Nunes: 'Hidden' passage in Mueller report shows scope memo tainted by Trump dossier

[The Purge]

The Washington Times ^ | 04-19-2019 | Daniel Chaitin

House Intelligence Committee ranking member Devin Nunes, R-Calif., revealed where in special counsel Robert Mueller's report he says "Clinton dirt" tainted the Russia investigation.

During an interview on Fox News, hours after the 448-page report was released, Nunes pointed to a "hidden" passage on page 11 that addresses the scope memo for the yearslong investigation.

"When you look at what happened today, remember we talked a lot about the scope memo. What were the directions given to the special counsel? Well, we now know hidden on page 11, very thinly, still veiled, but we now know they used the Steele dossier, the Clinton dirt, the Clinton-paid-for dirt as part of the memo for the special counsel that directed the special counsel what to do," Nunes told host Sean Hannity.

----------

Yes they used the fake dossier on the mueller investigation

Nunes at40 min mark Mark Levin is before Nunes

Nunes says it is a very important revelation - remember scope memo? that we haven’t seen yet? - Rod Rosenstein directed Mueller to use it - mentions page 11 in the report

 

[kyzr]

Now its up to FXN to come thru with their "avalanche" of crimes done by the deep state. They better be right, or FXN will be accused of "fake news" like they have been accusing CNN & MSNBC of. Its Barr's turn at bat, lets see some justice.

 

[Zorro!]

The Washington Times ^ | 04-19-2019 | Daniel Chaitin

House Intelligence Committee ranking member Devin Nunes, R-Calif., revealed where in special counsel Robert Mueller's report he says "Clinton dirt" tainted the Russia investigation.

During an interview on Fox News, hours after the 448-page report was released, Nunes pointed to a "hidden" passage on page 11 that addresses the scope memo for the yearslong investigation.

"When you look at what happened today, remember we talked a lot about the scope memo. What were the directions given to the special counsel? Well, we now know hidden on page 11, very thinly, still veiled, but we now know they used the Steele dossier, the Clinton dirt, the Clinton-paid-for dirt as part of the memo for the special counsel that directed the special counsel what to do," Nunes told host Sean Hannity.

----------

Yes they used the fake dossier on the mueller investigation

Nunes at40 min mark Mark Levin is before Nunes

Nunes says it is a very important revelation - remember scope memo? that we haven’t seen yet? - Rod Rosenstein directed Mueller to use it - mentions page 11 in the report

Nunes has been right all along.

The Steele Dossier hoax is disinformation. We knew this as soon as we read it. Trump knew it as soon as he was briefed on one of it's claims. This belies the hysteria foisted on us by the Democratic Party and its media allies, preeminently the New York Times.

The Times pioneered a new form of journalism in shoving the hoax down our throats over the past two years. In the new new journalism practiced by the Times, one reports stories based on secondary and tertiary sources whose identities must be protected based on the sensitivity of their information or the like. How sensitive can you get and still win a Pulitzer Prize?


Mollie

✔@MZHemingway
NYT: "Ha ha, funny story, you'll never believe it. That dossier we spent years defending as legitimate and a worthy basis for FISA wiretaps on citizens is so unfounded it might actually be Russian disinformation, just like the collusion skeptics warned." https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/us/politics/steele-dossier-mueller-report.html …

6:39 PM - Apr 19, 2019

 

[edthecynic]

Mollie

✔@MZHemingway
NYT: "Ha ha, funny story, you'll never believe it. That dossier we spent years defending as legitimate and a worthy basis for FISA wiretaps on citizens is so unfounded it might actually be Russian disinformation, just like the collusion skeptics warned." https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/us/politics/steele-dossier-mueller-report.html …

6:39 PM - Apr 19, 2019

Gee, what a surprise, NOT!
The quote attributed to the NY Times does not exist.
A typical lying scum Right-wing FAKE QUOTE!!!!!