🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Obama Wants A Coalition To Punish Isis For Beheading American Journalists? Un-freaken Believable!

The purpose of a Coalition is to provide something for President Obama to hide behind.

There are more people working in the Pentagon than belong to ISIS and Obama needs a coalition?

Exactly! But the low information voter will fall for Obama's flimflam, hook line and sinker! Just wait till after 9:20 this evening when Obama's media propagandists will re-invent Obama into a world leader who will not take any crap from "extremists".

Problem is, real leaders don't lead from behind!

JWK



"Shovel-ready was not as ... uh .. shovel-ready as we expected."___ Obama, June, 2011
 
It’s amazing how Obama justified the attack on Benghazi because of a video, but when a video shows the beheading of two American Citizens Obama’s response is we need to form a coalition to punish ISIS savages.

Haven't we already been bombing them? Seems you'd rather believe anti-American propaganda than face the truth. :asshole:
 
ednvb.jpg

Isn't the answer the same as "which one do the wingnuts think is more important"?

Yes, communist, subversives would say that....thank you for saying it!
 
It’s amazing how Obama justified the attack on Benghazi because of a video, but when a video shows the beheading of two American Citizens Obama’s response is we need to form a coalition to punish ISIS savages.

Haven't we already been bombing them? Seems you'd rather believe anti-American propaganda than face the truth. :asshole:

Another ASSWIPE THAT DOESN'T KNOW WHAT GOING ON.... JUST SPEWS DNC TALKING POINTS!...Shall we call these JERK OFF THE SUBVERSIVE FAITHFUL strikes?

US air strikes in Iraq will have minimal impact on Isis Pentagon World news theguardian.com
 
The purpose of a Coalition is to provide something for President Obama to hide behind.

There are more people working in the Pentagon than belong to ISIS and Obama needs a coalition?

Is that what you said when Bush assembled the "coalition of the willing? Weren't we strong enough to take on Iraq by ourselves? It's amazing how the hypocrisy just flows and flows these days
 
Who knows what the real agenda is here. Is invading a country something we do if a journalist is beheaded or is that just an excuse to depose Assad for the neocons.
 
It’s amazing how Obama justified the attack on Benghazi because of a video, but when a video shows the beheading of two American Citizens Obama’s response is we need to form a coalition to punish ISIS savages.

Haven't we already been bombing them? Seems you'd rather believe anti-American propaganda than face the truth. :asshole:

Another ASSWIPE THAT DOESN'T KNOW WHAT GOING ON.... JUST SPEWS DNC TALKING POINTS!...Shall we call these JERK OFF THE SUBVERSIVE FAITHFUL strikes?

US air strikes in Iraq will have minimal impact on Isis Pentagon World news theguardian.com

I'm the one that doesn't know what's going on, but you confirm we have been bombing them? You just never cease to amaze!!! :lmao:
 
obama will give assurances to ISIS that they will not face an American military threat. He will promise them that all they will face is the half trained Iraq army and Kurd peshmurga.

The benefit to American troops is that they won't be on the ground to be murdered by the Iraqis or the Kurds.
 

Isn't the answer the same as "which one do the wingnuts think is more important"?

Yes, communist, subversives would say that....thank you for saying it!

Not smart enough to realize that either way you answer that question you lose , are you? :lmao:

Really! :asshole::rofl::rofl:

Yes, really. Think about it, if you're able. Put down the doobie for second, though.
 
It’s amazing how Obama justified the attack on Benghazi because of a video, but when a video shows the beheading of two American Citizens Obama’s response is we need to form a coalition to punish ISIS savages.

Haven't we already been bombing them? Seems you'd rather believe anti-American propaganda than face the truth. :asshole:

Another ASSWIPE THAT DOESN'T KNOW WHAT GOING ON.... JUST SPEWS DNC TALKING POINTS!...Shall we call these JERK OFF THE SUBVERSIVE FAITHFUL strikes?

US air strikes in Iraq will have minimal impact on Isis Pentagon World news theguardian.com

I'm the one that doesn't know what's going on, but you confirm we have been bombing them? You just never cease to amaze!!! :lmao:

And as usual, NOT accomplishing a fucking thing except making 2 digit IQ'd subversives, such as yourself, all wet by thinking the Manchurian muslim has done something! :badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:
 

Isn't the answer the same as "which one do the wingnuts think is more important"?

Yes, communist, subversives would say that....thank you for saying it!

Not smart enough to realize that either way you answer that question you lose , are you? :lmao:

Really! :asshole::rofl::rofl:

Yes, really. Think about it, if you're able. Put down the doobie for second, though.

Seems you're the one slurring English....who has the doobie?:badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:
 
The purpose of a Coalition is to provide something for President Obama to hide behind.

There are more people working in the Pentagon than belong to ISIS and Obama needs a coalition?

Is that what you said when Bush assembled the "coalition of the willing? Weren't we strong enough to take on Iraq by ourselves? It's amazing how the hypocrisy just flows and flows these days

Iraq was a country with the 5th largest army in the world, ISIS is a tiny little rag tag army.

That is the same in your opinion.
 
I would like to hear someone articulate precisely and in detail what exactly is the threat of ISIS to American vital interests?

...at least what are they to the extent that we should be expected to do what will as always amount to 90% of the heavy lifting.

They're brown and they stink

bombs away!!
 
obama will give assurances to ISIS that they will not face an American military threat. He will promise them that all they will face is the half trained Iraq army and Kurd peshmurga.

The benefit to American troops is that they won't be on the ground to be murdered by the Iraqis or the Kurds.

The Kurds have not forgotten the many times the US has stood in the way of their slaughter, the Kurds may be the closest ally the US has in the region.
 
I would like to hear someone articulate precisely and in detail what exactly is the threat of ISIS to American vital interests?

...at least what are they to the extent that we should be expected to do what will as always amount to 90% of the heavy lifting.
It's not what they are now...it's what they can become...they are a part of a larger problem that no one wants to discuss.
 
The purpose of a Coalition is to provide something for President Obama to hide behind.

There are more people working in the Pentagon than belong to ISIS and Obama needs a coalition?

Is that what you said when Bush assembled the "coalition of the willing? Weren't we strong enough to take on Iraq by ourselves? It's amazing how the hypocrisy just flows and flows these days

Iraq was a country with the 5th largest army in the world, ISIS is a tiny little rag tag army.

That is the same in your opinion.

During the first Gulf War maybe, but by 2003 their army was about half that size. Try again. As for ISIS until now Obama's opponents were acting like it was the rebirth of the Soviet Union. Got to watch those about-faces. Could get whiplash!

Iraqi Army - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
 
The purpose of a Coalition is to provide something for President Obama to hide behind.

There are more people working in the Pentagon than belong to ISIS and Obama needs a coalition?

Is that what you said when Bush assembled the "coalition of the willing? Weren't we strong enough to take on Iraq by ourselves? It's amazing how the hypocrisy just flows and flows these days

Iraq was a country with the 5th largest army in the world, ISIS is a tiny little rag tag army.

That is the same in your opinion.

During the first Gulf War maybe, but by 2003 their army was about half that size. Try again. As for ISIS until now Obama's opponents were acting like it was the rebirth of the Soviet Union. Got to watch those about-faces. Could get whiplash!

Iraqi Army - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The first gulf war left the Iraqi army largely intact, if you remember they were allowed to retreat.

The size back then? Go ahead and post your best link. But remember, the objective was to take over the country and completely destroy Saddam. Again we are talking to very different things.

what is important to remember is Obama created isis, Obama all by himself created the crisis in iraq.

Obama now wants a coalition, to save himself, politically, or he is just giving the enemy time to hide, let the heat die down , then isis can return.

either way, total Democrat foreign policy blunder as well as incompetent military leafership.
 

Forum List

Back
Top