Palestinians Massing At The Israeli Border

[ Not bad being at the border and being killed or injured. One ALWAYS gets paid for it. This is from today, as the "protests" continue. Now, which group/territory turn their protest/riots into a paying gig? ]

The head of the charity committee of Hamas, Ahmad Kurd, announced that the Gaza government will distribute compensation money to about 4,000 of the rioters who were hurt in confrontations with Israel.

Channel 2 News reported that the payments will be made through banks in Gaza.

Hamas to pay rioters injured by IDF
 
RE: Palestinians Massing At The Israeli Border
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

I get it, so you are just guessing. You don't have any actual data to support your claim.

Does either of these two documents suggest or reference a pre-existing Palestinian State? I think not.
Yes they do.

Recognizing that the Palestinian people is entitled to self-determination in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations,

Expressing its grave concern that the Palestinian people has been prevented from enjoying its inalienable rights, in particular its right to self-determination,

Guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter,

Recalling its relevant resolutions which affirm the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination,

1. Reaffirms the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people in Palestine, including:

A/RES/3236 (XXIX) of 22 November 1974

Recognizing, Recalling, Reaffirms, all suggest a condition that pre dates the resolution. What event in Palestine's history could trigger these pre-existing rights? The only one I could find is Palestine's creation in 1924.
(COMMENT)

There is no pre-existing right to a Palestinian state dating back to 1924. The Government of Palestine of 1924 was the UK Mandate Responsibility. No Government, not even when asked, was composed of any Arabs of Palestine.

You are just making this up as you go along.

Most Respectfully,
R
There is no pre-existing right to a Palestinian state dating back to 1924.
You are still ducking the question.

Recognizing, Recalling, Reaffirms, all suggest a condition that pre dates the resolution. What event in Palestine's history could trigger these pre-existing rights?​
 
RE: Palestinians Massing At The Israeli Border
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

I get it, so you are just guessing. You don't have any actual data to support your claim.

Does either of these two documents suggest or reference a pre-existing Palestinian State? I think not.
Yes they do.

Recognizing that the Palestinian people is entitled to self-determination in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations,

Expressing its grave concern that the Palestinian people has been prevented from enjoying its inalienable rights, in particular its right to self-determination,

Guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter,

Recalling its relevant resolutions which affirm the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination,

1. Reaffirms the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people in Palestine, including:

A/RES/3236 (XXIX) of 22 November 1974

Recognizing, Recalling, Reaffirms, all suggest a condition that pre dates the resolution. What event in Palestine's history could trigger these pre-existing rights? The only one I could find is Palestine's creation in 1924.
(COMMENT)

There is no pre-existing right to a Palestinian state dating back to 1924. The Government of Palestine of 1924 was the UK Mandate Responsibility. No Government, not even when asked, was composed of any Arabs of Palestine.

You are just making this up as you go along.

Most Respectfully,
R
There is no pre-existing right to a Palestinian state dating back to 1924.
You are still ducking the question.

Recognizing, Recalling, Reaffirms, all suggest a condition that pre dates the resolution. What event in Palestine's history could trigger these pre-existing rights?​

Rocco is not arguing against the rights of the Arab Palestinians to self-determination. He is arguing that the Jewish people have those same rights. If the source of those rights is UN resolutions (it's not) as you claim then the Jewish people's claims are just as entrenched as the Arab's.
 
RE: Palestinians Massing At The Israeli Border
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

I get it, so you are just guessing. You don't have any actual data to support your claim.

Does either of these two documents suggest or reference a pre-existing Palestinian State? I think not.
Yes they do.

Recognizing that the Palestinian people is entitled to self-determination in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations,

Expressing its grave concern that the Palestinian people has been prevented from enjoying its inalienable rights, in particular its right to self-determination,

Guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter,

Recalling its relevant resolutions which affirm the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination,

1. Reaffirms the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people in Palestine, including:

A/RES/3236 (XXIX) of 22 November 1974

Recognizing, Recalling, Reaffirms, all suggest a condition that pre dates the resolution. What event in Palestine's history could trigger these pre-existing rights? The only one I could find is Palestine's creation in 1924.
(COMMENT)

There is no pre-existing right to a Palestinian state dating back to 1924. The Government of Palestine of 1924 was the UK Mandate Responsibility. No Government, not even when asked, was composed of any Arabs of Palestine.

You are just making this up as you go along.

Most Respectfully,
R
There is no pre-existing right to a Palestinian state dating back to 1924.
You are still ducking the question.

Recognizing, Recalling, Reaffirms, all suggest a condition that pre dates the resolution. What event in Palestine's history could trigger these pre-existing rights?​
You fish too much. There are no fishes in this ocean you are swimming in.

The Ottoman Empire owned all of that land by force for 800 years.
They joined Germany in WWI and LOST the war, and most of those lands with it. Just as Germany did.

There was no Arab Nation initiated on the Land of Israel, EVER, not even when the Muslim Kurds first took the area in the 7th Century invasion.

The Palestine Mandate (called Palestine instead of Israel by the British government because they HATED JEWS ).

But the Mandate for Palestine was still and should have continued to be for The National Homeland of the Jewish People, because it was ON the ANCIENT HOMELAND of......guess who?

The ONLY reason Husseini and his clan of bastards complained and started riots against the Jews, is because he believed in Jihad and that the Jews should NEVER have ANY sovereignty of their own, Especially on once upon a time Muslim conquered land.

You can BS about pre this, and pre that all you like.

NO ARAB muslim at the time thought of themselves as "Palestinians", they actually wanted to have that land of that Mandate as part of the Syrian Mandate and become Greater Syria.

ALL BECAUSE the Arab leaders HATED JEWS.

Only reason why the Arab League was created.
Only reason why riots against the Jews began in 1920 and continue to this day.

SOME Muslims HATE Jews and give them absolutely NO RIGHTS as human being at all. They do not even see them as humans.


Is your vision about the "conflict" better now?
 
RE: Palestinians Massing At The Israeli Border
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

I get it, so you are just guessing. You don't have any actual data to support your claim.

Does either of these two documents suggest or reference a pre-existing Palestinian State? I think not.
Yes they do.

Recognizing that the Palestinian people is entitled to self-determination in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations,

Expressing its grave concern that the Palestinian people has been prevented from enjoying its inalienable rights, in particular its right to self-determination,

Guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter,

Recalling its relevant resolutions which affirm the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination,

1. Reaffirms the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people in Palestine, including:

A/RES/3236 (XXIX) of 22 November 1974

Recognizing, Recalling, Reaffirms, all suggest a condition that pre dates the resolution. What event in Palestine's history could trigger these pre-existing rights? The only one I could find is Palestine's creation in 1924.
(COMMENT)

There is no pre-existing right to a Palestinian state dating back to 1924. The Government of Palestine of 1924 was the UK Mandate Responsibility. No Government, not even when asked, was composed of any Arabs of Palestine.

You are just making this up as you go along.

Most Respectfully,
R
There is no pre-existing right to a Palestinian state dating back to 1924.
You are still ducking the question.

Recognizing, Recalling, Reaffirms, all suggest a condition that pre dates the resolution. What event in Palestine's history could trigger these pre-existing rights?​
As Rocco stated: There was NO pre-exiting right to any Palestinian Arab State dating back to 1920, actually.

And when the Arabs of the Mandate for Palestine were offered their own State out of what was left of the Mandate, minus 78% given to the Hashemite Arabs......THEY rejected it.

In other words, these endless weekly riots (peaceful, are they not? )
are simply a continuation of the same violent riots started by Husseini in 1920.

Nothing new, Tinmore.


No Jewish State then, if the Muslims had anything to say then.

NO Jewish State NOW, if the Muslims have anything to say about it now.
 
RE: Palestinians Massing At The Israeli Border
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

I get it, so you are just guessing. You don't have any actual data to support your claim.

Does either of these two documents suggest or reference a pre-existing Palestinian State? I think not.
Yes they do.

Recognizing that the Palestinian people is entitled to self-determination in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations,

Expressing its grave concern that the Palestinian people has been prevented from enjoying its inalienable rights, in particular its right to self-determination,

Guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter,

Recalling its relevant resolutions which affirm the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination,

1. Reaffirms the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people in Palestine, including:

A/RES/3236 (XXIX) of 22 November 1974

Recognizing, Recalling, Reaffirms, all suggest a condition that pre dates the resolution. What event in Palestine's history could trigger these pre-existing rights? The only one I could find is Palestine's creation in 1924.
(COMMENT)

There is no pre-existing right to a Palestinian state dating back to 1924. The Government of Palestine of 1924 was the UK Mandate Responsibility. No Government, not even when asked, was composed of any Arabs of Palestine.

You are just making this up as you go along.

Most Respectfully,
R
There is no pre-existing right to a Palestinian state dating back to 1924.
You are still ducking the question.

Recognizing, Recalling, Reaffirms, all suggest a condition that pre dates the resolution. What event in Palestine's history could trigger these pre-existing rights?​
As Rocco stated: There was NO pre-exiting right to any Palestinian Arab State dating back to 1920, actually.

And when the Arabs of the Mandate for Palestine were offered their own State out of what was left of the Mandate, minus 78% given to the Hashemite Arabs......THEY rejected it.

In other words, these endless weekly riots (peaceful, are they not? )
are simply a continuation of the same violent riots started by Husseini in 1920.

Nothing new, Tinmore.


No Jewish State then, if the Muslims had anything to say then.

NO Jewish State NOW, if the Muslims have anything to say about it now.

Which automatically means if they had their way there would not be the “ Two State Solution “ we hear so much about . Hope they keep it up; it just gives Israel more reason not to give up any more land
 
While most of us in the relevant first world have school, jobs, family responsibilities and a sense of our lives being meaningful, the UNRWA welfare fraud enabled Death Cultists are, while largely ignored, looking for that little slice of Death Cult “martyrdom”.


Report: Two Palestinians killed by IDF fire during weekly Gaza protests

REPORT: TWO PALESTINIANS KILLED BY IDF FIRE DURING WEEKLY GAZA PROTESTS


Weekly Riots by the eternally aggrieved, welfare fraud entitled Islamic terrorists.
 
Behind the Great March of Return I Need More Welfare Money


https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...e8-af3c-2123715f78df_story.html?noredirect=on

GAZA CITY — Every Friday for the past month, thousands of Palestinians have surged to Gaza’s border fence with Israel in a show of anger and defiance, some throwing stones and molotov cocktails, others simply wanting to be there.

“Young people have nothing to lose,” said 31-year-old Mohammed Sukkar, a few hundred yards from the boundary fence on the first day of protests last month as the crowd retreated after pops of gunfire. Sukkar is unemployed and said he is hard-pressed to feed his six children.



Sukkah is a role model for Arab-Moslem “yutes”. He’s 31, unemployed, has six kids he can’t feed.....so.......no point looking for a job, might as well attend the border riots and maybe catch a stray bullet.

Sure beats working for a living.
 
While most of us in the relevant first world have school, jobs, family responsibilities and a sense of our lives being meaningful, the UNRWA welfare fraud enabled Death Cultists are, while largely ignored, looking for that little slice of Death Cult “martyrdom”.


Report: Two Palestinians killed by IDF fire during weekly Gaza protests

REPORT: TWO PALESTINIANS KILLED BY IDF FIRE DURING WEEKLY GAZA PROTESTS


Weekly Riots by the eternally aggrieved, welfare fraud entitled Islamic terrorists.

Way to go !!!!
 
  • It is worth noting that the Hamas and Islamic Jihad members who were killed while participating in the violence near the Gaza-Israel border did not come there dressed in military uniforms or carrying their weapons. Instead, the Hamas and Islamic Jihad men participated in the weekly protests dressed in civilian clothes. They pretended they were ordinary and innocent civilians protesting against the economic crisis in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.

  • While they are in Cairo, the Hamas and Islamic Jihad leaders continue to send thousands of women and children to engage in violent attacks on Israeli soldiers. These leaders do not care about the safety or welfare of their women and children. On the contrary; the more dead women and children, the better. That way, they can blame Israel for killing innocent civilians and incite more Palestinians to join the jihad against Jews.

  • Those who are encouraging women and children to take part in a violent confrontation with the Israeli army should be held accountable for war crimes. It is time for the international community to call on Hamas and Islamic Jihad and the other terrorist groups in the Gaza Strip to stop hiding behind women and children and to stop using them as human shields in their jihad to eliminate Israel.
(full article online)

Hamas, Islamic Jihad War Crimes Against Children and Women
 
It was interesting to come across an article from almost a year ago regarding the failed Islamic terrorist gee-had at the Israeli border.

As of April of last year, enthusiasm for the border gee-had was waning as Arabs-Moslems began to see themselves used as cannon fodder by Hamas.

Just another Islamic Terrorist stunt that achieved only dead and injured islsmic terrorists.



Three weeks: How Gaza’s mass protests are failing to make an impact



Examination of numbers reported injured and types of injuries points to major reduction in violence and numbers participating in protests.
The “Great March of Return” protests that Hamas and Gaza activists launched on March 30 saw their lowest turnout in three weeks and the smallest number of casualties in clashes with Israeli forces, with one Palestinian killed and 528 reported injured on Friday.

Israeli authorities have been steadfast and on message about the protesters being a cover for violent action, while Hamas and the local activists have attempted to keep up the momentum. The proportion of those injured by live fire has declined by half, indicating a major reduction not only in the size of the protests but the level of violence along the border.

 
Blaming Israel for violence, Gaza factions warn: “We will not allow attacks on border protesters to continue” • Armed groups say they are “shocked by Arab world’s silence.”

(full article online)

Armed factions in Gaza: Region on verge of explosion

Armed factions in Gaza'istan. They're such drama queens. If they are on the verge of explosion, let them explode and burn down more of the infrastructure that is bought and paid for by the UNRWA welfare fraud.

These chuckleheads are nothing but a liability to the Arab-Islamist world so it's odd that they're playing the "poor, oppressed Pal'istanian" card.
 
The IDF said that about 11,000 rioters gathered in several locations along the border fence. The rioters hurled rocks at IDF soldiers and the fence, and a number of explosive devices and grenades were thrown at the fence and at the forces operating near it.

(full article online)

Border Police officer wounded during Gaza riots
 

Forum List

Back
Top