Nazi Lib Scientist demands global warming deniers be punished

[Blackrook]

Michael E. Kraft: Climate-change deniers deserve punishment

The libs are growing more and more like the Nazis every day.

On the one hand, they are crushing down without mercy states that don't want to let pervs in the ladies room and states that don't want to force Christian bakers to bake gay wedding cakes.

And now they want to crush into silence anyone who dares defy the Nazi propaganda global warming theory, even think tanks and advocacy groups (columnists and well, anyone who dares write in a newspaper that global warming isn't true).

It's "Seig heil!" all around for our liberal pals in the government, criminal justice system, the media, academia, and the entertainment industry.

We need to start fighting back.

And now they want to start putting people on our side in prison.

So this is not going to stay bloodless much longer....

Keep your ammo dry folks.

Libs, if you want to stay out of the crossfire, you need to oppose the Nazis now and prove you are not part of this.

How about you guno?

 

[Grandma]

'Fraid they'll come after you first?

 

[AvgGuyIA]

I am with you. It's coming to a civil war. People will be push just so far then it becomes survival of the fittest.

 

[Blackrook]

'Fraid they'll come after you first?

Not afraid of anything asshole. Fuck you, Commie slut.

 

[Blackrook]

Grandma announces that she is a fucking Nazi and therefore she wants this to happen. Grandma, when they come for you, don't come looking for my help.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Why not? Let's #MakeThePlanetGreatAgain

 

[Blackrook]

We are at a tipping point. The demand that we now force states to allow perverted men into women's rooms means the left has now officially become screaming mad crazy insane and they will now have to resort to violent and extreme ways to enforce their Nazi demands.

 

[Blackrook]

And Bruce Springstein is part of this shit. I'm fucking pissed off, I used to like that guy. But he's a fucking nobody now, a total has-been, and he's standing up for pervs who want to molest little girls so he's history as far as I am concerned.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Nazi Lib"

lol

Another ignorant conservative who doesn’t know that fascism exists on the right side of the political spectrum.

 

[Blackrook]

"Nazi Lib"

lol

Another ignorant conservative who doesn’t know that fascism exists on the right side of the political spectrum.

Sorry, but Mussoulini was a socialist before he was a fascist.

2. Mussolini was a socialist before becoming a fascist.
Born to a socialist father, Mussolini was named after leftist Mexican President Benito Juárez. His two middle names, Amilcare and Andrea, came from Italian socialists Amilcare Cipriani and Andrea Costa. Early in Mussolini’s life, for instance, those names seemed appropriate. While living in Switzerland from 1902 to 1904, he cultivated an intellectual image and wrote for socialist periodicals such as L’Avvenire del Lavoratore (The Worker’s Future). He then served in the Italian army for nearly two years before resuming his career as a teacher and journalist. In his articles and speeches, Mussolini preached violent revolution, praised famed communist thinker Karl Marx and criticized patriotism. In 1912 he became editor of Avanti! (Forward!), the official daily newspaper of Italy’s Socialist Party. But he was expelled from the party two years later over his support for World War I. By 1919 a radically changed Mussolini had founded the fascist movement, which would later become the Fascist Party.

9 Things You May Not Know About Mussolini - History in the Headlines

There is nothing "conservative" about putting on a uniform, strutting around, and demanding that the government control everything. That's leftist all the way baby...

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Nazi Lib Scientist demands global warming deniers be punished"

This is a lie.

The author of the linked article is not advocating that private persons should be subject to ‘punishment’ for denying the fact of climate change, the author is stating that major fossil fuel companies could be subject to criminal charges for conspiring to lie to consumers and investors concerning fossil fuel’s contribution to climate change.

You’re either a reprehensible liar or too stupid to comprehend the linked article; where the former is likely the case.

 

[Wyatt earp]

"Nazi Lib Scientist demands global warming deniers be punished"

This is a lie.

The author of the linked article is not advocating that private persons should be subject to ‘punishment’ for denying the fact of climate change, the author is stating that major fossil fuel companies could be subject to criminal charges for conspiring to lie to consumers and investors concerning fossil fuel’s contribution to climate change.

You’re either a reprehensible liar or too stupid to comprehend the linked article; where the former is likely the case.

^^^^^^^^

This coming from a guy with Aldoph Hitler pajamas and underoos?????



.

 

[Political Junky]

"Nazi Lib"

lol

Another ignorant conservative who doesn’t know that fascism exists on the right side of the political spectrum.

Sorry, but Mussoulini was a socialist before he was a fascist.

2. Mussolini was a socialist before becoming a fascist.
Born to a socialist father, Mussolini was named after leftist Mexican President Benito Juárez. His two middle names, Amilcare and Andrea, came from Italian socialists Amilcare Cipriani and Andrea Costa. Early in Mussolini’s life, for instance, those names seemed appropriate. While living in Switzerland from 1902 to 1904, he cultivated an intellectual image and wrote for socialist periodicals such as L’Avvenire del Lavoratore (The Worker’s Future). He then served in the Italian army for nearly two years before resuming his career as a teacher and journalist. In his articles and speeches, Mussolini preached violent revolution, praised famed communist thinker Karl Marx and criticized patriotism. In 1912 he became editor of Avanti! (Forward!), the official daily newspaper of Italy’s Socialist Party. But he was expelled from the party two years later over his support for World War I. By 1919 a radically changed Mussolini had founded the fascist movement, which would later become the Fascist Party.

9 Things You May Not Know About Mussolini - History in the Headlines

There is nothing "conservative" about putting on a uniform, strutting around, and demanding that the government control everything. That's leftist all the way baby...

Yes, he went from Left to Right.

 

[LoneLaugher]

What does the OP think of the comments that are linked to the article she posted?

 

[AvgGuyIA]

"Nazi Lib"

lol

Another ignorant conservative who doesn’t know that fascism exists on the right side of the political spectrum.

Sorry, but Mussoulini was a socialist before he was a fascist.

2. Mussolini was a socialist before becoming a fascist.
Born to a socialist father, Mussolini was named after leftist Mexican President Benito Juárez. His two middle names, Amilcare and Andrea, came from Italian socialists Amilcare Cipriani and Andrea Costa. Early in Mussolini’s life, for instance, those names seemed appropriate. While living in Switzerland from 1902 to 1904, he cultivated an intellectual image and wrote for socialist periodicals such as L’Avvenire del Lavoratore (The Worker’s Future). He then served in the Italian army for nearly two years before resuming his career as a teacher and journalist. In his articles and speeches, Mussolini preached violent revolution, praised famed communist thinker Karl Marx and criticized patriotism. In 1912 he became editor of Avanti! (Forward!), the official daily newspaper of Italy’s Socialist Party. But he was expelled from the party two years later over his support for World War I. By 1919 a radically changed Mussolini had founded the fascist movement, which would later become the Fascist Party.

9 Things You May Not Know About Mussolini - History in the Headlines

There is nothing "conservative" about putting on a uniform, strutting around, and demanding that the government control everything. That's leftist all the way baby...

Yes, he went from Left to Right.

He went from left to far Left, dummy. Conservatives want less government. Fascist want more, just like Democrats, socialists and communists.

 

[Blackrook]

• Most of us recognize the value of science in dealing with complex problems that pose significant risks to public health and well-being.Thus we expect reputable science to be reported and used in helping us make difficult policy choices, such as what to do about climate change.Scientific findings and associated uncertainties should be scrutinized carefully and debated vigorously within the scientific community and among the public.However, denying the best scientific evidence we have is neither smart nor safe. It could lead to greater societal harm than if we had taken sensible action when reliable knowledge was first available.Dismissal of well-established climate science has parallels to decades of debate over tobacco use and its effects on health. Tobacco companies long denied any causal relation between smoking and disease even when their own studies showed the opposite to be true.Similarly, some fossil fuel companies for decades publicly rejected established climate science and the role of burning fossil fuels in anthropogenic climate change while their internal studies confirmed both.The tobacco companies eventually paid a steep price for their actions. In 1999, the Justice Department filed a civil lawsuit against them, charging that they "engaged in and executed" a "massive 50-year scheme to defraud the public, including consumers of cigarettes," in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO.Specifically, the lawsuit said the companies engaged in a conspiracy to launch a public relations campaign challenging scientific evidence that demonstrated the health risks of smoking at the same time that their own research confirmed smoking's danger.The tobacco companies lost the suit. The federal courts found them in violation of RICO, in particular for fraudulently covering up scientific evidence of health risks linked to smoking. The courts rejected the tobacco companies' argument that their statements were protected under the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech.Is there a parallel to current controversies over climate change science? Some members of Congress say there is. Members of Congress have asked the Justice Department to pursue charges under RICO against major fossil fuel companies for knowingly deceiving the public — and investors — about the dangers of climate change when their own studies showed the reality of the threat. Under questioning by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., Attorney General Loretta Lynch revealed she has referred the matter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for study.In addition, in late March, more than a dozen state attorneys general meeting in New York also said they would "aggressively" investigate whether fossil fuel companies misled the public and investors about the risks of climate change. Several state attorneys general already have initiated such investigations under consumer and investor protection laws. Some ask whether such inquiries should be limited to fossil fuel companies. What about extending the liability, they say, to certain think tanks and advocacy groups?

Some such groups have been heavily funded by the fossil fuel industry and have misrepresented climate change risks to the public. That might be a tougher sell, given rights to free speech, but it could be given consideration.

The Obama administration and other nations finally are acting on climate change. But their responses are modest in light of the challenges faced, and they will need to be supplemented over time with more effective initiatives. Will the public support tougher policies?Recent polls show that worry about climate change is now at an eight-year high. However, climate change remains a low salience issue, and the public is poorly informed about its causes and impacts.There also is no sense of urgency about taking action, including the widely endorsed setting of a price on carbon.Our current limited policies reflect a history of science denial by fossil fuel companies and others that have sown confusion and weakened public support for doing more. Those who intentionally misled the public about climate change should be held accountable.

I can't fix the damn formatting, but as you can see, the author's intent to attack the First Amendment directly is crystal clear. He is a liberal, and he is also an anti-free speech Nazi. That is why I accurately called him a "lib Nazi."

 

[Blackrook]

Attacking free speech based on RICO just proves I was right when I opposed RICO when it was first enacted.

RICO criminalized belonging to a "corrupt organization" -- guess who decides what's "corrupt"?

The government decides what's "corrupt"?

Do you still believe you have a right to freely organize politically under the First Amendment?

Yes, so long as the government doesn't believe you are "corrupt."

 

[Intolerant]

I am with you. It's coming to a civil war. People will be push just so far then it becomes survival of the fittest.

That reminds me. I need to order a few more cases of 308.