Skull Pilot
Diamond Member
- Nov 17, 2007
- 45,446
- 6,163
- 1,830
TAx increase for all except the leeches. Yay team.
Which of your taxes go up under the bill?
What ObamaCare Means for Your Taxes - SmartMoney.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
TAx increase for all except the leeches. Yay team.
Which of your taxes go up under the bill?
How can a Supreme Court decision not be constitutional?
If it doesn't follow the constitution.
That's nonsensical. The Supreme Court decides constitutionality.
SCOTUS decisions are not inerrant, if they were Dred Scott would still be the law of the land. They are not even the final arbiter, if they were we would not have an income tax. They are, however, by default, constitutional.
If it doesn't follow the constitution.
That's nonsensical. The Supreme Court decides constitutionality.
No they didn't, they rewrote the bill instead of ruling on the Constitution.
If they had not changed the commerce clause, it would have been ruled as unconditional.
TAx increase for all except the leeches. Yay team.
Which of your taxes go up under the bill?
What ObamaCare Means for Your Taxes - SmartMoney.com
If it doesn't follow the constitution.
That's nonsensical. The Supreme Court decides constitutionality.
No they didn't, they rewrote the bill instead of ruling on the Constitution.
If they had not changed the commerce clause, it would have been ruled as unconditional.
If it doesn't follow the constitution.
The Supreme Court is granted the power by the constitution to be the final arbiter of questions federal law. This makes Supreme Court decisions constitutionally inerrant.
Quote it.
You are in fact incorrect.
That is not what the Constitution says.
It is a power claimed by the SCOTUS and arguably implied by the Constitution. But the Constitution absolutely doesn't say that.
And it wouldn't be true anyway.
Jut as each branch has checks on it, so too the Judicial Branch can be overridden via appropriate legislation or by the Amendment of the Constitution itself.
All the taxes that are in that article are ones I will see increase.
NO. Just say which of your taxes go up. And then prove it.
and there it is.
early notes say the Mandate is Constitutional as a Tax........ if I recall Obama said it wasn't a tax......
well, its all over but the crying.
The system is the system, life goes on.
Reminder to self, pick up the Rosetta Stone module for French
and there it is.
early notes say the Mandate is Constitutional as a Tax........ if I recall Obama said it wasn't a tax......
well, its all over but the crying.
The system is the system, life goes on.
Reminder to self, pick up the Rosetta Stone module for French
And don't forget. This takes 500 bilion dollars out of medicare for the elderly. The people who need the most health care are going to get less. And, this health care has a 15 member death panel.
The Supreme Court is granted the power by the constitution to be the final arbiter of questions federal law. This makes Supreme Court decisions constitutionally inerrant.
Quote it.
You are in fact incorrect.
That is not what the Constitution says.
It is a power claimed by the SCOTUS and arguably implied by the Constitution. But the Constitution absolutely doesn't say that.
And it wouldn't be true anyway.
Jut as each branch has checks on it, so too the Judicial Branch can be overridden via appropriate legislation or by the Amendment of the Constitution itself.
Further, if SCOTUS oversteps its authority and makes rulings that are outside the juridiction of the constitution or is incompetent by failing to apply constitutional interpretations to the laws it reviews or otherwise lawless in its actions, the Constitution clearly provides means to remove errant Justices from their positions. SCOTUS is not an ultimate power without any restraints.
And don't forget. This takes 500 bilion dollars out of medicare for the elderly. The people who need the most health care are going to get less. And, this health care has a 15 member death panel.
does this mean you won't be here long?
The History of the Individual Mandate
By Ramesh Ponnuru
March 27, 2012.
The History of the Individual Mandate - By Ramesh Ponnuru - The Corner - National Review Online
The prolem is not a tax, a mandate or Obamacare, it's all about Obama. Obama got done that which the Good Ol Boys failed to get in 100 years.
Everytihing Obama has done has been opposed by the Right to make sure he fails. A priority from the beginning.
He he not failing because he is not stupid like the Good Ol Boys stereotype Black men to be no matter who they are. The like Cosby because the basked young black men.
Hard to out smart Chicago Smarts.LMAO
SCOTUS decisions are not inerrant, if they were Dred Scott would still be the law of the land. They are not even the final arbiter, if they were we would not have an income tax. They are, however, by default, constitutional.
Dred Scot and income tax were added to the constitution after the fact. That doesn't make the Supreme Court wrong, it just means that their decisions aren't necessarily eternal. When I said they were the final arbiter I meant that there is no higher authority to decide a question of federal law. Not to say that the law can't be changed afterward.