My Draft Pro-Discrimination Law

[DGS49]

In a nutshell, here it is:

In cases where an employee will be dealing directly, face to face, with customers and/or clients, employers have an express RIGHT to discriminate on the basis of:

• Face and/or body ornamentation (tattoos, piercings, etc.),
• Anti-biological gender identification,
• Extraordinary hair styles and colors (employer's discretion),
• A pattern of anti-grammatical speaking, and/or
• Inappropriate (for the industry) clothing and accessories (e.g., fingernails that impede using a keyboard).

Disparate impact on specific races, ethnicities, genders shall NOT be deemed proof of illegal discrimination.

And since this ALL relates to voluntary behavior, none of it runs afoul of current anti-discrimination laws.

Comments?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Probably not.

 

[sparky]

Comments?

Obviously the devil is in the details DG

I'll use myself as example, i'm old, ugly , am not well spoken, (idgaf) have the flag tattooed on my arm , and don't usually agree with humanity

i work for myself, because i know nobody in their right mind would hire me

~s~

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

No business in their right mind that deals personally with international clientele would hire anyone that looks like a complete loon. Companies already have the right to discriminate based appearances that the applicant may "choose" to wear or in some way, put on themselves.