Pentagon officials discussing how to respond if Trump issues controversial orders

[RetiredGySgt]

You're talking about proactively -BEFORE THE FACT- contemplating mutiny...That's the very definition of ignoring your oath (i.e. treason), you got-damned dope.

You would've put civilians in boxcars.

Yup announcing they will actively disobey the President before he even does anything is mutiny

 

[westwall]

You're talking about proactively -BEFORE THE FACT- contemplating mutiny...That's the very definition of ignoring your oath (i.e. treason), you got-damned dope.

You would've put civilians in boxcars.

In a former life I see white as a SS camp guard. Dutifully following his orders. With a dose of brutality tossed in for his own amusement.

 

[White 6]

it is required by the oath to obey the President it is clearly stated in the oath retard.

You mean this oath?

 

[White 6]

You're talking about proactively -BEFORE THE FACT- contemplating mutiny...That's the very definition of ignoring your oath (i.e. treason), you got-damned dope.

You would've put civilians in boxcars.

I am talking about exactly what I said, not what you wish me to talk about.

 

[White 6]

The president is the CIC per that very document.

Relax. They will follow any legal order, he gives, as they have always done.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You mean this oath?
View attachment 1039875

that is not the oath taken when you enlist,

.

 

[Natural Citizen]

You're talking about proactively -BEFORE THE FACT- contemplating mutiny...That's the very definition of ignoring your oath (i.e. treason), you got-damned dope.

You would've put civilians in boxcars.

Totally off-topic, but fundamentally speaking, there really is no such thing as a ''civilian.''

Not in America anyway. The Framers warned Americans about standing armies. And they left Americans the Lawful means/framework to shoot usurpers in the face as a moral duty. But this is a much deeper discussion. Was reminded of it here is all.

Actually, every tme someone mentions the word ''civilian,'' I'm reminded of it. I just never say anything.

 

[White 6]

that is not the oath officers take.

How would you know, as a retired Sgt?

United States Uniformed Services Oath of Office - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[DonGlock26]

Relax. They will follow any legal order, he gives, as they have always done.

Unless they are calling communist Chinese generals behind Trump's back.

 

[White 6]

How would you know, as a retired Sgt?

United States Uniformed Services Oath of Office - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Perhaps you are confusing with this?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Here's an example for you.

Air Force General Sentenced In Historic Court-Martial

A military judged sentenced an Air Force general to a reprimand, base restriction for two months, and a $10,000 fine per month for 6 months.

www.airandspaceforces.com

Was he the former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff? No.

Not applicable.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

~~~~~~
You put it on the message board and it's open to response by anyone that reads it..
You asked a question, I answered it.

Granted, but I can't educate that moron if you give him the answers!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It's fucking illegal -gross insubordination- to conspire against the CiC before he has done anything.

It's truly hard to believe that you passed the ASVAB.

He probably didn't. He likely got in on a CAT IV waiver with no high school diploma.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

The fascists will be out of power Jan 20, 2025.

Then new fascists will take over.

 

[dblack]

Then new fascists will take over.

Fascist 2.0. Now new and improved!

 

[Vrenn]

Tried what in 2020?

Who decides what order is legal or not?

Ah, selective amnesia.

 

[Vrenn]

it is required by the oath to obey the President it is clearly stated in the oath retard.

As long as he's giving LEGAL orders. If he does issue illegal ones, we have DC 2020 all over again.

 

[struth]

As long as he's giving LEGAL orders. If he does issue illegal ones, we have DC 2020 all over again.

What illegal orders? Who decides if they are legal or illegal?

 

[Vrenn]

What illegal orders? Who decides if they are legal or illegal?

It's laid out pretty clear in the UCMJ. But since you have the reading level of a turnip I don't see you know this.

 

[struth]

It's laid out pretty clear in the UCMJ. But since you have the reading level of a turnip I don't see you know this.

What unlawful order was given?