Poll to condemn or condone "the violence and law breaking that took place inside the Capital on 1/6"

[Faun]

Down to a mere 54% condemnation
How do libbies like a poll that does not produce the results they were confident about?

Down to a mere 54% condemnation
How do libbies like a poll that does not produce the results they were confident about?

Not a math major I see.
The purpose of the thread and poll was to see how many REPUBLICANS condemn the 1/6 riot.
To compute the percentage of Republicans who condemn the 1/6 riot, compute 32/42 = 76%.
Not sure how you came up with 54%???

36 people didn't vote if they were Republican or not; or if they condemned the riots or not. So there could have been GOP in that group who condemn or support Insurrection Day.

True, but then that 36 knew their vote wouldn't count as Republicans who condemn or condone the 1/6 riot, they basically "abstained". There could have been independents, democrats, anarchists, etc. in that 36 count of "others".

Uh, no, you're not a mind reader to know why they chose to post their position rather than vote on it.

they chose not to identify so you don't get to read their minds either.

Dumbfuck, I'm not the one guessing what they meant.

you claim they could be republicans and that they should count against the republican count, right?

OK, so now everyone here sees you're not even capable of comprehending the meaning of the word, "could." Which means I'm not reading minds. Are ya proud of yourself now?

 

[Correll]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

whats the point of condemning them?
what really matters is a commission to investigate it.
two republicans voted for investigation.

House votes to establish committee to investigate Jan. 6 Capitol riot

Two Republicans — Cheney and Kinzinger — joined the Democrats in approving the new panel.

www.nbcnews.com

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

That's what y'all do. You did (and still do it) it with followers of Islam. Y'all do it with BLM.

just more Republican projection...

Did you forget that I was the republican that made a big deal about Trump increasing his black male vote?

Almost like I can distinguish between sub groups based on their behavior.


My point stands.

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

Not even close. Nobody is asking for all Republicans to be thrown in jail, just the rioters. Nobody is trying to ban Republicans from entering the country like Trump tried to ban Muslims.

The only people I see “using” the riot are Trump wannabes. They are using it to make money.

Bullshit. The riot is being used to smear republicans and Trump supporters as a group. Hell, the meme right above does that. You posted in this thread, but didn't say anything about it. Do you support that behavior, or are you just remaining quite while other more partisan lefties do it?

Saying that the rioters/terrorists on January 6 were all Republican is a true statement. Saying that all Republicans are rioters and terrorists is not a true statement.

It is similar to the statement that not all Republicans are racist but most racist are Republicans.

1. Note that you had to quality "all rioters". How ironic. ANd you can't see it even now can you?

2. We have one admitted antifa guy who was there agitating. It is a plausible theory.

3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. My apologies. Let me rephrase. Not all Trumpsters rioted, but most of the rioters were Trumpsters.

2. Did you link to this alleged "antifa guy"? Who is this alleged individual?

3. Pointing out the undeniable fact that you are a racist isn't baiting, it's stating facts.

1. Plenty of rioters that are not trump supporters. Indeed, the vast majority are leftards.

2.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/16/sullivan-video-arrested/

"Sullivan, who has at turns identified himself as a racial justice protester and leftist documentarian,"


3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. Not on January 6th. That day it was all Trump supporters.

2. Fact Check: Was a member of Antifa arrested in the Capitol riot?

The Ruling​

False.​

​

None of the 230 people arrested for alleged participation in the Capitol attacks were linked to any left-wing movement. There is no evidence that Sullivan was a member of Antifa, Black Lives Matter or any other left-leaning group, especially a "leader" of Antifa.​

3. Just stating the fact that you are a racist. Facts are facts and not baiting. You believe yourself to be better and smarter than people with more melanin than you. (SPOILER ALERT...you aren't)

1. YOu assume.

2. Sorry. He self identifies as a "wacial justice" what have you. THat makes him yours.

3. Better? I never said better. That was the voices in your head, mr wacistbaiter.

1. We conclude based on ALL the evidence.
2. Not ANTIFA, not BLM, not the FBI. It was all Trumpsters
3. You believe you are more intelligent based on the color of your skin. You're not.

1. We have one proven example of a lefty infiltrator. That disproves your claim of "all" and raises the possibility of more.

2. You admitted that the iq gap is real. Now you are talking shit.

1. I debunked your "proven lefty"
2. I provided evidence that the ID gap doe as not mean whites are more intelligent than blacks as racists believe (and you, apparently...guess that makes you racist)

1. No, you didn't. He is a self identified "wacial justice" type. That makes him yours.

2. No, you argued for environmental causes. That does not negate the gap, it is just an attempt to explain it away. The gap is still there. your confusing on this is kind of sad.

1. Sorry, Trumpster, the January 6th riot is all on Trump cultists.

2. What is sad is your need to feel superior to people of color. (You aren’t superior in any way, shape or form) What you are is straight up racist.

1. That you would like about sullivan demonstrates that you and people like you, could be lying about others.

2. I've never claimed to be superior. That was something you made up in your head.

 

[easyt65]

1. Sorry, Trumpster, the January 6th riot is all on Trump cultists.

Again, the bipartisan committee and their investigation report say YOU ARE A LIAR.

I will believe the findings of this bipartisan committee over the BUTT-HURT FEELINGS & OPINION of a TDS-suffering, emotional, irrational hate-driven, Trump-addicted snowflake.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Down to a mere 54% condemnation
How do libbies like a poll that does not produce the results they were confident about?

Down to a mere 54% condemnation
How do libbies like a poll that does not produce the results they were confident about?

Not a math major I see.
The purpose of the thread and poll was to see how many REPUBLICANS condemn the 1/6 riot.
To compute the percentage of Republicans who condemn the 1/6 riot, compute 32/42 = 76%.
Not sure how you came up with 54%???

36 people didn't vote if they were Republican or not; or if they condemned the riots or not. So there could have been GOP in that group who condemn or support Insurrection Day.

True, but then that 36 knew their vote wouldn't count as Republicans who condemn or condone the 1/6 riot, they basically "abstained". There could have been independents, democrats, anarchists, etc. in that 36 count of "others".

Uh, no, you're not a mind reader to know why they chose to post their position rather than vote on it.

they chose not to identify so you don't get to read their minds either.

Dumbfuck, I'm not the one guessing what they meant.

you claim they could be republicans and that they should count against the republican count, right?

OK, so now everyone here sees you're not even capable of comprehending the meaning of the word, "could." Which means I'm not reading minds. Are ya proud of yourself now?

you ARE claiming the total of repubicans that voted is not accurate based on YOU claiming people that chose not to identify as republican, Simple solution read all the posts and weed out all these republican that secretly supported the violence but did not identify as republican. Ohh and IT is the same by the way dumbass YOU claim to know republicans did not self identify.

 

[Faun]

Down to a mere 54% condemnation
How do libbies like a poll that does not produce the results they were confident about?

Down to a mere 54% condemnation
How do libbies like a poll that does not produce the results they were confident about?

Not a math major I see.
The purpose of the thread and poll was to see how many REPUBLICANS condemn the 1/6 riot.
To compute the percentage of Republicans who condemn the 1/6 riot, compute 32/42 = 76%.
Not sure how you came up with 54%???

36 people didn't vote if they were Republican or not; or if they condemned the riots or not. So there could have been GOP in that group who condemn or support Insurrection Day.

True, but then that 36 knew their vote wouldn't count as Republicans who condemn or condone the 1/6 riot, they basically "abstained". There could have been independents, democrats, anarchists, etc. in that 36 count of "others".

Uh, no, you're not a mind reader to know why they chose to post their position rather than vote on it.

they chose not to identify so you don't get to read their minds either.

Dumbfuck, I'm not the one guessing what they meant.

you claim they could be republicans and that they should count against the republican count, right?

OK, so now everyone here sees you're not even capable of comprehending the meaning of the word, "could." Which means I'm not reading minds. Are ya proud of yourself now?

you ARE claiming the total of repubicans that voted is not accurate based on YOU claiming people that chose not to identify as republican, Simple solution read all the posts and weed out all these republican that secretly supported the violence but did not identify as republican. Ohh and IT is the same by the way dumbass YOU claim to know republicans did not self identify.

Dumbfuck, no poll on this site is accurate. It's an unscientific poll with a margin of error in the high 90's.

That aside, I said "could." Which they could. Anybody on this forum [/b]could[/b] vote on any of those options. That's not reading minds, you knuckle-drafging troglodyte.

 

[HappyJoy]

I want to know why an unarmed petite woman can be shot dead, and the shooter isn't made public, not to mention stand trial for murder.

Do you think that "unarmed petite woman" was practicing her rights as an American while she was trespassing?

The answer to trespassing is a no trespass warning (less than arrest), not the death penalty.

Apparently not, she dead. Stopped everyone else in their tracks, they got the warning they needed.

Murder is an effective warning mechanism. It’s just that people who do it are not supposed to be hidden from responsibility and not law enforcement.
The murderer was likely disguised as security and was a plant to kill someone to send the message “No protesting about results of election”

Hey dumbfuck, all the protesting was to be had outside. Not a single person had a gun pointed at them...outside.

A plant? You're a plant.

Hey, this thread was very successful, 2,000 posts and climbing. Poll worked well.

I'm not happy that only 80% of Republicans condemn the capital riot. But that's a solid majority.

I didn't see a lot of condemnation from the right, I saw excuses.

 

[HappyJoy]

I want to know why an unarmed petite woman can be shot dead, and the shooter isn't made public, not to mention stand trial for murder.

Do you think that "unarmed petite woman" was practicing her rights as an American while she was trespassing?

Ahhhhhh good, you obviously support shooting blacks that are rioting, looting and burning. That's a start.

Nope, not unless they are rushing members of Congress and the first one pops through the last barrier between them.

 

[kyzr]

I want to know why an unarmed petite woman can be shot dead, and the shooter isn't made public, not to mention stand trial for murder.

Do you think that "unarmed petite woman" was practicing her rights as an American while she was trespassing?

The answer to trespassing is a no trespass warning (less than arrest), not the death penalty.

Apparently not, she dead. Stopped everyone else in their tracks, they got the warning they needed.

Murder is an effective warning mechanism. It’s just that people who do it are not supposed to be hidden from responsibility and not law enforcement.
The murderer was likely disguised as security and was a plant to kill someone to send the message “No protesting about results of election”

Hey dumbfuck, all the protesting was to be had outside. Not a single person had a gun pointed at them...outside.

A plant? You're a plant.

Hey, this thread was very successful, 2,000 posts and climbing. Poll worked well.

I'm not happy that only 80% of Republicans condemn the capital riot. But that's a solid majority.

I didn't see a lot of condemnation from the right, I saw excuses.

76% of Republicans voted to condemn the 1/6 riot.
I'm disappointed, I thought it would be higher.
True, the 24% who don't condemn have their "excuses".
That's still a better result than the democrats inciting the 2020 BLM/antifa riots.

 

[Faun]

I want to know why an unarmed petite woman can be shot dead, and the shooter isn't made public, not to mention stand trial for murder.

Do you think that "unarmed petite woman" was practicing her rights as an American while she was trespassing?

The answer to trespassing is a no trespass warning (less than arrest), not the death penalty.

Apparently not, she dead. Stopped everyone else in their tracks, they got the warning they needed.

Murder is an effective warning mechanism. It’s just that people who do it are not supposed to be hidden from responsibility and not law enforcement.
The murderer was likely disguised as security and was a plant to kill someone to send the message “No protesting about results of election”

Hey dumbfuck, all the protesting was to be had outside. Not a single person had a gun pointed at them...outside.

A plant? You're a plant.

Hey, this thread was very successful, 2,000 posts and climbing. Poll worked well.

I'm not happy that only 80% of Republicans condemn the capital riot. But that's a solid majority.

I didn't see a lot of condemnation from the right, I saw excuses.

76% of Republicans voted to condemn the 1/6 riot.
I'm disappointed, I thought it would be higher.
True, the 24% who don't condemn have their "excuses".
That's still a better result than the democrats inciting the 2020 BLM/antifa riots.

Who do you think instigated it? The right or the left?

 

[kyzr]

I want to know why an unarmed petite woman can be shot dead, and the shooter isn't made public, not to mention stand trial for murder.

Do you think that "unarmed petite woman" was practicing her rights as an American while she was trespassing?

The answer to trespassing is a no trespass warning (less than arrest), not the death penalty.

Apparently not, she dead. Stopped everyone else in their tracks, they got the warning they needed.

Murder is an effective warning mechanism. It’s just that people who do it are not supposed to be hidden from responsibility and not law enforcement.
The murderer was likely disguised as security and was a plant to kill someone to send the message “No protesting about results of election”

Hey dumbfuck, all the protesting was to be had outside. Not a single person had a gun pointed at them...outside.

A plant? You're a plant.

Hey, this thread was very successful, 2,000 posts and climbing. Poll worked well.

I'm not happy that only 80% of Republicans condemn the capital riot. But that's a solid majority.

I didn't see a lot of condemnation from the right, I saw excuses.

76% of Republicans voted to condemn the 1/6 riot.
I'm disappointed, I thought it would be higher.
True, the 24% who don't condemn have their "excuses".
That's still a better result than the democrats inciting the 2020 BLM/antifa riots.

Who do you think instigated it? The right or the left?

The right instigated 1/6, not sure who all to blame, the "proud boys" look to be in deep shit.
The left instigated the BLM/antifa riots

 

[Faun]

I want to know why an unarmed petite woman can be shot dead, and the shooter isn't made public, not to mention stand trial for murder.

Do you think that "unarmed petite woman" was practicing her rights as an American while she was trespassing?

The answer to trespassing is a no trespass warning (less than arrest), not the death penalty.

Apparently not, she dead. Stopped everyone else in their tracks, they got the warning they needed.

Murder is an effective warning mechanism. It’s just that people who do it are not supposed to be hidden from responsibility and not law enforcement.
The murderer was likely disguised as security and was a plant to kill someone to send the message “No protesting about results of election”

Hey dumbfuck, all the protesting was to be had outside. Not a single person had a gun pointed at them...outside.

A plant? You're a plant.

Hey, this thread was very successful, 2,000 posts and climbing. Poll worked well.

I'm not happy that only 80% of Republicans condemn the capital riot. But that's a solid majority.

I didn't see a lot of condemnation from the right, I saw excuses.

76% of Republicans voted to condemn the 1/6 riot.
I'm disappointed, I thought it would be higher.
True, the 24% who don't condemn have their "excuses".
That's still a better result than the democrats inciting the 2020 BLM/antifa riots.

Who do you think instigated it? The right or the left?

The right instigated 1/6, not sure who all to blame, the "proud boys" look to be in deep shit.
The left instigated the BLM/antifa riots
View attachment 510006

The BLM riots have nothing to do with it.

 

[Seawytch]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

whats the point of condemning them?
what really matters is a commission to investigate it.
two republicans voted for investigation.

House votes to establish committee to investigate Jan. 6 Capitol riot

Two Republicans — Cheney and Kinzinger — joined the Democrats in approving the new panel.

www.nbcnews.com

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

That's what y'all do. You did (and still do it) it with followers of Islam. Y'all do it with BLM.

just more Republican projection...

Did you forget that I was the republican that made a big deal about Trump increasing his black male vote?

Almost like I can distinguish between sub groups based on their behavior.


My point stands.

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

Not even close. Nobody is asking for all Republicans to be thrown in jail, just the rioters. Nobody is trying to ban Republicans from entering the country like Trump tried to ban Muslims.

The only people I see “using” the riot are Trump wannabes. They are using it to make money.

Bullshit. The riot is being used to smear republicans and Trump supporters as a group. Hell, the meme right above does that. You posted in this thread, but didn't say anything about it. Do you support that behavior, or are you just remaining quite while other more partisan lefties do it?

Saying that the rioters/terrorists on January 6 were all Republican is a true statement. Saying that all Republicans are rioters and terrorists is not a true statement.

It is similar to the statement that not all Republicans are racist but most racist are Republicans.

1. Note that you had to quality "all rioters". How ironic. ANd you can't see it even now can you?

2. We have one admitted antifa guy who was there agitating. It is a plausible theory.

3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. My apologies. Let me rephrase. Not all Trumpsters rioted, but most of the rioters were Trumpsters.

2. Did you link to this alleged "antifa guy"? Who is this alleged individual?

3. Pointing out the undeniable fact that you are a racist isn't baiting, it's stating facts.

1. Plenty of rioters that are not trump supporters. Indeed, the vast majority are leftards.

2.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/16/sullivan-video-arrested/

"Sullivan, who has at turns identified himself as a racial justice protester and leftist documentarian,"


3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. Not on January 6th. That day it was all Trump supporters.

2. Fact Check: Was a member of Antifa arrested in the Capitol riot?

The Ruling​

False.​

​

None of the 230 people arrested for alleged participation in the Capitol attacks were linked to any left-wing movement. There is no evidence that Sullivan was a member of Antifa, Black Lives Matter or any other left-leaning group, especially a "leader" of Antifa.​

3. Just stating the fact that you are a racist. Facts are facts and not baiting. You believe yourself to be better and smarter than people with more melanin than you. (SPOILER ALERT...you aren't)

1. YOu assume.

2. Sorry. He self identifies as a "wacial justice" what have you. THat makes him yours.

3. Better? I never said better. That was the voices in your head, mr wacistbaiter.

1. We conclude based on ALL the evidence.
2. Not ANTIFA, not BLM, not the FBI. It was all Trumpsters
3. You believe you are more intelligent based on the color of your skin. You're not.

1. We have one proven example of a lefty infiltrator. That disproves your claim of "all" and raises the possibility of more.

2. You admitted that the iq gap is real. Now you are talking shit.

1. I debunked your "proven lefty"
2. I provided evidence that the ID gap doe as not mean whites are more intelligent than blacks as racists believe (and you, apparently...guess that makes you racist)

1. No, you didn't. He is a self identified "wacial justice" type. That makes him yours.

2. No, you argued for environmental causes. That does not negate the gap, it is just an attempt to explain it away. The gap is still there. your confusing on this is kind of sad.

1. Sorry, Trumpster, the January 6th riot is all on Trump cultists.

2. What is sad is your need to feel superior to people of color. (You aren’t superior in any way, shape or form) What you are is straight up racist.

1. That you would like about sullivan demonstrates that you and people like you, could be lying about others.

2. I've never claimed to be superior. That was something you made up in your head.

1. The scores of Trump supporters that have been arrested paint a different story. The riot on January 6 was Trump supporters.

2. That’s good because you aren’t. You aren’t more intelligent or superior in any way, shape or form.

 

[Seawytch]

1. Sorry, Trumpster, the January 6th riot is all on Trump cultists.

Again, the bipartisan committee and their investigation report say YOU ARE A LIAR.

I will believe the findings of this bipartisan committee over the BUTT-HURT FEELINGS & OPINION of a TDS-suffering, emotional, irrational hate-driven, Trump-addicted snowflake.

No it doesn’t. We all know the riot was by Trump supporters for Trump. It wasn’t ANTIFA, BLM or the FBI. Trump supporters rioted. Trump supporters were arrested. Trump supporters will go to jail.

 

[kyzr]

I want to know why an unarmed petite woman can be shot dead, and the shooter isn't made public, not to mention stand trial for murder.

Do you think that "unarmed petite woman" was practicing her rights as an American while she was trespassing?

The answer to trespassing is a no trespass warning (less than arrest), not the death penalty.

Apparently not, she dead. Stopped everyone else in their tracks, they got the warning they needed.

Murder is an effective warning mechanism. It’s just that people who do it are not supposed to be hidden from responsibility and not law enforcement.
The murderer was likely disguised as security and was a plant to kill someone to send the message “No protesting about results of election”

Hey dumbfuck, all the protesting was to be had outside. Not a single person had a gun pointed at them...outside.

A plant? You're a plant.

Hey, this thread was very successful, 2,000 posts and climbing. Poll worked well.

I'm not happy that only 80% of Republicans condemn the capital riot. But that's a solid majority.

I didn't see a lot of condemnation from the right, I saw excuses.

76% of Republicans voted to condemn the 1/6 riot.
I'm disappointed, I thought it would be higher.
True, the 24% who don't condemn have their "excuses".
That's still a better result than the democrats inciting the 2020 BLM/antifa riots.

Who do you think instigated it? The right or the left?

The right instigated 1/6, not sure who all to blame, the "proud boys" look to be in deep shit.
The left instigated the BLM/antifa riots
View attachment 510006

The BLM riots have nothing to do with it.

The BLM riots are proof of the left's double-standard. The 1/6 rioters are being hunted down by the FBI and prosecuted. The BLM/antifa rioters are being ignored, and even bailed out of jail by leftists. Is all rioting wrong, or are some rioters "more equal" than others?

 

[Faun]

I want to know why an unarmed petite woman can be shot dead, and the shooter isn't made public, not to mention stand trial for murder.

Do you think that "unarmed petite woman" was practicing her rights as an American while she was trespassing?

The answer to trespassing is a no trespass warning (less than arrest), not the death penalty.

Apparently not, she dead. Stopped everyone else in their tracks, they got the warning they needed.

Murder is an effective warning mechanism. It’s just that people who do it are not supposed to be hidden from responsibility and not law enforcement.
The murderer was likely disguised as security and was a plant to kill someone to send the message “No protesting about results of election”

Hey dumbfuck, all the protesting was to be had outside. Not a single person had a gun pointed at them...outside.

A plant? You're a plant.

Hey, this thread was very successful, 2,000 posts and climbing. Poll worked well.

I'm not happy that only 80% of Republicans condemn the capital riot. But that's a solid majority.

I didn't see a lot of condemnation from the right, I saw excuses.

76% of Republicans voted to condemn the 1/6 riot.
I'm disappointed, I thought it would be higher.
True, the 24% who don't condemn have their "excuses".
That's still a better result than the democrats inciting the 2020 BLM/antifa riots.

Who do you think instigated it? The right or the left?

The right instigated 1/6, not sure who all to blame, the "proud boys" look to be in deep shit.
The left instigated the BLM/antifa riots
View attachment 510006

The BLM riots have nothing to do with it.

The BLM riots are proof of the left's double-standard. The 1/6 rioters are being hunted down by the FBI and prosecuted. The BLM/antifa rioters are being ignored, and even bailed out of jail by leftists. Is all rioting wrong, or are some rioters "more equal" than others?

It's not a double standard since the events have nothing to do with each other. That's like saying why are you hunting down someone for hit and run but not for speeding?

 

[Chillicothe]

The BLM/antifa rioters are being ignored, and even bailed out of jail by leftists.

Ah, poster 'kyzer'.....have you ever been introduced to 'due diligence'?
To 'research'?
To 'homework'?
To 'vetting'?
To a library?

Look, do this....use google to investigate if none of the rioters and hooligans who disrupted righteous protests last summer were arrested and convicted, or plead guilty.

Nationally, at least 9,300 people have been arrested due to their alleged criminal behavior.
In my own city, in late May there was a lawful and respectful protest against police brutality as exemplified by the Floyd murder. Late in the day hooligans and vandals emerged to break windows and burn stuff. 22 were arrested.

Notably, they weren't BLM, or ANTIFA, or local black teenagers. Nor were they career thugs. Instead, they were young white folks....guys and gals....in their 20's an 30's from the suburbs and nearby rural communities. They were out to cause 'excitement'. They did. And the worst ones got arrested, and convicted, or are still awaiting trial.

So don't give me that "BLM" or "ANTIFA" silliness. Don't give it to me anymore than the rightfielders screeched out "migrant caravans", screeched "MS-13", screeched "Chicago shootings", screeched 'rapists from Mexico'.

The rightfield uses some alleged 'other' to gin up their same-thinkers that they are under attack.
It is nonsense.
It is Chicken-Little-ism.

In my humble opinion.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I want to know why an unarmed petite woman can be shot dead, and the shooter isn't made public, not to mention stand trial for murder.

Do you think that "unarmed petite woman" was practicing her rights as an American while she was trespassing?

The answer to trespassing is a no trespass warning (less than arrest), not the death penalty.

Apparently not, she dead. Stopped everyone else in their tracks, they got the warning they needed.

Murder is an effective warning mechanism. It’s just that people who do it are not supposed to be hidden from responsibility and not law enforcement.
The murderer was likely disguised as security and was a plant to kill someone to send the message “No protesting about results of election”

Hey dumbfuck, all the protesting was to be had outside. Not a single person had a gun pointed at them...outside.

A plant? You're a plant.

Hey, this thread was very successful, 2,000 posts and climbing. Poll worked well.

I'm not happy that only 80% of Republicans condemn the capital riot. But that's a solid majority.

I didn't see a lot of condemnation from the right, I saw excuses.

76% of Republicans voted to condemn the 1/6 riot.
I'm disappointed, I thought it would be higher.
True, the 24% who don't condemn have their "excuses".
That's still a better result than the democrats inciting the 2020 BLM/antifa riots.

Who do you think instigated it? The right or the left?

The right instigated 1/6, not sure who all to blame, the "proud boys" look to be in deep shit.
The left instigated the BLM/antifa riots
View attachment 510006

The BLM riots have nothing to do with it.

The BLM riots are proof of the left's double-standard. The 1/6 rioters are being hunted down by the FBI and prosecuted. The BLM/antifa rioters are being ignored, and even bailed out of jail by leftists. Is all rioting wrong, or are some rioters "more equal" than others?

It's not a double standard since the events have nothing to do with each other. That's like saying why are you hunting down someone for hit and run but not for speeding?

Ya billions in damage 2 dozen murders 2000 cops hurt , wait remind me how much was done on jan 6th again?

 

[WEATHER53]

I want to know why an unarmed petite woman can be shot dead, and the shooter isn't made public, not to mention stand trial for murder.

Do you think that "unarmed petite woman" was practicing her rights as an American while she was trespassing?

The answer to trespassing is a no trespass warning (less than arrest), not the death penalty.

Apparently not, she dead. Stopped everyone else in their tracks, they got the warning they needed.

Murder is an effective warning mechanism. It’s just that people who do it are not supposed to be hidden from responsibility and not law enforcement.
The murderer was likely disguised as security and was a plant to kill someone to send the message “No protesting about results of election”

Hey dumbfuck, all the protesting was to be had outside. Not a single person had a gun pointed at them...outside.

A plant? You're a plant.

Hey, this thread was very successful, 2,000 posts and climbing. Poll worked well.

I'm not happy that only 80% of Republicans condemn the capital riot. But that's a solid majority.

I didn't see a lot of condemnation from the right, I saw excuses.

76% of Republicans voted to condemn the 1/6 riot.
I'm disappointed, I thought it would be higher.
True, the 24% who don't condemn have their "excuses".
That's still a better result than the democrats inciting the 2020 BLM/antifa riots.

Who do you think instigated it? The right or the left?

The right instigated 1/6, not sure who all to blame, the "proud boys" look to be in deep shit.
The left instigated the BLM/antifa riots
View attachment 510006

The BLM riots have nothing to do with it.

The BLM riots are proof of the left's double-standard. The 1/6 rioters are being hunted down by the FBI and prosecuted. The BLM/antifa rioters are being ignored, and even bailed out of jail by leftists. Is all rioting wrong, or are some rioters "more equal" than others?

It's not a double standard since the events have nothing to do with each other. That's like saying why are you hunting down someone for hit and run but not for speeding?

Ya billions in damage 2 dozen murders 2000 cops hurt , wait remind me how much was done on jan 6th again?

Windows were broken

 

[kyzr]

The BLM/antifa rioters are being ignored, and even bailed out of jail by leftists.

Ah, poster 'kyzer'.....have you ever been introduced to 'due diligence'?
To 'research'?
To 'homework'?
To 'vetting'?
To a library?

Look, do this....use google to investigate if none of the rioters and hooligans who disrupted righteous protests last summer were arrested and convicted, or plead guilty.

Nationally, at least 9,300 people have been arrested due to their alleged criminal behavior.
In my own city, in late May there was a lawful and respectful protest against police brutality as exemplified by the Floyd murder. Late in the day hooligans and vandals emerged to break windows and burn stuff. 22 were arrested.

Notably, they weren't BLM, or ANTIFA, or local black teenagers. Nor were they career thugs. Instead, they were young white folks....guys and gals....in their 20's an 30's from the suburbs and nearby rural communities. They were out to cause 'excitement'. They did. And the worst ones got arrested, and convicted, or are still awaiting trial.

So don't give me that "BLM" or "ANTIFA" silliness. Don't give it to me anymore than the rightfielders screeched out "migrant caravans", screeched "MS-13", screeched "Chicago shootings", screeched 'rapists from Mexico'.

The rightfield uses some alleged 'other' to gin up their same-thinkers that they are under attack.
It is nonsense.
It is Chicken-Little-ism.

In my humble opinion.

I claimed that rioters were bailed out to riot more, here is one example. Google it, there are many others.

Bail fund backed by Kamala Harris freed same rioter twice – now he's been charged again

A man who was twice bailed out of jail in separate cases by a fund supported by Vice President Kamala Harris has been arrested again while under investigation for another possible case, Minnesota prosecutors said.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Correll]

I want to know why an unarmed petite woman can be shot dead, and the shooter isn't made public, not to mention stand trial for murder.

Do you think that "unarmed petite woman" was practicing her rights as an American while she was trespassing?

The answer to trespassing is a no trespass warning (less than arrest), not the death penalty.

Apparently not, she dead. Stopped everyone else in their tracks, they got the warning they needed.

Murder is an effective warning mechanism. It’s just that people who do it are not supposed to be hidden from responsibility and not law enforcement.
The murderer was likely disguised as security and was a plant to kill someone to send the message “No protesting about results of election”

Hey dumbfuck, all the protesting was to be had outside. Not a single person had a gun pointed at them...outside.

A plant? You're a plant.

Hey, this thread was very successful, 2,000 posts and climbing. Poll worked well.

I'm not happy that only 80% of Republicans condemn the capital riot. But that's a solid majority.

I didn't see a lot of condemnation from the right, I saw excuses.

That is your confirmation bias warping your perceptions. The solid majority here, condemned it. What more do you want?