Orwell warning About Liberal Media

[owebo]

Fox News has the most in common with Pravda of the 70's.

The GOP, Trump, and the right...has only 1 TV News network!

Fox News.

Sure. Not too bright are you? Communists are left wing. Those who support Liberty are on the right.

Don't tell Glenn Beck or Jonah Goldberg that commies are only on the left.

"Commies" are Left Wing....Fascism however is simply a tool that anyone can use.

Fascism is of the left.....and democrats are running towards it at light speed...

View attachment 93636

You keep posting this stupid thing, and it is completely wrong, you fucking idiot.

Sure fascist...sure....

 

[bripat9643]

Fox News has the most in common with Pravda of the 70's.

The GOP, Trump, and the right...has only 1 TV News network!

Fox News.

Sure. Not too bright are you? Communists are left wing. Those who support Liberty are on the right.

Don't tell Glenn Beck or Jonah Goldberg that commies are only on the left.

"Commies" are Left Wing....Fascism however is simply a tool that anyone can use.

Fascism is of the left.....and democrats are running towards it at light speed...

View attachment 93636

You keep posting this stupid thing, and it is completely wrong, you fucking idiot.

It's 100% accurate. Of course, leftwing douche bags will never admit it.

 

[Grizz]

1. 1 of 7
   In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
   
   If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.
   
   Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.

Poor George Orwell. You people are shitting all over him. You truly do not know what he was about. He was a liberal. He was left thinking. His message, his thought, his beliefs have no connection to the right wing, to your fascism, to religion, etc. You are trying to say he spoke for you, and he didn't. So sad.

He failed to forsee that the far-left hijacked Democrats would become the neo-fascists. But he got everything else right.

Liberals are not fascists. It is a contradiction in terms. Stop listening to your right wing propagandists and get an education.

So....was Hitler "using" Fascism or Socialism?
You've never once has had an original thought and I pity you.

 

[owebo]

1. 1 of 7
   In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
   
   If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.
   
   Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.

Poor George Orwell. You people are shitting all over him. You truly do not know what he was about. He was a liberal. He was left thinking. His message, his thought, his beliefs have no connection to the right wing, to your fascism, to religion, etc. You are trying to say he spoke for you, and he didn't. So sad.

He failed to forsee that the far-left hijacked Democrats would become the neo-fascists. But he got everything else right.

Liberals are not fascists. It is a contradiction in terms. Stop listening to your right wing propagandists and get an education.

So....was Hitler "using" Fascism or Socialism?
You've never once has had an original thought and I pity you.

Do you have any fucking idea what fascism even is?

 

[Esmeralda]

1. 1 of 7
   In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
   
   If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.
   
   Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.

Poor George Orwell. You people are shitting all over him. You truly do not know what he was about. He was a liberal. He was left thinking. His message, his thought, his beliefs have no connection to the right wing, to your fascism, to religion, etc. You are trying to say he spoke for you, and he didn't. So sad.

No, we are saying that he completely described what you are and what you believe in. We are saying that you are so terrified of us that you'd support "re-education" camps and failing that death to those who dare disagree with you. He was actually describing your Left Wing Fascism and your need to eliminate dissention in all of it's forms.

But then...you knew that.

He described when? Please, tell me which of his works you have read. Tell me how you intrepret his work.

You know nothing about Orwell. You do not understand him at all. Read Burmese Days and Down and out in Paris and London. He was a liberal, a leftist, not conservative, not right wing, not religious. You completely misunderstand him.

In Animal Farm, his point not socialism, that's just the vehicle he uses. His point is that power corrupts. In 1984, his message is again, not socialism, the corruptness of communist Russia is the vehicle he uses. In Politics and the English Language, he is talking about propaganda, not about political correctness.

You don't understand him. I have doubt you have even read his work, much less studied it. And definitely you have not understood him. And, if you have any personal familiarity with those works I have just mentioned, you have only familiarity with them and none of his other work. Mostly likely you have been told what to thing, by a right wing propagandist, someone doing just the opposite of what Orwell would want to be don.

It's sad and disturbing the way you all are shitting all over his legacy. Read Burmese Days and tell me he's right wing. Read Down and out in Paris and London and tell me he's right wing.

" In 1984, his message is again, not socialism, the corruptness of communist Russia is the vehicle he uses. In Politics and the English Language, he is talking about propaganda, not about political correctness. "

Dumbass, you just made my point. I shit on you and your legacy you dumbass, you have not a fucking clue as to what you are talking about.

I have studied Orwell and taught him. You don't get him at all. Some rightwing propagandist has told you what to think, and you just do what you are told. You do not understand Orwell.

 

[toxicmedia]

Orwell nailed it! US Pravda media is deliverin' it.

Fox News has the most in common with Pravda of the 70's.

The GOP, Trump, and the right...has only 1 TV News network!

Fox News.

How does that make it like Pravda?

Pravda was the only source of news for Russian commies, and Fox News is the only TV news for American righties

Pravda was the only news source for the entire population of the USSR. You're free to watch your commie news sources.

You're obviously an idiot.

It's not about me, it's about how the GOP has message control, like Pravda had. The meager other righty media outlets say absolutely the same thing Fox does.

They don't tell you what to think, but Fox News is really just there to make you feel like you're right

 

[B. Kidd]

1. 1 of 7
   In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
   
   If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.
   
   Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.

Poor George Orwell. You people are shitting all over him. You truly do not know what he was about. He was a liberal. He was left thinking. His message, his thought, his beliefs have no connection to the right wing, to your fascism, to religion, etc. You are trying to say he spoke for you, and he didn't. So sad.

He failed to forsee that the far-left hijacked Democrats would become the neo-fascists. But he got everything else right.

Liberals are not fascist. It is a contradiction in terms. Stop listening to your right wing propagandists and get an education.

What's funny is that you have no clue you're a fascist.....

And neither does the rest whom are gonna vote for the Hill-Beast!

 

[toxicmedia]

Sure. Not too bright are you? Communists are left wing. Those who support Liberty are on the right.

Don't tell Glenn Beck or Jonah Goldberg that commies are only on the left.

"Commies" are Left Wing....Fascism however is simply a tool that anyone can use.

Fascism is of the left.....and democrats are running towards it at light speed...

View attachment 93636

You keep posting this stupid thing, and it is completely wrong, you fucking idiot.

It's 100% accurate. Of course, leftwing douche bags will never admit it.

There isn't anything in the universe that is 100% accurate. Except the fact that Donald Trump will lose in November.

 

[Grizz]

1. 1 of 7
   In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
   
   If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.
   
   Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.

Poor George Orwell. You people are shitting all over him. You truly do not know what he was about. He was a liberal. He was left thinking. His message, his thought, his beliefs have no connection to the right wing, to your fascism, to religion, etc. You are trying to say he spoke for you, and he didn't. So sad.

No, we are saying that he completely described what you are and what you believe in. We are saying that you are so terrified of us that you'd support "re-education" camps and failing that death to those who dare disagree with you. He was actually describing your Left Wing Fascism and your need to eliminate dissention in all of it's forms.

But then...you knew that.

He described when? Please, tell me which of his works you have read. Tell me how you intrepret his work.

You know nothing about Orwell. You do not understand him at all. Read Burmese Days and Down and out in Paris and London. He was a liberal, a leftist, not conservative, not right wing, not religious. You completely misunderstand him.

In Animal Farm, his point not socialism, that's just the vehicle he uses. His point is that power corrupts. In 1984, his message is again, not socialism, the corruptness of communist Russia is the vehicle he uses. In Politics and the English Language, he is talking about propaganda, not about political correctness.

You don't understand him. I have doubt you have even read his work, much less studied it. And definitely you have not understood him. And, if you have any personal familiarity with those works I have just mentioned, you have only familiarity with them and none of his other work. Mostly likely you have been told what to thing, by a right wing propagandist, someone doing just the opposite of what Orwell would want to be don.

It's sad and disturbing the way you all are shitting all over his legacy. Read Burmese Days and tell me he's right wing. Read Down and out in Paris and London and tell me he's right wing.

" In 1984, his message is again, not socialism, the corruptness of communist Russia is the vehicle he uses. In Politics and the English Language, he is talking about propaganda, not about political correctness. "

Dumbass, you just made my point. I shit on you and your legacy you dumbass, you have not a fucking clue as to what you are talking about.

I have studied Orwell and taught him. You don't get him at all. Some rightwing propagandist has told you what to think, and you just do what you are told. You do not understand Orwell.

Was Hitler using "Fascism" or "Socialism" ?
I completely get him. You are nothing more than a Left Wing Propagandist, and not a good one at that.

 

[owebo]

Don't tell Glenn Beck or Jonah Goldberg that commies are only on the left.

"Commies" are Left Wing....Fascism however is simply a tool that anyone can use.

Fascism is of the left.....and democrats are running towards it at light speed...

View attachment 93636

You keep posting this stupid thing, and it is completely wrong, you fucking idiot.

It's 100% accurate. Of course, leftwing douche bags will never admit it.

There isn't anything in the universe that is 100% accurate. Except the fact that Donald Trump will lose in November.

I can't wait to see Trumps landslide win......

 

[owebo]

Poor George Orwell. You people are shitting all over him. You truly do not know what he was about. He was a liberal. He was left thinking. His message, his thought, his beliefs have no connection to the right wing, to your fascism, to religion, etc. You are trying to say he spoke for you, and he didn't. So sad.

No, we are saying that he completely described what you are and what you believe in. We are saying that you are so terrified of us that you'd support "re-education" camps and failing that death to those who dare disagree with you. He was actually describing your Left Wing Fascism and your need to eliminate dissention in all of it's forms.

But then...you knew that.

He described when? Please, tell me which of his works you have read. Tell me how you intrepret his work.

You know nothing about Orwell. You do not understand him at all. Read Burmese Days and Down and out in Paris and London. He was a liberal, a leftist, not conservative, not right wing, not religious. You completely misunderstand him.

In Animal Farm, his point not socialism, that's just the vehicle he uses. His point is that power corrupts. In 1984, his message is again, not socialism, the corruptness of communist Russia is the vehicle he uses. In Politics and the English Language, he is talking about propaganda, not about political correctness.

You don't understand him. I have doubt you have even read his work, much less studied it. And definitely you have not understood him. And, if you have any personal familiarity with those works I have just mentioned, you have only familiarity with them and none of his other work. Mostly likely you have been told what to thing, by a right wing propagandist, someone doing just the opposite of what Orwell would want to be don.

It's sad and disturbing the way you all are shitting all over his legacy. Read Burmese Days and tell me he's right wing. Read Down and out in Paris and London and tell me he's right wing.

" In 1984, his message is again, not socialism, the corruptness of communist Russia is the vehicle he uses. In Politics and the English Language, he is talking about propaganda, not about political correctness. "

Dumbass, you just made my point. I shit on you and your legacy you dumbass, you have not a fucking clue as to what you are talking about.

I have studied Orwell and taught him. You don't get him at all. Some rightwing propagandist has told you what to think, and you just do what you are told. You do not understand Orwell.

Was Hitler using "Fascism" or "Socialism" ?
I completely get him. You are nothing more than a Left Wing Propagandist, and not a good one at that.

I didn't think you had the slightest fucking clue....

 

[B. Kidd]

1. 1 of 7
   In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
   
   If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.
   
   Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.

Poor George Orwell. You people are shitting all over him. You truly do not know what he was about. He was a liberal. He was left thinking. His message, his thought, his beliefs have no connection to the right wing, to your fascism, to religion, etc. You are trying to say he spoke for you, and he didn't. So sad.

No, we are saying that he completely described what you are and what you believe in. We are saying that you are so terrified of us that you'd support "re-education" camps and failing that death to those who dare disagree with you. He was actually describing your Left Wing Fascism and your need to eliminate dissention in all of it's forms.

But then...you knew that.

He described when? Please, tell me which of his works you have read. Tell me how you intrepret his work.

You know nothing about Orwell. You do not understand him at all. Read Burmese Days and Down and out in Paris and London. He was a liberal, a leftist, not conservative, not right wing, not religious. You completely misunderstand him.

In Animal Farm, his point not socialism, that's just the vehicle he uses. His point is that power corrupts. In 1984, his message is again, not socialism, the corruptness of communist Russia is the vehicle he uses. In Politics and the English Language, he is talking about propaganda, not about political correctness.

You don't understand him. I have doubt you have even read his work, much less studied it. And definitely you have not understood him. And, if you have any personal familiarity with those works I have just mentioned, you have only familiarity with them and none of his other work. Mostly likely you have been told what to thing, by a right wing propagandist, someone doing just the opposite of what Orwell would want to be don.

It's sad and disturbing the way you all are shitting all over his legacy. Read Burmese Days and tell me he's right wing. Read Down and out in Paris and London and tell me he's right wing.

" In 1984, his message is again, not socialism, the corruptness of communist Russia is the vehicle he uses. In Politics and the English Language, he is talking about propaganda, not about political correctness. "

Dumbass, you just made my point. I shit on you and your legacy you dumbass, you have not a fucking clue as to what you are talking about.

I have studied Orwell and taught him. You don't get him at all. Some rightwing propagandist has told you what to think, and you just do what you are told. You do not understand Orwell.

Your students should sue........or at the least, get a refund.

 

[Grizz]

No, we are saying that he completely described what you are and what you believe in. We are saying that you are so terrified of us that you'd support "re-education" camps and failing that death to those who dare disagree with you. He was actually describing your Left Wing Fascism and your need to eliminate dissention in all of it's forms.

But then...you knew that.

He described when? Please, tell me which of his works you have read. Tell me how you intrepret his work.

You know nothing about Orwell. You do not understand him at all. Read Burmese Days and Down and out in Paris and London. He was a liberal, a leftist, not conservative, not right wing, not religious. You completely misunderstand him.

In Animal Farm, his point not socialism, that's just the vehicle he uses. His point is that power corrupts. In 1984, his message is again, not socialism, the corruptness of communist Russia is the vehicle he uses. In Politics and the English Language, he is talking about propaganda, not about political correctness.

You don't understand him. I have doubt you have even read his work, much less studied it. And definitely you have not understood him. And, if you have any personal familiarity with those works I have just mentioned, you have only familiarity with them and none of his other work. Mostly likely you have been told what to thing, by a right wing propagandist, someone doing just the opposite of what Orwell would want to be don.

It's sad and disturbing the way you all are shitting all over his legacy. Read Burmese Days and tell me he's right wing. Read Down and out in Paris and London and tell me he's right wing.

" In 1984, his message is again, not socialism, the corruptness of communist Russia is the vehicle he uses. In Politics and the English Language, he is talking about propaganda, not about political correctness. "

Dumbass, you just made my point. I shit on you and your legacy you dumbass, you have not a fucking clue as to what you are talking about.

I have studied Orwell and taught him. You don't get him at all. Some rightwing propagandist has told you what to think, and you just do what you are told. You do not understand Orwell.

Was Hitler using "Fascism" or "Socialism" ?
I completely get him. You are nothing more than a Left Wing Propagandist, and not a good one at that.

I didn't think you had the slightest fucking clue....

Don't think just listen.

 

[owebo]

He described when? Please, tell me which of his works you have read. Tell me how you intrepret his work.

You know nothing about Orwell. You do not understand him at all. Read Burmese Days and Down and out in Paris and London. He was a liberal, a leftist, not conservative, not right wing, not religious. You completely misunderstand him.

In Animal Farm, his point not socialism, that's just the vehicle he uses. His point is that power corrupts. In 1984, his message is again, not socialism, the corruptness of communist Russia is the vehicle he uses. In Politics and the English Language, he is talking about propaganda, not about political correctness.

You don't understand him. I have doubt you have even read his work, much less studied it. And definitely you have not understood him. And, if you have any personal familiarity with those works I have just mentioned, you have only familiarity with them and none of his other work. Mostly likely you have been told what to thing, by a right wing propagandist, someone doing just the opposite of what Orwell would want to be don.

It's sad and disturbing the way you all are shitting all over his legacy. Read Burmese Days and tell me he's right wing. Read Down and out in Paris and London and tell me he's right wing.

" In 1984, his message is again, not socialism, the corruptness of communist Russia is the vehicle he uses. In Politics and the English Language, he is talking about propaganda, not about political correctness. "

Dumbass, you just made my point. I shit on you and your legacy you dumbass, you have not a fucking clue as to what you are talking about.

I have studied Orwell and taught him. You don't get him at all. Some rightwing propagandist has told you what to think, and you just do what you are told. You do not understand Orwell.

Was Hitler using "Fascism" or "Socialism" ?
I completely get him. You are nothing more than a Left Wing Propagandist, and not a good one at that.

I didn't think you had the slightest fucking clue....

Don't think just listen.

You do neither well...

 

[NYcarbineer]

"Commies" are Left Wing....Fascism however is simply a tool that anyone can use.

Fascism is of the left.....and democrats are running towards it at light speed...

View attachment 93636

You keep posting this stupid thing, and it is completely wrong, you fucking idiot.

It's 100% accurate. Of course, leftwing douche bags will never admit it.

There isn't anything in the universe that is 100% accurate. Except the fact that Donald Trump will lose in November.

I can't wait to see Trumps landslide win......

I can't wait to collect that thousand dollars from you.

 

[Grizz]

" In 1984, his message is again, not socialism, the corruptness of communist Russia is the vehicle he uses. In Politics and the English Language, he is talking about propaganda, not about political correctness. "

Dumbass, you just made my point. I shit on you and your legacy you dumbass, you have not a fucking clue as to what you are talking about.

I have studied Orwell and taught him. You don't get him at all. Some rightwing propagandist has told you what to think, and you just do what you are told. You do not understand Orwell.

Was Hitler using "Fascism" or "Socialism" ?
I completely get him. You are nothing more than a Left Wing Propagandist, and not a good one at that.

I didn't think you had the slightest fucking clue....

Don't think just listen.

You do neither well...

I always listen when someone I respect is talking. I never listen when an ill educated kid like you spouts bull shit.

 

[Esmeralda]

1. 1 of 7
   In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
   
   If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.
   
   Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.

Poor George Orwell. You people are shitting all over him. You truly do not know what he was about. He was a liberal. He was left thinking. His message, his thought, his beliefs have no connection to the right wing, to your fascism, to religion, etc. You are trying to say he spoke for you, and he didn't. So sad.

He failed to forsee that the far-left hijacked Democrats would become the neo-fascists. But he got everything else right.

Liberals are not fascist. It is a contradiction in terms. Stop listening to your right wing propagandists and get an education.

What's funny is that you have no clue you're a fascist.....

What's sad is that you have no idea what a fascist is.

 

[owebo]

I have studied Orwell and taught him. You don't get him at all. Some rightwing propagandist has told you what to think, and you just do what you are told. You do not understand Orwell.

Was Hitler using "Fascism" or "Socialism" ?
I completely get him. You are nothing more than a Left Wing Propagandist, and not a good one at that.

I didn't think you had the slightest fucking clue....

Don't think just listen.

You do neither well...

I always listen when someone I respect is talking. I never listen when an ill educated kid like you spouts bull shit.

Good luck finishing your on-line degree....

 

[owebo]

1. 1 of 7
   In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
   
   If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.
   
   Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.

Poor George Orwell. You people are shitting all over him. You truly do not know what he was about. He was a liberal. He was left thinking. His message, his thought, his beliefs have no connection to the right wing, to your fascism, to religion, etc. You are trying to say he spoke for you, and he didn't. So sad.

He failed to forsee that the far-left hijacked Democrats would become the neo-fascists. But he got everything else right.

Liberals are not fascist. It is a contradiction in terms. Stop listening to your right wing propagandists and get an education.

What's funny is that you have no clue you're a fascist.....

What's sad is that you have no idea what a fascist is.

You...

 

[Dr Grump]

1. 1 of 7
   In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
   
   If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.
   
   Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.

I thought you right-wing loons were all about personal responsibility. So now Trump acting like a misogynistic, creepy mofo is the media's fault? Interesting;....