No.Isn't that what it does when it legitimizes ownership of property?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No.Isn't that what it does when it legitimizes ownership of property?
Then explain how property can be obtained without force.
You've never heard of voluntary trade?Then explain how property can be obtained without force.
Sure. What does that have to do with what I asked?You've never heard of voluntary trade?
I answered your question clearly.Sure. What does that have to do with what I asked?
You didn't. You asked me a question. Asking a question isn't the same as explaining your philosophy. I understand what voluntary trade is. I don't understand the relevance here. If I pick a bunch of apples off a tree and you've caught some fish in a river then we can freely exchange items with one another without ever having used force against another human being. That's not what I'm talking about and I believe you know that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about property in terms of someone claiming ownership of the apple tree itself or the river itself. That you can't do without force. There is no plausible scenario where you've gone around and have gotten the consent of everyone on earth that that tree or river is yours.I answered your question clearly.
I'm not playing horseshit games with you. If you think you have a point, make it and we'll discuss.
Ok. Horseshit games it is.You didn't. You asked me a question.
That's just name calling. If you can dissect my argument then I'd be happy to hear it..
Ok. Horseshit games it is.
Ok whatever. I keep giving you opportunity and you keep passing it up.Back in the troll penalty box with you.
Piss off, troll.That's just name calling. If you can dissect my argument then I'd be happy to hear it.
Ok whatever. I keep giving you opportunity and you keep passing it up.
You're the one getting angry and calling names.Piss off, troll.
Your disingenuous, silly accusation that I want "the money first and the work second" completely misrepresents the arguments I presented. Let's break this down in a way that highlights the key issues, which you conveniently ignored:You want the money first and the work second
Cart before horse is the entirety of your child like assertions
Are you over 20?
Yep. Unfortunately, I've dealt with you before, so you're on a very short leash.You're the one getting angry and calling names.![]()
Apparently did my championship seasons wrong then. Of course I was busy up on the podium after the race and wasn’t down in the pits with the losers telling each other good race.Obviously you have no idea about competition. You do sound like a fan. Yet that is why they have rules in sports. To make it fair and to play by the rules. That is why after the competition, they say good game. to each other. But obviously you believe winning is everything and you can do anything to win.
Sounds like you were cherry picking.Apparently did my championship seasons wrong then. Of course I was busy up on the podium after the race and wasn’t down in the pits with the losers telling each other good race.
Listen I don't care if you can't rationalize your philosophy. You're a libertarian, right? I don't expect you to be able to.Yep. Unfortunately, I've dealt with you before, so you're on a very short leash.