Last July, Republican elected officials were finding themselves near the bottom of Republican favorability polls. The Republicans went on to showcase that in the debates. Even now, when it really comes down to voting for an elected Republican to be President--mostly it makes better sense to Republicans, to not vote for one their elected officials. Trump and Carson became the Presidential forerunners.
Now in Iowa, the one elected official with a chance at winning is the one the Republican elected officials dislike the most, Ted Cruz. And the Cruz style has been publically reported! Senator Cruz is actually genuinely abrasive, and most likely--like former Speaker Boehner--when pushing a campaign agenda(?)! Republican elected officials do not create governing appeal or policy. That lack of responsibility in their jobs is now being showcased. They cannot be nominated, even in their own party. They proposed crazy things. Senator Rubio is blatantly in favor of doing a Stallone-famous, Rambo approach to anti-terrorism. He is an elected, Republican Senator. The idea is to send in a commando--one or maybe more. Kill someone. Take a Photo of the deceased. Then get the hell out--especially in the absence of any Wi-Fi--and put the photo on the internet. Blatantly stated: Show the potential Jihadist recruits that the Secular Kamikazes are not winning! Show the potential jihadist recruits that only Stallone is really winning(?)! (And that he actually lives really near to Hollywood, USA(?)! In the link, Cruz actually has no problem with being hated by elected Republican officials, even Boehner(?)! There is some sense to that.
A lot of people just don’t like Ted Cruz. How come that’s okay with him?
People for moment will likely allow for an on-the-job training-requirement as a plausible preference for the White House. The response of elected officials worldwide has been a dis-connect, in basis, even from one another. Outsiders and Nonsensical people have a current opportunity. The Two Front-Runner Democrats are elected officials, not famous for their reliance on simply an "Oppose-Terrorism," single-issue campaign.
Right now, there is a dominant issue. From GOP comes a famously hated Front-Runner, GOP apparent. He is famous for a single-issue. He could be viewed just as likely able to kill off all the people in the U. S. federal government, to start with: And proceed without caution after that(?)! Even worse is that the main GOP front-runner looks more like he has been entirely caught off-guard, without any prepared response to recent events. Then The Third Democrat at least supports an outsider, fresh perspective on the whole thing. Mostly, however, what Democrats now know about Maryland is race riots. Cruz tends to the photo-op outrageous--like others, the front-runners in the Republican Party. Attention getting is wanted Attention is Paid. Bed Wetting can happen(?)!
Mostly, to many at the moment, now: "Kill all the refugees--Everywhere!" likely makes better sense, as a presidential campaign platform for America(?)--except maybe Christians(?)! And then except maybe Mormons(?)! Except they already said that(?)!.
Senator Cruz appears to have no problem with that--easily thinks it a good idea, even now--In the Republican Party. The Front-Runner is thought to think he is good idea, in the Republican Party, just that, and nothing more!
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!'
(Lands of Many Nations know famously old lyrics: "Smoke Signal answers, now blowing in the wind--The answers have gone up in smoke(?)! Many now think maybe new strategy better, in next life!)
Now in Iowa, the one elected official with a chance at winning is the one the Republican elected officials dislike the most, Ted Cruz. And the Cruz style has been publically reported! Senator Cruz is actually genuinely abrasive, and most likely--like former Speaker Boehner--when pushing a campaign agenda(?)! Republican elected officials do not create governing appeal or policy. That lack of responsibility in their jobs is now being showcased. They cannot be nominated, even in their own party. They proposed crazy things. Senator Rubio is blatantly in favor of doing a Stallone-famous, Rambo approach to anti-terrorism. He is an elected, Republican Senator. The idea is to send in a commando--one or maybe more. Kill someone. Take a Photo of the deceased. Then get the hell out--especially in the absence of any Wi-Fi--and put the photo on the internet. Blatantly stated: Show the potential Jihadist recruits that the Secular Kamikazes are not winning! Show the potential jihadist recruits that only Stallone is really winning(?)! (And that he actually lives really near to Hollywood, USA(?)! In the link, Cruz actually has no problem with being hated by elected Republican officials, even Boehner(?)! There is some sense to that.
A lot of people just don’t like Ted Cruz. How come that’s okay with him?
People for moment will likely allow for an on-the-job training-requirement as a plausible preference for the White House. The response of elected officials worldwide has been a dis-connect, in basis, even from one another. Outsiders and Nonsensical people have a current opportunity. The Two Front-Runner Democrats are elected officials, not famous for their reliance on simply an "Oppose-Terrorism," single-issue campaign.
Right now, there is a dominant issue. From GOP comes a famously hated Front-Runner, GOP apparent. He is famous for a single-issue. He could be viewed just as likely able to kill off all the people in the U. S. federal government, to start with: And proceed without caution after that(?)! Even worse is that the main GOP front-runner looks more like he has been entirely caught off-guard, without any prepared response to recent events. Then The Third Democrat at least supports an outsider, fresh perspective on the whole thing. Mostly, however, what Democrats now know about Maryland is race riots. Cruz tends to the photo-op outrageous--like others, the front-runners in the Republican Party. Attention getting is wanted Attention is Paid. Bed Wetting can happen(?)!
Mostly, to many at the moment, now: "Kill all the refugees--Everywhere!" likely makes better sense, as a presidential campaign platform for America(?)--except maybe Christians(?)! And then except maybe Mormons(?)! Except they already said that(?)!.
Senator Cruz appears to have no problem with that--easily thinks it a good idea, even now--In the Republican Party. The Front-Runner is thought to think he is good idea, in the Republican Party, just that, and nothing more!
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!'
(Lands of Many Nations know famously old lyrics: "Smoke Signal answers, now blowing in the wind--The answers have gone up in smoke(?)! Many now think maybe new strategy better, in next life!)