New info on the Orlando shooters gun, it WAS A FULL MILITARY AUTO

[depotoo]

Also the sig sauer mPx can be fully auto or semi. Maybe someone got mixed up.

 

[Bassman007]

Also the sig sauer mPx can be fully auto or semi. Maybe someone got mixed up.

I am not familiar with this gun, but I will say that the firing mechanisms of these two models by law are so different that they are not really the same gun, and should by law have different names so as not to confuse the fools who think that they are buying an assault rifle when they are not.

 

[depotoo]

He bought it from St Lucie Gun Sales

If he was sold an illegal gun then the seller should be considered an accessory before the fact.

Something in the article was wrong, and we have no idea where he bought the gun, as this is not released as of yet

Thanks for nothing.

Sorry, the article says two different things, and the FBI will not say anything. Will they ever? We have the right to know, as long as this was not a full auto gun with a serial number that was shipped to say Pakistan, and made it's way back to the USA by some magic. So do we have the right to know what gun did this to Americas children?

The article doesn't say "two different things". It actually makes it very clear that the gun was a civilian, semi-auto version of the Sig rifle, your misunderstanding of the term "mil spec" notwithstanding.

We do know what gun he used and where he bought the gun.

Who is we? Because the dopey media reported that he used an AR-15.

Now where did he buy the gun, since you know.......

 

[depotoo]

Or reporters...

Also the sig sauer mPx can be fully auto or semi. Maybe someone got mixed up.

I am not familiar with this gun, but I will say that the firing mechanisms of these two models by law are so different that they are not really the same gun, and should by law have different names so as not to confuse the fools who think that they are buying an assault rifle when they are not.

 

[Bassman007]

He bought it from St Lucie Gun Sales

Something in the article was wrong, and we have no idea where he bought the gun, as this is not released as of yet

Thanks for nothing.

Sorry, the article says two different things, and the FBI will not say anything. Will they ever? We have the right to know, as long as this was not a full auto gun with a serial number that was shipped to say Pakistan, and made it's way back to the USA by some magic. So do we have the right to know what gun did this to Americas children?

The article doesn't say "two different things". It actually makes it very clear that the gun was a civilian, semi-auto version of the Sig rifle, your misunderstanding of the term "mil spec" notwithstanding.

We do know what gun he used and where he bought the gun.

Who is we? Because the dopey media reported that he used an AR-15.

Now where did he buy the gun, since you know.......

Ok, why did the FBI allow this? Judge Jeanine: Terrorists have no Second Amendment rights

 

[depotoo]

WATCH: Gun Shop Owner Who Sold Firearms to Orlando Killer Explains Florida Gun Laws To Media

He bought it from St Lucie Gun Sales

Thanks for nothing.

Sorry, the article says two different things, and the FBI will not say anything. Will they ever? We have the right to know, as long as this was not a full auto gun with a serial number that was shipped to say Pakistan, and made it's way back to the USA by some magic. So do we have the right to know what gun did this to Americas children?

The article doesn't say "two different things". It actually makes it very clear that the gun was a civilian, semi-auto version of the Sig rifle, your misunderstanding of the term "mil spec" notwithstanding.

We do know what gun he used and where he bought the gun.

Who is we? Because the dopey media reported that he used an AR-15.

Now where did he buy the gun, since you know.......

Ok, why did the FBI allow this? Judge Jeanine: Terrorists have no Second Amendment rights

 

[depotoo]

Bassman, who knows? He was interviewed 3 times and they said there was nothing there and closed the file each time.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

You're first mistake was putting your trust in a liberal article....your second is not doing a search to find out if he is indeed right...which he's not.
And third....get on the internet,do a search for MCX for sale....
SIG SAUER MCX 5.56 16" FOLDING STOCK : Semi Auto Rifles at GunBroker.com

Research rest with the FBI detailing the information of the attack, which has not happened as of yet

What exactly does that have to do with milspec?

Milspec guns are available to military and law enforcement, the article clearly says this is the situation of this gun. So are there two versions, or is there one. That said a civilian version of this gun can not be mil spec, or even be converted to mil spec by any means, so their is an error, probably by the manufacturer lying to customers of the civilian version. Again if you know the law, any military gun or gun that can be converted to mil spec by any means is not consumer legal for sale. The military spec in question being the firing mode

You apparently have no idea what milspec means.

Mil spec as it applies to an assault rifle pertains to the firing system. The civilian version has to be so different that it can not be converted to the mil spec standard used by law enforcement.

The mil spec for water filtration is not really applicable, is it.

You’re truly the typical lying rightwing idiot.

Your thread fails as a consequence of your stupidity, yet you continue to post, oblivious as to how ridiculous you are.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Stupid Americans react to the firearm used instead of the policies which motivated the perpetrator.

No. stupid Americans believe there were 'policies' that ‘motivated’ the perpetrator.

The perpetrator was motivated by an unwarranted hatred of gay Americans; he alone is responsible for his actions.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

He bought it from St Lucie Gun Sales

Thanks for nothing.

Sorry, the article says two different things, and the FBI will not say anything. Will they ever? We have the right to know, as long as this was not a full auto gun with a serial number that was shipped to say Pakistan, and made it's way back to the USA by some magic. So do we have the right to know what gun did this to Americas children?

The article doesn't say "two different things". It actually makes it very clear that the gun was a civilian, semi-auto version of the Sig rifle, your misunderstanding of the term "mil spec" notwithstanding.

We do know what gun he used and where he bought the gun.

Who is we? Because the dopey media reported that he used an AR-15.

Now where did he buy the gun, since you know.......

Ok, why did the FBI allow this? Judge Jeanine: Terrorists have no Second Amendment rights

For a "Judge", Ms. Pirro doesn't seem to quite understand how the Constitution works...

 

[Bassman007]

WATCH: Gun Shop Owner Who Sold Firearms to Orlando Killer Explains Florida Gun Laws To Media

He bought it from St Lucie Gun Sales

Sorry, the article says two different things, and the FBI will not say anything. Will they ever? We have the right to know, as long as this was not a full auto gun with a serial number that was shipped to say Pakistan, and made it's way back to the USA by some magic. So do we have the right to know what gun did this to Americas children?

The article doesn't say "two different things". It actually makes it very clear that the gun was a civilian, semi-auto version of the Sig rifle, your misunderstanding of the term "mil spec" notwithstanding.

We do know what gun he used and where he bought the gun.

Who is we? Because the dopey media reported that he used an AR-15.

Now where did he buy the gun, since you know.......

Ok, why did the FBI allow this? Judge Jeanine: Terrorists have no Second Amendment rights

Florida gun laws were not the problem, the FBI should have stopped this, and they did nothing, sad but true

 

[Bassman007]

He bought it from St Lucie Gun Sales

Sorry, the article says two different things, and the FBI will not say anything. Will they ever? We have the right to know, as long as this was not a full auto gun with a serial number that was shipped to say Pakistan, and made it's way back to the USA by some magic. So do we have the right to know what gun did this to Americas children?

The article doesn't say "two different things". It actually makes it very clear that the gun was a civilian, semi-auto version of the Sig rifle, your misunderstanding of the term "mil spec" notwithstanding.

We do know what gun he used and where he bought the gun.

Who is we? Because the dopey media reported that he used an AR-15.

Now where did he buy the gun, since you know.......

Ok, why did the FBI allow this? Judge Jeanine: Terrorists have no Second Amendment rights

For a "Judge", Ms. Pirro doesn't seem to quite understand how the Constitution works...

Perhaps you can explain how the Constitution works now? We are so eager to learn.....

 

[theDoctorisIn]

He bought it from St Lucie Gun Sales

The article doesn't say "two different things". It actually makes it very clear that the gun was a civilian, semi-auto version of the Sig rifle, your misunderstanding of the term "mil spec" notwithstanding.

We do know what gun he used and where he bought the gun.

Who is we? Because the dopey media reported that he used an AR-15.

Now where did he buy the gun, since you know.......

Ok, why did the FBI allow this? Judge Jeanine: Terrorists have no Second Amendment rights

For a "Judge", Ms. Pirro doesn't seem to quite understand how the Constitution works...

Perhaps you can explain how the Constitution works now? We are so eager to learn.....

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

 

[Bassman007]

He bought it from St Lucie Gun Sales

Who is we? Because the dopey media reported that he used an AR-15.

Now where did he buy the gun, since you know.......

Ok, why did the FBI allow this? Judge Jeanine: Terrorists have no Second Amendment rights

For a "Judge", Ms. Pirro doesn't seem to quite understand how the Constitution works...

Perhaps you can explain how the Constitution works now? We are so eager to learn.....

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Copy and paste is sure amazing, easy but no less amazing

(a)
Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, goes upon, enters, flies over, or otherwise obtains information concerning any vessel, aircraft, work of defense, navy yard, naval station, submarine base, fueling station, fort, battery, torpedo station, dockyard, canal, railroad, arsenal, camp, factory, mine, telegraph, telephone, wireless, or signal station, building, office, research laboratory or station or other place connected with the national defense owned or constructed, or in progress of construction by the United States or under the control of the United States, or of any of its officers, departments, or agencies, or within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, or any place in which any vessel, aircraft, arms, munitions, or other materials or instruments for use in time of war are being made, prepared, repaired, stored, or are the subject of research or development, under any contract or agreement with the United States, or any department or agency thereof, or with any person on behalf of the United States, or otherwise on behalf of the United States, or any prohibited place so designated by the President by proclamation in time of war or in case of national emergency in which anything for the use of the Army, Navy, or Air Force is being prepared or constructed or stored, information as to which prohibited place the President has determined would be prejudicial to the national defense; or
(b)
Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, and with like intent or reason to believe, copies, takes, makes, or obtains, or attempts to copy, take, make, or obtain, any sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, document, writing, or note of anything connected with the national defense; or
(c)
Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, receives or obtains or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain from any person, or from any source whatever, any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note, of anything connected with the national defense, knowing or having reason to believe, at the time he receives or obtains, or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain it, that it has been or will be obtained, taken, made, or disposed of by any person contrary to the provisions of this chapter; or
(d)
Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(e)
Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(g)
If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Th

Rifle Used in Orlando Shooting Was Designed for Military Use The gun was a Sig Sauer MCX, a new model built from the ground for FULL AUTO MILITARY USE. So every poster here claiming that the gun was a semi auto AR-15 is an uninformed fool.

This is new info that was previously not available, so now we need to find out how this gun was acquired, and if he bought it legally, why did the FBI allow this. The gun came with 30 round clips, these guns are banned to all but the military or law enforcement or terrorist in the USA. So perhaps he was given his gun by ISIS, we just do not know yet.

Somebody really screwed up here........................

A if you think this is funny, u r really sick

You lying dumbass. Why do you post such blatant lies? Are you fucking sick - or just really stupid?

If the weapon, that was not an AR-15 and was a Sig MCX was not a full auto, then it was not a military spec gun, was it?

Until the FBI tells us better, we really do not know exactly what gun he had or where he got it, do we?

Again all military spec guns are full auto............so if it was a military spec gun, it was a full auto, if it was a semi auto, it was not a military spec gun.

Why is the FBI keeping this a secret? allowing fools here to say the gun was actually an AR-15?

The current standard issue M-16 is not full auto neither is the M-4.

 

[Bassman007]

Th

Rifle Used in Orlando Shooting Was Designed for Military Use The gun was a Sig Sauer MCX, a new model built from the ground for FULL AUTO MILITARY USE. So every poster here claiming that the gun was a semi auto AR-15 is an uninformed fool.

This is new info that was previously not available, so now we need to find out how this gun was acquired, and if he bought it legally, why did the FBI allow this. The gun came with 30 round clips, these guns are banned to all but the military or law enforcement or terrorist in the USA. So perhaps he was given his gun by ISIS, we just do not know yet.

Somebody really screwed up here........................

A if you think this is funny, u r really sick

You lying dumbass. Why do you post such blatant lies? Are you fucking sick - or just really stupid?

If the weapon, that was not an AR-15 and was a Sig MCX was not a full auto, then it was not a military spec gun, was it?

Until the FBI tells us better, we really do not know exactly what gun he had or where he got it, do we?

Again all military spec guns are full auto............so if it was a military spec gun, it was a full auto, if it was a semi auto, it was not a military spec gun.

Why is the FBI keeping this a secret? allowing fools here to say the gun was actually an AR-15?

The current standard issue M-16 is not full auto neither is the M-4.

Th

Rifle Used in Orlando Shooting Was Designed for Military Use The gun was a Sig Sauer MCX, a new model built from the ground for FULL AUTO MILITARY USE. So every poster here claiming that the gun was a semi auto AR-15 is an uninformed fool.

This is new info that was previously not available, so now we need to find out how this gun was acquired, and if he bought it legally, why did the FBI allow this. The gun came with 30 round clips, these guns are banned to all but the military or law enforcement or terrorist in the USA. So perhaps he was given his gun by ISIS, we just do not know yet.

Somebody really screwed up here........................

A if you think this is funny, u r really sick

You lying dumbass. Why do you post such blatant lies? Are you fucking sick - or just really stupid?

If the weapon, that was not an AR-15 and was a Sig MCX was not a full auto, then it was not a military spec gun, was it?

Until the FBI tells us better, we really do not know exactly what gun he had or where he got it, do we?

Again all military spec guns are full auto............so if it was a military spec gun, it was a full auto, if it was a semi auto, it was not a military spec gun.

Why is the FBI keeping this a secret? allowing fools here to say the gun was actually an AR-15?

The current standard issue M-16 is not full auto neither is the M-4.

No matter, if they are burst or can be converted to full auto, they can never be sold as civilian guns even if they are semi auto. You have to look at both sides of the picture, not just one

 

[theDoctorisIn]

He bought it from St Lucie Gun Sales

Ok, why did the FBI allow this? Judge Jeanine: Terrorists have no Second Amendment rights

For a "Judge", Ms. Pirro doesn't seem to quite understand how the Constitution works...

Perhaps you can explain how the Constitution works now? We are so eager to learn.....

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Copy and paste is sure amazing, easy but no less amazing

(a)
Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, goes upon, enters, flies over, or otherwise obtains information concerning any vessel, aircraft, work of defense, navy yard, naval station, submarine base, fueling station, fort, battery, torpedo station, dockyard, canal, railroad, arsenal, camp, factory, mine, telegraph, telephone, wireless, or signal station, building, office, research laboratory or station or other place connected with the national defense owned or constructed, or in progress of construction by the United States or under the control of the United States, or of any of its officers, departments, or agencies, or within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, or any place in which any vessel, aircraft, arms, munitions, or other materials or instruments for use in time of war are being made, prepared, repaired, stored, or are the subject of research or development, under any contract or agreement with the United States, or any department or agency thereof, or with any person on behalf of the United States, or otherwise on behalf of the United States, or any prohibited place so designated by the President by proclamation in time of war or in case of national emergency in which anything for the use of the Army, Navy, or Air Force is being prepared or constructed or stored, information as to which prohibited place the President has determined would be prejudicial to the national defense; or
(b)
Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, and with like intent or reason to believe, copies, takes, makes, or obtains, or attempts to copy, take, make, or obtain, any sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, document, writing, or note of anything connected with the national defense; or
(c)
Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, receives or obtains or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain from any person, or from any source whatever, any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note, of anything connected with the national defense, knowing or having reason to believe, at the time he receives or obtains, or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain it, that it has been or will be obtained, taken, made, or disposed of by any person contrary to the provisions of this chapter; or
(d)
Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(e)
Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(g)
If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy.

Now you're just trolling your own thread.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Th

Rifle Used in Orlando Shooting Was Designed for Military Use The gun was a Sig Sauer MCX, a new model built from the ground for FULL AUTO MILITARY USE. So every poster here claiming that the gun was a semi auto AR-15 is an uninformed fool.

This is new info that was previously not available, so now we need to find out how this gun was acquired, and if he bought it legally, why did the FBI allow this. The gun came with 30 round clips, these guns are banned to all but the military or law enforcement or terrorist in the USA. So perhaps he was given his gun by ISIS, we just do not know yet.

Somebody really screwed up here........................

A if you think this is funny, u r really sick

You lying dumbass. Why do you post such blatant lies? Are you fucking sick - or just really stupid?

If the weapon, that was not an AR-15 and was a Sig MCX was not a full auto, then it was not a military spec gun, was it?

Until the FBI tells us better, we really do not know exactly what gun he had or where he got it, do we?

Again all military spec guns are full auto............so if it was a military spec gun, it was a full auto, if it was a semi auto, it was not a military spec gun.

Why is the FBI keeping this a secret? allowing fools here to say the gun was actually an AR-15?

The current standard issue M-16 is not full auto neither is the M-4.

Th

Rifle Used in Orlando Shooting Was Designed for Military Use The gun was a Sig Sauer MCX, a new model built from the ground for FULL AUTO MILITARY USE. So every poster here claiming that the gun was a semi auto AR-15 is an uninformed fool.

This is new info that was previously not available, so now we need to find out how this gun was acquired, and if he bought it legally, why did the FBI allow this. The gun came with 30 round clips, these guns are banned to all but the military or law enforcement or terrorist in the USA. So perhaps he was given his gun by ISIS, we just do not know yet.

Somebody really screwed up here........................

A if you think this is funny, u r really sick

You lying dumbass. Why do you post such blatant lies? Are you fucking sick - or just really stupid?

If the weapon, that was not an AR-15 and was a Sig MCX was not a full auto, then it was not a military spec gun, was it?

Until the FBI tells us better, we really do not know exactly what gun he had or where he got it, do we?

Again all military spec guns are full auto............so if it was a military spec gun, it was a full auto, if it was a semi auto, it was not a military spec gun.

Why is the FBI keeping this a secret? allowing fools here to say the gun was actually an AR-15?

The current standard issue M-16 is not full auto neither is the M-4.

No matter, if they are burst or can be converted to full auto, they can never be sold as civilian guns even if they are semi auto. You have to look at both sides of the picture, not just one

Civilians can buy full automatic weapons but the red tape and cost doesn't make it easy.

 

[Contumacious]

Th

Rifle Used in Orlando Shooting Was Designed for Military Use The gun was a Sig Sauer MCX, a new model built from the ground for FULL AUTO MILITARY USE. So every poster here claiming that the gun was a semi auto AR-15 is an uninformed fool.

This is new info that was previously not available, so now we need to find out how this gun was acquired, and if he bought it legally, why did the FBI allow this. The gun came with 30 round clips, these guns are banned to all but the military or law enforcement or terrorist in the USA. So perhaps he was given his gun by ISIS, we just do not know yet.

Somebody really screwed up here........................

A if you think this is funny, u r really sick

You lying dumbass. Why do you post such blatant lies? Are you fucking sick - or just really stupid?

If the weapon, that was not an AR-15 and was a Sig MCX was not a full auto, then it was not a military spec gun, was it?

Until the FBI tells us better, we really do not know exactly what gun he had or where he got it, do we?

Again all military spec guns are full auto............so if it was a military spec gun, it was a full auto, if it was a semi auto, it was not a military spec gun.

Why is the FBI keeping this a secret? allowing fools here to say the gun was actually an AR-15?

The current standard issue M-16 is not full auto neither is the M-4.

Th

Rifle Used in Orlando Shooting Was Designed for Military Use The gun was a Sig Sauer MCX, a new model built from the ground for FULL AUTO MILITARY USE. So every poster here claiming that the gun was a semi auto AR-15 is an uninformed fool.

This is new info that was previously not available, so now we need to find out how this gun was acquired, and if he bought it legally, why did the FBI allow this. The gun came with 30 round clips, these guns are banned to all but the military or law enforcement or terrorist in the USA. So perhaps he was given his gun by ISIS, we just do not know yet.

Somebody really screwed up here........................

A if you think this is funny, u r really sick

You lying dumbass. Why do you post such blatant lies? Are you fucking sick - or just really stupid?

If the weapon, that was not an AR-15 and was a Sig MCX was not a full auto, then it was not a military spec gun, was it?

Until the FBI tells us better, we really do not know exactly what gun he had or where he got it, do we?

Again all military spec guns are full auto............so if it was a military spec gun, it was a full auto, if it was a semi auto, it was not a military spec gun.

Why is the FBI keeping this a secret? allowing fools here to say the gun was actually an AR-15?

The current standard issue M-16 is not full auto neither is the M-4.

No matter, if they are burst or can be converted to full auto, they can never be sold as civilian guns even if they are semi auto. You have to look at both sides of the picture, not just one

Civilians can buy full automatic weapons but the red tape and cost doesn't make it easy.

That's even if you have a BATF license.

Ask the Davidians.

.