Nate Silver: Rasmussen has a "long history" of overestimating Republican chances

[pyetro]

Sort of like San obvious statement but here it is anyway:

 

[Synthaholic]

Rasmussen has been a joke for at least 15 years.

 

[kyzr]

Wonder who overestimated Trump in 2016?

 

[Uncensored2008]

America loves what the democrats are doing.

America looks around and wants democrats to give us more of this.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Rasmussen has been a joke for at least 15 years.

And if you disagree, the Cancel Culture lynch mob will destroy your life and attack your children.

Vote democrat, they bring Cancel Culture to you!

 

[pyetro]

Wonder who overestimated Trump in 2016?

All you got is 2016

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Rasmussen is intentionally overestimating Republican chances; it uses ‘polls’ as a form of partisan advocacy.

 

[kyzr]

Rasmussen is intentionally overestimating Republican chances; it uses ‘polls’ as a form of partisan advocacy.

How do you know that Rasmussen is "intentionally overestimating Trump's chances"?
Remember 2016? Which pollsters were the most accurate?
Its actually fun to watch 2016 again as a reminder, most polls are bullshit.

 

[Nostra]

Ol Nate gave Trump a 5% chance of winning in 2016, so for him to question the accuracy of anyone else if a hoot.

 

[Nostra]

Rasmussen has been a joke for at least 15 years.

Wrong, but you have always been a joke.



On its final poll released Nov. 7, the day before Election Day, Rasmussen had Hillary Clinton up 2 points on Donald Trump. Clinton won the popular vote by 1 percentage point, even though Donald Trump beat her on electoral votes.

No other pollster tracked by RealClearPolitics came as close to the final results.

Rasmussen calls itself most accurate pollster of 2016

The pollster is pointing to final results posted by RealClearPolitics.

thehill.com