Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Many say Scandinavian countries are “socialistic”, esp conservatives. Many right-wing even call them communist. LOL. They even support nationalistic regimes like Putin’s Russia. BTW, extreme nationalism is often seen as “Nazi”.Read your post. Socialism always means government ownership - I would have said control - of the means of production by one means or another. This condition does not exist in the Scandinavian countries.There is NOT only one definition of socialism!No, there is only one widely accepted definition about socialism and that is that the government controls the means of production, and the Scandinavian countries are not socialist. The only socialist countries in the world today are China, Cuba, Laos and Vietnam.Such a general statement; there are many forms/degrees of “socialism”.Everyone likes to get free stuff, but the people who are duped into supporting socialism simply don't understand what what it costs them in the long run.Many people don't want freedom and liberty today. They want government to give them stuff and tell them what to do like the serfs they are. Democrats all.
Those societies in Scandinavia seem to be very happy.
List of socialist states - Wikipedia
Socialism is a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership of the means of production and workers' self-management,[10] as well as the political theories and movements associated with them.[11] Social ownership can be public, collective or cooperativeownership, or citizen ownership of equity.[12] There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them,[13] with social ownership being the common element shared by its various forms.
Socialism - Wikipedia
His neighbors have the numbers and the weaponry in this fight. Your anarchist’s best chance is to appeal to neighbors and hope they’ll come to some agreement by which to cooperate and oh shit, there goes anarchy.Which violates the NAP. Under such a violation, it is incumbent upon the person having the shit to light up the fuckers coming to take his shit.Anarchy works until your neighbors decide to join forces to take yo shiet
You have a reading comprehension problem.Exactly what I said, it is a belief that God does not exist, which is a belief about God.Definition in Wikipedia:lol Not true, he believes God does not exist and that is a belief about God.You do NOT understand. An atheist has NO BELIEFS about Gods/gods. Hence, a-theist.I understand atheism perfectly. It is a belief about the existence of God, just and Christianity, Islam, Judaism, etc. are. If, as you propose, it should be illegal for people who have other beliefs about God to share these beliefs, it should also be illegal for atheists to share their beliefs about God.You appear to be ignorant about atheism.
A-theist: one who is NOT a theist.
BTW, i am not a strong atheist.
Atheism is, in the broadest sense, the absence of belief in the existence of deities.
None of the Scandinavian countries are socialist by the definition your posted. If you have a different definition of socialism I'd be interested in hearing it.Many say Scandinavian countries are “socialistic”, esp conservatives. Many right-wing even call them communist. LOL. They even support nationalistic regimes like Putin’s Russia. BTW, extreme nationalism is often seen as “Nazi”.Read your post. Socialism always means government ownership - I would have said control - of the means of production by one means or another. This condition does not exist in the Scandinavian countries.There is NOT only one definition of socialism!No, there is only one widely accepted definition about socialism and that is that the government controls the means of production, and the Scandinavian countries are not socialist. The only socialist countries in the world today are China, Cuba, Laos and Vietnam.Such a general statement; there are many forms/degrees of “socialism”.Everyone likes to get free stuff, but the people who are duped into supporting socialism simply don't understand what what it costs them in the long run.
Those societies in Scandinavia seem to be very happy.
List of socialist states - Wikipedia
Socialism is a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership of the means of production and workers' self-management,[10] as well as the political theories and movements associated with them.[11] Social ownership can be public, collective or cooperativeownership, or citizen ownership of equity.[12] There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them,[13] with social ownership being the common element shared by its various forms.
Socialism - Wikipedia
It's simple, really.^ Therein lies the massive, MASSIVE amount of wiggle room.conduct that unreasonably intrudes on the liberty of others.
And that is why anarchy is impossible.While it is true that some anarchist are peaceful people, some are not.
Anarchy is a absence of any rules or regulations. Thus one has to rely on the nature of each individual to co-exist peacefully.
But if one anarchist decides he wants the land and belongings of another one, there is nothing about anarchy that would keep him from taking it.
I agree. I wish a stateless society could work. It would not last longer than a few weeks, unfortunately.
Um, fuck the state in all it's many guises.
Anarchy and Communism suffer the same problem as they ignore the existence of assholes.
With anarchy its assholes with more power than you locally (bigger gun, more of them), with communism is assholes with more power than you in charge of things.
Disputes could be handled privately.And that is why anarchy is impossible.While it is true that some anarchist are peaceful people, some are not.
Anarchy is a absence of any rules or regulations. Thus one has to rely on the nature of each individual to co-exist peacefully.
But if one anarchist decides he wants the land and belongings of another one, there is nothing about anarchy that would keep him from taking it.
The moment there is a dispute between individuals, there will be a need for resolution of that dispute. Enter government.
.
Anarchy is absence of The State, not rules.
While it is true that some anarchist are peaceful people, some are not.
Anarchy is a absence of any rules or regulations. Thus one has to rely on the nature of each individual to co-exist peacefully.
But if one anarchist decides he wants the land and belongings of another one, there is nothing about anarchy that would keep him from taking it.
Anarchy is absence of The State, not rules.
While it is true that some anarchist are peaceful people, some are not.
Anarchy is a absence of any rules or regulations. Thus one has to rely on the nature of each individual to co-exist peacefully.
But if one anarchist decides he wants the land and belongings of another one, there is nothing about anarchy that would keep him from taking it.
Disputes could be handled privately.And that is why anarchy is impossible.While it is true that some anarchist are peaceful people, some are not.
Anarchy is a absence of any rules or regulations. Thus one has to rely on the nature of each individual to co-exist peacefully.
But if one anarchist decides he wants the land and belongings of another one, there is nothing about anarchy that would keep him from taking it.
The moment there is a dispute between individuals, there will be a need for resolution of that dispute. Enter government.
.
Authority can be derived through voluntary associations....Your model is of, by, and for proactive aggressive force....The kind of force that harms and kills people.Anarchy is absence of The State, not rules.
While it is true that some anarchist are peaceful people, some are not.
Anarchy is a absence of any rules or regulations. Thus one has to rely on the nature of each individual to co-exist peacefully.
But if one anarchist decides he wants the land and belongings of another one, there is nothing about anarchy that would keep him from taking it.
anarchy is absence of authority, without authority rules are just suggestions.
Authority can be derived through voluntary associations....Your model is of, by, and for proactive aggressive force....The kind of force that harms and kills people.Anarchy is absence of The State, not rules.
While it is true that some anarchist are peaceful people, some are not.
Anarchy is a absence of any rules or regulations. Thus one has to rely on the nature of each individual to co-exist peacefully.
But if one anarchist decides he wants the land and belongings of another one, there is nothing about anarchy that would keep him from taking it.
anarchy is absence of authority, without authority rules are just suggestions.
And in capitalism we are mere slaves of the monied masters..
Anarchy and Communism suffer the same problem as they ignore the existence of assholes.
With anarchy its assholes with more power than you locally (bigger gun, more of them), with communism is assholes with more power than you in charge of things.
Just try working for a company and speaking yer mind on Facebook..And in capitalism we are mere slaves of the monied masters..
Anarchy and Communism suffer the same problem as they ignore the existence of assholes.
With anarchy its assholes with more power than you locally (bigger gun, more of them), with communism is assholes with more power than you in charge of things.
Hyperbole, nothing but. Sorry but Bill Gates can't come over to my house and make me wax his car for free.
View attachment 248065
Anarchy and Communism suffer the same problem as they ignore the existence of assholes.
With anarchy its assholes with more power than you locally (bigger gun, more of them), with communism is assholes with more power than you in charge of things.
Just try working for a company and speaking yer mind on Facebook..And in capitalism we are mere slaves of the monied masters..
Anarchy and Communism suffer the same problem as they ignore the existence of assholes.
With anarchy its assholes with more power than you locally (bigger gun, more of them), with communism is assholes with more power than you in charge of things.
Hyperbole, nothing but. Sorry but Bill Gates can't come over to my house and make me wax his car for free.
