eots
no fly list
take an axe to that bush and throw it on the compost with the rest of the vegetation
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It doesn't matter...he's a registered Republican and therefore a victim."Obama arrived at the airport Wednesday afternoon before going to Fairleigh Dickinson Univeristy to campaign for Gov. Jon Corzine. Superior Court Judge Amilkar Velez-Lopez said Brek could have realistically carried out the threats since he worked in close proximity to where the president would be and had the weapons to carry it out.
...
"Brek is charged with third-degree making terroristic threats, third degree receiving stolen property and fourth-degree possession of prohibited devices, the hollow point bullets.
...
"The Essex County Prosecutors Office will handle the case. Prosecutor Paula Dow said in a press conference following the arraignment that Brek told another airport employee he had cut a hole in the fence to be able to shoot the president and simulated holding a rifle in the direction of where the president would be."
Newark airport security worker pleads not guilty to threatening Obama | New Jersey Real-Time News - - NJ.com
It is really pretty simple you cannot imply anything that could be considered a threat of any kind when you work in a area where security of the president is being checked. Even if it is bullshit from prior conversations of talking shit it has to be checked.
See, now that as an explanation, I have no problem with. It's the partisan whine about flags and guns and the NRA, being a republican, blah blah blah that I refuse to take as a credible source to be commented on in anything other than trivial humorous terms.
I have no issue with it being taken seriously, once I have it from a reasonable source. If if that 'source' is the Guardian - a well known left wing newspaper.
My reasons were not your interpretation. YOU made this false premise:Yes, you did. My post was simply a quote from the article, with a flag waving.
Nothing more.
We have seen you do this time and again, making up things and reading more into that which isn't there.
Your MO is quite consistent, I'll give you that.
I see, so you used that quote for absolutely no reason. Got ya!!
"Proof the man is guilty as hell!!"
You own that strawman, not me.
To watch you go apoplectic.My reasons were not your interpretation. YOU made this false premise:I see, so you used that quote for absolutely no reason. Got ya!!
"Proof the man is guilty as hell!!"
You own that strawman, not me.
Then explain your reason for posting that quote.