Nine muslim apes gang raped mother of two in Sweden

[JoeB131]

The gentleman below, the man who actually coined the phrase "Regressive Left", is a British liberal who puts his life on the line every single day, on the streets, as he works to defeat jihadism. You know, the group from the one religion for which you spin so passionately. I guess you might look at him as the enemy, then, huh?

Naw, I just look at him as another minority trying to suck up to white people.

You see, there's a reason why we have a problem with "Jihadism". It's because back in the 1980's, when big hair was a thing, some idiots decided that they were going to arm, equip and train Islamic fanatics to fight the socialists we didn't like because they might actually demand equal distribution of resources or something.

I don't get upset when the rabid pit bull you clowns raised mauls you...

You created this situation.

 

[JoeB131]

just typed in Gang Rape, Sweden into google, and this fake news story didn't come up.

Fake news.

There are hundreds of news items about muslim rapists. Use better search terms.

Sweden: Muslim settlers raped Mother of two while they laughed and called her whore…….

48 stains of semen found after refugee gang rape mother of two

They are all repeating the same fake news story, verbatim, with the same questionable picture of a Jihadist with an earring.

Okay, a "Jihadist" with an earring should already make this story questionable. Like someone just got lazy with their photo bucket search.

 

[Mac1958]

The gentleman below, the man who actually coined the phrase "Regressive Left", is a British liberal who puts his life on the line every single day, on the streets, as he works to defeat jihadism. You know, the group from the one religion for which you spin so passionately. I guess you might look at him as the enemy, then, huh?

Naw, I just look at him as another minority trying to suck up to white people.

You see, there's a reason why we have a problem with "Jihadism". It's because back in the 1980's, when big hair was a thing, some idiots decided that they were going to arm, equip and train Islamic fanatics to fight the socialists we didn't like because they might actually demand equal distribution of resources or something.

I don't get upset when the rabid pit bull you clowns raised mauls you...

You created this situation.

"Naw, I just look at him as another minority trying to suck up to white people."

Wow. Of course that's all you would see. How simple.

Mr. Nawaz is a brave, honest, humble, decent man, risking his life every day for what he believes.

You are his polar opposite.
.

 

[Mac1958]

 

[Correll]

See, I read his words and judged him and them by their content.

Joe saw brown skin and judged the man and dismissed his ideas.

And he thinks that the Right is racist.

 

[Mac1958]

See, I read his words and judged him and them by their content.

Joe saw brown skin and judged the man and dismissed his ideas.

And he thinks that the Right is racist.

I don't even know if he's serious at this point.
.

 

[Correll]

See, I read his words and judged him and them by their content.

Joe saw brown skin and judged the man and dismissed his ideas.

And he thinks that the Right is racist.

I don't even know if he's serious at this point.
.

He is serious about something.

 

[Desperado]

And these are the people Obama is bringing to America

 

[Correll]

And these are the people Obama is bringing to America

And that's the point that the Left is so desperate to distract from.

 

[JoeB131]

Wow. Of course that's all you would see. How simple.

Mr. Nawaz is a brave, honest, humble, decent man, risking his life every day for what he believes.

You are his polar opposite.

Every group has its Uncle Toms... I'm not impressed.

Here's the thing. WHY does Jihadism have such a following in the slums of London?

Hmmmm.... Why do you think that is, Mac? Could it be that all these folks were brought over to do menial jobs white Britons didn't want to do?

 

[JoeB131]

See, I read his words and judged him and them by their content.

Joe saw brown skin and judged the man and dismissed his ideas.

And he thinks that the Right is racist.

Naw, I read his words, and it's just another suckup minority saying, "Yeah, boss, we sure be shiftless!"

Kind of like Clarance Thomas, Ben Carson and Herman Cain in this country. Ignore decades of injustice and abuse... it's our own damned fault,really.

 

[Mac1958]

He is serious about something.

You'll notice who gave him a "winner" thing on this post.

Those two are probably the nastiest, most hateful people on this board.
.

 

[Correll]

See, I read his words and judged him and them by their content.

Joe saw brown skin and judged the man and dismissed his ideas.

And he thinks that the Right is racist.

Naw, I read his words, and it's just another suckup minority saying, "Yeah, boss, we sure be shiftless!"

Kind of like Clarance Thomas, Ben Carson and Herman Cain in this country. Ignore decades of injustice and abuse... it's our own damned fault,really.

NOpe. not at all what he was saying.

Your racist reaction to minorities that don't conform is disgusting.

 

[Desperado]

Wow. Of course that's all you would see. How simple.

Mr. Nawaz is a brave, honest, humble, decent man, risking his life every day for what he believes.

You are his polar opposite.

Every group has its Uncle Toms... I'm not impressed.

Here's the thing. WHY does Jihadism have such a following in the slums of London?

Hmmmm.... Why do you think that is, Mac? Could it be that all these folks were brought over to do menial jobs white Britons didn't want to do?

So you are saying that the chimney sweep in Mary Poppins was really a muslim?

 

[JoeB131]

NOpe. not at all what he was saying.

Your racist reaction to minorities that don't conform is disgusting.

I think "sucking up to the man" is kind of conforming, don't you?

I mean, hey, Ben Carson got himself a sweet gig, all he has to do is go around the country telling white folks how shiftless black folks are, and they shower him with money like a stripper on a pole....

 

[Correll]

NOpe. not at all what he was saying.

Your racist reaction to minorities that don't conform is disgusting.

I think "sucking up to the man" is kind of conforming, don't you?

I mean, hey, Ben Carson got himself a sweet gig, all he has to do is go around the country telling white folks how shiftless black folks are, and they shower him with money like a stripper on a pole....

His point was about the behavior of liberals. We all knows about the existence of Radical Islam.

 

[JoeB131]

His point was about the behavior of liberals. We all knows about the existence of Radical Islam.

The problem with dumb-ass rednecks like you is that you think Muslims are a hive-mind.

Muslims are not the Borg.

You see, the problem with people like you and Mac is that you think our problem with Islam is their belief in a Magic Fariy in the Sky is worse than your belief in a Magic Fairy in the Sky...

Which works if you ignore everything Christians did between 1 AD and 1945. I guess if you leave all that stuff out, you look pretty good.

Here's why we have a problem with the Islamic World

1) We support the Zionists.
2) We prop up some really awful governments over there.
3) We think the solution to everything is to bomb or invade it.

Now, we might have good strategic reasons to do these things (or not), but we shouldn't be surprised when not everyone goes along with them.

Nor should we take fake news stories about rapes that didn't happen and say, "See, See, those people are like that!" to slander the people whose lives have been turned upside down by our idiotic policies.

 

[Correll]

His point was about the behavior of liberals. We all knows about the existence of Radical Islam.

The problem with dumb-ass rednecks like you is that you think Muslims are a hive-mind.

Muslims are not the Borg.

You see, the problem with people like you and Mac is that you think our problem with Islam is their belief in a Magic Fariy in the Sky is worse than your belief in a Magic Fairy in the Sky...

Which works if you ignore everything Christians did between 1 AD and 1945. I guess if you leave all that stuff out, you look pretty good.

Here's why we have a problem with the Islamic World

1) We support the Zionists.
2) We prop up some really awful governments over there.
3) We think the solution to everything is to bomb or invade it.

Now, we might have good strategic reasons to do these things (or not), but we shouldn't be surprised when not everyone goes along with them.

Nor should we take fake news stories about rapes that didn't happen and say, "See, See, those people are like that!" to slander the people whose lives have been turned upside down by our idiotic policies.

1. I do not think Muslims are a hive mind.

2. As I am not living in the time period of 1ad to 1945, that works for me.

3. I support the jews because A. I am anti-genocide, and B. the Arabs are assholes.

4. The idea that the governments over there suck because of US, was a big part of the logic that predicted an easy transition to a liberal democracy in Iraq. IMO, that has been debunked.

5. We do not think that solution to everything is to bomb or invade it.

6. The Muslim World has NOT had our last 100 years of woman's rights. There is a real difference between them and us on how our cultures treat women. We need to be real about that BEFORE we import more of them and make them a larger part of our future CUlture fusion.

 

[JoeB131]

1. I do not think Muslims are a hive mind.

2. As I am not living in the time period of 1ad to 1945, that works for me.

That's a dumb statement, Cleetus... You ignore that fact that Jesus was perfectly fine with all the bad stuff Christians did before 1945... or at least his churches were.

3. I support the jews because A. I am anti-genocide, and B. the Arabs are assholes.

But you have no problem with genocide against the Palestinians. So if someone took your property tomorrow because a Magic Fairy in the sky said it was his, you'd be good with that? Just asking.

4. The idea that the governments over there suck because of US, was a big part of the logic that predicted an easy transition to a liberal democracy in Iraq. IMO, that has been debunked.

Um. No.

Here's the thing. We PUT Saddam in power. Until he turned on us. And then we tolerated him because we knew that if they had "Democracy", they'd vote in the Shi'ites and be friendly with Iran. (which is what happened eventually, anyway.)

5. We do not think that solution to everything is to bomb or invade it.

Since 1980, we've bombed, occupied or invaded -

Iran (1980, 1987-1988), Libya (1981, 1986, 1989, 2011), Lebanon (1983), Kuwait (1991), Iraq (1991-2011, 2014-), Somalia (1992-1993, 2007-), Bosnia (1995), Saudi Arabia (1991, 1996), Afghanistan (1998, 2001-), Sudan (1998), Kosovo (1999), Yemen (2000, 2002-), Pakistan (2004-) and now Syria.

Seems like our go-to solution for much of everything.

6. The Muslim World has NOT had our last 100 years of woman's rights. There is a real difference between them and us on how our cultures treat women. We need to be real about that BEFORE we import more of them and make them a larger part of our future CUlture fusion.

Yet two Islamic nations - Pakistan and Indonesia - have elected Female Heads of State! We on the other hand, rejected a woman to put a Nazi Game Show Host in.

I think after we elected the "Pussy-Grabber", we really don't have any place to complain about how women are treated.
.

 

[danielpalos]

only the right wing, never gets it. federal ID means easier federal enforcement.

I already addressed that.

NOT importing rapists is far easier and more effective than catching and imprisoning them after they commit rapes of our women.

And so far, your stated reasons for having our women raped, has been POSSIBLE fees to our government.


That is such a weak "reason" as to be dismissed.


What is your real reason? DO you even know?

no, you haven't. how do you ban tourism?

Yes. I did.

NOT importing rapists is far easier and more effective than catching and imprisoning them after they commit rapes of our women.

And so far, your stated reasons for having our women raped, has been POSSIBLE fees to our government.


That is such a weak "reason" as to be dismissed.


What is your real reason? DO you even know?

no, you haven't. how do you ban tourism?

Same way you ban anything. Make the ban, then enforce it. What part of this do you pretend is not doable?

AND why do you so fully embrace the rape of our women?

by ignoring economics?

In the US, tourism is either the first, second, or third largest employer in 29 states,[which?] employing 7.3 million in 2004, to take care of 1.19 billion trips tourists took in the US in 2005. As of 2007, there are 2,462 registered National Historic Landmarks (NHL) recognized by the United States government. As of 2016, Orlando is the most visited destination in the United States.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourism_in_the_United_States

It is the right wing that denies and disparages a God, by needing more than Ten religious Commandments.

If the poor are not really poor enough by Third World, Iron Age standards, then the rich run this moral hazard as well: Otherwise, I may have too much and disown you and say, 'Who is the LORD?' Or I may become poor and steal, and so dishonor the name of my God.