Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's still 2 or 3 decades in the future. What they're building isn't a power plant, but a proof of concept. There's a lot of heat generated, which would be used to drive steam turbines, when it becomes commercial. The date predicted for a feasible system is usually circa 2050.Interesting. They did not say, or I didn't hear, how it would produce electricity for use. This design just seems too complicated to ever be commercially feasible.The key to energy development in the future is fusion. ITER - the way to new energy
ITER- The world's largest puzzle
Why can't they just put it on a cargo rocket and give it a one way trip into outer space?
Seems to me that would cheaper than trying to bury it and then perpetually maintain the burial site.
I hope you are kidding!
How so? No CO2 or other GHGs generated.It's still 2 or 3 decades in the future. What they're building isn't a power plant, but a proof of concept. There's a lot of heat generated, which would be used to drive steam turbines, when it becomes commercial. The date predicted for a feasible system is usually circa 2050.Interesting. They did not say, or I didn't hear, how it would produce electricity for use. This design just seems too complicated to ever be commercially feasible.The key to energy development in the future is fusion. ITER - the way to new energy
ITER- The world's largest puzzle
same as global warming.
It's still 2 or 3 decades in the future. What they're building isn't a power plant, but a proof of concept. There's a lot of heat generated, which would be used to drive steam turbines, when it becomes commercial. The date predicted for a feasible system is usually circa 2050.Interesting. They did not say, or I didn't hear, how it would produce electricity for use. This design just seems too complicated to ever be commercially feasible.The key to energy development in the future is fusion. ITER - the way to new energy
ITER- The world's largest puzzle
Compared to what is shown in the video conventional nuclear power is very simple. Can you imagine the cost of what they are building? It can't be built for commercial reasons it has to be something else, maybe just to say they can do it.
let's bury it, then send it into outer space. it's a shovel ready government project.Sending waste into space would be prohibitively expensive. It's much cheaper to bury it or, better yet, not generate it at all. That'll be one of the greatest benefits of fusion power, much lower amounts of nuclear waste.Why can't they just put it on a cargo rocket and give it a one way trip into outer space? Seems to me that would cheaper than trying to bury it and then perpetually maintain the burial site.
It's still 2 or 3 decades in the future. What they're building isn't a power plant, but a proof of concept. There's a lot of heat generated, which would be used to drive steam turbines, when it becomes commercial. The date predicted for a feasible system is usually circa 2050.Interesting. They did not say, or I didn't hear, how it would produce electricity for use. This design just seems too complicated to ever be commercially feasible.The key to energy development in the future is fusion. ITER - the way to new energy
ITER- The world's largest puzzle
Compared to what is shown in the video conventional nuclear power is very simple. Can you imagine the cost of what they are building? It can't be built for commercial reasons it has to be something else, maybe just to say they can do it.
our military had made a tremendous successful use of nuclear harnessing. for a long long time.
It's still 2 or 3 decades in the future. What they're building isn't a power plant, but a proof of concept. There's a lot of heat generated, which would be used to drive steam turbines, when it becomes commercial. The date predicted for a feasible system is usually circa 2050.Interesting. They did not say, or I didn't hear, how it would produce electricity for use. This design just seems too complicated to ever be commercially feasible.The key to energy development in the future is fusion. ITER - the way to new energy
ITER- The world's largest puzzle
Compared to what is shown in the video conventional nuclear power is very simple. Can you imagine the cost of what they are building? It can't be built for commercial reasons it has to be something else, maybe just to say they can do it.
our military had made a tremendous successful use of nuclear harnessing. for a long long time.
Been there done than, but the military is not run on a profit.
Actually we are getting off topic.i'm sure you've pondered a non nuclear navy, the cost. was that your MOS ?Been there done than, but the military is not run on a profit.our military had made a tremendous successful use of nuclear harnessing. for a long long time.Compared to what is shown in the video conventional nuclear power is very simple. Can you imagine the cost of what they are building? It can't be built for commercial reasons it has to be something else, maybe just to say they can do it.It's still 2 or 3 decades in the future. What they're building isn't a power plant, but a proof of concept. There's a lot of heat generated, which would be used to drive steam turbines, when it becomes commercial. The date predicted for a feasible system is usually circa 2050.Interesting. They did not say, or I didn't hear, how it would produce electricity for use. This design just seems too complicated to ever be commercially feasible.
spending on the military, is one of the best uses of income tax.
That's why it's good to see the cost of a fusion power system being spread around. Neither commercial entities or the U.S. can go it alone in this case.Bottom line, nuclear power isn't cheap.
