- Jul 21, 2010
- 71,802
- 55,602
- 3,605
- Thread starter
- #301
No one claimed solar was the best choice for every area of the world. You would have better results with wind and hydroelectric. Also biofuel and small nuclear.Solar in the UK is shit. In southern Scotland, it's shitter. I put my postcode into a website, and the orientation of the house to NESW, and after the lifespan of buying the panels, it would have cost me £1,800. So if I just stay with the national grid on fossil fuels, I'm £1,800 better off.
It might work in Americastan, but not here.