easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,142
- 2,645
"Attorney General Loretta Lynch concedes there are “challenges” associated with vetting refugees from Syria:
LINK: AG Lynch: Acknowledges ‘Challenges’ to Vetting Syrian Refugees - Breitbart
“Certainly there are challenges to [the vetting] process because of the situation in Syria.” Lynch testified before the House Judiciary Committee. “But I would note, however, that we do have the benefit of having that significant and robust screening process in place. A process that Europe has not been to set up which renders them more vulnerable.”
WHAT does that process entail? It has already been admitted to that there are no Syrian agencies or documents / bios that can be used to screen them.
US Rep: 'Are you or have you ever been a terrorists or a member of ISIS?
SYRIAN: 'No
US REP: Ok, NEXT.....
ACTUALLY, Lynch explained that their process consists of looking at our existing FBI, CIA, NSA, etc databases - if they are not in any of those they are considered 'approved'. The idea of 'Green Lighting' a possible ISIS member / terrorist simply because we don't have him in our database YET is a little FRIGHTENING, though.
"Lynch declined to say that complete vetting of Syrian refugees is impossible, dancing around the issue when pressed by Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) about the concerns raised by FBI Director James Comey that the government lacks the intelligence to fully vet the Syrian refugees who have applied for resettlement in the US."
She KNOWS, like the FBI, CIA, etc have said, that their 'comprehensive screening process' is anything BUT and that they are basically rolling the dice and HOPING none of the ISIS terrorists their leader vowed would be mingled in with the refugees are there....
WHEN the US is hit with a Paris-like attack by ISIS members allowed into the country they will defend their actions by saying, 'NO program is fool-proof!'
LINK: AG Lynch: Acknowledges ‘Challenges’ to Vetting Syrian Refugees - Breitbart
“Certainly there are challenges to [the vetting] process because of the situation in Syria.” Lynch testified before the House Judiciary Committee. “But I would note, however, that we do have the benefit of having that significant and robust screening process in place. A process that Europe has not been to set up which renders them more vulnerable.”
WHAT does that process entail? It has already been admitted to that there are no Syrian agencies or documents / bios that can be used to screen them.
US Rep: 'Are you or have you ever been a terrorists or a member of ISIS?
SYRIAN: 'No
US REP: Ok, NEXT.....
ACTUALLY, Lynch explained that their process consists of looking at our existing FBI, CIA, NSA, etc databases - if they are not in any of those they are considered 'approved'. The idea of 'Green Lighting' a possible ISIS member / terrorist simply because we don't have him in our database YET is a little FRIGHTENING, though.
"Lynch declined to say that complete vetting of Syrian refugees is impossible, dancing around the issue when pressed by Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) about the concerns raised by FBI Director James Comey that the government lacks the intelligence to fully vet the Syrian refugees who have applied for resettlement in the US."
She KNOWS, like the FBI, CIA, etc have said, that their 'comprehensive screening process' is anything BUT and that they are basically rolling the dice and HOPING none of the ISIS terrorists their leader vowed would be mingled in with the refugees are there....
WHEN the US is hit with a Paris-like attack by ISIS members allowed into the country they will defend their actions by saying, 'NO program is fool-proof!'