P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 79,041
- 4,383
- Thread starter
- #121
Uncle Winney, the racist ass that he was, had nothing to give to anybody.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Uncle Winney, the racist ass that he was, had nothing to give to anybody.
Uncle Winney, the racist ass that he was, had nothing to give to anybody.
Facts don't penetrate your thick head do they?
Uncle Winney, the racist ass that he was, had nothing to give to anybody.
Facts don't penetrate your thick head do they?
The British run Palestine Mandate was an administrative position not an ownership position. The mandate was to assist the inhabitants of Palestine, i.e. the Palestinians, in gaining their independence. Britain violated the mandate by casting the interests of the inhabitants aside and favoring the interests of foreigners.
Facts don't penetrate your thick head do they?
The British run Palestine Mandate was an administrative position not an ownership position. The mandate was to assist the inhabitants of Palestine, i.e. the Palestinians, in gaining their independence. Britain violated the mandate by casting the interests of the inhabitants aside and favoring the interests of foreigners.
Wrong as usual. The League of Nations mandated that "Palestine" be divided into two countries IF the people there so desired. One Jewish one Arab. The Arabs refused to form a Country. In fact they refused because they wanted the Arab nations bordering them to invade and claim the land.
...IF the people there so desired.
For the contention to be valid there should have been a prior legitimate sovereign, that was ousted. No arab state of palistan has ever existed in history to fit the bill.That seems to be the major problem. When was the victory of Israel over Palestine. There is considerable history showing when Israel occupied different parts of Palestine but I can find no history where Israel has won land or legally acquired any land.
It still looks like arab occupational bullshit.It still looks like occupation.
For the contention to be valid there should have been a prior legitimate sovereign, that was ousted. No arab state of palistan has ever existed in history to fit the bill.That seems to be the major problem. When was the victory of Israel over Palestine. There is considerable history showing when Israel occupied different parts of Palestine but I can find no history where Israel has won land or legally acquired any land.It still looks like arab occupational bullshit.It still looks like occupation.
The British run Palestine Mandate was an administrative position not an ownership position. The mandate was to assist the inhabitants of Palestine, i.e. the Palestinians, in gaining their independence. Britain violated the mandate by casting the interests of the inhabitants aside and favoring the interests of foreigners.
Wrong as usual. The League of Nations mandated that "Palestine" be divided into two countries IF the people there so desired. One Jewish one Arab. The Arabs refused to form a Country. In fact they refused because they wanted the Arab nations bordering them to invade and claim the land.
...IF the people there so desired.
It was virtually unanimous among the inhabitants to reject the proposal. Even the Jewish inhabitants of Palestine rejected the proposal.
Britain violated the mandate.
The Zionist project was fraught with discontinuities, contradictions, and conflicts with the Palestinian natives and occasionally the British Mandate administration, but in the final analysis its implementation was quite successful.
Factors that led to this success include:
In-Migration and Demographic Transformation
Land Acquisition
Separate Jewish Economy
Jewish Labor
Separate Social and Political Institutions
Creation of a Jewish State within a State
Wrong as usual. The League of Nations mandated that "Palestine" be divided into two countries IF the people there so desired. One Jewish one Arab. The Arabs refused to form a Country. In fact they refused because they wanted the Arab nations bordering them to invade and claim the land.
It was virtually unanimous among the inhabitants to reject the proposal. Even the Jewish inhabitants of Palestine rejected the proposal.
Britain violated the mandate.
Britain accepted the mandate from the fall of the Turkish Ottoman Empires falling hand. As has been done with every Empire.
You just post lies. Britain violated the mandate? How can an Empire violate it's own commands? Once Britain accepted the mandate, it was theirs.
Jordan received ~76% of the Palestinian mandated land from Britain before Israel received it's 1% of the Palestinian Mandate.
British Mandate for Palestine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Zionist project was fraught with discontinuities, contradictions, and conflicts with the Palestinian natives and occasionally the British Mandate administration, but in the final analysis its implementation was quite successful.
Factors that led to this success include:
In-Migration and Demographic Transformation
Land Acquisition
Separate Jewish Economy
Jewish Labor
Separate Social and Political Institutions
Creation of a Jewish State within a State
Time for the Palestinians to work towards peace rather than ending Israel in one of many Arabian machinations towards this goal.
SOUTHWEST ASIA
Facts don't penetrate your thick head do they?
The British run Palestine Mandate was an administrative position not an ownership position. The mandate was to assist the inhabitants of Palestine, i.e. the Palestinians, in gaining their independence. Britain violated the mandate by casting the interests of the inhabitants aside and favoring the interests of foreigners.
Wrong as usual. The League of Nations mandated that "Palestine" be divided into two countries IF the people there so desired. One Jewish one Arab. The Arabs refused to form a Country. In fact they refused because they wanted the Arab nations bordering them to invade and claim the land.[
The British run Palestine Mandate was an administrative position not an ownership position. The mandate was to assist the inhabitants of Palestine, i.e. the Palestinians, in gaining their independence. Britain violated the mandate by casting the interests of the inhabitants aside and favoring the interests of foreigners.
Wrong as usual. The League of Nations mandated that "Palestine" be divided into two countries IF the people there so desired. One Jewish one Arab. The Arabs refused to form a Country. In fact they refused because they wanted the Arab nations bordering them to invade and claim the land.[
Indeed.
The Arabs refused to form a Country.
Arabs should have had something in the first place to make such claim, of course.Uncle Winney, the racist ass that he was, had nothing to give to anybody.
Especially when there had been no owner, of course.The British run Palestine Mandate was an administrative position not an ownership position.
Well, joose were "palestinians" too.The mandate was to assist the inhabitants of Palestine, i.e. the Palestinians, in gaining their independence.
Indeed, the creation of Jordan for the Hashemite tribe, kicked out by the bin Saud.Britain violated the mandate by casting the interests of the inhabitants aside and favoring the interests of foreigners.
Heh, the proposal was put forward by the UN.It was virtually unanimous among the inhabitants to reject the proposal. Even the Jewish inhabitants of Palestine rejected the proposal. Britain violated the mandate.
They think they had a country, of course. Especially in view that, "palestinian" as "exclusively arab" is a PLO invention.Not true. The Palestinians already had a country. They just refused to give half of it to foreign colonialists.
How about the State department ignorance of the fact that, Palestine was not a class "A" mandate?The U.S. State Department Digest of International Law says that the terms of the Treaty of Lausanne provided for the application of the principles of state succession to the "A" Mandates. ...For the contention to be valid there should have been a prior legitimate sovereign, that was ousted. No arab state of palistan has ever existed in history to fit the bill.That seems to be the major problem. When was the victory of Israel over Palestine. There is considerable history showing when Israel occupied different parts of Palestine but I can find no history where Israel has won land or legally acquired any land.It still looks like arab occupational bullshit.It still looks like occupation.
Wrong as usual. The League of Nations mandated that "Palestine" be divided into two countries IF the people there so desired. One Jewish one Arab. The Arabs refused to form a Country. In fact they refused because they wanted the Arab nations bordering them to invade and claim the land.
It was virtually unanimous among the inhabitants to reject the proposal. Even the Jewish inhabitants of Palestine rejected the proposal.
Britain violated the mandate.
Britain accepted the mandate from the fall of the Turkish Ottoman Empires falling hand. As has been done with every Empire.
You just post lies. Britain violated the mandate? How can an Empire violate it's own commands? Once Britain accepted the mandate, it was theirs.
Jordan received ~76% of the Palestinian mandated land from Britain before Israel received it's 1% of the Palestinian Mandate.
British Mandate for Palestine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Zionist project was fraught with discontinuities, contradictions, and conflicts with the Palestinian natives and occasionally the British Mandate administration, but in the final analysis its implementation was quite successful.
Factors that led to this success include:
In-Migration and Demographic Transformation
Land Acquisition
Separate Jewish Economy
Jewish Labor
Separate Social and Political Institutions
Creation of a Jewish State within a State
Time for the Palestinians to work towards peace rather than ending Israel in one of many Arabian machinations towards this goal.
SOUTHWEST ASIA
"One always finds in Palestine Arabs who have been in the country only a few weeks or a few months. Since they are themselves strangers in a strange land, they are the loudest to cry: 'Out with the Jews!'. Amongst them are to be found representatives of every Arab country: Arabs from Transjordan, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Egypt, the Sudan and Iraq."The League of Nations Charter called for the right of self determination of the inhabitants. Foreigners have no rights.