Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
which banks were defrauded out of the most money....how much should they get for the severe damages they lost
right....it is only worth 3 mil i feel......he overvalued it especially when an empty lot is going for 200 mil...mara logo....pffftttttttYou meant under valued
Don't you mean the judge under valued Mar a logo?which banks were defrauded out of the most money....how much should they get for the severe damages they lost
maralogo was overvalued at 18 mil by a judge when an empty lot is going for 200 mil
That amount was based on the amount of fraud
Our laws were the victim.
Considering the feds had nothing to do with this I see why it is not relevant.Like the Obiden Banana Administration cares about Amendments....stinking Amendments....
They don't give a shit.
Excessive fineyeah, I don't see how it violates 8th amendment rights.
I know what it says. Who's to say?Excessive fine
300 million dollar find for a victimless civil suit brought on by the state is excessiveI know what it says. Who's to say?
And absurd ruling which cannot stand.That amount was based on the amount of fraud documented in the trial.
It doesn't violate anything.
DERP
It happened to be victimless.300 million dollar find for a victimless civil suit brought in by the state is excessive
What are you talking about? Trump got the money and paid it back in interest. This case was not based on future crimes but the one trump was charged withIt happened to be victimless.
But it was undetermined if it would harm or not harm when he got the money. That's what makes it a crime. It's irresponsible. It happened to be victimless someone else could have done it and not had it been victimless. That's why it's a crime.
Who does the money go to?Just like Alex Jones and OJ Simpson in their civil cases, I don't see Trump ever actually paying but an extremely tiny fraction of the money awarded anyway.
Right but since it wasn't known if he'd be able to return the money that's where it was a crime.What are you talking about? Trump got the money and paid it back in interest. This case was not based on future crimes but the one trump was charged with
He returned the money before any civil suit. What are you talking about? Besides it's up to the bank to file charges not the state of new YorkRight but since it wasn't known if he'd be able to return the money that's where it was a crime.
I don't know that that doesn't mean it's a crime.He returned the money before any civil suit. What are you talking about? Besides it's up to the bank to file charges not the state of new York
None of those were broken but if they were someone should file charges.Oh WHATTA HOWL. Now the party that has made a mockery of laws and justice for the past DECADE thinks our laws were the victim!
That takes the cake!
WHAT ABOUT THOSE LAWS???
- What about the law of being allowed a defense Trump was denied?
- What about the law that Trump was entitled to a trial by a jury of his peers?
- What about the law that Trump's tax records are private between him and the IRS?
- What about the law that the punishment should fit the crime?
- What about the law guaranteeing due process and a speedy trial? (both denied to the DC prisoners of J6).
