- Nov 17, 2009
- 71,163
- 39,022
Are you suggesting they had an illegal purpose, or does it just hurt your feels that they were there?
You're answering my question with a question. What possible purpose would they have to be following the jury bus?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you suggesting they had an illegal purpose, or does it just hurt your feels that they were there?
Opinion front? You understand that isn't a law, don't you?you never gave a good reason why a reporter is following a sequestered jury.
now since you are being an intentional fucktardwhit -
Understanding the Jury Sequestration Rules
Jury sequestration is a strategy often used by judges to increase the chances of a fair and objective trial. It involves the isolation of the jurors from any outside influence during the course of the trial. Learn about the various rules that need to be followed during such an event, through...opinionfront.com
Jury Sequestration and Restrictions
► The jurors should be instructed not to discuss the case with anyone prior to sequestration or during the recess while the case is being tried. They must also avoid any contact with the media.
► If the trial is going to last a long time, arrangements could be made so that the jurors have some sort of contact with their families, under the supervision of the court deputies and bailiffs.
► The name of the hotel in which the jury is to be sequestered should be kept anonymous.
now go fuck yourself.
How can one be a freelancer for MSNBC?
Are you accusing NBC of jury intimidation? You know that's nuts, right? You gotta have some pretty substantial evidence to make a claim like that and not sound batshit cray.No, you would have no less an an idea of what Al Capone has to do with jury intimidation than NBC.
Certainly not the sharpest tack, are you?
One can be a freelancer and sell to MSNBC but there are no freelancers on the staff of MSNBC.ask MSNBC.
Then produce the contract to prove that is what was the case.Jesus, is your world so tiny you've never even heard of contract workers?? What fucking basement have you been locked in for your entire life?
LOL
tyranny is trying to stop someone from doing something without legal authority.What the hell is wrong with you??
How could you possibly not have a problem with a reporter getting instructed to follow a jury bus?
What purpose do you think they would do that?? For no reason at all??
You are exactly the type of person that is poisoning this country right now.
You have no issue with all manner of bad behavior/policies etc. if it benefits something you agree with,
That is called "ends justifies the means"... otherwise known as tyranny.
It is people like you who are too stupid to understand that the tyranny eventually turns on you.
and what evidence did you have about RUSSIA or Kavanaugh or a few impeachments?Are you accusing NBC of jury intimidation? You know that's nuts, right? You gotta have some pretty substantial evidence to make a claim like that and not sound batshit cray.
i don't give a shit about your reindeer games. i am simply saying what is in the article and that this repoter, freelancer or otherwise, was in direct communication with a MSNBC producer who said she authorized it.One can be a freelancer and sell to MSNBC but there are no freelancers on the staff of MSNBC.
At Salon, they are saying that the car was overdue for an oil change and all the folks at Huffpo are talking about a broken blinker light.For what purpose would they be following them?
No... there is another side to that.tyranny is trying to stop someone from doing something without legal authority.
We currently can travel public roads at will. If you can show that is somehow harassing someone, you might have something.You're answering my question with a question. What possible purpose would they have to be following the jury bus?
Yet no charges filed, because no laws were broken.you understand the police are on top of this and they are far more aware of the law than you or i.
so, fuck off.
Get back with me when you can name the charges that were filed, or the laws that were broken.No... there is another side to that.
It is also deciding who to prosecute depending on what side they are on.
I know, as well as every single person who knows who you are here, that how you feel about a situation depends on how it falls within your political beliefs.
If this was some other jury deciding a case that you agreed with, and it was Fox News.... oh HELL yes you would be upset.
And we all know it.
Your only showing what I am saying about you is correct.Get back with me when you can name the charges that were filed, or the laws that were broken.
Tracking down who the jurists are--their cars and their license plates----able to release this info for libs Socialist SA collection of criminals and druggies to go "protest" at these people houses which always includes threats?Intimidating from a block away? How did that happen?
If you say so. Still nothing illegal?Your only showing what I am saying about you is correct.
And everyone here knows it. Even you.
So were they in their cars or a bus?Tracking down who the jurists are--their cars and their license plates----able to release this info for libs Socialist SA collection of criminals and druggies to go "protest" at these people houses which always includes threats?