Obama lowered the bar

[dannyboys]

People are scratching their heads asking why oh why are we faced with such a plethora of lousy potential Presidential choices?
Hillary the congenital grifter and lair. Sanders a washed in the blood Socialist who refuses to admit the middle class taxpayer would have to pony up for everyone's free college/university tuition but insists he'll take the money from the "rich". Who want's to remake the US in the image of Denmark.
Trump with the "abnormal hair". All the other wack-jobs on both sides of the debate stage.
Because when an entire race 'block-votes' for a candidate with ZERO experience based on promising them all a bunch of "free shit" and on the color of his skin combined with a bunch of 'White Guilters' well you get what you paid for. Junk.
Obama's election wins lowered the bar so low in fact anyone can apply now for the job. Honesty, integrity, ability to govern be damned.
The Biden Eclipse and the Trump Plateau

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Most who would serve well as president will not subject themselves or their families to the continual rectal inspection given by today's media.

I mean, for what?

 

[bendog]

Anyone seriously think we elect a Madrassa boy named Barak Hussein Obama without W's follies?

And we're dangerously close to electing another first time senator with no military or other federal experience.

 

[TNHarley]

Its hard for genuine people to make it that far. The elections are bullshit. Stupid voters let the establishment rig it.
Independents don't have a chance.
It will only get worse.

 

[healthmyths]

Its hard for genuine people to make it that far. The elections are bullshit. Stupid voters let the establishment rig it.
Independents don't have a chance.
It will only get worse.

NO it is you people don't seem to have the ability to distinguish BIASED News reporting.
FACT:
In 2008 85% of media donated money to Democrats!
1,160 (85%) of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
http://dailycaller.com/2010/08/28/o...etwork-execs-writers-reporters/#ixzz2O598MhzN

NOW you tell me why would a hard working "Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC" contribute money and then NOT promote Obama? They donated money to him! 85% of them did!
Consequence?
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election
BY PAUL BEDARD | MARCH 16, 2015 | 10:49 AM
A sweeping study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press.
The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data & Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans.
Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors, Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner's "Washington Secrets" columnist, can be contacted at [email protected].
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election

Now you tell me based on the above, what kind of stories do you think the public reads? Positive stories about Obama/Democrats and negative stories about GOP??

but of course you won't agree!