Dot Com
Nullius in verba
Didn't their existing keystone pipeline have > 10 spills in one year too?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mindless DittoNutzis think that makes oil safe. Strychnine is also 100% organic!
March 07, 2012
RUSH: Oil's not even toxic. It's natural! Oil is organic. It's as organic as anything is.
Are you saying its not natural?
Like I have shown over and over again, CON$erviNutzis always play dumb when they are caught with their foot in their mouth.
Are you saying that nothing natural or organic can be toxic?
You're angry because our country isn't dirty enough? Really?
You seem to be missing the point [I know, surprise surprise].
If we don't drill for our own oil here, with our very strict environmental standards, then we just end up importing it from overseas. Typically from thrid world shitholes that don't give a flying fuck about the environment. So in the end, we actually reward those countries for crapping all over the environment while at the same time denying jobs right here in the US.
So that is the Hussein's energy policy- reward other countries that abide by lesser standards than ours. He'd rather give a raghead a job, than some redneck American.
Ummm, you know our number one export is gasoline, right?
OK, think about this. Do you really think that America has so much oil we could flood the market world wide and bring down the price two dollars a gallon?
Ahhhh, the brilliance of CON$erviNutzis, there's nothing toxic about toxins.Are you saying its not natural?
Like I have shown over and over again, CON$erviNutzis always play dumb when they are caught with their foot in their mouth.
Are you saying that nothing natural or organic can be toxic?
So what if it is toxic? Nature can and does break down toxins.
Why, because your MessiahRushie told you so. That settles it. The Pinko Slime Of Politics told him we have more oil than Saudi Arabia so all we have to do is get it out of the ground and gas will be under $2 a gallon.You seem to be missing the point [I know, surprise surprise].
If we don't drill for our own oil here, with our very strict environmental standards, then we just end up importing it from overseas. Typically from thrid world shitholes that don't give a flying fuck about the environment. So in the end, we actually reward those countries for crapping all over the environment while at the same time denying jobs right here in the US.
So that is the Hussein's energy policy- reward other countries that abide by lesser standards than ours. He'd rather give a raghead a job, than some redneck American.
Ummm, you know our number one export is gasoline, right?
OK, think about this. Do you really think that America has so much oil we could flood the market world wide and bring down the price two dollars a gallon?
Yes, and why is that? Some of it is because some foreign countries cannot refine their oil, so they ship the oil here to have us refine it and ship it back. Don't see a problem with that, at least thats jobs for refineries and shipping.
Another reason of course is the Hussein economy has more Americans than ever unemployed, so there is far less usage, as well as they can't afford to buy as much as they normally would.
But, I doubt you want to talk about that point.
What do you want to do, go back to windmills and blacksmiths or admit that oil is what fuels the world? The ultra radical left are no dummies. They understand that a couple of incidents of sabotage can be used to gain a political advantage. Barry is the last chance for the radical left wing and if it takes an accident that inconveniences people in Louisiana or Michigan what do you think they will do? You already saw the propaganda value that Dean saw in it.
The keystone line would also transport other products north to south,not just oil from Canada.
Why, because your MessiahRushie told you so. That settles it. The Pinko Slime Of Politics told him we have more oil than Saudi Arabia so all we have to do is get it out of the ground and gas will be under $2 a gallon.Ummm, you know our number one export is gasoline, right?
OK, think about this. Do you really think that America has so much oil we could flood the market world wide and bring down the price two dollars a gallon?
Yes, and why is that? Some of it is because some foreign countries cannot refine their oil, so they ship the oil here to have us refine it and ship it back. Don't see a problem with that, at least thats jobs for refineries and shipping.
Another reason of course is the Hussein economy has more Americans than ever unemployed, so there is far less usage, as well as they can't afford to buy as much as they normally would.
But, I doubt you want to talk about that point.
Of course what the pathological liar leaves out and the DittoNutzie is too stupid to figure out is that this oil is very very EXPENSIVE to get out of the ground and more expensive to refine, much too expensive to sell at $2 per gallon!!!!! "New technology" ain't cheap!!!
March 07, 2012
RUSH: Folks, with new technology, we have more oil in the ground that we can get than they have in Saudi Arabia. That "2% of the world's reserves" means 2% of what has been brought up, 2% of what has been produced, not 2% of the supply. This has been an out-and-out lie, and I don't know how else to categorize it.
March 07, 2012
RUSH: But again, we have much more than 2% of the world's reserves."Reserves" only mean what's been discovered. It only means what has been brought out of the ground. Not 2% of what's in the ground, not 2% of the world supply. We have far more than 2% of the world's supply! We have more oil in the ground -- and this is not me saying it; this is several geological surveys and studies in many different publications. We have more oil in the ground than Saudi Arabia does.
Ahhhh, the brilliance of CON$erviNutzis, there's nothing toxic about toxins.
Like I have shown over and over again, CON$erviNutzis always play dumb when they are caught with their foot in their mouth.
Are you saying that nothing natural or organic can be toxic?
So what if it is toxic? Nature can and does break down toxins.
Give this DittoNutzi arsenic in his water, it's only natural.
I'm reading a book, "Cyber War" by Richard A. Clarke (Harper/Collins, 2010, NY), and his take on all this recent oil spillage is that he has his reservations about recent spills could be cyber sabotage. He cited some potential consequences from hacking and controlling SCADA systems. “You could cause trains to derail, blow up generators, melt power lines. The recent pipeline in San Francisco, which is still being investigated, could have happened as a result of this. The control system can be made to appear perfectly normal, while the functionality is being messed with, by blocking one end of the pipeline, causing it to explode.” He learned from his colleague Professor William W. Kaufmann, who taught defense analysis and strategic nuclear weapons policy at MIT for decades, and later at Harvard and the Brookings Institution. He was also advisor to six Secretaries of Defense, shuttling between Boston and Washington every week for decades.What do you want to do, go back to windmills and blacksmiths or admit that oil is what fuels the world? The ultra radical left are no dummies. They understand that a couple of incidents of sabotage can be used to gain a political advantage. Barry is the last chance for the radical left wing and if it takes an accident that inconveniences people in Louisiana or Michigan what do you think they will do? You already saw the propaganda value that Dean saw in it.
Agreed. The perspective should be, "Best Foot Forward". Damage by use of inferior or substandard materials, even incompetence should be criminal, though, and the Penalties to include 100% restoration and 100% damages.Consider that there are not only innocent reasons for accidents but both incompetent and criminal.
Where there are issues with the integrity, or maintenance, or inspection of pipe-line, I would ask where the Fuck is Government Regulation and Oversight. Yes, Government has a role in prevention and safeguarding. Yes the Oil Companies have a Responsibility, even in foresight. There is always what you know V.S. what you tell us, My bets on the truth coming out one way or another.
We are not in need of more oil. Our biggest export now is diesel and gasoline. So time is not a factor here. Environmental and human damage is.
I totally agree with you on Quality, and Disaster Preperation. Best laid plans, ect. Our mill has one section that makes pipe for pipelines like this. There are many grades of pipe, with differant costs and strengths. Dealing with this type of crude, you need to go with the best, as in most expensive. Less is risking damage to the humans near the line, as well as their property, and the environment we all share.
Definately shows the President's wisdom in making sure there is time to consider all the factors on a project like this.
You are making it Political. I think I need to Puke. ..........
There, that's better.
It was made political when the GOP tried to rush it through. The projected course through the Sandhills was insane. That is the area where the water goes down for a vast aquifer. An aquifer that we use for extensive agriculture.
The tar sand carried by the Keystone spill line is for export, so it will have no effect on imports!!!We are not in need of more oil. Our biggest export now is diesel and gasoline. So time is not a factor here. Environmental and human damage is.
I totally agree with you on Quality, and Disaster Preperation. Best laid plans, ect. Our mill has one section that makes pipe for pipelines like this. There are many grades of pipe, with differant costs and strengths. Dealing with this type of crude, you need to go with the best, as in most expensive. Less is risking damage to the humans near the line, as well as their property, and the environment we all share.
The USA imports more than 11 million barrels of Oil each day.
Deducting the exports of refined petroleum products, the net inports are still over 8 million barrels per day.
The truth does not have a bad taste. Despite that, it could still leave your mouth on occasion.
How much petroleum does the United States import and from where? - FAQ - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)