Offical Impeachment Thread

[Rustic]

no link

THREAD CLOSED,

Lol
It changed no one’s minds one way or another, and no first-hand information. Like I said a nothing burger.

... and still no Russian connection

 

[Baz Ares]

Hearsay is not admissible evidence, as Jordan made very clear with Sondland's correction that had 6 men and 4 conversations making a mockery of Taylor's "clear (3rd hand) understanding".

Ken Starr nailed the summary, not a hint of a crime was presented, let alone an impeachable crime.

sondland will be front & center to testify as a first person witness next week - on wednesday i believe; so there goes your little happy place thought bubble popping.

That's ok, all Sondland can testify to is a "thought crime" since no crime was committed, let alone an impeachable crime.
Ukraine got the money and didn't investigate the Bidens, QED, no crime, period, full stop.

sondalnd admitted that there was a shake down.

A shakedown with no quid, no pro, and no quo?



How does that work?

Even Republicans are conceding quid pro quo

MAGA: Illegally quid pro quo all you can?

 

[Rustic]

No minds have been changed, another soap opera.... and still no Russian connection

What is there to change? It is all HEARSAY testimony and all being co-opted by the House. Another worthless shell game by the limpdicked democrats.

HUH ?

hundreds of pages of testimony have been corroborated.

The Whistleblower Complaint Has Largely Been Corroborated. Here's How.



nice try though.

Everyone thinks the same thing they did before today... fact
And the vast majority of American public don’t pay attention to these type of things.

... and still no Russian connection

 

[Rustic]

The question of whether or not Trump is guilty isn't up for debate anymore. He's clearly guilty.

The question is if Republicans care.

America doesn’t care… Because there’s no first-hand information on the subject. LOL

 

[rightwinger]

Any way you shake it, Trump comes out as looking either corrupt or inept.

His dealings with Ukraine were amateurish at best. He had two diplomatic channels......one looking out for Ukraine, one supporting Russia’s interests

Trump is so inept that he can’t even conceal an attempted bribe and extortion of Ukraine. Unless you support my reelection with some damaging information.......you are out of luck pal

 

[Faun]

Damn, you get dumber by the post.
The president has no such duty, dope. The president cannot prosecute anyone.

The DOJ prosecutes scum like Biden, moron, and Trump is their boss.

You have to be brain damaged not to understand such simple concepts.

The president isn't the DOJ.
Where's Barr in this equation, dope?

The President runs the DOJ, moron. He's the AG's boss. He's the boss of everyone in the DOJ.

The president cannot prosecute anyone, dope.

He can tell his AG to prosecute them, moron.

They don't have to listen, ya lying fucking moron.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

How many average people do the Dims really think sat around to listen to some idiot wax on about the history of Ukraine in global politics for an hour / hour and half before even mentioning Giuliani or Trump and then, only by hearsay, opinion and supposition to say that the PRESIDENT'S FOREIGN POLICY DID NOT FIT HIS?!

EXACTLY... this today was a complete SNOOZE FEST, and I guarantee, VERY few people watched it. But there was no GOTCHA, there was no new HEAD LINE, there wasn't ANYTHING, and the demtrash were banking on this being the BIG DAY, THIS WAS IT, this was their two STAR WITNESSES... we were supposed to see OVERWHELMING, something... but no, we saw NOTHING.

It's BACK FIRING, and if Nancy has a BRAIN CELL LEFT, she's going to be PULLING THE PLUG on ScHITf like FRIDAY.

The networks spent millions in lost adverting revenue to air this commercial free non stop, the same people that ran reruns of Leave It To Beaver last July rather than air the 4th celebration of our nation, its heroes and military because they considered THAT a waste of money. I only had the hearing on in the background and it was bad enough, folks who propped toothpicks in their eyes today for the "big show" won't be tuning in again much tomorrow.

I watched every second and will do the same tomorrow. I can't speak for those who can't understand the big words.

Get a job

I don't need one.

Must be nice

 

[The Purge]

If that was the case why wait TWO DAYS...WHY NOT IMMEDIATELY???

What's the rush? He had 20 more days,

Well, he could have always send BLANKETS INSTEAD OF MILITARY AID LIKE THE SURRENDER MONKEY DID...LOOK IT UP. ASSWIPE!

The problem is what Trump was asking for in exchange for releasing the aid - whether weapon or wampum doesn't matter. You fellas have a knack for irrelevance.

He asked for NOTHING as the transcript proves....but low IQ liberals will follow lying talkingvpoints to their deaths!

He asked for a favor. As the transcript proves. You may want to try a different line of bullshit.

A favor...like this favor?

 

[WEATHER53]

So all the threads are moved into this fake, ridiculous thread title???
THE most telling and evasive moment is when bug eyed Shits was asked when the First Republican can see or hear what the Democrats already have and Shits became indignant and would not answer.

 

[RealDave]

Since when do "witnesses" read their prepared testimony instead of answering questions?

This isn't a trial. Try to keep up.

So far it is just one massive hearsay slander while the people in question are kept tied and gagged in another room without so much as the chance to defend themselves much less air their side!

Wow, try reading the transcripts. These are people that were involved & know first hand about Trump's extortion demands.

 

[Olde Europe]

You are not even close to having this correct. You clearly did not watch the hearing.

The phone call took place at a restaurant and the staffer was present when the call was placed FROM Sondland TO Trump on July 26.

The staffer could hear Trump's end of the conversation.

Taylor says staffer overheard Trump ask Sondland about 'the investigations'

That one wasn't anywhere near being correct. Or rather, for as long as I watched him, the polar opposite of what he said had a fabulously high chance of being close to the truth.

Other than that, Sondland is a fabulously incompetent bag man, placing a phone call to the president at a Ukrainian restaurant and giving everyone around a chance to overhear sensitive information on the corrupt deals he helped bring about together with Mulvaney and the abominable Giuliani. Perhaps he'd be best advised to consult with Cohen, since Trump's bag men have a propensity to wind up in prison. Sondland has already perjured himself before Congress, and Cohen might have a story to tell on that.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Democrats have yet to prove intent. I ll wait patiently.

 

[Syriusly]

House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes did not hold anything back and slammed Democrats for damaging the country. He also went after the media and again called on Hunter Biden to testify about allegations of corruption in Ukraine.

Devin Nunes Devastates Schiff, Democrats With Fiery Opening Statement

Nunes did spew forth his usual collection of lies and conspiracy theory bullshit.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Hearsay is not admissible evidence, as Jordan made very clear with Sondland's correction that had 6 men and 4 conversations making a mockery of Taylor's "clear (3rd hand) understanding".

Ken Starr nailed the summary, not a hint of a crime was presented, let alone an impeachable crime.

sondland will be front & center to testify as a first person witness next week - on wednesday i believe; so there goes your little happy place thought bubble popping.

That's ok, all Sondland can testify to is a "thought crime" since no crime was committed, let alone an impeachable crime.
Ukraine got the money and didn't investigate the Bidens, QED, no crime, period, full stop.

sondalnd admitted that there was a shake down.

A shakedown with no quid, no pro, and no quo?

How does that work?

It wouldn't matter if there was. As Professor Dershowitz pointed out, there is no law against quid pro quo's in the statute. He looked up, down and sideways. Couldn't find one.

 

[WEATHER53]

Hearsay is not admissible evidence, as Jordan made very clear with Sondland's correction that had 6 men and 4 conversations making a mockery of Taylor's "clear (3rd hand) understanding".

Ken Starr nailed the summary, not a hint of a crime was presented, let alone an impeachable crime.

sondland will be front & center to testify as a first person witness next week - on wednesday i believe; so there goes your little happy place thought bubble popping.

That's ok, all Sondland can testify to is a "thought crime" since no crime was committed, let alone an impeachable crime.
Ukraine got the money and didn't investigate the Bidens, QED, no crime, period, full stop.

sondalnd admitted that there was a shake down.

A shakedown with no quid, no pro, and no quo?

How does that work?

Even Republicans are conceding quid pro quo

False and fake

 

[easyt65]

BAD NEWS FOR DEMOCRATS:

"A new report declared Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz has reached a "critical final step" before releasing his findings on alleged Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act abuses."


GOOD NEWS FOR DEMOCRATS:

Rosenstein, Clapper, Brennan, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, & other Democrats do not have to worry about spending THIS YEAR'S Thanksgiving in PRISON...

"DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz announced the completion of his year-and-a-half investigation on Sept. 13, providing a draft copy of the report to the Justice Department and FBI for a classification review.

One DOJ official told the Washington Post they aim to have the report released by Nov. 20, but another said after Thanksgiving was more likely due to what was described as a "complicated and contentious mix of legal, classification and political issues at play."

Have a Happy Thanksgiving, you traitors! Don't over-eat & don't forget to Lawyer-Up!




DOJ inspector general reaches 'critical final step' for report on alleged FISA abuses

After Thanksgiving?: A new release window for report on alleged FISA abuses emerges

 

[RealDave]

When is a quid pro quo not a quid pro quo?

When the other party involved Ukraine says it never happened. You can't have a murder case without a dead body.

The President of the Ukraine is supposed to announce that he accepted a bribe?

 

[Paulie]

House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes did not hold anything back and slammed Democrats for damaging the country. He also went after the media and again called on Hunter Biden to testify about allegations of corruption in Ukraine.

Devin Nunes Devastates Schiff, Democrats With Fiery Opening Statement

Actually, Nunes acted like the Trump bitch that he is.

I found it funny that he whined about leaks when he was the one running to the White House leaking confidential information to Trump.

A Brief Timeline of Devin Nunes' Odd White House Ties

Nunes couldn't smack down a ham sandwich.

You can't leak confidential information to the President. He's in charge of confidential information.

That’s what happens when you let the news teach you about the government

 

[RealDave]

Hearsay is not admissible evidence, as Jordan made very clear with Sondland's correction that had 6 men and 4 conversations making a mockery of Taylor's "clear (3rd hand) understanding".

Ken Starr nailed the summary, not a hint of a crime was presented, let alone an impeachable crime.

sondland will be front & center to testify as a first person witness next week - on wednesday i believe; so there goes your little happy place thought bubble popping.

That's ok, all Sondland can testify to is a "thought crime" since no crime was committed, let alone an impeachable crime.
Ukraine got the money and didn't investigate the Bidens, QED, no crime, period, full stop.

sondalnd admitted that there was a shake down.

A shakedown with no quid, no pro, and no quo?

How does that work?

It wouldn't matter if there was. As Professor Dershowitz pointed out, there is no law against quid pro quo's in the statute. He looked up, down and sideways. Couldn't find one.

So extortion is legal. Who knew?

 

[bripat9643]

The DOJ prosecutes scum like Biden, moron, and Trump is their boss.

You have to be brain damaged not to understand such simple concepts.

The president isn't the DOJ.
Where's Barr in this equation, dope?

The President runs the DOJ, moron. He's the AG's boss. He's the boss of everyone in the DOJ.

The president cannot prosecute anyone, dope.

He can tell his AG to prosecute them, moron.

They don't have to listen, ya lying fucking moron.

They pretty much do, moron. Why do you imagine Sessions is no longer AG?