Mueller's Ship Springing More Leaks As It Goes Farther Off Course

[theDoctorisIn]

Mueller is violating the Fourth Amendment: The stated goal of the investigation was to see if there was any possible collusion between Trump campaign associates and Russia during the presidential campaign.

So where is this evidence of "collusion" and why are people being charged for things which are completely unrelated?

How is Mueller violating the 4th amendment?

You forgot an important part of Mueller's appointment. It wasn't just to investigate Russian collusion - he was also instructed by the assistant AG to investigate "all other issues that might come up during the investigation".

The prosecutorial privilege to act "under color of law" comes with the duty to respect the rights the law guarantees. Take Paul Manafort for example: He was a subject in a non-violent-crime investigation, being represented by counsel, and was cooperating with Congress at the time Mueller’s Gang of 17 chose to break into his home, while he and his wife were in bed sleeping.

I can guarantee that if this had happened to you, it would be a violation of your right to be protected against unreasonable searches and seizures. You'd be shitposting on here 24/7 about it.

The search of Manafort's home was completely legal. Mueller had a warrant, signed by a judge, granted because he showed enough evidence to establish probable cause.

No 4th amendment violation there.

 

[JGalt]

Mueller is violating the Fourth Amendment: The stated goal of the investigation was to see if there was any possible collusion between Trump campaign associates and Russia during the presidential campaign.

So where is this evidence of "collusion" and why are people being charged for things which are completely unrelated?

How is Mueller violating the 4th amendment?

You forgot an important part of Mueller's appointment. It wasn't just to investigate Russian collusion - he was also instructed by the assistant AG to investigate "all other issues that might come up during the investigation".

Israel and a documentary about an exiled Turkish Cleric?

Mueller is 'WAY' off of the reservation, kimosabe.

Your claim that the DOJ gave Mueller carte blanche to take the witch hunt ANYWHERE he wants with no restrictions or boundaries is the very definition of 'witch hunt'.

I'm sure that someone else has already attempted to point this out to you, and you just ignored it.

But again, here's the order appointing Mueller as Special Counsel:

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download

Please note sections (b)(ii) and (c).

Thank you for providing that. I looked but couldn't find it.

So in other words, Mueller has the right to throw anything at anyone involved in the Trump campaign, and see if it sticks to them.

That's one hell of a witch hunt.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Mueller is violating the Fourth Amendment: The stated goal of the investigation was to see if there was any possible collusion between Trump campaign associates and Russia during the presidential campaign.

So where is this evidence of "collusion" and why are people being charged for things which are completely unrelated?

How is Mueller violating the 4th amendment?

You forgot an important part of Mueller's appointment. It wasn't just to investigate Russian collusion - he was also instructed by the assistant AG to investigate "all other issues that might come up during the investigation".

Israel and a documentary about an exiled Turkish Cleric?

Mueller is 'WAY' off of the reservation, kimosabe.

Your claim that the DOJ gave Mueller carte blanche to take the witch hunt ANYWHERE he wants with no restrictions or boundaries is the very definition of 'witch hunt'.

I'm sure that someone else has already attempted to point this out to you, and you just ignored it.

But again, here's the order appointing Mueller as Special Counsel:

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download

Please note sections (b)(ii) and (c).

Thank you for providing that. I looked but couldn't find it.

So in other words, Mueller has the right to throw anything at anyone involved in the Trump campaign, and see if it sticks to them.

That's one hell of a witch hunt.

You can call it a "witch hunt" if you want to - I know how much you guys need to feel like victims - but it's doesn't matter. Mueller's investigation is entirely in line with the law, no matter how unfair you think it is.

Keep in mind, Ken Starr was appointed to investigate a real estate deal from the 70s.

 

[nat4900]

You forgot an important part of Mueller's appointment. It wasn't just to investigate Russian collusion - he was also instructed by the assistant AG to investigate "all other issues that might come up during the investigation".

Actually the nitwit did NOT forget...that would imply once knowing something.....instead, its just old fashioned ignorance.......

Mueller is much more interested in Obstruction of Justice charges since "collusion"....although unethical, is not a crime of culpability while Obstruction of justice clearly is......

Look up the articles of impeachment on Nixon,and you will see the prominence of Obstruction.

 

[JGalt]

Mueller is violating the Fourth Amendment: The stated goal of the investigation was to see if there was any possible collusion between Trump campaign associates and Russia during the presidential campaign.

So where is this evidence of "collusion" and why are people being charged for things which are completely unrelated?

How is Mueller violating the 4th amendment?

You forgot an important part of Mueller's appointment. It wasn't just to investigate Russian collusion - he was also instructed by the assistant AG to investigate "all other issues that might come up during the investigation".

The prosecutorial privilege to act "under color of law" comes with the duty to respect the rights the law guarantees. Take Paul Manafort for example: He was a subject in a non-violent-crime investigation, being represented by counsel, and was cooperating with Congress at the time Mueller’s Gang of 17 chose to break into his home, while he and his wife were in bed sleeping.

I can guarantee that if this had happened to you, it would be a violation of your right to be protected against unreasonable searches and seizures. You'd be shitposting on here 24/7 about it.

The search of Manafort's home was completely legal. Mueller had a warrant, signed by a judge, granted because he showed enough evidence to establish probable cause.

No 4th amendment violation there.

Even so, Manafort's indictment might not stand up in a court of law. Apparently they "went beyond the scope of the warrant"...

Mueller Team’s Apparent ‘Mistake’ Could Screw Their Case Against Manafort

Team Mueller may have violated Manafort’s constitutional rights

 

[easyt65]

So when is Mueller going to get back to investigating anything to do with the Russians / Trump and / or come up with any evidence related to crimes NOT committed by Trump?

Mueller has only proven the media correct when / as they just reported he has a history of being a f*-up as a prosecutir.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Mueller is violating the Fourth Amendment: The stated goal of the investigation was to see if there was any possible collusion between Trump campaign associates and Russia during the presidential campaign.

So where is this evidence of "collusion" and why are people being charged for things which are completely unrelated?

How is Mueller violating the 4th amendment?

You forgot an important part of Mueller's appointment. It wasn't just to investigate Russian collusion - he was also instructed by the assistant AG to investigate "all other issues that might come up during the investigation".

The prosecutorial privilege to act "under color of law" comes with the duty to respect the rights the law guarantees. Take Paul Manafort for example: He was a subject in a non-violent-crime investigation, being represented by counsel, and was cooperating with Congress at the time Mueller’s Gang of 17 chose to break into his home, while he and his wife were in bed sleeping.

I can guarantee that if this had happened to you, it would be a violation of your right to be protected against unreasonable searches and seizures. You'd be shitposting on here 24/7 about it.

The search of Manafort's home was completely legal. Mueller had a warrant, signed by a judge, granted because he showed enough evidence to establish probable cause.

No 4th amendment violation there.

Even so, Manafort's indictment might not stand up in a court of law. Apparently they "went beyond the scope of the warrant"...

Mueller Team’s Apparent ‘Mistake’ Could Screw Their Case Against Manafort

Feel free to hang your hopes on the legal expertise of "Rachel Stockman".

According to your link, the files that were apparently covered by attorney-client privilege have been returned - and any claim that the case was "tainted" by it is asinine, since none of the "evidence" has been shown to the jury yet.

 

[JGalt]

Mueller is violating the Fourth Amendment: The stated goal of the investigation was to see if there was any possible collusion between Trump campaign associates and Russia during the presidential campaign.

So where is this evidence of "collusion" and why are people being charged for things which are completely unrelated?

How is Mueller violating the 4th amendment?

You forgot an important part of Mueller's appointment. It wasn't just to investigate Russian collusion - he was also instructed by the assistant AG to investigate "all other issues that might come up during the investigation".

The prosecutorial privilege to act "under color of law" comes with the duty to respect the rights the law guarantees. Take Paul Manafort for example: He was a subject in a non-violent-crime investigation, being represented by counsel, and was cooperating with Congress at the time Mueller’s Gang of 17 chose to break into his home, while he and his wife were in bed sleeping.

I can guarantee that if this had happened to you, it would be a violation of your right to be protected against unreasonable searches and seizures. You'd be shitposting on here 24/7 about it.

The search of Manafort's home was completely legal. Mueller had a warrant, signed by a judge, granted because he showed enough evidence to establish probable cause.

No 4th amendment violation there.

Even so, Manafort's indictment might not stand up in a court of law. Apparently they "went beyond the scope of the warrant"...

Mueller Team’s Apparent ‘Mistake’ Could Screw Their Case Against Manafort

Feel free to hang your hopes on the legal expertise of "Rachel Stockman".

According to your link, the files that were apparently covered by attorney-client privilege have been returned - and any claim that the case was "tainted" by it is asinine, since none of the "evidence" has been shown to the jury yet.

Then we'll just have to wait and see how this all ends. According to the Trump-haters and most "media" outlets, he's already been tried, convicted, and sentenced. But ultimately it's up to a judge and jury, right?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

How is Mueller violating the 4th amendment?

You forgot an important part of Mueller's appointment. It wasn't just to investigate Russian collusion - he was also instructed by the assistant AG to investigate "all other issues that might come up during the investigation".

The prosecutorial privilege to act "under color of law" comes with the duty to respect the rights the law guarantees. Take Paul Manafort for example: He was a subject in a non-violent-crime investigation, being represented by counsel, and was cooperating with Congress at the time Mueller’s Gang of 17 chose to break into his home, while he and his wife were in bed sleeping.

I can guarantee that if this had happened to you, it would be a violation of your right to be protected against unreasonable searches and seizures. You'd be shitposting on here 24/7 about it.

The search of Manafort's home was completely legal. Mueller had a warrant, signed by a judge, granted because he showed enough evidence to establish probable cause.

No 4th amendment violation there.

Even so, Manafort's indictment might not stand up in a court of law. Apparently they "went beyond the scope of the warrant"...

Mueller Team’s Apparent ‘Mistake’ Could Screw Their Case Against Manafort

Feel free to hang your hopes on the legal expertise of "Rachel Stockman".

According to your link, the files that were apparently covered by attorney-client privilege have been returned - and any claim that the case was "tainted" by it is asinine, since none of the "evidence" has been shown to the jury yet.

Then we'll just have to wait and see how this all ends. According to the Trump-haters, he's already been tried, convicted, and sentenced. But ultimately it's up to a judge and jury, right?

Now, now. There's no need to build a strawman.

Ultimately, I would guess that no direct charges will be filed by Mueller against Trump directly. If he did, it wouldn't end up before a "jury", anyway - it would end up in front of the Senate.

On the other hand, I do think he's going to take out a lot of Trump's allies and advisors - including most of the people who actually understand how politics work.

Maybe this was what he meant by "draining the swamp".

 

[leftwinger]

How did they get any Warrant to bust into any Private home?

Using the DNC/Beast Russian "Dossier" to listen in on Private American Citizens Conversations? Then install Russian plants to contact Trumps' people? 100% slime. Using the GOVT to setup/attack Citizens.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

How did they get any Warrant to bust into any Private home?

Using the DNC/Beast Russian "Dossier" to listen in on Private American Citizens Conversations? Then install Russian plants to contact Trumps' people? 100% slime. Using the GOVT to setup/attack Citizens.

They showed a federal judge enough evidence to show probable cause.

What that evidence was, we won't know unless this actually goes to trial.

 

[JGalt]

The prosecutorial privilege to act "under color of law" comes with the duty to respect the rights the law guarantees. Take Paul Manafort for example: He was a subject in a non-violent-crime investigation, being represented by counsel, and was cooperating with Congress at the time Mueller’s Gang of 17 chose to break into his home, while he and his wife were in bed sleeping.

I can guarantee that if this had happened to you, it would be a violation of your right to be protected against unreasonable searches and seizures. You'd be shitposting on here 24/7 about it.

The search of Manafort's home was completely legal. Mueller had a warrant, signed by a judge, granted because he showed enough evidence to establish probable cause.

No 4th amendment violation there.

Even so, Manafort's indictment might not stand up in a court of law. Apparently they "went beyond the scope of the warrant"...

Mueller Team’s Apparent ‘Mistake’ Could Screw Their Case Against Manafort

Feel free to hang your hopes on the legal expertise of "Rachel Stockman".

According to your link, the files that were apparently covered by attorney-client privilege have been returned - and any claim that the case was "tainted" by it is asinine, since none of the "evidence" has been shown to the jury yet.

Then we'll just have to wait and see how this all ends. According to the Trump-haters, he's already been tried, convicted, and sentenced. But ultimately it's up to a judge and jury, right?

Now, now. There's no need to build a strawman.

Ultimately, I would guess that no direct charges will be filed by Mueller against Trump directly. If he did, it wouldn't end up before a "jury", anyway - it would end up in front of the Senate.

On the other hand, I do think he's going to take out a lot of Trump's allies and advisors - including most of the people who actually understand how politics work.

Maybe this was what he meant by "draining the swamp".

How did they get any Warrant to bust into any Private home?

Using the DNC/Beast Russian "Dossier" to listen in on Private American Citizens Conversations? Then install Russian plants to contact Trumps' people? 100% slime. Using the GOVT to setup/attack Citizens.

They showed a federal judge enough evidence to show probable cause.

What that evidence was, we won't know unless this actually goes to trial.

Geez. This is going to drag on longer than the "John Doe" investigation, when they tried to indict Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker back in 2013. That was a complete clusterf*ck. They also made some 2:00 AM raids and held people at gunpoint while they trashed their houses. But when they finally got done, he was still Governor and everyone involved acted like it never happened.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

The search of Manafort's home was completely legal. Mueller had a warrant, signed by a judge, granted because he showed enough evidence to establish probable cause.

No 4th amendment violation there.

Even so, Manafort's indictment might not stand up in a court of law. Apparently they "went beyond the scope of the warrant"...

Mueller Team’s Apparent ‘Mistake’ Could Screw Their Case Against Manafort

Feel free to hang your hopes on the legal expertise of "Rachel Stockman".

According to your link, the files that were apparently covered by attorney-client privilege have been returned - and any claim that the case was "tainted" by it is asinine, since none of the "evidence" has been shown to the jury yet.

Then we'll just have to wait and see how this all ends. According to the Trump-haters, he's already been tried, convicted, and sentenced. But ultimately it's up to a judge and jury, right?

Now, now. There's no need to build a strawman.

Ultimately, I would guess that no direct charges will be filed by Mueller against Trump directly. If he did, it wouldn't end up before a "jury", anyway - it would end up in front of the Senate.

On the other hand, I do think he's going to take out a lot of Trump's allies and advisors - including most of the people who actually understand how politics work.

Maybe this was what he meant by "draining the swamp".

How did they get any Warrant to bust into any Private home?

Using the DNC/Beast Russian "Dossier" to listen in on Private American Citizens Conversations? Then install Russian plants to contact Trumps' people? 100% slime. Using the GOVT to setup/attack Citizens.

They showed a federal judge enough evidence to show probable cause.

What that evidence was, we won't know unless this actually goes to trial.

Geez. This is going to drag on longer than the "John Doe" investigation, when they tried to indict Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker back in 2013. That was a complete clusterf*ck. They also made some 2:00 AM raids and held people at gunpoint while they trashed their houses. But when they finally got done, he was still Governor and everyone involved acted like it never happened.

Well, Mueller's only been at it 6 months now - it took Ken Starr 4 years to come up with a blowjob.

 

[OKTexas]

What a joke!

3 people already going to court with one guility and all you can do is pull bs out of your ass. Man you're dumber then shit and I am sorry that you were born in this country as you're a disgrace to everything it ever stood for.

Still haven't mastered the proper uses of "then" and "than" I see Matthew.


.

 

[otto105]

Meanwhile:

1) Mueller should be under investigation himself for his part of the Uranium Scam; and

2) Comey's Firing, which sparked the Mueller Investigation....is now obviously the correct decision, with jail a possible outcome, for:

a) Usurping and intentionally fucking up the Clinton E-Mail Investigation; and

b) Leaking FBI data to the New York Times (admittedly).

Washington is a truly fucked up place. The Fox is constantly in the Hen House. Democrats are Bolsheviks, and Republicans are Pussies.

The space between your ears is a fucked up place.

 

[otto105]

The search of Manafort's home was completely legal. Mueller had a warrant, signed by a judge, granted because he showed enough evidence to establish probable cause.

No 4th amendment violation there.

Even so, Manafort's indictment might not stand up in a court of law. Apparently they "went beyond the scope of the warrant"...

Mueller Team’s Apparent ‘Mistake’ Could Screw Their Case Against Manafort

Feel free to hang your hopes on the legal expertise of "Rachel Stockman".

According to your link, the files that were apparently covered by attorney-client privilege have been returned - and any claim that the case was "tainted" by it is asinine, since none of the "evidence" has been shown to the jury yet.

Then we'll just have to wait and see how this all ends. According to the Trump-haters, he's already been tried, convicted, and sentenced. But ultimately it's up to a judge and jury, right?

Now, now. There's no need to build a strawman.

Ultimately, I would guess that no direct charges will be filed by Mueller against Trump directly. If he did, it wouldn't end up before a "jury", anyway - it would end up in front of the Senate.

On the other hand, I do think he's going to take out a lot of Trump's allies and advisors - including most of the people who actually understand how politics work.

Maybe this was what he meant by "draining the swamp".

How did they get any Warrant to bust into any Private home?

Using the DNC/Beast Russian "Dossier" to listen in on Private American Citizens Conversations? Then install Russian plants to contact Trumps' people? 100% slime. Using the GOVT to setup/attack Citizens.

They showed a federal judge enough evidence to show probable cause.

What that evidence was, we won't know unless this actually goes to trial.

Geez. This is going to drag on longer than the "John Doe" investigation, when they tried to indict Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker back in 2013. That was a complete clusterf*ck. They also made some 2:00 AM raids and held people at gunpoint while they trashed their houses. But when they finally got done, he was still Governor and everyone involved acted like it never happened.

Is anything that you post correct? Judging by this post the answer is no.

And that 2:00am chick is still in jail.

 

[JGalt]

Even so, Manafort's indictment might not stand up in a court of law. Apparently they "went beyond the scope of the warrant"...

Mueller Team’s Apparent ‘Mistake’ Could Screw Their Case Against Manafort

Feel free to hang your hopes on the legal expertise of "Rachel Stockman".

According to your link, the files that were apparently covered by attorney-client privilege have been returned - and any claim that the case was "tainted" by it is asinine, since none of the "evidence" has been shown to the jury yet.

Then we'll just have to wait and see how this all ends. According to the Trump-haters, he's already been tried, convicted, and sentenced. But ultimately it's up to a judge and jury, right?

Now, now. There's no need to build a strawman.

Ultimately, I would guess that no direct charges will be filed by Mueller against Trump directly. If he did, it wouldn't end up before a "jury", anyway - it would end up in front of the Senate.

On the other hand, I do think he's going to take out a lot of Trump's allies and advisors - including most of the people who actually understand how politics work.

Maybe this was what he meant by "draining the swamp".

How did they get any Warrant to bust into any Private home?

Using the DNC/Beast Russian "Dossier" to listen in on Private American Citizens Conversations? Then install Russian plants to contact Trumps' people? 100% slime. Using the GOVT to setup/attack Citizens.

They showed a federal judge enough evidence to show probable cause.

What that evidence was, we won't know unless this actually goes to trial.

Geez. This is going to drag on longer than the "John Doe" investigation, when they tried to indict Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker back in 2013. That was a complete clusterf*ck. They also made some 2:00 AM raids and held people at gunpoint while they trashed their houses. But when they finally got done, he was still Governor and everyone involved acted like it never happened.

Well, Mueller's only been at it 6 months now - it took Ken Starr 4 years to come up with a blowjob.

..and Hillary 20 years to clean up after it.

 

[leftwinger]

Even so, Manafort's indictment might not stand up in a court of law. Apparently they "went beyond the scope of the warrant"...

Mueller Team’s Apparent ‘Mistake’ Could Screw Their Case Against Manafort

Feel free to hang your hopes on the legal expertise of "Rachel Stockman".

According to your link, the files that were apparently covered by attorney-client privilege have been returned - and any claim that the case was "tainted" by it is asinine, since none of the "evidence" has been shown to the jury yet.

Then we'll just have to wait and see how this all ends. According to the Trump-haters, he's already been tried, convicted, and sentenced. But ultimately it's up to a judge and jury, right?

Now, now. There's no need to build a strawman.

Ultimately, I would guess that no direct charges will be filed by Mueller against Trump directly. If he did, it wouldn't end up before a "jury", anyway - it would end up in front of the Senate.

On the other hand, I do think he's going to take out a lot of Trump's allies and advisors - including most of the people who actually understand how politics work.

Maybe this was what he meant by "draining the swamp".

How did they get any Warrant to bust into any Private home?

Using the DNC/Beast Russian "Dossier" to listen in on Private American Citizens Conversations? Then install Russian plants to contact Trumps' people? 100% slime. Using the GOVT to setup/attack Citizens.

They showed a federal judge enough evidence to show probable cause.

What that evidence was, we won't know unless this actually goes to trial.

Geez. This is going to drag on longer than the "John Doe" investigation, when they tried to indict Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker back in 2013. That was a complete clusterf*ck. They also made some 2:00 AM raids and held people at gunpoint while they trashed their houses. But when they finally got done, he was still Governor and everyone involved acted like it never happened.

Well, Mueller's only been at it 6 months now - it took Ken Starr 4 years to come up with a blowjob.

Horse-Hockey. Comey started this nonsense ~July 2016.
Be prepared for what you people cause.

 

[JGalt]

Even so, Manafort's indictment might not stand up in a court of law. Apparently they "went beyond the scope of the warrant"...

Mueller Team’s Apparent ‘Mistake’ Could Screw Their Case Against Manafort

Feel free to hang your hopes on the legal expertise of "Rachel Stockman".

According to your link, the files that were apparently covered by attorney-client privilege have been returned - and any claim that the case was "tainted" by it is asinine, since none of the "evidence" has been shown to the jury yet.

Then we'll just have to wait and see how this all ends. According to the Trump-haters, he's already been tried, convicted, and sentenced. But ultimately it's up to a judge and jury, right?

Now, now. There's no need to build a strawman.

Ultimately, I would guess that no direct charges will be filed by Mueller against Trump directly. If he did, it wouldn't end up before a "jury", anyway - it would end up in front of the Senate.

On the other hand, I do think he's going to take out a lot of Trump's allies and advisors - including most of the people who actually understand how politics work.

Maybe this was what he meant by "draining the swamp".

How did they get any Warrant to bust into any Private home?

Using the DNC/Beast Russian "Dossier" to listen in on Private American Citizens Conversations? Then install Russian plants to contact Trumps' people? 100% slime. Using the GOVT to setup/attack Citizens.

They showed a federal judge enough evidence to show probable cause.

What that evidence was, we won't know unless this actually goes to trial.

Geez. This is going to drag on longer than the "John Doe" investigation, when they tried to indict Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker back in 2013. That was a complete clusterf*ck. They also made some 2:00 AM raids and held people at gunpoint while they trashed their houses. But when they finally got done, he was still Governor and everyone involved acted like it never happened.

Is anything that you post correct? Judging by this post the answer is no.

And that 2:00am chick is still in jail.

The one who stole from a veteran's group? She deserves to be in jail.

But Scott Walker is still standing, and will most likely be Governor next term as well.

"On July 16, 2015, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled 4–2 that Walker did not illegally collaborate with conservative groups during the recall campaigns. Writing for the majority in the case, Justice Michael Gableman stated: "To be clear, this conclusion ends the John Doe investigation because the special prosecutor's legal theory is unsupported in either reason or law," he said, "Consequently, the investigation is closed."

Scott Walker (politician) - Wikipedia

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Feel free to hang your hopes on the legal expertise of "Rachel Stockman".

According to your link, the files that were apparently covered by attorney-client privilege have been returned - and any claim that the case was "tainted" by it is asinine, since none of the "evidence" has been shown to the jury yet.

Then we'll just have to wait and see how this all ends. According to the Trump-haters, he's already been tried, convicted, and sentenced. But ultimately it's up to a judge and jury, right?

Now, now. There's no need to build a strawman.

Ultimately, I would guess that no direct charges will be filed by Mueller against Trump directly. If he did, it wouldn't end up before a "jury", anyway - it would end up in front of the Senate.

On the other hand, I do think he's going to take out a lot of Trump's allies and advisors - including most of the people who actually understand how politics work.

Maybe this was what he meant by "draining the swamp".

How did they get any Warrant to bust into any Private home?

Using the DNC/Beast Russian "Dossier" to listen in on Private American Citizens Conversations? Then install Russian plants to contact Trumps' people? 100% slime. Using the GOVT to setup/attack Citizens.

They showed a federal judge enough evidence to show probable cause.

What that evidence was, we won't know unless this actually goes to trial.

Geez. This is going to drag on longer than the "John Doe" investigation, when they tried to indict Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker back in 2013. That was a complete clusterf*ck. They also made some 2:00 AM raids and held people at gunpoint while they trashed their houses. But when they finally got done, he was still Governor and everyone involved acted like it never happened.

Well, Mueller's only been at it 6 months now - it took Ken Starr 4 years to come up with a blowjob.

Horse-Hockey. Comey started this nonsense ~July 2016.
Be prepared for what you people cause.

And the "Whitewater investigation" had started a year before Ken Starr was appointed Special Prosecutor.

What exactly should we be "prepared for"?