3420(b) makes it a crime for the bank or its personnel to provide notice to the customer.

* It should also be noted that 18 U.S.C. § 1510(b) establishes criminal penalties for situations where an officer of a financial institution notifies, directly or indirectly, any person regarding the existence or contents of a subpoena with the intent to obstruct a judicial proceeding.

426. Prohibiting Banks from Notifying Customers of Grand Jury Subpoenas | USAM | Department of Justice

Irrelevant.. this is a special counsel not a grand jury..

The Special Counsel can't get a subpoena without a grand jury...

Bullshit, all they have to do, just like any prosecutor, is apply to a judge with probable cause. You're not very smart are ya?


.

Mueller has been using a Grand Jury to get subpoenas since April. You aren't that bright are you?

And?


.

 

[Lewdog]

This.

426. Prohibiting Banks from Notifying Customers of Grand Jury Subpoenas

There are two situations when banks and their personnel are prohibited from notifying their customers of a grand jury subpoena for their records. The first is when the government obtains a court order delaying notification by following the procedures set at § 3409(a) of the Act. See Delayed Notice at 11, 12 U.S.C. § 3413(i). The second situation is where the records are being subpoenaed to investigate crimes against a financial institution or supervisory agency, 12 U.S.C. § 3420(b) makes it a crime for the bank or its personnel to provide notice to the customer.

* It should also be noted that 18 U.S.C. § 1510(b) establishes criminal penalties for situations where an officer of a financial institution notifies, directly or indirectly, any person regarding the existence or contents of a subpoena with the intent to obstruct a judicial proceeding.

426. Prohibiting Banks from Notifying Customers of Grand Jury Subpoenas | USAM | Department of Justice

Irrelevant.. this is a special counsel not a grand jury..

The Special Counsel can't get a subpoena without a grand jury...

Bullshit, all they have to do, just like any prosecutor, is apply to a judge with probable cause. You're not very smart are ya?


.

Mueller has been using a Grand Jury to get subpoenas since April. You aren't that bright are you?

And?


.

And? If he didn't need to do it... why the fuck do you think he would be doing it? Why would he be wasting time and doing an extra step he doesn't need? Do you understand he is a special counsel and not actual law enforcement or a part of the system?

"Why is it necessary for Special Counsel Mueller to issue subpoenas for his investigation through a grand jury?

Prosecutors don’t have subpoena power. Courts do, and a grand jury is, technically, an arm of a federal district court."

David Sklansky on Mueller’s Investigation: Grand Juries, Subpoenas, and Gathering Evidence | Stanford Law School

 

[tinydancer]

WSJ has issued a correction as well and why the heck is the print so big? sorries.

Bloomberg in embarrassing climbdown after it admits it was WRONG to say Mueller was going through Trump's bank records

• Bloomberg News reported that special counsel Robert Mueller had subpoenaed Trump's records from Deutsche Bank weeks ago
• White House denied the claims and now Bloomberg has been forced to change its report to say the bank records 'pertain to people affiliated' with Trump
• The Wall Street Journal also issued a correction which confirmed the subpoena related to 'people or entities close to Mr. Trump,' not Trump himself

Read more: Bloomberg WRONG about Mueller checking Trump's records | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

[OKTexas]

Irrelevant.. this is a special counsel not a grand jury..

The Special Counsel can't get a subpoena without a grand jury...

Bullshit, all they have to do, just like any prosecutor, is apply to a judge with probable cause. You're not very smart are ya?


.

Mueller has been using a Grand Jury to get subpoenas since April. You aren't that bright are you?

And?


.

And? If he didn't need to do it... why the fuck do you think he would be doing it? Why would he be wasting time and doing an extra step he doesn't need? Do you understand he is a special counsel and not actual law enforcement or a part of the system?

"Why is it necessary for Special Counsel Mueller to issue subpoenas for his investigation through a grand jury?

Prosecutors don’t have subpoena power. Courts do, and a grand jury is, technically, an arm of a federal district court."

David Sklansky on Mueller’s Investigation: Grand Juries, Subpoenas, and Gathering Evidence | Stanford Law School

If you think a grand jury can short circuit the 4th Amendment, you're wrong.


.

 

[paperview]

Irrelevant.. this is a special counsel not a grand jury..

The Special Counsel can't get a subpoena without a grand jury...

Bullshit, all they have to do, just like any prosecutor, is apply to a judge with probable cause. You're not very smart are ya?


.

Mueller has been using a Grand Jury to get subpoenas since April. You aren't that bright are you?

And?


.

And? If he didn't need to do it... why the fuck do you think he would be doing it? Why would he be wasting time and doing an extra step he doesn't need? Do you understand he is a special counsel and not actual law enforcement or a part of the system?

"Why is it necessary for Special Counsel Mueller to issue subpoenas for his investigation through a grand jury?

Prosecutors don’t have subpoena power. Courts do, and a grand jury is, technically, an arm of a federal district court."

David Sklansky on Mueller’s Investigation: Grand Juries, Subpoenas, and Gathering Evidence | Stanford Law School

You're expecting conservatives to think through things.

They don't do that.

 

[Lewdog]

The Special Counsel can't get a subpoena without a grand jury...

Bullshit, all they have to do, just like any prosecutor, is apply to a judge with probable cause. You're not very smart are ya?


.

Mueller has been using a Grand Jury to get subpoenas since April. You aren't that bright are you?

And?


.

And? If he didn't need to do it... why the fuck do you think he would be doing it? Why would he be wasting time and doing an extra step he doesn't need? Do you understand he is a special counsel and not actual law enforcement or a part of the system?

"Why is it necessary for Special Counsel Mueller to issue subpoenas for his investigation through a grand jury?

Prosecutors don’t have subpoena power. Courts do, and a grand jury is, technically, an arm of a federal district court."

David Sklansky on Mueller’s Investigation: Grand Juries, Subpoenas, and Gathering Evidence | Stanford Law School

If you think a grand jury can short circuit the 4th Amendment, you're wrong.


.

You've jumped the shark. Delete your account. Do not pass Go, do not collect $200.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

WSJ has issued a correction as well and why the heck is the print so big? sorries.

Bloomberg in embarrassing climbdown after it admits it was WRONG to say Mueller was going through Trump's bank records

• Bloomberg News reported that special counsel Robert Mueller had subpoenaed Trump's records from Deutsche Bank weeks ago
• White House denied the claims and now Bloomberg has been forced to change its report to say the bank records 'pertain to people affiliated' with Trump
• The Wall Street Journal also issued a correction which confirmed the subpoena related to 'people or entities close to Mr. Trump,' not Trump himself

Read more: Bloomberg WRONG about Mueller checking Trump's records | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Democrats will still say Mueller subpoenaed Trumps bank records.

The Mueller investigation is over anyway. It will have a gasp or two but it has imploded and lost all credibility.

 

[Lewdog]

WSJ has issued a correction as well and why the heck is the print so big? sorries.

Bloomberg in embarrassing climbdown after it admits it was WRONG to say Mueller was going through Trump's bank records

• Bloomberg News reported that special counsel Robert Mueller had subpoenaed Trump's records from Deutsche Bank weeks ago
• White House denied the claims and now Bloomberg has been forced to change its report to say the bank records 'pertain to people affiliated' with Trump
• The Wall Street Journal also issued a correction which confirmed the subpoena related to 'people or entities close to Mr. Trump,' not Trump himself

Read more: Bloomberg WRONG about Mueller checking Trump's records | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Democrats will still say Mueller subpoenaed Trumps bank records.

The Mueller investigation is over anyway. It will have a gasp or two but it has imploded and lost all credibility.

How has it lost credibility? A person showed their bias... they got fired.

Do you think anyone is going to do a plea deal or get convicted if there isn't evidence?

 

[tinydancer]

WSJ has issued a correction as well and why the heck is the print so big? sorries.

Bloomberg in embarrassing climbdown after it admits it was WRONG to say Mueller was going through Trump's bank records

• Bloomberg News reported that special counsel Robert Mueller had subpoenaed Trump's records from Deutsche Bank weeks ago
• White House denied the claims and now Bloomberg has been forced to change its report to say the bank records 'pertain to people affiliated' with Trump
• The Wall Street Journal also issued a correction which confirmed the subpoena related to 'people or entities close to Mr. Trump,' not Trump himself

Read more: Bloomberg WRONG about Mueller checking Trump's records | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Democrats will still say Mueller subpoenaed Trumps bank records.

The Mueller investigation is over anyway. It will have a gasp or two but it has imploded and lost all credibility.

How has it lost credibility? A person showed their bias... they got fired.

Do you think anyone is going to do a plea deal or get convicted if there isn't evidence?

Mueller and the DOJ hid the reason for why the investigator was dismissed from Congress. Contempt of Congress charge is being developed now against the FBI and the DOJ.

 

[paperview]

Bullshit, all they have to do, just like any prosecutor, is apply to a judge with probable cause. You're not very smart are ya?


.

Mueller has been using a Grand Jury to get subpoenas since April. You aren't that bright are you?

And?


.

And? If he didn't need to do it... why the fuck do you think he would be doing it? Why would he be wasting time and doing an extra step he doesn't need? Do you understand he is a special counsel and not actual law enforcement or a part of the system?

"Why is it necessary for Special Counsel Mueller to issue subpoenas for his investigation through a grand jury?

Prosecutors don’t have subpoena power. Courts do, and a grand jury is, technically, an arm of a federal district court."

David Sklansky on Mueller’s Investigation: Grand Juries, Subpoenas, and Gathering Evidence | Stanford Law School

If you think a grand jury can short circuit the 4th Amendment, you're wrong.


.

You've jumped the shark. Delete your account. Do not pass Go, do not collect $200.

Yow doggies. I had another reply to OakyTX after reading that stoopid post of his -- but yours fits the bill 10X better.

 

[Lewdog]

WSJ has issued a correction as well and why the heck is the print so big? sorries.

Bloomberg in embarrassing climbdown after it admits it was WRONG to say Mueller was going through Trump's bank records

• Bloomberg News reported that special counsel Robert Mueller had subpoenaed Trump's records from Deutsche Bank weeks ago
• White House denied the claims and now Bloomberg has been forced to change its report to say the bank records 'pertain to people affiliated' with Trump
• The Wall Street Journal also issued a correction which confirmed the subpoena related to 'people or entities close to Mr. Trump,' not Trump himself

Read more: Bloomberg WRONG about Mueller checking Trump's records | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Democrats will still say Mueller subpoenaed Trumps bank records.

The Mueller investigation is over anyway. It will have a gasp or two but it has imploded and lost all credibility.

How has it lost credibility? A person showed their bias... they got fired.

Do you think anyone is going to do a plea deal or get convicted if there isn't evidence?

Mueller and the DOJ hid the reason for why the investigator was dismissed from Congress. Contempt of Congress charge is being developed now against the FBI and the DOJ.

Why should he tell them? The most important thing is he did it. Does you boss tell everyone why they fire someone? Most companies don't do that... and it is part of Mueller's powers, that he can appoint or kick people off his team.

 

[paperview]

The Mueller investigation is over anyway. It will have a gasp or two but it has imploded and lost all credibility.

You really seem fond of embarrassing yourself.

Does this work well for you in real life?

 

[tinydancer]

[QUOTE="tinydancer, post:

How has it lost credibility? A person showed their bias... they got fired.

Do you think anyone is going to do a plea deal or get convicted if there isn't evidence?

Mueller and the DOJ hid the reason for why the investigator was dismissed from Congress. Contempt of Congress charge is being developed now against the FBI and the DOJ.

Why should he tell them? The most important thing is he did it. Does you boss tell everyone why they fire someone? Most companies don't do that... and it is part of Mueller's powers, that he can appoint or kick people off his team.

THE FBI and the DOJ have been stonewalling Congress. They are pissed and this firing was like the last straw.

"Nunes said the committee had repeatedly sought information about Strzok's reassignment without answers.

"By hiding from Congress, and from the American people, documented political bias by a key FBI head investigator for both the Russia collusion probe and the Clinton email investigation, the FBI and DOJ engaged in a willful attempt to thwart Congress’ constitutional oversight responsibility," Nunes said in a statement released over the weekend.

"This is part of a months-long pattern by the DOJ and FBI of stonewalling and obstructing this Committee’s oversight work, particularly oversight of their use of the Steele dossier," Nunes said. "At this point, these agencies should be investigating themselves."

House Intel chairman threatens FBI director, deputy AG with contempt of Congress