PP and the children

[dannyboys]

Every PP demonstration has lots of little girls holding PP signs.
What do the mothers of these little girls tell them when they are telling the girls about the facts of life?
"Ok little Sally I've told you all about how babies are made. Pretty cool eh?
One thing I forgot to mention to you is if for any reasons you don't want the baby I'll drive you to the nearest abortion mill AKA Planned Parenthood clinic and they'll kill the baby inside you for free".

 

[TheOldSchool]

Every PP demonstration has lots of little girls holding PP signs.
What do the mothers of these little girls tell them when they are telling the girls about the facts of life?
"Ok little Sally I've told you all about how babies are made. Pretty cool eh?
One thing I forgot to mention to you is if for any reasons you don't want the baby I'll drive you to the nearest abortion mill AKA Planned Parenthood clinic and they'll kill the baby inside you for free".

Thoughts and prayers

 

[EverCurious]

Its because the feminists have somehow convinced women that killing their unborn child is a woman's right... In reality it is nothing more than a family choice decision - to have kids or not - but lots of third wave feminists are... less than logical. Some feel they are somehow "sticking it to men" and get a power trip from it ~shrug~

I have little doubt that if their little girls were told the truth about what an abortion was they'd be terrified at that age.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Its because the feminists have somehow convinced women that killing their unborn child is a woman's right... In reality it is nothing more than a family choice decision - to have kids or not - but lots of third wave feminists are... less than logical. Some feel they are somehow "sticking it to men" and get a power trip from it ~shrug~

I have little doubt that if their little girls were told the truth about what an abortion was they'd be terrified at that age.

We should really take advice from the better parts of the world and ban abortion

 

[EverCurious]

Its because the feminists have somehow convinced women that killing their unborn child is a woman's right... In reality it is nothing more than a family choice decision - to have kids or not - but lots of third wave feminists are... less than logical. Some feel they are somehow "sticking it to men" and get a power trip from it ~shrug~

I have little doubt that if their little girls were told the truth about what an abortion was they'd be terrified at that age.

We should really take advice from the better parts of the world and ban abortion

I'm pro-choice, deal with it. I don't think the gov should particularly be involved in the private decisions of families - marriage, abortion, child rearing, etc are something that only needs the most limited interference/regulation by gov as possible to ensure the safety of kidos/partners, and obliquely paperwork in the case of SSM.

Abortion in particular should neither be endorsed, nor banned by gov., merely regulated within acceptable reason.

 

[WTP]

Every PP demonstration has lots of little girls holding PP signs.
What do the mothers of these little girls tell them when they are telling the girls about the facts of life?
"Ok little Sally I've told you all about how babies are made. Pretty cool eh?
One thing I forgot to mention to you is if for any reasons you don't want the baby I'll drive you to the nearest abortion mill AKA Planned Parenthood clinic and they'll kill the baby inside you for free".

But, but, the girl said she was raped? The other girl said she was a victim of incest, and the other one said that her life was in jeopardy if she did not have an abortion? The girls asked, do I not have choices for my own body and the child I want to be born? And how do they know it's a fully developed baby that has feelings when the brain has not developed yet to call it killing babies? Answer girls, they don't. But you have a SC mostly of men that get to decide a woman's rights. How frucked up is that? Pretty frucked up. And ha, this is the 21st century.

 

[centerleftFL]

Every PP demonstration has lots of little girls holding PP signs.
What do the mothers of these little girls tell them when they are telling the girls about the facts of life?
"Ok little Sally I've told you all about how babies are made. Pretty cool eh?
One thing I forgot to mention to you is if for any reasons you don't want the baby I'll drive you to the nearest abortion mill AKA Planned Parenthood clinic and they'll kill the baby inside you for free".

Well, I certainly HOPE if and when her daughter NEEDS an abortion, she will TAKE her to PP herself. She will need the support. I also hope her mother makes contributions to PP in the meantime.

I'm sure PP will thank you for your concern.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

PP is Satan's spawn

 

[gipper]

Its because the feminists have somehow convinced women that killing their unborn child is a woman's right... In reality it is nothing more than a family choice decision - to have kids or not - but lots of third wave feminists are... less than logical. Some feel they are somehow "sticking it to men" and get a power trip from it ~shrug~

I have little doubt that if their little girls were told the truth about what an abortion was they'd be terrified at that age.

We should really take advice from the better parts of the world and ban abortion

I'm pro-choice, deal with it. I don't think the gov should particularly be involved in the private decisions of families - marriage, abortion, child rearing, etc are something that only needs the most limited interference/regulation by gov as possible to ensure the safety of kidos/partners, and obliquely paperwork in the case of SSM.

Abortion in particular should neither be endorsed, nor banned by gov., merely regulated within acceptable reason.

Following your logic, I think the government shouldn’t be involved in murder. If you murder someone, it is your business. Not the government’s. The government shouldn’t endorse or ban murder.

 

[EverCurious]

Its because the feminists have somehow convinced women that killing their unborn child is a woman's right... In reality it is nothing more than a family choice decision - to have kids or not - but lots of third wave feminists are... less than logical. Some feel they are somehow "sticking it to men" and get a power trip from it ~shrug~

I have little doubt that if their little girls were told the truth about what an abortion was they'd be terrified at that age.

We should really take advice from the better parts of the world and ban abortion

I'm pro-choice, deal with it. I don't think the gov should particularly be involved in the private decisions of families - marriage, abortion, child rearing, etc are something that only needs the most limited interference/regulation by gov as possible to ensure the safety of kidos/partners, and obliquely paperwork in the case of SSM.

Abortion in particular should neither be endorsed, nor banned by gov., merely regulated within acceptable reason.

Following your logic, I think the government shouldn’t be involved in murder. If you murder someone, it is your business. Not the government’s. The government shouldn’t endorse or ban murder.

I do understand your belief, I know, and respect, that you think abortion is murder. However, I do not think it is until a point of development. It is a nearly impossible compromise between your belief and mine, and it'll likely never be resolved to both our satisfaction. This is something that we will constantly disagree upon no doubt and that is alright - let it be always a subject in elections and that is the way of things.

 

[dannyboys]

Its because the feminists have somehow convinced women that killing their unborn child is a woman's right... In reality it is nothing more than a family choice decision - to have kids or not - but lots of third wave feminists are... less than logical. Some feel they are somehow "sticking it to men" and get a power trip from it ~shrug~

I have little doubt that if their little girls were told the truth about what an abortion was they'd be terrified at that age.

We should really take advice from the better parts of the world and ban abortion

I'm pro-choice, deal with it. I don't think the gov should particularly be involved in the private decisions of families - marriage, abortion, child rearing, etc are something that only needs the most limited interference/regulation by gov as possible to ensure the safety of kidos/partners, and obliquely paperwork in the case of SSM.

Abortion in particular should neither be endorsed, nor banned by gov., merely regulated within acceptable reason.

You appear very 'selective' about how,when,where the Gov. is sticking their noses into the lives of Americans.

 

[gipper]

Its because the feminists have somehow convinced women that killing their unborn child is a woman's right... In reality it is nothing more than a family choice decision - to have kids or not - but lots of third wave feminists are... less than logical. Some feel they are somehow "sticking it to men" and get a power trip from it ~shrug~

I have little doubt that if their little girls were told the truth about what an abortion was they'd be terrified at that age.

We should really take advice from the better parts of the world and ban abortion

I'm pro-choice, deal with it. I don't think the gov should particularly be involved in the private decisions of families - marriage, abortion, child rearing, etc are something that only needs the most limited interference/regulation by gov as possible to ensure the safety of kidos/partners, and obliquely paperwork in the case of SSM.

Abortion in particular should neither be endorsed, nor banned by gov., merely regulated within acceptable reason.

Following your logic, I think the government shouldn’t be involved in murder. If you murder someone, it is your business. Not the government’s. The government shouldn’t endorse or ban murder.

I do understand your belief, I know, and respect, that you think abortion is murder. However, I do not think it is until a point of development. It is a nearly impossible compromise between your belief and mine, and it'll likely never be resolved to both our satisfaction. This is something that we will constantly disagree upon no doubt and that is alright - let it be always a subject in elections and that is the way of things.

Your problem is your position is illogical. Abortion is murder, no matter what stage of development.

 

[EverCurious]

Its because the feminists have somehow convinced women that killing their unborn child is a woman's right... In reality it is nothing more than a family choice decision - to have kids or not - but lots of third wave feminists are... less than logical. Some feel they are somehow "sticking it to men" and get a power trip from it ~shrug~

I have little doubt that if their little girls were told the truth about what an abortion was they'd be terrified at that age.

We should really take advice from the better parts of the world and ban abortion

I'm pro-choice, deal with it. I don't think the gov should particularly be involved in the private decisions of families - marriage, abortion, child rearing, etc are something that only needs the most limited interference/regulation by gov as possible to ensure the safety of kidos/partners, and obliquely paperwork in the case of SSM.

Abortion in particular should neither be endorsed, nor banned by gov., merely regulated within acceptable reason.

Following your logic, I think the government shouldn’t be involved in murder. If you murder someone, it is your business. Not the government’s. The government shouldn’t endorse or ban murder.

I do understand your belief, I know, and respect, that you think abortion is murder. However, I do not think it is until a point of development. It is a nearly impossible compromise between your belief and mine, and it'll likely never be resolved to both our satisfaction. This is something that we will constantly disagree upon no doubt and that is alright - let it be always a subject in elections and that is the way of things.

Your problem is your position is illogical. Abortion is murder, no matter what stage of development.

I disagree. I apply a viability and development standard.

 

[EverCurious]

Its because the feminists have somehow convinced women that killing their unborn child is a woman's right... In reality it is nothing more than a family choice decision - to have kids or not - but lots of third wave feminists are... less than logical. Some feel they are somehow "sticking it to men" and get a power trip from it ~shrug~

I have little doubt that if their little girls were told the truth about what an abortion was they'd be terrified at that age.

We should really take advice from the better parts of the world and ban abortion

I'm pro-choice, deal with it. I don't think the gov should particularly be involved in the private decisions of families - marriage, abortion, child rearing, etc are something that only needs the most limited interference/regulation by gov as possible to ensure the safety of kidos/partners, and obliquely paperwork in the case of SSM.

Abortion in particular should neither be endorsed, nor banned by gov., merely regulated within acceptable reason.

You appear very 'selective' about how,when,where the Gov. is sticking their noses into the lives of Americans.

As little as possible while still maintaining freedom. It should be selective IMO.

 

[dannyboys]

Its because the feminists have somehow convinced women that killing their unborn child is a woman's right... In reality it is nothing more than a family choice decision - to have kids or not - but lots of third wave feminists are... less than logical. Some feel they are somehow "sticking it to men" and get a power trip from it ~shrug~

I have little doubt that if their little girls were told the truth about what an abortion was they'd be terrified at that age.

We should really take advice from the better parts of the world and ban abortion

I'm pro-choice, deal with it. I don't think the gov should particularly be involved in the private decisions of families - marriage, abortion, child rearing, etc are something that only needs the most limited interference/regulation by gov as possible to ensure the safety of kidos/partners, and obliquely paperwork in the case of SSM.

Abortion in particular should neither be endorsed, nor banned by gov., merely regulated within acceptable reason.

What would you say if Trump ordered every illegal woman who is pregnant when they cross the border, must have an abortion?
You'd go bat-shit crazy!
Remember almost 100% of Latino women are devout Catholics. You'll have a better chance of spotting one of BONOBO's famous White unicorns than you would spotting a Latino woman at a PP abortion mill.
So which women are having abortions? Poor negro and white women, East Indians and asians who only want male children.

 

[dannyboys]

Its because the feminists have somehow convinced women that killing their unborn child is a woman's right... In reality it is nothing more than a family choice decision - to have kids or not - but lots of third wave feminists are... less than logical. Some feel they are somehow "sticking it to men" and get a power trip from it ~shrug~

I have little doubt that if their little girls were told the truth about what an abortion was they'd be terrified at that age.

We should really take advice from the better parts of the world and ban abortion

I'm pro-choice, deal with it. I don't think the gov should particularly be involved in the private decisions of families - marriage, abortion, child rearing, etc are something that only needs the most limited interference/regulation by gov as possible to ensure the safety of kidos/partners, and obliquely paperwork in the case of SSM.

Abortion in particular should neither be endorsed, nor banned by gov., merely regulated within acceptable reason.

You appear very 'selective' about how,when,where the Gov. is sticking their noses into the lives of Americans.

As little as possible while still maintaining freedom. It should be selective IMO.

Ask Chuck and Nancy and the new crop of radical LIB/Socialists whether they want 'selective' Gov. interference into the lives of private US citizens.
Their answer will not surprise you.
Cortez, the LIB MSM new Socialist hero wants to turn the US into Cuba.

 

[centerleftFL]

Its because the feminists have somehow convinced women that killing their unborn child is a woman's right... In reality it is nothing more than a family choice decision - to have kids or not - but lots of third wave feminists are... less than logical. Some feel they are somehow "sticking it to men" and get a power trip from it ~shrug~

I have little doubt that if their little girls were told the truth about what an abortion was they'd be terrified at that age.

We should really take advice from the better parts of the world and ban abortion

I'm pro-choice, deal with it. I don't think the gov should particularly be involved in the private decisions of families - marriage, abortion, child rearing, etc are something that only needs the most limited interference/regulation by gov as possible to ensure the safety of kidos/partners, and obliquely paperwork in the case of SSM.

Abortion in particular should neither be endorsed, nor banned by gov., merely regulated within acceptable reason.

Following your logic, I think the government shouldn’t be involved in murder. If you murder someone, it is your business. Not the government’s. The government shouldn’t endorse or ban murder.

Not good with that dictionary stuff huh, nevertheless physiology. But I guess the double digit IQ crowd, nonetheless, has OPINIONS.

 

[EverCurious]

Its because the feminists have somehow convinced women that killing their unborn child is a woman's right... In reality it is nothing more than a family choice decision - to have kids or not - but lots of third wave feminists are... less than logical. Some feel they are somehow "sticking it to men" and get a power trip from it ~shrug~

I have little doubt that if their little girls were told the truth about what an abortion was they'd be terrified at that age.

We should really take advice from the better parts of the world and ban abortion

I'm pro-choice, deal with it. I don't think the gov should particularly be involved in the private decisions of families - marriage, abortion, child rearing, etc are something that only needs the most limited interference/regulation by gov as possible to ensure the safety of kidos/partners, and obliquely paperwork in the case of SSM.

Abortion in particular should neither be endorsed, nor banned by gov., merely regulated within acceptable reason.

You appear very 'selective' about how,when,where the Gov. is sticking their noses into the lives of Americans.

As little as possible while still maintaining freedom. It should be selective IMO.

Ask Chuck and Nancy and the new crop of radical LIB/Socialists whether they want 'selective' Gov. interference into the lives of private US citizens.
Their answer will not surprise you.
Cortez, the LIB MSM new Socialist hero wants to turn the US into Cuba.

I agree, and that's why I'm not a Dem...

 

[centerleftFL]

QUOTE="EverCurious, post: 20327626, member: 50158"]Its because the feminists have somehow convinced women that killing their unborn child is a woman's right... In reality it is nothing more than a family choice decision - to have kids or not - but lots of third wave feminists are... less than logical. Some feel they are somehow "sticking it to men" and get a power trip from it ~shrug~

I have little doubt that if their little girls were told the truth about what an abortion was they'd be terrified at that age.[/QUOTE]

Good thing MARLA MAPLES didn't listen to her BOYFRIEND when he knocked her up and wanted her to get an abortion...

'I said, "what are we going to do about this?"': Trump's awkward Howard Stern remarks suggesting he considered ABORTING Tiffany come back to haunt him as he gives historic pro-life speech

ABIGAIL MILLER and DAVID MARTOSKO, US POLITICAL EDITOR FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 20:54 EDT, 19 January 2018 |
UPDATED: 02:06 EDT, 20 January 2018

Donald Trump has been called out on social media for giving a speech at Friday's annual March For Life despite reportedly suggesting he asked his second wife Marla Maples to get an abortion when she became pregnant with Tiffany.
Trump criticized US abortion laws as among the most permissive in the world in a speech to anti-abortion activists at the rally in Washington, DC, and pledged his administration would always defend the 'right to life.'

But he was quickly skewered on social media as people reminded him of an interview he gave with Howard Stern in 2004, in which he can be heard telling the talk-show host that he suggested Maples have an abortion, according to tapes leaked to Newsweek from the Howard Stern Show.

 

[gipper]

Its because the feminists have somehow convinced women that killing their unborn child is a woman's right... In reality it is nothing more than a family choice decision - to have kids or not - but lots of third wave feminists are... less than logical. Some feel they are somehow "sticking it to men" and get a power trip from it ~shrug~

I have little doubt that if their little girls were told the truth about what an abortion was they'd be terrified at that age.

We should really take advice from the better parts of the world and ban abortion

I'm pro-choice, deal with it. I don't think the gov should particularly be involved in the private decisions of families - marriage, abortion, child rearing, etc are something that only needs the most limited interference/regulation by gov as possible to ensure the safety of kidos/partners, and obliquely paperwork in the case of SSM.

Abortion in particular should neither be endorsed, nor banned by gov., merely regulated within acceptable reason.

Following your logic, I think the government shouldn’t be involved in murder. If you murder someone, it is your business. Not the government’s. The government shouldn’t endorse or ban murder.

Not good with that dictionary stuff huh, nevertheless physiology. But I guess the double digit IQ crowd, nonetheless, has OPINIONS.

Yeah...logic is difficult for some people to comprehend.

When you kill a human being with premeditation, what have you done?