kaz
Diamond Member
- Dec 1, 2010
- 78,025
- 22,327
But it's not just nukes that they have more than your guns, they have tanks, mortars, bombs, cruise missiles AA missiles... all kinds of things that you're not allowed to have. Nukes was just an example.So our Constitution purposely leaves us outgunned by a tyrannical government?![]()
Only if you assume the government is going to nuke its own territory, and leave itself governing nothing but empty, radioactive wasteland.
But then, you're probably stupid enough to actually think that.
And again, your point is WHAT, precisely? That we should just concede our freedoms, disarm entirely, and become vulnerable wards of the state? I mean, seriously. Relate this to some kind of intelligent, logical, mature statement of position, here.
Her point is that if she can get you to concede anything, that children can't buy guns, that people can't by nukes, in her mind, that means there are no Constitutional limits on government's ability to regulate guns and they can ban them entirely.
Keep in mind I'm not defending her view, just answering what her point is
Oh, I'm well aware of where it's going. I'm just pointing out that it needs to say so clearly, so that it can be mocked appropriately.
Agreed, but she'd never be that honest. It might be interesting to try though