Newly Elected Congresswoman Who Grew Up in Soviet Ukraine Gives Stark Warning About Socialism

It’s an immigrant’s story, with a message every American should hear.

As a native of Eastern Europe, Victoria Spartz has seen life under socialism up close and knows the damage it can do.

As a newly elected American congresswoman, she’s in a position to stop it from destroying the United States.


Spartz was the underdog winner of a race in Indiana’s 5th Congressional District to replace the retiring Rep. Susan Brooks.

And in an interview Monday morning on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends,” the Ukraine native explained why she got into politics in her adopted country.


BJ's Pull Quote


“I grew up in a socialistic country,” Spartz told co-host Ainsley Earhardt.

“I grew up in socialism. I saw what happens when it runs out of money, and it’s not pretty.”
What a difference a Constitution makes. Our form of socialism, which is Government, is limited by our supreme law of the land. Only right wingers never get it.
Why then is the leftwing always trying to undo our Constitutional protections and remove the limits on governments? Sounds like they're the ones not getting it.
Just right winger parler vous without any sublime truth value?

The left understand our federal Constitution unlike the parler crowd on the right wing.

Our welfare clause is General not common nor limited in any way.

So your contention is that the Gov can anything it wants to if they can justify it as being for "the greater good"?
Our welfare clause is General and must cover any given contingency in a top down manner.

For comparison and contrast, there is no general warfare clause for right wingers to justify anything they want for the "common defense".

I admit that I am coming in late here -
Is it the General Welfare Clause of the Constitution being discussed here?
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
 
She has no clue what she is talking about. Republicans pulled a even bigger con than Trump did on Americans. The Democrats are not pushing socialism.
Holy crap! What a massive amazing lie!

Why should a young person have to go deep into debt for a college education?
Blame the colleges for consistently jacking up their tuition costs. Cars cost something. Houses cost something.
Food costs, etc. Why should college be free?
Well, it will only be free to little Betty who wants her worthless college degree in liberal arts. Everyone else is being asked to make her education cost nothing!

Should peopole die because they can't afford the hospital bills?
NO ONE is denied medical
services due to income. Stop lying.

Helping people is not socialism. It is common decency. For this bitch, if you are muiddle class or poor, her message is "drop dead."
You start this post by lying about democrats and socialism and by the end you make an appeal
for it. You are a pathetic dope.
 
It’s an immigrant’s story, with a message every American should hear.

As a native of Eastern Europe, Victoria Spartz has seen life under socialism up close and knows the damage it can do.

As a newly elected American congresswoman, she’s in a position to stop it from destroying the United States.


Spartz was the underdog winner of a race in Indiana’s 5th Congressional District to replace the retiring Rep. Susan Brooks.

And in an interview Monday morning on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends,” the Ukraine native explained why she got into politics in her adopted country.


BJ's Pull Quote


“I grew up in a socialistic country,” Spartz told co-host Ainsley Earhardt.

“I grew up in socialism. I saw what happens when it runs out of money, and it’s not pretty.”
What a difference a Constitution makes. Our form of socialism, which is Government, is limited by our supreme law of the land. Only right wingers never get it.
Why then is the leftwing always trying to undo our Constitutional protections and remove the limits on governments? Sounds like they're the ones not getting it.
Just right winger parler vous without any sublime truth value?

The left understand our federal Constitution unlike the parler crowd on the right wing.

Our welfare clause is General not common nor limited in any way.

So your contention is that the Gov can anything it wants to if they can justify it as being for "the greater good"?
Our welfare clause is General and must cover any given contingency in a top down manner.

For comparison and contrast, there is no general warfare clause for right wingers to justify anything they want for the "common defense".

So your contention is that the Gov can anything it wants to if they can justify it as being for "the greater good"?

Yes or no?
The end must justify the means.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Of course, so what you are really saying is that in your interpretation the "General Welfare Clause" supersedes the rest of the Constitution and allows the Gov to do whatever they want if the deem it in the "best interest" of the people. Care to source that?
 
It’s an immigrant’s story, with a message every American should hear.

As a native of Eastern Europe, Victoria Spartz has seen life under socialism up close and knows the damage it can do.

As a newly elected American congresswoman, she’s in a position to stop it from destroying the United States.


Spartz was the underdog winner of a race in Indiana’s 5th Congressional District to replace the retiring Rep. Susan Brooks.

And in an interview Monday morning on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends,” the Ukraine native explained why she got into politics in her adopted country.


BJ's Pull Quote


“I grew up in a socialistic country,” Spartz told co-host Ainsley Earhardt.

“I grew up in socialism. I saw what happens when it runs out of money, and it’s not pretty.”
What a difference a Constitution makes. Our form of socialism, which is Government, is limited by our supreme law of the land. Only right wingers never get it.
Why then is the leftwing always trying to undo our Constitutional protections and remove the limits on governments? Sounds like they're the ones not getting it.
Just right winger parler vous without any sublime truth value?

The left understand our federal Constitution unlike the parler crowd on the right wing.

Our welfare clause is General not common nor limited in any way.

So your contention is that the Gov can anything it wants to if they can justify it as being for "the greater good"?
Our welfare clause is General and must cover any given contingency in a top down manner.

For comparison and contrast, there is no general warfare clause for right wingers to justify anything they want for the "common defense".

I admit that I am coming in late here -
Is it the General Welfare Clause of the Constitution being discussed here?
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;


It seems incongruous where you write that there is no justification for Common defense and then post the passage that justifies common defense
 
It’s an immigrant’s story, with a message every American should hear.

As a native of Eastern Europe, Victoria Spartz has seen life under socialism up close and knows the damage it can do.

As a newly elected American congresswoman, she’s in a position to stop it from destroying the United States.


Spartz was the underdog winner of a race in Indiana’s 5th Congressional District to replace the retiring Rep. Susan Brooks.

And in an interview Monday morning on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends,” the Ukraine native explained why she got into politics in her adopted country.


BJ's Pull Quote


“I grew up in a socialistic country,” Spartz told co-host Ainsley Earhardt.

“I grew up in socialism. I saw what happens when it runs out of money, and it’s not pretty.”
What a difference a Constitution makes. Our form of socialism, which is Government, is limited by our supreme law of the land. Only right wingers never get it.
Why then is the leftwing always trying to undo our Constitutional protections and remove the limits on governments? Sounds like they're the ones not getting it.
Just right winger parler vous without any sublime truth value?

The left understand our federal Constitution unlike the parler crowd on the right wing.

Our welfare clause is General not common nor limited in any way.

So your contention is that the Gov can anything it wants to if they can justify it as being for "the greater good"?
Our welfare clause is General and must cover any given contingency in a top down manner.

For comparison and contrast, there is no general warfare clause for right wingers to justify anything they want for the "common defense".

So your contention is that the Gov can anything it wants to if they can justify it as being for "the greater good"?

Yes or no?
The end must justify the means.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Of course, so what you are really saying is that in your interpretation the "General Welfare Clause" supersedes the rest of the Constitution and allows the Gov to do whatever they want if the deem it in the "best interest" of the people. Care to source that?
No. What I am really saying is that our welfare clause is General not common nor limited in any way. And, that any given contingency is covered and should be solved in a top down manner within the constraints of our federal Constitution.

This is the End:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

The Means must be sacrificed to the End not the End to the Means; which is what right wingers prefer.
 
It’s an immigrant’s story, with a message every American should hear.

As a native of Eastern Europe, Victoria Spartz has seen life under socialism up close and knows the damage it can do.

As a newly elected American congresswoman, she’s in a position to stop it from destroying the United States.


Spartz was the underdog winner of a race in Indiana’s 5th Congressional District to replace the retiring Rep. Susan Brooks.

And in an interview Monday morning on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends,” the Ukraine native explained why she got into politics in her adopted country.


BJ's Pull Quote


“I grew up in a socialistic country,” Spartz told co-host Ainsley Earhardt.

“I grew up in socialism. I saw what happens when it runs out of money, and it’s not pretty.”
What a difference a Constitution makes. Our form of socialism, which is Government, is limited by our supreme law of the land. Only right wingers never get it.
Why then is the leftwing always trying to undo our Constitutional protections and remove the limits on governments? Sounds like they're the ones not getting it.
Just right winger parler vous without any sublime truth value?

The left understand our federal Constitution unlike the parler crowd on the right wing.

Our welfare clause is General not common nor limited in any way.

So your contention is that the Gov can anything it wants to if they can justify it as being for "the greater good"?
Our welfare clause is General and must cover any given contingency in a top down manner.

For comparison and contrast, there is no general warfare clause for right wingers to justify anything they want for the "common defense".

I admit that I am coming in late here -
Is it the General Welfare Clause of the Constitution being discussed here?
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;


It seems incongruous where you write that there is no justification for Common defense and then post the passage that justifies common defense
Not really, you merely misunderstood the point I was making.
 
It’s an immigrant’s story, with a message every American should hear.

As a native of Eastern Europe, Victoria Spartz has seen life under socialism up close and knows the damage it can do.

As a newly elected American congresswoman, she’s in a position to stop it from destroying the United States.


Spartz was the underdog winner of a race in Indiana’s 5th Congressional District to replace the retiring Rep. Susan Brooks.

And in an interview Monday morning on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends,” the Ukraine native explained why she got into politics in her adopted country.


BJ's Pull Quote


“I grew up in a socialistic country,” Spartz told co-host Ainsley Earhardt.

“I grew up in socialism. I saw what happens when it runs out of money, and it’s not pretty.”
What a difference a Constitution makes. Our form of socialism, which is Government, is limited by our supreme law of the land. Only right wingers never get it.
Why then is the leftwing always trying to undo our Constitutional protections and remove the limits on governments? Sounds like they're the ones not getting it.
Just right winger parler vous without any sublime truth value?

The left understand our federal Constitution unlike the parler crowd on the right wing.

Our welfare clause is General not common nor limited in any way.

So your contention is that the Gov can anything it wants to if they can justify it as being for "the greater good"?
Our welfare clause is General and must cover any given contingency in a top down manner.

For comparison and contrast, there is no general warfare clause for right wingers to justify anything they want for the "common defense".

I admit that I am coming in late here -
Is it the General Welfare Clause of the Constitution being discussed here?
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;


It seems incongruous where you write that there is no justification for Common defense and then post the passage that justifies common defense
Not really, you merely misunderstood the point I was making.

Which was?
 
It’s an immigrant’s story, with a message every American should hear.

As a native of Eastern Europe, Victoria Spartz has seen life under socialism up close and knows the damage it can do.

As a newly elected American congresswoman, she’s in a position to stop it from destroying the United States.


Spartz was the underdog winner of a race in Indiana’s 5th Congressional District to replace the retiring Rep. Susan Brooks.

And in an interview Monday morning on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends,” the Ukraine native explained why she got into politics in her adopted country.


BJ's Pull Quote


“I grew up in a socialistic country,” Spartz told co-host Ainsley Earhardt.

“I grew up in socialism. I saw what happens when it runs out of money, and it’s not pretty.”
What a difference a Constitution makes. Our form of socialism, which is Government, is limited by our supreme law of the land. Only right wingers never get it.
Why then is the leftwing always trying to undo our Constitutional protections and remove the limits on governments? Sounds like they're the ones not getting it.
Just right winger parler vous without any sublime truth value?

The left understand our federal Constitution unlike the parler crowd on the right wing.

Our welfare clause is General not common nor limited in any way.

So your contention is that the Gov can anything it wants to if they can justify it as being for "the greater good"?
Our welfare clause is General and must cover any given contingency in a top down manner.

For comparison and contrast, there is no general warfare clause for right wingers to justify anything they want for the "common defense".

I admit that I am coming in late here -
Is it the General Welfare Clause of the Constitution being discussed here?
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
Having massive social programs and calling it welfare was quite a coup. Of course with a Fiat Currency that is born to die it is quite easy. The die part of the currency is slow at the moment. But it is happening.
 
It’s an immigrant’s story, with a message every American should hear.

As a native of Eastern Europe, Victoria Spartz has seen life under socialism up close and knows the damage it can do.

As a newly elected American congresswoman, she’s in a position to stop it from destroying the United States.


Spartz was the underdog winner of a race in Indiana’s 5th Congressional District to replace the retiring Rep. Susan Brooks.

And in an interview Monday morning on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends,” the Ukraine native explained why she got into politics in her adopted country.


BJ's Pull Quote


“I grew up in a socialistic country,” Spartz told co-host Ainsley Earhardt.

“I grew up in socialism. I saw what happens when it runs out of money, and it’s not pretty.”
What a difference a Constitution makes. Our form of socialism, which is Government, is limited by our supreme law of the land. Only right wingers never get it.
Why then is the leftwing always trying to undo our Constitutional protections and remove the limits on governments? Sounds like they're the ones not getting it.
Just right winger parler vous without any sublime truth value?

The left understand our federal Constitution unlike the parler crowd on the right wing.

Our welfare clause is General not common nor limited in any way.

So your contention is that the Gov can anything it wants to if they can justify it as being for "the greater good"?
Our welfare clause is General and must cover any given contingency in a top down manner.

For comparison and contrast, there is no general warfare clause for right wingers to justify anything they want for the "common defense".

I admit that I am coming in late here -
Is it the General Welfare Clause of the Constitution being discussed here?
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;


It seems incongruous where you write that there is no justification for Common defense and then post the passage that justifies common defense
Not really, you merely misunderstood the point I was making.
The point you were trying to make is inconsistent. On the one hand, you pretend the general welfare clause is unlimited and allows the government to do anything it wants, while on the other you insist that the Constitutional mandate for national defense IS limited. You can't have it both ways, although you always try to.
 
It’s an immigrant’s story, with a message every American should hear.

As a native of Eastern Europe, Victoria Spartz has seen life under socialism up close and knows the damage it can do.

As a newly elected American congresswoman, she’s in a position to stop it from destroying the United States.


Spartz was the underdog winner of a race in Indiana’s 5th Congressional District to replace the retiring Rep. Susan Brooks.

And in an interview Monday morning on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends,” the Ukraine native explained why she got into politics in her adopted country.


BJ's Pull Quote


“I grew up in a socialistic country,” Spartz told co-host Ainsley Earhardt.

“I grew up in socialism. I saw what happens when it runs out of money, and it’s not pretty.”
What a difference a Constitution makes. Our form of socialism, which is Government, is limited by our supreme law of the land. Only right wingers never get it.
Why then is the leftwing always trying to undo our Constitutional protections and remove the limits on governments? Sounds like they're the ones not getting it.
Just right winger parler vous without any sublime truth value?

The left understand our federal Constitution unlike the parler crowd on the right wing.

Our welfare clause is General not common nor limited in any way.

So your contention is that the Gov can anything it wants to if they can justify it as being for "the greater good"?
Our welfare clause is General and must cover any given contingency in a top down manner.

For comparison and contrast, there is no general warfare clause for right wingers to justify anything they want for the "common defense".

I admit that I am coming in late here -
Is it the General Welfare Clause of the Constitution being discussed here?
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;


It seems incongruous where you write that there is no justification for Common defense and then post the passage that justifies common defense
Not really, you merely misunderstood the point I was making.
The point you were trying to make is inconsistent. On the one hand, you pretend the general welfare clause is unlimited and allows the government to do anything it wants, while on the other you insist that the Constitutional mandate for national defense IS limited. You can't have it both ways, although you always try to.


Well put.
 
Maybe on Parler you may always be Right, here you are just full of fallacy. Don't blame us right wingers don't understand our simple Constitution. Our welfare clause is General not Common or limited in any way. And, we have no general warfare clause, yet right wingers insist on a warfare-State not a welfare-State while blaming the left for excessive use of Socialism.
Put down the bong, you babbling goofball.
 
Last edited:
It’s an immigrant’s story, with a message every American should hear.

As a native of Eastern Europe, Victoria Spartz has seen life under socialism up close and knows the damage it can do.

As a newly elected American congresswoman, she’s in a position to stop it from destroying the United States.


Spartz was the underdog winner of a race in Indiana’s 5th Congressional District to replace the retiring Rep. Susan Brooks.

And in an interview Monday morning on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends,” the Ukraine native explained why she got into politics in her adopted country.


BJ's Pull Quote


“I grew up in a socialistic country,” Spartz told co-host Ainsley Earhardt.

“I grew up in socialism. I saw what happens when it runs out of money, and it’s not pretty.”
What a difference a Constitution makes. Our form of socialism, which is Government, is limited by our supreme law of the land. Only right wingers never get it.
Why then is the leftwing always trying to undo our Constitutional protections and remove the limits on governments? Sounds like they're the ones not getting it.
Just right winger parler vous without any sublime truth value?

The left understand our federal Constitution unlike the parler crowd on the right wing.

Our welfare clause is General not common nor limited in any way.

So your contention is that the Gov can anything it wants to if they can justify it as being for "the greater good"?
Our welfare clause is General and must cover any given contingency in a top down manner.

For comparison and contrast, there is no general warfare clause for right wingers to justify anything they want for the "common defense".

I admit that I am coming in late here -
Is it the General Welfare Clause of the Constitution being discussed here?
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;


It seems incongruous where you write that there is no justification for Common defense and then post the passage that justifies common defense
Not really, you merely misunderstood the point I was making.
The point you were trying to make is inconsistent. On the one hand, you pretend the general welfare clause is unlimited and allows the government to do anything it wants, while on the other you insist that the Constitutional mandate for national defense IS limited. You can't have it both ways, although you always try to.

Rational people would think that the General Welfare of a country was intimately tied to National Defense.
 
It’s an immigrant’s story, with a message every American should hear.

As a native of Eastern Europe, Victoria Spartz has seen life under socialism up close and knows the damage it can do.

As a newly elected American congresswoman, she’s in a position to stop it from destroying the United States.


Spartz was the underdog winner of a race in Indiana’s 5th Congressional District to replace the retiring Rep. Susan Brooks.

And in an interview Monday morning on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends,” the Ukraine native explained why she got into politics in her adopted country.


BJ's Pull Quote


“I grew up in a socialistic country,” Spartz told co-host Ainsley Earhardt.

“I grew up in socialism. I saw what happens when it runs out of money, and it’s not pretty.”
What a difference a Constitution makes. Our form of socialism, which is Government, is limited by our supreme law of the land. Only right wingers never get it.
Why then is the leftwing always trying to undo our Constitutional protections and remove the limits on governments? Sounds like they're the ones not getting it.
Just right winger parler vous without any sublime truth value?

The left understand our federal Constitution unlike the parler crowd on the right wing.

Our welfare clause is General not common nor limited in any way.

So your contention is that the Gov can anything it wants to if they can justify it as being for "the greater good"?
Our welfare clause is General and must cover any given contingency in a top down manner.

For comparison and contrast, there is no general warfare clause for right wingers to justify anything they want for the "common defense".

I admit that I am coming in late here -
Is it the General Welfare Clause of the Constitution being discussed here?
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;


It seems incongruous where you write that there is no justification for Common defense and then post the passage that justifies common defense
Not really, you merely misunderstood the point I was making.
The point you were trying to make is inconsistent. On the one hand, you pretend the general welfare clause is unlimited and allows the government to do anything it wants, while on the other you insist that the Constitutional mandate for national defense IS limited. You can't have it both ways, although you always try to.

Rational people would think that the General Welfare of a country was intimately tied to National Defense.
We have a Common defense clause not a General defense clause.
 
Which was?
Our welfare clause is General and must cover any given contingency in a top down manner.

For comparison and contrast, there is no general warfare clause for right wingers to justify anything they want for the "common defense".

That is factually false
General Welfare is a Country that protects it's borders,
Provides general Govt services like Police and fire depts. and travel accessible paths for Fire and police to move on.,
A court system to settle disputes.
You want General Welfare to Morph into specific welfare -

I have never even heard Lunatics Like Sanders promote the idea that every contingency must be covered.
 
Which was?
Our welfare clause is General and must cover any given contingency in a top down manner.

For comparison and contrast, there is no general warfare clause for right wingers to justify anything they want for the "common defense".

That is factually false
General Welfare is a Country that protects it's borders,
Provides general Govt services like Police and fire depts. and travel accessible paths for Fire and police to move on.,
A court system to settle disputes.
You want General Welfare to Morph into specific welfare -

I have never even heard Lunatics Like Sanders promote the idea that every contingency must be covered.
Factually false about what? We have protected borders. General welfare is just that. We have a common defense clause for "national security".

You simply like to make stuff up. This is not Parler. Our welfare clause is General not common or limited in any way and must cover any given contingency in a top down manner.
 

Forum List

Back
Top