candycorn
Diamond Member
Had he said nothing, you guys would say the same thing, that he has no clue what to do, and is allowing the radical Muslims to unleash hell over there. So say something or nothing, you would've ripped him for it.
What I don't get is this:
Say nothing: You'd be mad he didn't set a red line (which would've been crossed and then require military action)
Say something: Which he did, and they crossed it, and now seems to require military action
My question is, why are you folks so obsessed with HAVING to resort to military action all over the damn place? WE ARE NOT THE WORLD POLICE.
Very True:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...like-a-leader-of-the-free-world-on-syria.html