Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,353
- 81,079
Watch the video. Listen to when the gun goes off. He definitely attacked the guy long before the first shot.he is dead due to his own reaction. thanks, the video shows him attacking the man with the gun, holding the gun, struggling to remove the gun from the owner's hands. it's in the video. go look.they never detained anyone.
IDIOT. Worse they shot and killed him put him on the pavement for jogging while black.
Dead on the road never able to move again.
If that is not detained I don’t know what is.,
And this is the view on the left side of the truck when the first shot was fired.
View attachment 335915
Do you think the shooter was on the left or to the right?
If to the right he has to be obstructing the jogger’s path with shotgun point it.
That clearly was an attempt to detain when the gun went off within a few feet of the jogger’s intend rout.
When the shot was fired - there is no self defense for the shooter because he fired and possibly wounded his target. That it was clearly initiated the combat.
he is dead due to his own reaction. thanks, the video shows him attacking the man with the gun, holding the gun, struggling to remove the gun from the owner's hands. it's in the video. go look.
What you are calling the jogger’s attack is after a shot was fired which means the jogger was responding to an attack in the only way he could which was to take the gun away from the madman just shot him.
You failed to see the person lunging at the person with the shotgun?
It's not even clear the shotgun was fired before he touched it. Recall, he was hit in the ARM.
If someone lunges at your gun, of course you can defend yourself.
Wow! maybe 2 seconds is a long time to you, but not to most people.
The first shot wasnt fired until he was attacked, RIGHT?
Yes, after he was attacked. It is uncertain if the first shot happened before or after the man touched the shotgun. I will go with after but it's very hard to see from the clip.
I agree, but there is no evidence he was pointing the gun at him either. we know by the video he didn't point it at him as he approached the pick up. I can say because of that, his intentions weren't to point his weapon at the man. never. Why give up an advantage? isn't logical. and it's the logic thing along with the video that clearly clears the two family members.
Arbery was shot in the hand. I would say that's evidence the gun was pointed in his general direction.