Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,334
- 80,982
- 2,635
LOLAt least you finally admit you have no proof that happened.How about showing the material to your client for his review and approval just like every other publisher ever did?You know you're insane right? How was she supposed to know it was an error until someone brought it to her attention?Not much of a publisher or a President of Harvard Law Review to let such a critical, titanic error out in the first place and then let it sit there for 15 years
And how "titanic" was it until Obama gained national prominence?
It's Publishing 101, they fact check and get the author to sign off before they go to print
What you're trying to get us to believe is that the Publisher didn't know the first rule of publishing and the President of the Harvard Law Review didn't review his own work
Despite your imaginary "publishing 101" nonsense, you a) still have absolutely no evidence it was the work of Obama's; b) still have absolutely no evidence they showed Obama the pamphlet; c) still have no evidence you're nothing but a lying bumbling baboon; and d) still have absolutely no evidence Obama ever saw the pamphlet back then.
And even worse for you lying about all of that -- even a partner from Acton & Dystel said not every client reviewed their own bio. So now you have to think up your next lie....