POLL: Individual Freedom is the foundation of a successful civil society.

Agree or Disagree - individual freedom is the foundation of a successful civil society

  • Disagree, because individual freedom is enjoyed at the collective's expense

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Disagree, because individual freedom doesn't pay a living wage

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    24
Many people don't want freedom and liberty today. They want government to give them stuff and tell them what to do like the serfs they are. Democrats all.
 
Full Individual Freedom can only occur when that individual is ALONE.
In society, there must be compromises among ALL individuals (incl the upper 1% in the US).
These compromises should be “ethical”, similar to the “Golden Rule” concept.
 
Many people don't want freedom and liberty today. They want government to give them stuff and tell them what to do like the serfs they are. Democrats all.
Everyone likes to get free stuff, but the people who are duped into supporting socialism simply don't understand what what it costs them in the long run.
 
Many people don't want freedom and liberty today. They want government to give them stuff and tell them what to do like the serfs they are. Democrats all.
Gee, that was enlightening — NOT!
 
Many people don't want freedom and liberty today. They want government to give them stuff and tell them what to do like the serfs they are. Democrats all.
Everyone likes to get free stuff, but the people who are duped into supporting socialism simply don't understand what what it costs them in the long run.
Such a general statement; there are many forms/degrees of “socialism”.
Those societies in Scandinavia seem to be very happy.
 
It should be illegal to be a Muslim.
It should be illegal to brainwash any citizen with any religious BS.
So you are saying there should be a law against atheists?
You appear to be ignorant about atheism.
A-theist: one who is NOT a theist.
BTW, i am not a strong atheist.
I understand atheism perfectly. It is a belief about the existence of God, just and Christianity, Islam, Judaism, etc. are. If, as you propose, it should be illegal for people who have other beliefs about God to share these beliefs, it should also be illegal for atheists to share their beliefs about God.
 
Many people don't want freedom and liberty today. They want government to give them stuff and tell them what to do like the serfs they are. Democrats all.
Everyone likes to get free stuff, but the people who are duped into supporting socialism simply don't understand what what it costs them in the long run.
Such a general statement; there are many forms/degrees of “socialism”.
Those societies in Scandinavia seem to be very happy.
No, there is only one widely accepted definition about socialism and that is that the government controls the means of production, and the Scandinavian countries are not socialist. The only socialist countries in the world today are China, Cuba, Laos and Vietnam.

List of socialist states - Wikipedia
 
It should be illegal to be a Muslim.
It should be illegal to brainwash any citizen with any religious BS.
So you are saying there should be a law against atheists?
You appear to be ignorant about atheism.
A-theist: one who is NOT a theist.
BTW, i am not a strong atheist.
I understand atheism perfectly. It is a belief about the existence of God, just and Christianity, Islam, Judaism, etc. are. If, as you propose, it should be illegal for people who have other beliefs about God to share these beliefs, it should also be illegal for atheists to share their beliefs about God.
You do NOT understand. An atheist has NO BELIEFS about Gods/gods. Hence, a-theist.
 
Anytime government gives you anything it is accompanied by more control and less freedom . Many today just don't care. They are mindless drones. Democrats all.
 
It should be illegal to be a Muslim.
It should be illegal to brainwash any citizen with any religious BS.
So you are saying there should be a law against atheists?
You appear to be ignorant about atheism.
A-theist: one who is NOT a theist.
BTW, i am not a strong atheist.
I understand atheism perfectly. It is a belief about the existence of God, just and Christianity, Islam, Judaism, etc. are. If, as you propose, it should be illegal for people who have other beliefs about God to share these beliefs, it should also be illegal for atheists to share their beliefs about God.
You do NOT understand. An atheist has NO BELIEFS about Gods/gods. Hence, a-theist.
lol Not true, he believes God does not exist and that is a belief about God.
 
Many people don't want freedom and liberty today. They want government to give them stuff and tell them what to do like the serfs they are. Democrats all.
Everyone likes to get free stuff, but the people who are duped into supporting socialism simply don't understand what what it costs them in the long run.
Such a general statement; there are many forms/degrees of “socialism”.
Those societies in Scandinavia seem to be very happy.
No, there is only one widely accepted definition about socialism and that is that the government controls the means of production, and the Scandinavian countries are not socialist. The only socialist countries in the world today are China, Cuba, Laos and Vietnam.

List of socialist states - Wikipedia
There is NOT only one definition of socialism!

Socialism is a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership of the means of production and workers' self-management,[10] as well as the political theories and movements associated with them.[11] Social ownership can be public, collective or cooperativeownership, or citizen ownership of equity.[12] There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them,[13] with social ownership being the common element shared by its various forms.

Socialism - Wikipedia
 
anarcho_capitalism_wallpaper_by_appriweb-d5xfm41.jpg

Um, fuck the state in all it's many guises.
 
Last edited:
It should be illegal to brainwash any citizen with any religious BS.
So you are saying there should be a law against atheists?
You appear to be ignorant about atheism.
A-theist: one who is NOT a theist.
BTW, i am not a strong atheist.
I understand atheism perfectly. It is a belief about the existence of God, just and Christianity, Islam, Judaism, etc. are. If, as you propose, it should be illegal for people who have other beliefs about God to share these beliefs, it should also be illegal for atheists to share their beliefs about God.
You do NOT understand. An atheist has NO BELIEFS about Gods/gods. Hence, a-theist.
lol Not true, he believes God does not exist and that is a belief about God.
Definition in Wikipedia:

Atheism is, in the broadest sense, the absence of belief in the existence of deities.
 
Many people don't want freedom and liberty today. They want government to give them stuff and tell them what to do like the serfs they are. Democrats all.
Everyone likes to get free stuff, but the people who are duped into supporting socialism simply don't understand what what it costs them in the long run.
Such a general statement; there are many forms/degrees of “socialism”.
Those societies in Scandinavia seem to be very happy.
No, there is only one widely accepted definition about socialism and that is that the government controls the means of production, and the Scandinavian countries are not socialist. The only socialist countries in the world today are China, Cuba, Laos and Vietnam.

List of socialist states - Wikipedia
There is NOT only one definition of socialism!

Socialism is a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership of the means of production and workers' self-management,[10] as well as the political theories and movements associated with them.[11] Social ownership can be public, collective or cooperativeownership, or citizen ownership of equity.[12] There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them,[13] with social ownership being the common element shared by its various forms.

Socialism - Wikipedia
Read your post. Socialism always means government ownership - I would have said control - of the means of production by one means or another. This condition does not exist in the Scandinavian countries.
 
So you are saying there should be a law against atheists?
You appear to be ignorant about atheism.
A-theist: one who is NOT a theist.
BTW, i am not a strong atheist.
I understand atheism perfectly. It is a belief about the existence of God, just and Christianity, Islam, Judaism, etc. are. If, as you propose, it should be illegal for people who have other beliefs about God to share these beliefs, it should also be illegal for atheists to share their beliefs about God.
You do NOT understand. An atheist has NO BELIEFS about Gods/gods. Hence, a-theist.
lol Not true, he believes God does not exist and that is a belief about God.
Definition in Wikipedia:

Atheism is, in the broadest sense, the absence of belief in the existence of deities.
Exactly what I said, it is a belief that God does not exist, which is a belief about God.
 

Forum List

Back
Top