Poll to condemn or condone "the violence and law breaking that took place inside the Capital on 1/6"

Do you support the "violence and law breaking that took place inside the Capital on 1/6"?

  • I'm a GOP voter and NO I do NOT support the attack on the Capital Building

    Votes: 35 33.3%
  • I'm a GOP voter and YES I do support the attack on the Capital Building

    Votes: 11 10.5%
  • I'm a democrat and I condemn the 1/6 attack on the Capital Building

    Votes: 22 21.0%
  • Other, see my post

    Votes: 37 35.2%

  • Total voters
    105
The Jan 6 thing was the exercising of the 1st Amendment despite the fact it was triggered by retarded BLM and Q. The Capital Building is a great piece of White man architecture. But the contents in it are shit. Most hilarious is democrats whining about Jan 6 with the actual, massive violence and actual, massive law breaking happening in their Black and Brown constituencies.
...riots as instigated by the occupants of the capital building....who are not being hunted down and prosecuted by the FBI...
View attachment 509336
The king of lawlessness
You berate Trump for wanting to break up riots with force, but condone/rationalize Ashli Babbitt's murder?
(play video of post just above this one)
What about low-IQ Maxine's urging for violence against Trump admin people? You okay with that?
I'm not a fan of democrat's constant double standards.
Democrats are the promoters of lawlessness, Trump is the "law and order" president.
I'm sad she was killed.

You are two faced on the topic....

You think George Floyd's murder was justified for passing a 20$ counterfeit bill, and Eric Garners murder was justified for selling single cigarettes on the street and Michael Browns murder for shoplifting a $5 pack of cigarette, and Beyona Taylor for sleeping in her own home....

But Babbit, breaking in to the capitol, bashing in and breaking the windows in the doors that was the only protection between the violent mob she was a part of and the vice president and congress critters was somehow not worse than those mentioned above, is pure hypocrisy imo.
Either you are deliberately lying or you have a very slanted and misinformed grasp of the facts:
1. George Floyd wasn't murdered, his death was accidental, he resisted arrest and had to be subdued. You may disagree with the method used, but it is legal in Minneapolis:

2. Eric Garner's death was caused by his resisting arrest. A better question is why were cops directed to clamp down on illegal cigarette sales to increase tax revenue?

3. Michael Brown robbed a store and attacked a cop. How about that "hands up don't shoot" bullshit?

4. Criminals belong in prison, unless they resist arrest, then what happens happens.

5. How about how fast this OH cop had to decide which girl lived or died? Tell me he should have let one get stabbed.

6. So you are happy that unarmed Ashli Babbitt got shot while the SWAT team was clearing the crowd behind her? IMHO she should have been arrested before being shot, but that's just me. The protest was ending, she didn't have to die. She was NOT resisting arrest like your black criminals were.
What danger was George Floyd to society...the people police are to protect? Or the police themselves once handcuffed? He was murdered, Chauvin murdered him according to a jury of his peers.

What harm was Eric Gardner to society...people in the public that are suppose to be protected? There were 5 cops for one Eric Gardner and yes... all for taxes, they were in no danger of harm....

What harm was Michael brown to the public? What mortal harm could he have brought to the cop, with him being unarmed and yards away when the cop shot to kill him? For $5 bucks? Come on!

Yet Ashli climbing through a violently smashed and broken door window.... with others continuing to smash adjacent door windows, with her participating or standing on the front line of the violent smashing these door windows with bats ....just waiting to climb thru it to get through to a House Chamber, where the vice president and congress critters were being evacuated from....the shooting was not justified compared to the three men mentioned above...??? Really? I find that hard to believe....

So you say Ashli belonged in prison?
1. Floyd was a criminal, Gardner was a criminal, Brown was a criminal. They resisted arrest and got what they got. If they didn't resist arrest they would all be alive today. Pols write the laws, and the police enforce the laws, its not that complicated. If you don't want to follow the US laws, move to another country.

2. Ashli Babbitt deserved to be arrested, tried for her crime, and sent to jail, NOT SHOT. Look at the video again, the SWAT team was clearing the rioters. She didn't do anything that justified her murder.
You lie yet again. That team (don't know that they're SWAT) was not clearing out rioters until after she was shot. Before she was shot, they were escorting 3 the other cops, who were guarding the door, down the stairs to exit that area.
 
The Jan 6 thing was the exercising of the 1st Amendment despite the fact it was triggered by retarded BLM and Q. The Capital Building is a great piece of White man architecture. But the contents in it are shit. Most hilarious is democrats whining about Jan 6 with the actual, massive violence and actual, massive law breaking happening in their Black and Brown constituencies.
...riots as instigated by the occupants of the capital building....who are not being hunted down and prosecuted by the FBI...
View attachment 509336
The king of lawlessness
You berate Trump for wanting to break up riots with force, but condone/rationalize Ashli Babbitt's murder?
(play video of post just above this one)
What about low-IQ Maxine's urging for violence against Trump admin people? You okay with that?
I'm not a fan of democrat's constant double standards.
Democrats are the promoters of lawlessness, Trump is the "law and order" president.
I'm sad she was killed.

You are two faced on the topic....

You think George Floyd's murder was justified for passing a 20$ counterfeit bill, and Eric Garners murder was justified for selling single cigarettes on the street and Michael Browns murder for shoplifting a $5 pack of cigarette, and Beyona Taylor for sleeping in her own home....

But Babbit, breaking in to the capitol, bashing in and breaking the windows in the doors that was the only protection between the violent mob she was a part of and the vice president and congress critters was somehow not worse than those mentioned above, is pure hypocrisy imo.
Either you are deliberately lying or you have a very slanted and misinformed grasp of the facts:
1. George Floyd wasn't murdered, his death was accidental, he resisted arrest and had to be subdued. You may disagree with the method used, but it is legal in Minneapolis:

2. Eric Garner's death was caused by his resisting arrest. A better question is why were cops directed to clamp down on illegal cigarette sales to increase tax revenue?

3. Michael Brown robbed a store and attacked a cop. How about that "hands up don't shoot" bullshit?

4. Criminals belong in prison, unless they resist arrest, then what happens happens.

5. How about how fast this OH cop had to decide which girl lived or died? Tell me he should have let one get stabbed.

6. So you are happy that unarmed Ashli Babbitt got shot while the SWAT team was clearing the crowd behind her? IMHO she should have been arrested before being shot, but that's just me. The protest was ending, she didn't have to die. She was NOT resisting arrest like your black criminals were.
What danger was George Floyd to society...the people police are to protect? Or the police themselves once handcuffed? He was murdered, Chauvin murdered him according to a jury of his peers.

What harm was Eric Gardner to society...people in the public that are suppose to be protected? There were 5 cops for one Eric Gardner and yes... all for taxes, they were in no danger of harm....

What harm was Michael brown to the public? What mortal harm could he have brought to the cop, with him being unarmed and yards away when the cop shot to kill him? For $5 bucks? Come on!

Yet Ashli climbing through a violently smashed and broken door window.... with others continuing to smash adjacent door windows, with her participating or standing on the front line of the violent smashing these door windows with bats ....just waiting to climb thru it to get through to a House Chamber, where the vice president and congress critters were being evacuated from....the shooting was not justified compared to the three men mentioned above...??? Really? I find that hard to believe....

So you say Ashli belonged in prison?
1. Floyd was a criminal, Gardner was a criminal, Brown was a criminal. They resisted arrest and got what they got. If they didn't resist arrest they would all be alive today. Pols write the laws, and the police enforce the laws, its not that complicated. If you don't want to follow the US laws, move to another country.

2. Ashli Babbitt deserved to be arrested, tried for her crime, and sent to jail, NOT SHOT. Look at the video again, the SWAT team was clearing the rioters. She didn't do anything that justified her murder.
Ashli Babbitt deserved to be arrested, tried for her crime, and sent to jail, NOT SHOT.
What’s the line? Oh yeah…. If she would have just complied, she would be alive today.
 
Correll
uz1o27w2e4h61.jpg


How many w.s. are in this country?
growing numbers since theiy're a rising threat



How fucking many? Are you retarded? I asked a simple question. HOW FUCKING MANY?
Nobody is taking a census of white supremacists.

Incidents of white supremacist propaganda hit an all-time high in 2020, according to a new report from the Anti-Defamation League's Center on Extremism, which has tracked racist propaganda for decades. anti-Semitic, racist and anti-LGBTQ+ posters, flyers and graffiti were recorded 5,125 times in 2020, according to the report, almost twice the number of incidents recorded in 2019.
The report, released today, details incidents in every state excluding Hawaii. It includes 130 incidents of white supremacists putting up banners, 56 in-person white supremacist events and 283 incidents of anti-Semitc language or propaganda that specifically targeted Jewish institutions, a 68% increase from 2019.


The President says that they are a big problem. I hear liberals talking all the time about how big of a problem they are.


Yet when I ask how many of them there are, no one can ever tell me.


How can you claim that they are a big problem, when you don't have any idea how many of them there are?
The most recent indicator is how white supremacists are now openly accepted:



You claimed "growing numbers", "rising threat", but you can't give me any numbers on how many their are.


White Nationalist? FUnny, I've heard had liberals for years telling me that AMERCIA is a WHITE SUPREMACIST NATION, founded by w.s., for w.s. and w.s. all the way though, blah, blah, blah.


So, why are you making a big deal over this guy? It's almost like you feel he is some...how out shocking and worthy of note?

You people just say whatever shit you feel works for the moment, like monkeys throwing shit at a wall to see if anything sticks.


When I, or anyone actually calls you on it, you are shocked and unable to support it.


But you never stop.


w.s. are an irrelevant fringe. This nation has had a bi-partisan consensus on racial equality for minorities since before I was born, and I am not young.
fringe? The capitol jan6th was the culmination


....

Dude. You are trying to distract from your inability to support your panic mongering with anything resembling a real number.

w.s. are an irrelevant fringe. The 1/6 riot, was not w.s., w.s. could not get together a big enough crowd to storm a 7-11.

You are a dishonest asshole troll.
 
Down to a mere 54% condemnation
How do libbies like a poll that does not produce the results they were confident about?
 
The Jan 6 thing was the exercising of the 1st Amendment despite the fact it was triggered by retarded BLM and Q. The Capital Building is a great piece of White man architecture. But the contents in it are shit. Most hilarious is democrats whining about Jan 6 with the actual, massive violence and actual, massive law breaking happening in their Black and Brown constituencies.
...riots as instigated by the occupants of the capital building....who are not being hunted down and prosecuted by the FBI...
View attachment 509336
The king of lawlessness
You berate Trump for wanting to break up riots with force, but condone/rationalize Ashli Babbitt's murder?
(play video of post just above this one)
What about low-IQ Maxine's urging for violence against Trump admin people? You okay with that?
I'm not a fan of democrat's constant double standards.
Democrats are the promoters of lawlessness, Trump is the "law and order" president.
I'm sad she was killed.

You are two faced on the topic....

You think George Floyd's murder was justified for passing a 20$ counterfeit bill, and Eric Garners murder was justified for selling single cigarettes on the street and Michael Browns murder for shoplifting a $5 pack of cigarette, and Beyona Taylor for sleeping in her own home....

But Babbit, breaking in to the capitol, bashing in and breaking the windows in the doors that was the only protection between the violent mob she was a part of and the vice president and congress critters was somehow not worse than those mentioned above, is pure hypocrisy imo.
Either you are deliberately lying or you have a very slanted and misinformed grasp of the facts:
1. George Floyd wasn't murdered, his death was accidental, he resisted arrest and had to be subdued. You may disagree with the method used, but it is legal in Minneapolis:

2. Eric Garner's death was caused by his resisting arrest. A better question is why were cops directed to clamp down on illegal cigarette sales to increase tax revenue?

3. Michael Brown robbed a store and attacked a cop. How about that "hands up don't shoot" bullshit?

4. Criminals belong in prison, unless they resist arrest, then what happens happens.

5. How about how fast this OH cop had to decide which girl lived or died? Tell me he should have let one get stabbed.

6. So you are happy that unarmed Ashli Babbitt got shot while the SWAT team was clearing the crowd behind her? IMHO she should have been arrested before being shot, but that's just me. The protest was ending, she didn't have to die. She was NOT resisting arrest like your black criminals were.
What danger was George Floyd to society...the people police are to protect? Or the police themselves once handcuffed? He was murdered, Chauvin murdered him according to a jury of his peers.

What harm was Eric Gardner to society...people in the public that are suppose to be protected? There were 5 cops for one Eric Gardner and yes... all for taxes, they were in no danger of harm....

What harm was Michael brown to the public? What mortal harm could he have brought to the cop, with him being unarmed and yards away when the cop shot to kill him? For $5 bucks? Come on!

Yet Ashli climbing through a violently smashed and broken door window.... with others continuing to smash adjacent door windows, with her participating or standing on the front line of the violent smashing these door windows with bats ....just waiting to climb thru it to get through to a House Chamber, where the vice president and congress critters were being evacuated from....the shooting was not justified compared to the three men mentioned above...??? Really? I find that hard to believe....

So you say Ashli belonged in prison?
1. Floyd was a criminal, Gardner was a criminal, Brown was a criminal. They resisted arrest and got what they got. If they didn't resist arrest they would all be alive today. Pols write the laws, and the police enforce the laws, its not that complicated. If you don't want to follow the US laws, move to another country.

2. Ashli Babbitt deserved to be arrested, tried for her crime, and sent to jail, NOT SHOT. Look at the video again, the SWAT team was clearing the rioters. She didn't do anything that justified her murder.
You lie yet again. That team (don't know that they're SWAT) was not clearing out rioters until after she was shot. Before she was shot, they were escorting 3 the other cops, who were guarding the door, down the stairs to exit that area.
1. "That team" looked like SWAT to me. They had ARs and were in uniform. They were obviously NOT protesters.
They were on the stairs as Ashli was shot, probably a minute too late to stop her murder. One factoid that I know that maybe you don't is that when the SWAT teams entered the capital building, the riot was over. No one wanted to mess with the SWAT teams.
2. I don't see the SWAT guys escorting (3) cops down the stairs. It looks to me that they got there just as Ashli was shot, and cleared the area.
3. What matters is that unarmed Ashli was shot for protesting when she should have been arrested and told of her Miranda Rights, and then lawyered up, before trial. Now she's dead. That was murder.
 
The Jan 6 thing was the exercising of the 1st Amendment despite the fact it was triggered by retarded BLM and Q. The Capital Building is a great piece of White man architecture. But the contents in it are shit. Most hilarious is democrats whining about Jan 6 with the actual, massive violence and actual, massive law breaking happening in their Black and Brown constituencies.
...riots as instigated by the occupants of the capital building....who are not being hunted down and prosecuted by the FBI...
View attachment 509336
The king of lawlessness
You berate Trump for wanting to break up riots with force, but condone/rationalize Ashli Babbitt's murder?
(play video of post just above this one)
What about low-IQ Maxine's urging for violence against Trump admin people? You okay with that?
I'm not a fan of democrat's constant double standards.
Democrats are the promoters of lawlessness, Trump is the "law and order" president.
I'm sad she was killed.

You are two faced on the topic....

You think George Floyd's murder was justified for passing a 20$ counterfeit bill, and Eric Garners murder was justified for selling single cigarettes on the street and Michael Browns murder for shoplifting a $5 pack of cigarette, and Beyona Taylor for sleeping in her own home....

But Babbit, breaking in to the capitol, bashing in and breaking the windows in the doors that was the only protection between the violent mob she was a part of and the vice president and congress critters was somehow not worse than those mentioned above, is pure hypocrisy imo.
Either you are deliberately lying or you have a very slanted and misinformed grasp of the facts:
1. George Floyd wasn't murdered, his death was accidental, he resisted arrest and had to be subdued. You may disagree with the method used, but it is legal in Minneapolis:

2. Eric Garner's death was caused by his resisting arrest. A better question is why were cops directed to clamp down on illegal cigarette sales to increase tax revenue?

3. Michael Brown robbed a store and attacked a cop. How about that "hands up don't shoot" bullshit?

4. Criminals belong in prison, unless they resist arrest, then what happens happens.

5. How about how fast this OH cop had to decide which girl lived or died? Tell me he should have let one get stabbed.

6. So you are happy that unarmed Ashli Babbitt got shot while the SWAT team was clearing the crowd behind her? IMHO she should have been arrested before being shot, but that's just me. The protest was ending, she didn't have to die. She was NOT resisting arrest like your black criminals were.
Considering the fact that BOMBS WERE FOUND THAT DAY and that she was climbing thru a smashed window behind which was our entire government and she was wearing a backpack and disregarding the fact that a gun was pointed at her… yea… I’m glad she ate that bullet
 
No bombs were found
The violence we condemn was the execution of an unarmed protestor
Any potential future possibly maybe future threat that she might have posed is liberal blood lust bullshit
 
The Jan 6 thing was the exercising of the 1st Amendment despite the fact it was triggered by retarded BLM and Q. The Capital Building is a great piece of White man architecture. But the contents in it are shit. Most hilarious is democrats whining about Jan 6 with the actual, massive violence and actual, massive law breaking happening in their Black and Brown constituencies.
...riots as instigated by the occupants of the capital building....who are not being hunted down and prosecuted by the FBI...
View attachment 509336
The king of lawlessness
You berate Trump for wanting to break up riots with force, but condone/rationalize Ashli Babbitt's murder?
(play video of post just above this one)
What about low-IQ Maxine's urging for violence against Trump admin people? You okay with that?
I'm not a fan of democrat's constant double standards.
Democrats are the promoters of lawlessness, Trump is the "law and order" president.
I'm sad she was killed.

You are two faced on the topic....

You think George Floyd's murder was justified for passing a 20$ counterfeit bill, and Eric Garners murder was justified for selling single cigarettes on the street and Michael Browns murder for shoplifting a $5 pack of cigarette, and Beyona Taylor for sleeping in her own home....

But Babbit, breaking in to the capitol, bashing in and breaking the windows in the doors that was the only protection between the violent mob she was a part of and the vice president and congress critters was somehow not worse than those mentioned above, is pure hypocrisy imo.
Either you are deliberately lying or you have a very slanted and misinformed grasp of the facts:
1. George Floyd wasn't murdered, his death was accidental, he resisted arrest and had to be subdued. You may disagree with the method used, but it is legal in Minneapolis:

2. Eric Garner's death was caused by his resisting arrest. A better question is why were cops directed to clamp down on illegal cigarette sales to increase tax revenue?

3. Michael Brown robbed a store and attacked a cop. How about that "hands up don't shoot" bullshit?

4. Criminals belong in prison, unless they resist arrest, then what happens happens.

5. How about how fast this OH cop had to decide which girl lived or died? Tell me he should have let one get stabbed.

6. So you are happy that unarmed Ashli Babbitt got shot while the SWAT team was clearing the crowd behind her? IMHO she should have been arrested before being shot, but that's just me. The protest was ending, she didn't have to die. She was NOT resisting arrest like your black criminals were.
What danger was George Floyd to society...the people police are to protect? Or the police themselves once handcuffed? He was murdered, Chauvin murdered him according to a jury of his peers.

What harm was Eric Gardner to society...people in the public that are suppose to be protected? There were 5 cops for one Eric Gardner and yes... all for taxes, they were in no danger of harm....

What harm was Michael brown to the public? What mortal harm could he have brought to the cop, with him being unarmed and yards away when the cop shot to kill him? For $5 bucks? Come on!

Yet Ashli climbing through a violently smashed and broken door window.... with others continuing to smash adjacent door windows, with her participating or standing on the front line of the violent smashing these door windows with bats ....just waiting to climb thru it to get through to a House Chamber, where the vice president and congress critters were being evacuated from....the shooting was not justified compared to the three men mentioned above...??? Really? I find that hard to believe....

So you say Ashli belonged in prison?
1. Floyd was a criminal, Gardner was a criminal, Brown was a criminal. They resisted arrest and got what they got. If they didn't resist arrest they would all be alive today. Pols write the laws, and the police enforce the laws, its not that complicated. If you don't want to follow the US laws, move to another country.

2. Ashli Babbitt deserved to be arrested, tried for her crime, and sent to jail, NOT SHOT. Look at the video again, the SWAT team was clearing the rioters. She didn't do anything that justified her murder.
You lie yet again. That team (don't know that they're SWAT) was not clearing out rioters until after she was shot. Before she was shot, they were escorting 3 the other cops, who were guarding the door, down the stairs to exit that area.
1. "That team" looked like SWAT to me. They had ARs and were in uniform. They were obviously NOT protesters.
They were on the stairs as Ashli was shot, probably a minute too late to stop her murder. One factoid that I know that maybe you don't is that when the SWAT teams entered the capital building, the riot was over. No one wanted to mess with the SWAT teams.
2. I don't see the SWAT guys escorting (3) cops down the stairs. It looks to me that they got there just as Ashli was shot, and cleared the area.
3. What matters is that unarmed Ashli was shot for protesting when she should have been arrested and told of her Miranda Rights, and then lawyered up, before trial. Now she's dead. That was murder.
Doesn't matter what kind of cops they were, they were escorting other cops out of there.

3 cops were guarding the door. They step aside and then 4 better armed cops come up the stairs. 3 of the better armed cops escort the first 3 cops down the stairs, leaving the 4th near the top of the stairs when Ashli Targetpractice was shot. There was no other cop nearer to her than the cop who shot her.



At about 37:30, the mob swells in that hallway and the cops' lives become endangered as the mob gets increasingly angry and violent.

At about 38:25, 4 backups arrive.

At about 38:55, the guy with the helmet breaks out the window on one of the doors as 3 of the backups escort the 3 cops who were at the door, down the stairs and away as someone is heard saying, "they're being evacuated for their own safety." the 4th backups remains on the stairs.

At about 39:03, the guy with the helmet breaks out the window on the far right (where Ashli Targetpractice would get shot) as someone says, "they're breaking in.... The police are evacuating the other cop."

At about 39:10, a shot rings out. There is only one cop remaining, standing near the top of the stairs. All the other cops are down the stairs.

 
The Jan 6 thing was the exercising of the 1st Amendment despite the fact it was triggered by retarded BLM and Q. The Capital Building is a great piece of White man architecture. But the contents in it are shit. Most hilarious is democrats whining about Jan 6 with the actual, massive violence and actual, massive law breaking happening in their Black and Brown constituencies.
...riots as instigated by the occupants of the capital building....who are not being hunted down and prosecuted by the FBI...
View attachment 509336
The king of lawlessness
You berate Trump for wanting to break up riots with force, but condone/rationalize Ashli Babbitt's murder?
(play video of post just above this one)
What about low-IQ Maxine's urging for violence against Trump admin people? You okay with that?
I'm not a fan of democrat's constant double standards.
Democrats are the promoters of lawlessness, Trump is the "law and order" president.
I'm sad she was killed.

You are two faced on the topic....

You think George Floyd's murder was justified for passing a 20$ counterfeit bill, and Eric Garners murder was justified for selling single cigarettes on the street and Michael Browns murder for shoplifting a $5 pack of cigarette, and Beyona Taylor for sleeping in her own home....

But Babbit, breaking in to the capitol, bashing in and breaking the windows in the doors that was the only protection between the violent mob she was a part of and the vice president and congress critters was somehow not worse than those mentioned above, is pure hypocrisy imo.
Either you are deliberately lying or you have a very slanted and misinformed grasp of the facts:
1. George Floyd wasn't murdered, his death was accidental, he resisted arrest and had to be subdued. You may disagree with the method used, but it is legal in Minneapolis:

2. Eric Garner's death was caused by his resisting arrest. A better question is why were cops directed to clamp down on illegal cigarette sales to increase tax revenue?

3. Michael Brown robbed a store and attacked a cop. How about that "hands up don't shoot" bullshit?

4. Criminals belong in prison, unless they resist arrest, then what happens happens.

5. How about how fast this OH cop had to decide which girl lived or died? Tell me he should have let one get stabbed.

6. So you are happy that unarmed Ashli Babbitt got shot while the SWAT team was clearing the crowd behind her? IMHO she should have been arrested before being shot, but that's just me. The protest was ending, she didn't have to die. She was NOT resisting arrest like your black criminals were.
What danger was George Floyd to society...the people police are to protect? Or the police themselves once handcuffed? He was murdered, Chauvin murdered him according to a jury of his peers.

What harm was Eric Gardner to society...people in the public that are suppose to be protected? There were 5 cops for one Eric Gardner and yes... all for taxes, they were in no danger of harm....

What harm was Michael brown to the public? What mortal harm could he have brought to the cop, with him being unarmed and yards away when the cop shot to kill him? For $5 bucks? Come on!

Yet Ashli climbing through a violently smashed and broken door window.... with others continuing to smash adjacent door windows, with her participating or standing on the front line of the violent smashing these door windows with bats ....just waiting to climb thru it to get through to a House Chamber, where the vice president and congress critters were being evacuated from....the shooting was not justified compared to the three men mentioned above...??? Really? I find that hard to believe....

So you say Ashli belonged in prison?
1. Floyd was a criminal, Gardner was a criminal, Brown was a criminal. They resisted arrest and got what they got. If they didn't resist arrest they would all be alive today. Pols write the laws, and the police enforce the laws, its not that complicated. If you don't want to follow the US laws, move to another country.

2. Ashli Babbitt deserved to be arrested, tried for her crime, and sent to jail, NOT SHOT. Look at the video again, the SWAT team was clearing the rioters. She didn't do anything that justified her murder.
Ashli Babbitt deserved to be arrested, tried for her crime, and sent to jail, NOT SHOT.
What’s the line? Oh yeah…. If she would have just complied, she would be alive today.
Did anyone try to put handcuffs on Ashli? Or say "stop or I'll shoot"? Fuck no. She was murdered.
 
Down to a mere 54% condemnation
How do libbies like a poll that does not produce the results they were confident about?
That poll condemns you, Trump Humpers, and the denizens of this site
A mere 54% condemnation which certainly is not the 80%+ you felt you would get. What it shows is that support for your pet concept is tepid and dwindling daily
Not sure how it’s Trump humping to decry a murder. You need a vocabulary beyond 10 years old to be competitive here
 
3. What matters is that unarmed Ashli was shot for protesting when she should have been arrested and told of her Miranda Rights, and then lawyered up, before trial. Now she's dead. That was murder.
Nope, they did the right thing shooting her. You can point out that it turned out she was unarmed but the cop who shot her had no idea if she was armed or not. Two bombs were discovered by that time by the DNC and RNC. With her being part of that violent mob, smashing their way in to where lawmakers were hiding, the cop had no way of knowing if she had a bomb in her backpack.

Play stupid games -- win stupid prizes.
 
The Jan 6 thing was the exercising of the 1st Amendment despite the fact it was triggered by retarded BLM and Q. The Capital Building is a great piece of White man architecture. But the contents in it are shit. Most hilarious is democrats whining about Jan 6 with the actual, massive violence and actual, massive law breaking happening in their Black and Brown constituencies.
...riots as instigated by the occupants of the capital building....who are not being hunted down and prosecuted by the FBI...
View attachment 509336
The king of lawlessness
You berate Trump for wanting to break up riots with force, but condone/rationalize Ashli Babbitt's murder?
(play video of post just above this one)
What about low-IQ Maxine's urging for violence against Trump admin people? You okay with that?
I'm not a fan of democrat's constant double standards.
Democrats are the promoters of lawlessness, Trump is the "law and order" president.
I'm sad she was killed.

You are two faced on the topic....

You think George Floyd's murder was justified for passing a 20$ counterfeit bill, and Eric Garners murder was justified for selling single cigarettes on the street and Michael Browns murder for shoplifting a $5 pack of cigarette, and Beyona Taylor for sleeping in her own home....

But Babbit, breaking in to the capitol, bashing in and breaking the windows in the doors that was the only protection between the violent mob she was a part of and the vice president and congress critters was somehow not worse than those mentioned above, is pure hypocrisy imo.
Either you are deliberately lying or you have a very slanted and misinformed grasp of the facts:
1. George Floyd wasn't murdered, his death was accidental, he resisted arrest and had to be subdued. You may disagree with the method used, but it is legal in Minneapolis:

2. Eric Garner's death was caused by his resisting arrest. A better question is why were cops directed to clamp down on illegal cigarette sales to increase tax revenue?

3. Michael Brown robbed a store and attacked a cop. How about that "hands up don't shoot" bullshit?

4. Criminals belong in prison, unless they resist arrest, then what happens happens.

5. How about how fast this OH cop had to decide which girl lived or died? Tell me he should have let one get stabbed.

6. So you are happy that unarmed Ashli Babbitt got shot while the SWAT team was clearing the crowd behind her? IMHO she should have been arrested before being shot, but that's just me. The protest was ending, she didn't have to die. She was NOT resisting arrest like your black criminals were.
What danger was George Floyd to society...the people police are to protect? Or the police themselves once handcuffed? He was murdered, Chauvin murdered him according to a jury of his peers.

What harm was Eric Gardner to society...people in the public that are suppose to be protected? There were 5 cops for one Eric Gardner and yes... all for taxes, they were in no danger of harm....

What harm was Michael brown to the public? What mortal harm could he have brought to the cop, with him being unarmed and yards away when the cop shot to kill him? For $5 bucks? Come on!

Yet Ashli climbing through a violently smashed and broken door window.... with others continuing to smash adjacent door windows, with her participating or standing on the front line of the violent smashing these door windows with bats ....just waiting to climb thru it to get through to a House Chamber, where the vice president and congress critters were being evacuated from....the shooting was not justified compared to the three men mentioned above...??? Really? I find that hard to believe....

So you say Ashli belonged in prison?
1. Floyd was a criminal, Gardner was a criminal, Brown was a criminal. They resisted arrest and got what they got. If they didn't resist arrest they would all be alive today. Pols write the laws, and the police enforce the laws, its not that complicated. If you don't want to follow the US laws, move to another country.

2. Ashli Babbitt deserved to be arrested, tried for her crime, and sent to jail, NOT SHOT. Look at the video again, the SWAT team was clearing the rioters. She didn't do anything that justified her murder.
Ashli Babbitt deserved to be arrested, tried for her crime, and sent to jail, NOT SHOT.
What’s the line? Oh yeah…. If she would have just complied, she would be alive today.
Did anyone try to put handcuffs on Ashli? Or say "stop or I'll shoot"? Fuck no. She was murdered.
A gun in your face when you are climbing thru a window you just smashed IS a stop or I’ll shoot warning moron
 
Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.
the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones


61n6sf88ll871.jpg


The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.
whats the point of condemning them?
what really matters is a commission to investigate it.
two republicans voted for investigation.



The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.
That's what y'all do. You did (and still do it) it with followers of Islam. Y'all do it with BLM.

just more Republican projection...


Did you forget that I was the republican that made a big deal about Trump increasing his black male vote?

Almost like I can distinguish between sub groups based on their behavior.


My point stands.

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.
Not even close. Nobody is asking for all Republicans to be thrown in jail, just the rioters. Nobody is trying to ban Republicans from entering the country like Trump tried to ban Muslims.

The only people I see “using” the riot are Trump wannabes. They are using it to make money.


Bullshit. The riot is being used to smear republicans and Trump supporters as a group. Hell, the meme right above does that. You posted in this thread, but didn't say anything about it. Do you support that behavior, or are you just remaining quite while other more partisan lefties do it?
Saying that the rioters/terrorists on January 6 were all Republican is a true statement. Saying that all Republicans are rioters and terrorists is not a true statement.

It is similar to the statement that not all Republicans are racist but most racist are Republicans.


1. Note that you had to quality "all rioters". How ironic. ANd you can't see it even now can you?

2. We have one admitted antifa guy who was there agitating. It is a plausible theory.

3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.
1. My apologies. Let me rephrase. Not all Trumpsters rioted, but most of the rioters were Trumpsters.

2. Did you link to this alleged "antifa guy"? Who is this alleged individual?

3. Pointing out the undeniable fact that you are a racist isn't baiting, it's stating facts.

1. Plenty of rioters that are not trump supporters. Indeed, the vast majority are leftards.

2.


"Sullivan, who has at turns identified himself as a racial justice protester and leftist documentarian,"


3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.
1. Not on January 6th. That day it was all Trump supporters.

2. Fact Check: Was a member of Antifa arrested in the Capitol riot?

The Ruling​

False.​
None of the 230 people arrested for alleged participation in the Capitol attacks were linked to any left-wing movement. There is no evidence that Sullivan was a member of Antifa, Black Lives Matter or any other left-leaning group, especially a "leader" of Antifa.​

3. Just stating the fact that you are a racist. Facts are facts and not baiting. You believe yourself to be better and smarter than people with more melanin than you. (SPOILER ALERT...you aren't)


1. YOu assume.

2. Sorry. He self identifies as a "wacial justice" what have you. THat makes him yours.

3. Better? I never said better. That was the voices in your head, mr wacistbaiter.
1. We conclude based on ALL the evidence.
2. Not ANTIFA, not BLM, not the FBI. It was all Trumpsters
3. You believe you are more intelligent based on the color of your skin. You're not.


1. We have one proven example of a lefty infiltrator. That disproves your claim of "all" and raises the possibility of more.

2. You admitted that the iq gap is real. Now you are talking shit.
 
Down to a mere 54% condemnation
How do libbies like a poll that does not produce the results they were confident about?
Down to a mere 54% condemnation
How do libbies like a poll that does not produce the results they were confident about?
Not a math major I see.
The purpose of the thread and poll was to see how many REPUBLICANS condemn the 1/6 riot.
To compute the percentage of Republicans who condemn the 1/6 riot, compute 32/42 = 76%.
Not sure how you came up with 54%???
 
The Jan 6 thing was the exercising of the 1st Amendment despite the fact it was triggered by retarded BLM and Q. The Capital Building is a great piece of White man architecture. But the contents in it are shit. Most hilarious is democrats whining about Jan 6 with the actual, massive violence and actual, massive law breaking happening in their Black and Brown constituencies.
...riots as instigated by the occupants of the capital building....who are not being hunted down and prosecuted by the FBI...
View attachment 509336
The king of lawlessness
You berate Trump for wanting to break up riots with force, but condone/rationalize Ashli Babbitt's murder?
(play video of post just above this one)
What about low-IQ Maxine's urging for violence against Trump admin people? You okay with that?
I'm not a fan of democrat's constant double standards.
Democrats are the promoters of lawlessness, Trump is the "law and order" president.
I'm sad she was killed.

You are two faced on the topic....

You think George Floyd's murder was justified for passing a 20$ counterfeit bill, and Eric Garners murder was justified for selling single cigarettes on the street and Michael Browns murder for shoplifting a $5 pack of cigarette, and Beyona Taylor for sleeping in her own home....

But Babbit, breaking in to the capitol, bashing in and breaking the windows in the doors that was the only protection between the violent mob she was a part of and the vice president and congress critters was somehow not worse than those mentioned above, is pure hypocrisy imo.
Either you are deliberately lying or you have a very slanted and misinformed grasp of the facts:
1. George Floyd wasn't murdered, his death was accidental, he resisted arrest and had to be subdued. You may disagree with the method used, but it is legal in Minneapolis:

2. Eric Garner's death was caused by his resisting arrest. A better question is why were cops directed to clamp down on illegal cigarette sales to increase tax revenue?

3. Michael Brown robbed a store and attacked a cop. How about that "hands up don't shoot" bullshit?

4. Criminals belong in prison, unless they resist arrest, then what happens happens.

5. How about how fast this OH cop had to decide which girl lived or died? Tell me he should have let one get stabbed.

6. So you are happy that unarmed Ashli Babbitt got shot while the SWAT team was clearing the crowd behind her? IMHO she should have been arrested before being shot, but that's just me. The protest was ending, she didn't have to die. She was NOT resisting arrest like your black criminals were.
What danger was George Floyd to society...the people police are to protect? Or the police themselves once handcuffed? He was murdered, Chauvin murdered him according to a jury of his peers.

What harm was Eric Gardner to society...people in the public that are suppose to be protected? There were 5 cops for one Eric Gardner and yes... all for taxes, they were in no danger of harm....

What harm was Michael brown to the public? What mortal harm could he have brought to the cop, with him being unarmed and yards away when the cop shot to kill him? For $5 bucks? Come on!

Yet Ashli climbing through a violently smashed and broken door window.... with others continuing to smash adjacent door windows, with her participating or standing on the front line of the violent smashing these door windows with bats ....just waiting to climb thru it to get through to a House Chamber, where the vice president and congress critters were being evacuated from....the shooting was not justified compared to the three men mentioned above...??? Really? I find that hard to believe....

So you say Ashli belonged in prison?
1. Floyd was a criminal, Gardner was a criminal, Brown was a criminal. They resisted arrest and got what they got. If they didn't resist arrest they would all be alive today. Pols write the laws, and the police enforce the laws, its not that complicated. If you don't want to follow the US laws, move to another country.

2. Ashli Babbitt deserved to be arrested, tried for her crime, and sent to jail, NOT SHOT. Look at the video again, the SWAT team was clearing the rioters. She didn't do anything that justified her murder.
Ashli Babbitt deserved to be arrested, tried for her crime, and sent to jail, NOT SHOT.
What’s the line? Oh yeah…. If she would have just complied, she would be alive today.
Did anyone try to put handcuffs on Ashli? Or say "stop or I'll shoot"? Fuck no. She was murdered.
The cop claims he warned the mob to get back. Regardless, several in that mob standing near her yelled out, "he's got a gun!" They backed down. For a reason we'll never know -- Benedict Babbitt forged ahead to breach the police barricade.
 
The Jan 6 thing was the exercising of the 1st Amendment despite the fact it was triggered by retarded BLM and Q. The Capital Building is a great piece of White man architecture. But the contents in it are shit. Most hilarious is democrats whining about Jan 6 with the actual, massive violence and actual, massive law breaking happening in their Black and Brown constituencies.
...riots as instigated by the occupants of the capital building....who are not being hunted down and prosecuted by the FBI...
View attachment 509336
The king of lawlessness
You berate Trump for wanting to break up riots with force, but condone/rationalize Ashli Babbitt's murder?
(play video of post just above this one)
What about low-IQ Maxine's urging for violence against Trump admin people? You okay with that?
I'm not a fan of democrat's constant double standards.
Democrats are the promoters of lawlessness, Trump is the "law and order" president.
I'm sad she was killed.

You are two faced on the topic....

You think George Floyd's murder was justified for passing a 20$ counterfeit bill, and Eric Garners murder was justified for selling single cigarettes on the street and Michael Browns murder for shoplifting a $5 pack of cigarette, and Beyona Taylor for sleeping in her own home....

But Babbit, breaking in to the capitol, bashing in and breaking the windows in the doors that was the only protection between the violent mob she was a part of and the vice president and congress critters was somehow not worse than those mentioned above, is pure hypocrisy imo.
Either you are deliberately lying or you have a very slanted and misinformed grasp of the facts:
1. George Floyd wasn't murdered, his death was accidental, he resisted arrest and had to be subdued. You may disagree with the method used, but it is legal in Minneapolis:

2. Eric Garner's death was caused by his resisting arrest. A better question is why were cops directed to clamp down on illegal cigarette sales to increase tax revenue?

3. Michael Brown robbed a store and attacked a cop. How about that "hands up don't shoot" bullshit?

4. Criminals belong in prison, unless they resist arrest, then what happens happens.

5. How about how fast this OH cop had to decide which girl lived or died? Tell me he should have let one get stabbed.

6. So you are happy that unarmed Ashli Babbitt got shot while the SWAT team was clearing the crowd behind her? IMHO she should have been arrested before being shot, but that's just me. The protest was ending, she didn't have to die. She was NOT resisting arrest like your black criminals were.
What danger was George Floyd to society...the people police are to protect? Or the police themselves once handcuffed? He was murdered, Chauvin murdered him according to a jury of his peers.

What harm was Eric Gardner to society...people in the public that are suppose to be protected? There were 5 cops for one Eric Gardner and yes... all for taxes, they were in no danger of harm....

What harm was Michael brown to the public? What mortal harm could he have brought to the cop, with him being unarmed and yards away when the cop shot to kill him? For $5 bucks? Come on!

Yet Ashli climbing through a violently smashed and broken door window.... with others continuing to smash adjacent door windows, with her participating or standing on the front line of the violent smashing these door windows with bats ....just waiting to climb thru it to get through to a House Chamber, where the vice president and congress critters were being evacuated from....the shooting was not justified compared to the three men mentioned above...??? Really? I find that hard to believe....

So you say Ashli belonged in prison?
1. Floyd was a criminal, Gardner was a criminal, Brown was a criminal. They resisted arrest and got what they got. If they didn't resist arrest they would all be alive today. Pols write the laws, and the police enforce the laws, its not that complicated. If you don't want to follow the US laws, move to another country.

2. Ashli Babbitt deserved to be arrested, tried for her crime, and sent to jail, NOT SHOT. Look at the video again, the SWAT team was clearing the rioters. She didn't do anything that justified her murder.
Ashli Babbitt deserved to be arrested, tried for her crime, and sent to jail, NOT SHOT.
What’s the line? Oh yeah…. If she would have just complied, she would be alive today.
Did anyone try to put handcuffs on Ashli? Or say "stop or I'll shoot"? Fuck no. She was murdered.
Did anyone try to put handcuffs on Ashli? Or say "stop or I'll shoot"? Fuck no. She was murdered.
That certainly has never been your standard until now. They were all told to vacate the premises repeatedly, for hours.
 
Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.
the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones


61n6sf88ll871.jpg


The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.
whats the point of condemning them?
what really matters is a commission to investigate it.
two republicans voted for investigation.



The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.
That's what y'all do. You did (and still do it) it with followers of Islam. Y'all do it with BLM.

just more Republican projection...


Did you forget that I was the republican that made a big deal about Trump increasing his black male vote?

Almost like I can distinguish between sub groups based on their behavior.


My point stands.

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.
Not even close. Nobody is asking for all Republicans to be thrown in jail, just the rioters. Nobody is trying to ban Republicans from entering the country like Trump tried to ban Muslims.

The only people I see “using” the riot are Trump wannabes. They are using it to make money.


Bullshit. The riot is being used to smear republicans and Trump supporters as a group. Hell, the meme right above does that. You posted in this thread, but didn't say anything about it. Do you support that behavior, or are you just remaining quite while other more partisan lefties do it?
Saying that the rioters/terrorists on January 6 were all Republican is a true statement. Saying that all Republicans are rioters and terrorists is not a true statement.

It is similar to the statement that not all Republicans are racist but most racist are Republicans.


1. Note that you had to quality "all rioters". How ironic. ANd you can't see it even now can you?

2. We have one admitted antifa guy who was there agitating. It is a plausible theory.

3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.
1. My apologies. Let me rephrase. Not all Trumpsters rioted, but most of the rioters were Trumpsters.

2. Did you link to this alleged "antifa guy"? Who is this alleged individual?

3. Pointing out the undeniable fact that you are a racist isn't baiting, it's stating facts.

1. Plenty of rioters that are not trump supporters. Indeed, the vast majority are leftards.

2.


"Sullivan, who has at turns identified himself as a racial justice protester and leftist documentarian,"


3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.
1. Not on January 6th. That day it was all Trump supporters.

2. Fact Check: Was a member of Antifa arrested in the Capitol riot?

The Ruling​

False.​
None of the 230 people arrested for alleged participation in the Capitol attacks were linked to any left-wing movement. There is no evidence that Sullivan was a member of Antifa, Black Lives Matter or any other left-leaning group, especially a "leader" of Antifa.​

3. Just stating the fact that you are a racist. Facts are facts and not baiting. You believe yourself to be better and smarter than people with more melanin than you. (SPOILER ALERT...you aren't)


1. YOu assume.

2. Sorry. He self identifies as a "wacial justice" what have you. THat makes him yours.

3. Better? I never said better. That was the voices in your head, mr wacistbaiter.
1. We conclude based on ALL the evidence.
2. Not ANTIFA, not BLM, not the FBI. It was all Trumpsters
3. You believe you are more intelligent based on the color of your skin. You're not.


1. We have one proven example of a lefty infiltrator. That disproves your claim of "all" and raises the possibility of more.

2. You admitted that the iq gap is real. Now you are talking shit.
If you’re talking about Sullivan you’re both wrong and lying ( because it’s been shown to you before.). Sullivan had been disowned by BLM months before because of their suspicions that he was working for the Trump clowns and his brother is affiliated with the Proud Boys
 
The Reichstag Fire in 1933, started by the fascists, blamed on a Dutch communist, was the excuse used too assume absolute control by the Nazi party to squash all forms of dissent. The protest perpetrated on January 6th, and riot, by a very small minority, is being used for the same purpose. Learn from History, don’t be a fool, this is not a game and by no means designed for anything other than a power grab. The primary objective of the National Democratic Fascist Party is absolute dominance.
 
Down to a mere 54% condemnation
How do libbies like a poll that does not produce the results they were confident about?
Down to a mere 54% condemnation
How do libbies like a poll that does not produce the results they were confident about?
Not a math major I see.
The purpose of the thread and poll was to see how many REPUBLICANS condemn the 1/6 riot.
To compute the percentage of Republicans who condemn the 1/6 riot, compute 32/42 = 76%.
Not sure how you came up with 54%???
36 people didn't vote if they were Republican or not; or if they condemned the riots or not. So there could have been GOP in that group who condemn or support Insurrection Day.
 

Forum List

Back
Top