Nazis Are Not Socialists

National Socialist Party of Germany (NAZI), quotes about Nazi:
We ask that government undertake the obligation above all of providing citizens with adequate opportunity for employment and earning a living. The activities of the individual must not be allowed to clash with the interests of the community, but must take place within the confines and be for the good of all. Therefore, we demand: ... an end to the power of financial interest. We demand profit sharing in big business. We demand a broad extension of care for the aged. We demand ... the greatest possible consideration of small business in the purchases of the national, state, and municipal governments. In order to make possible to every capable and industrious [citizen] the attainment of higher education and thus the achievement of a post of leadership, the government must provide an all-around enlargement of our system of public education.... We demand the education at government expense of gifted children of poor parents.... The government must undertake the improvement of public health -- by protecting mother and child, by prohibiting child labor -- by the greatest possible support for all groups concerned with the physical education of youth. [W]e combat the ... materialistic spirit within and without us, and are convinced that a permanent recovery of our people can only proceed from within on the foundation of The Common Good Before the Individual Good.

Leave it to Socialists to disavow those who call themselves socialists and implement socialist policies.

Hilarious!
 
its quote from Mussolini dipshit


If a sub human can parrot it, it must be true, because said sub human is the birdbrain doing the parroting, and cannot admit being wrong since he doesn't understand jack, can't think, and hence is reduced as a lifeform to mindlessly repeating...
so hitler calling himself an anti marxist anti liberal national socialist a word he made up, is proof he's a socialist, but the father of fascism defining fascism as corporatism doesn't make sense to you?.... you can't be this stupid

Your thinking is too rigid. Words like Communism, Fascism, Socialism, Progressivism, Liberal, and Conservative.... these are all just labels fed to the "people" to keep them all divided, all hating each other.
they're definitions of political ideologies?... who is dividing us anyway?.... dont say the jews

The Banksters and The Military Industrial Complex.
 
its quote from Mussolini dipshit


If a sub human can parrot it, it must be true, because said sub human is the birdbrain doing the parroting, and cannot admit being wrong since he doesn't understand jack, can't think, and hence is reduced as a lifeform to mindlessly repeating...
so hitler calling himself an anti marxist anti liberal national socialist a word he made up, is proof he's a socialist, but the father of fascism defining fascism as corporatism doesn't make sense to you?.... you can't be this stupid

Your thinking is too rigid. Words like Communism, Fascism, Socialism, Progressivism, Liberal, and Conservative.... these are all just labels fed to the "people" to keep them all divided, all hating each other.
they're definitions of political ideologies?... who is dividing us anyway?.... dont say the jews

why not? both the FAR LEFT and the FAR RIGHT ----agree on that issue
why not what? why not blame the jews?
 
Nazis Are Not Socialists

No, they couldn't be. The fact that Nazi is an shorthand form of "Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei," which translates to "National-Socialist German Workers' Party" in English, the very word "socialist" being part of the term, is surely an indication that Nazis were and are not socialists.

Once again --- see the examples of the DPRK, GDR, Grape Nuts, 10.000 Maniacs etc, none of which are/were "democratic", contained neither grapes nor nuts, and do not place ten thousand people on the stage. The fact that some body calls itself "socialist" -- or "democratic", or "brothers" --- doesn't make them so. I can call myself a tangerine; the language allows me to make the claim. But the laws of biology don't allow me to BE a tangerine.

"Nazi", for its part, has become a separate term in itself, having nothing to do with the original German derivation, nor are we conversing IN German anyway. And even if we were, Nazi is a shortened form of National, not a shortened form of "socialist".

I'm sorry, but I don't know what to make of your comments. I don't because your first paragraph makes the point that terms have meaning that has nothing to do with whether one applies or accepts that meaning.
The fact that some body calls itself "socialist" -- or "democratic", or "brothers" --- doesn't make them so.

Then, in the next paragraph, you contradict that very idea.
even if we were, Nazi is a shortened form of National, not a shortened form of "socialist".
Now, I don't speak German, so maybe that's why it doesn't make sense to me that "Nazi" be a short form of "National" and not a short form of "Nationalsozialistische," which seems, even as non-speaker of German, to quite clearly indicate both "national" and "socialist." It seems to me the "na" is the shorthand for "national" and the "zi" is the shorthand for socialist. "Nationalsozialistische" doesn't really lose anything in the translation to English; there's are reason "National-Socialist" is hyphenated, that is to say, meaning is connected to the fact that it is. (See also/instead: What Is a Compound Adjective? Definition & Examples) Essentially, the meaing is that "National-Socialist" is the same thing in English as "Nationalsozialistische" in German, and every other way of combining those two words is not.

(Can I tell when someone does indeed mean "National-Socialist," rather than some other combination of that term, and thus has mispunctuated their writing? Only when they write enough that the context of what they mean becomes clear, no matter the words they write or punctuation they use or don't. When they don't write enough, their meaning is ambiguous. Make of that what you will, but the fact is that I've never learned how to read minds, but I have learned how to read what folks write.)

Pogo likes to pretend she is the board intellectual.

Who the fuck are you even talking about being a "board intellectual?
Rosie? :dunno:

Honey you think YOU are. You're just a wannabe.
 
BULLSHIT.

It was "OWNED" when OBAMA handed its CHOSEN owners a BILLION DOLLAR "loan" from the TAXPAYER that then did what Dems do....

made that taxpayer cash VANISH


In a truly free economy, the MERIT of the corporation is more important than whether or not it is part of the political corruption doling out the cash.

The Dems do not care about the lost billion in SOLYNDRA. The Dems want MORE...



SOLYNDRA is the perfect example of FASCIST ECONOMIC POLICY

1. government funded
2. government CHOSEN to "succeed"
3. no consequence when the money vanishes and the "corporation" fails
At least we have apparently cleared up the misconception that it is socialist.
 
National Socialist Party of Germany (NAZI), quotes about Nazi:
We ask that government undertake the obligation above all of providing citizens with adequate opportunity for employment and earning a living. The activities of the individual must not be allowed to clash with the interests of the community, but must take place within the confines and be for the good of all. Therefore, we demand: ... an end to the power of financial interest. We demand profit sharing in big business. We demand a broad extension of care for the aged. We demand ... the greatest possible consideration of small business in the purchases of the national, state, and municipal governments. In order to make possible to every capable and industrious [citizen] the attainment of higher education and thus the achievement of a post of leadership, the government must provide an all-around enlargement of our system of public education.... We demand the education at government expense of gifted children of poor parents.... The government must undertake the improvement of public health -- by protecting mother and child, by prohibiting child labor -- by the greatest possible support for all groups concerned with the physical education of youth. [W]e combat the ... materialistic spirit within and without us, and are convinced that a permanent recovery of our people can only proceed from within on the foundation of The Common Good Before the Individual Good.

Leave it to Socialists to disavow those who call themselves socialists and implement socialist policies.

Hilarious!


"Hilarious" might describe a wag who could have learned, just from this thread alone, that Nazis opposed socialists, sought to overthrow them running the country, organized the SA (storm troopers) to intimidate them, and tossed them into Dachau as soon as they came to power.

But of course that would have required actual work.
 
gee what do we call white supremacist Christians who hate socialism, hate people of different religions, and spend all their time spreading antisemitic conspiracy theories?

is it capitalists? no thats not right
 
AdolphHitlerandSocialist_zps33c21341.jpg
 
If a sub human can parrot it, it must be true, because said sub human is the birdbrain doing the parroting, and cannot admit being wrong since he doesn't understand jack, can't think, and hence is reduced as a lifeform to mindlessly repeating...
so hitler calling himself an anti marxist anti liberal national socialist a word he made up, is proof he's a socialist, but the father of fascism defining fascism as corporatism doesn't make sense to you?.... you can't be this stupid

Your thinking is too rigid. Words like Communism, Fascism, Socialism, Progressivism, Liberal, and Conservative.... these are all just labels fed to the "people" to keep them all divided, all hating each other.
they're definitions of political ideologies?... who is dividing us anyway?.... dont say the jews

why not? both the FAR LEFT and the FAR RIGHT ----agree on that issue
why not what? why not blame the jews?

yes---why not blame the jews------jews have virtually universal literacy and WRITE TOO MUCH
 
Explain in great detail how National Socialism "is not socialism."


Every time big government socialism fucks up, and it does nothing but, the die hard left wing liar will claim those in charge fucked up and socialism really works... just with them at the top...
its fascism... otherwise known as corporatism, hitler talked about the evils of socialism all the time the same way republicans do today
That's the way Mussolini described Fascism .. He invented the name.
 




There are many of those types of Hitler speeches.

The LEFT censors them because the LEFT lies and wants to paint Hitler as "right wing" when, in fact, he was 100% left wing socialist big government.
 
so hitler calling himself an anti marxist anti liberal national socialist a word he made up, is proof he's a socialist, but the father of fascism defining fascism as corporatism doesn't make sense to you?.... you can't be this stupid

Your thinking is too rigid. Words like Communism, Fascism, Socialism, Progressivism, Liberal, and Conservative.... these are all just labels fed to the "people" to keep them all divided, all hating each other.
they're definitions of political ideologies?... who is dividing us anyway?.... dont say the jews

why not? both the FAR LEFT and the FAR RIGHT ----agree on that issue
why not what? why not blame the jews?

yes---why not blame the jews------jews have virtually universal literacy and WRITE TOO MUCH
what??? jews write too much? thats a new one
 
BULLSHIT.

It was "OWNED" when OBAMA handed its CHOSEN owners a BILLION DOLLAR "loan" from the TAXPAYER that then did what Dems do....

made that taxpayer cash VANISH


In a truly free economy, the MERIT of the corporation is more important than whether or not it is part of the political corruption doling out the cash.

The Dems do not care about the lost billion in SOLYNDRA. The Dems want MORE...



SOLYNDRA is the perfect example of FASCIST ECONOMIC POLICY

1. government funded
2. government CHOSEN to "succeed"
3. no consequence when the money vanishes and the "corporation" fails
At least we have apparently cleared up the misconception that it is socialist.

Hitler was not a socialist in only one regard


Why nationalize industry when you can nationalize the people?
Adolf Hitler

Hitler knew that the key is control. Owning corporations in name is meaningless so long as you control them, which he did. In addition, instead of half wit bureaucrats running corporations you keep professionals in place who actually know what they are doing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top