President Biden said Republicans oppose women's rights -- Katie Britt's "tradwife" response proved him right

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2011
79,009
39,678
2,605
In a Republic, actually
'Britt seemed to want viewers to imagine her in an apron, gazing lovingly upon her family and realizing she must sacrifice some measure of domesticity for "the future of children." It's all nonsense, of course. She is exactly the "permanent politician" she accused Biden of being, as any perusal of her resume will show. Britt holds a political science degree and law degree from the University of Alabama. She went straight from graduation to work on the staff of her predecessor, Sen. Richard Shelby. She worked in private practice and government, but never as a full-time stay-at-home mother.

And yet, even as her colleagues were in D.C. for the speech, Britt framed herself as a hausfrau, talking about how "my husband, Wesley, and I just watched President Biden’s State of the Union Address from our living room." Her address was filmed from her kitchen with an aesthetic that former White House communications director Jennifer Palmieri mocked as "'tradwife," which is internet slang for "traditional wife." As feminist writer Jill Filipovic wrote, Britt's was a message of who women should be: "Afraid, valued only for being mothers, and in the kitchen." Republicans didn't even bother to hide the sexist nostalgia they were angling for. As the New York Times reported, talking points circulated before the speech suggested Republicans call her "America's mom."

Just last week, the GOP nominated Donald Trump to be president, despite a New York judge recently finding that "Trump sexually abused — indeed, raped" journalist E. Jean Carroll. In his State of the Union speech, Biden blew off the long-standing lie that Republicans oppose abortion because of "life," instead accusing Republicans of broadly opposing "reproductive freedom" and adding, "those bragging about overturning Roe v. Wade have no clue about the power of women in America." The "pro-life" mask is fully off, proving feminists were right all along: Republicans just want to make women second-class citizens.'


Britt is conservatism personified: reactionary, fearful of positive, beneficial change, hostile to the rights and protected liberties of women, dishonest purveyors of hypocrisy, demagoguery, disinformation, and lies.

Beyond the warranted ridicule of Britt’s cringeworthy response, we indeed see a Republican agenda seeking to render women second-class citizens, denied the freedom to make fundamental decisions as individuals.
 
'Britt seemed to want viewers to imagine her in an apron, gazing lovingly upon her family and realizing she must sacrifice some measure of domesticity for "the future of children." It's all nonsense, of course. She is exactly the "permanent politician" she accused Biden of being, as any perusal of her resume will show. Britt holds a political science degree and law degree from the University of Alabama. She went straight from graduation to work on the staff of her predecessor, Sen. Richard Shelby. She worked in private practice and government, but never as a full-time stay-at-home mother.

And yet, even as her colleagues were in D.C. for the speech, Britt framed herself as a hausfrau, talking about how "my husband, Wesley, and I just watched President Biden’s State of the Union Address from our living room." Her address was filmed from her kitchen with an aesthetic that former White House communications director Jennifer Palmieri mocked as "'tradwife," which is internet slang for "traditional wife." As feminist writer Jill Filipovic wrote, Britt's was a message of who women should be: "Afraid, valued only for being mothers, and in the kitchen." Republicans didn't even bother to hide the sexist nostalgia they were angling for. As the New York Times reported, talking points circulated before the speech suggested Republicans call her "America's mom."

Just last week, the GOP nominated Donald Trump to be president, despite a New York judge recently finding that "Trump sexually abused — indeed, raped" journalist E. Jean Carroll. In his State of the Union speech, Biden blew off the long-standing lie that Republicans oppose abortion because of "life," instead accusing Republicans of broadly opposing "reproductive freedom" and adding, "those bragging about overturning Roe v. Wade have no clue about the power of women in America." The "pro-life" mask is fully off, proving feminists were right all along: Republicans just want to make women second-class citizens.'


Britt is conservatism personified: reactionary, fearful of positive, beneficial change, hostile to the rights and protected liberties of women, dishonest purveyors of hypocrisy, demagoguery, disinformation, and lies.

Beyond the warranted ridicule of Britt’s cringeworthy response, we indeed see a Republican agenda seeking to render women second-class citizens, denied the freedom to make fundamental decisions as individuals.

Another long, tedious cut and paste opinion piece from a leftist tabloid.
 
.

Done both -- tradwife and liberal business owning career woman -- and I'd go back in a heartbeat if I had the chance again.

Tradwives totally rock!

.
 
'Britt seemed to want viewers to imagine her in an apron, gazing lovingly upon her family and realizing she must sacrifice some measure of domesticity for "the future of children." It's all nonsense, of course. She is exactly the "permanent politician" she accused Biden of being, as any perusal of her resume will show. Britt holds a political science degree and law degree from the University of Alabama. She went straight from graduation to work on the staff of her predecessor, Sen. Richard Shelby. She worked in private practice and government, but never as a full-time stay-at-home mother.

And yet, even as her colleagues were in D.C. for the speech, Britt framed herself as a hausfrau, talking about how "my husband, Wesley, and I just watched President Biden’s State of the Union Address from our living room." Her address was filmed from her kitchen with an aesthetic that former White House communications director Jennifer Palmieri mocked as "'tradwife," which is internet slang for "traditional wife." As feminist writer Jill Filipovic wrote, Britt's was a message of who women should be: "Afraid, valued only for being mothers, and in the kitchen." Republicans didn't even bother to hide the sexist nostalgia they were angling for. As the New York Times reported, talking points circulated before the speech suggested Republicans call her "America's mom."

Just last week, the GOP nominated Donald Trump to be president, despite a New York judge recently finding that "Trump sexually abused — indeed, raped" journalist E. Jean Carroll. In his State of the Union speech, Biden blew off the long-standing lie that Republicans oppose abortion because of "life," instead accusing Republicans of broadly opposing "reproductive freedom" and adding, "those bragging about overturning Roe v. Wade have no clue about the power of women in America." The "pro-life" mask is fully off, proving feminists were right all along: Republicans just want to make women second-class citizens.'


Britt is conservatism personified: reactionary, fearful of positive, beneficial change, hostile to the rights and protected liberties of women, dishonest purveyors of hypocrisy, demagoguery, disinformation, and lies.

Beyond the warranted ridicule of Britt’s cringeworthy response, we indeed see a Republican agenda seeking to render women second-class citizens, denied the freedom to make fundamental decisions as individuals.
Its very cynical. She obviously knows better.
 
Such a lying, stupidass title, I didn't bother to read the article.

It's ridiculous and foolish to claim repubs oppose women's rights.

To claim one person's response to any such lame claim proves it right is boggling in its simple stupidity.

Grow up.
 
'Britt seemed to want viewers to imagine her in an apron, gazing lovingly upon her family and realizing she must sacrifice some measure of domesticity for "the future of children." It's all nonsense, of course. She is exactly the "permanent politician" she accused Biden of being, as any perusal of her resume will show. Britt holds a political science degree and law degree from the University of Alabama. She went straight from graduation to work on the staff of her predecessor, Sen. Richard Shelby. She worked in private practice and government, but never as a full-time stay-at-home mother.

And yet, even as her colleagues were in D.C. for the speech, Britt framed herself as a hausfrau, talking about how "my husband, Wesley, and I just watched President Biden’s State of the Union Address from our living room." Her address was filmed from her kitchen with an aesthetic that former White House communications director Jennifer Palmieri mocked as "'tradwife," which is internet slang for "traditional wife." As feminist writer Jill Filipovic wrote, Britt's was a message of who women should be: "Afraid, valued only for being mothers, and in the kitchen." Republicans didn't even bother to hide the sexist nostalgia they were angling for. As the New York Times reported, talking points circulated before the speech suggested Republicans call her "America's mom."

Just last week, the GOP nominated Donald Trump to be president, despite a New York judge recently finding that "Trump sexually abused — indeed, raped" journalist E. Jean Carroll. In his State of the Union speech, Biden blew off the long-standing lie that Republicans oppose abortion because of "life," instead accusing Republicans of broadly opposing "reproductive freedom" and adding, "those bragging about overturning Roe v. Wade have no clue about the power of women in America." The "pro-life" mask is fully off, proving feminists were right all along: Republicans just want to make women second-class citizens.'


Britt is conservatism personified: reactionary, fearful of positive, beneficial change, hostile to the rights and protected liberties of women, dishonest purveyors of hypocrisy, demagoguery, disinformation, and lies.

Beyond the warranted ridicule of Britt’s cringeworthy response, we indeed see a Republican agenda seeking to render women second-class citizens, denied the freedom to make fundamental decisions as individuals.
Let's tackle your claim that under republicans, women would be second-citizens. Under republicans, women can still vote for any candidate of their choice, work in any field they wish, stay at home and be a housewife if they wish and free to travel to any location they so desire.
About the only area I think that you may be referring to, would be the big, bad abortion issue. Personally, I don't really care if a woman wants an abortion, it's her body. That, as I said, is my personal stance. The republican stance on it is:
1. At some point in the womb, that clump of cells develops a head, brain, arms, hands, legs, feet and can experience pain. In short, it becomes an actual baby, in general, we refer it to a "fetus," which in Latin, simply means, "little one."
As abortion isn't in the Constitution and in general, republicans stand with religious communities when it comes to life, they believe in protecting that "little one." It's a human life, so they tend to want to restrict killing it.
Personally, I believe that it should be left to the states to decide. In strong red states, it should go with their political ideology and in the strong blue states, the abortion issue should go with their base.
Perhaps women should simply not give into men trying to get in their pants until the man can produce and wear a condom, or get snipped. The condom prevention is cheap and pretty effective and getting snipped can actually be reversed at a later date.
Republicans are reactionary???!!! What's that old saying? "That's the pot calling the kettle black." The left is so reactionary it's laughable.
 
Let's tackle your claim that under republicans, women would be second-citizens. Under republicans, women can still vote for any candidate of their choice, work in any field they wish, stay at home and be a housewife if they wish and free to travel to any location they so desire.
About the only area I think that you may be referring to, would be the big, bad abortion issue. Personally, I don't really care if a woman wants an abortion, it's her body. That, as I said, is my personal stance. The republican stance on it is:
1. At some point in the womb, that clump of cells develops a head, brain, arms, hands, legs, feet and can experience pain. In short, it becomes an actual baby, in general, we refer it to a "fetus," which in Latin, simply means, "little one."
As abortion isn't in the Constitution and in general, republicans stand with religious communities when it comes to life, they believe in protecting that "little one." It's a human life, so they tend to want to restrict killing it.
Personally, I believe that it should be left to the states to decide. In strong red states, it should go with their political ideology and in the strong blue states, the abortion issue should go with their base.
Perhaps women should simply not give into men trying to get in their pants until the man can produce and wear a condom, or get snipped. The condom prevention is cheap and pretty effective and getting snipped can actually be reversed at a later date.
Republicans are reactionary???!!! What's that old saying? "That's the pot calling the kettle black." The left is so reactionary it's laughable.
.

Valiant effort, but you're fighting with a bot or a paid shill who gets a check for seeming to be changing people's minds.

.
 
What exactly do they have against a woman (or man) living life as a "traditional" husband or wife?
 
You mean like back in the good old days
Yes, like back in the good old days. Neither of my grandmothers ever had a drivers license, a job or cast a vote. My wife is the same way. Corporal Punishment, while not a first response, must be included in the paradigm for discipline to have any teeth.

In the situation noted in the song, the daughter would have been met at the door with a shotgun muzzle, her things, and the statement “You don’t live here anymore.”
 
What exactly do they have against a woman (or man) living life as a "traditional" husband or wife?
In the worldview of the Dems / Socialists, 60 million years of mammalian biology is just… you know…. so yesterday.

They believe that men can get pregnant, that biology is a function of “feelings” and all of the above helps to destroy the notion of the nuclear family which is their goal.
 
'Britt seemed to want viewers to imagine her in an apron, gazing lovingly upon her family and realizing she must sacrifice some measure of domesticity for "the future of children." It's all nonsense, of course. She is exactly the "permanent politician" she accused Biden of being, as any perusal of her resume will show. Britt holds a political science degree and law degree from the University of Alabama. She went straight from graduation to work on the staff of her predecessor, Sen. Richard Shelby. She worked in private practice and government, but never as a full-time stay-at-home mother.

And yet, even as her colleagues were in D.C. for the speech, Britt framed herself as a hausfrau, talking about how "my husband, Wesley, and I just watched President Biden’s State of the Union Address from our living room." Her address was filmed from her kitchen with an aesthetic that former White House communications director Jennifer Palmieri mocked as "'tradwife," which is internet slang for "traditional wife." As feminist writer Jill Filipovic wrote, Britt's was a message of who women should be: "Afraid, valued only for being mothers, and in the kitchen." Republicans didn't even bother to hide the sexist nostalgia they were angling for. As the New York Times reported, talking points circulated before the speech suggested Republicans call her "America's mom."

Just last week, the GOP nominated Donald Trump to be president, despite a New York judge recently finding that "Trump sexually abused — indeed, raped" journalist E. Jean Carroll. In his State of the Union speech, Biden blew off the long-standing lie that Republicans oppose abortion because of "life," instead accusing Republicans of broadly opposing "reproductive freedom" and adding, "those bragging about overturning Roe v. Wade have no clue about the power of women in America." The "pro-life" mask is fully off, proving feminists were right all along: Republicans just want to make women second-class citizens.'


Britt is conservatism personified: reactionary, fearful of positive, beneficial change, hostile to the rights and protected liberties of women, dishonest purveyors of hypocrisy, demagoguery, disinformation, and lies.

Beyond the warranted ridicule of Britt’s cringeworthy response, we indeed see a Republican agenda seeking to render women second-class citizens, denied the freedom to make fundamental decisions as individuals.

1710032642902.png






 
BREAKING: MAGA failure Senator Katie Britt gets brutally shredded by her hometown newspaper for her deeply bizarre, roundly mocked response to President Biden's State of the Union address.

"Don’t adjust your television. What we saw wasn’t an AI deepfake. That was Katie Britt. That speech happened. But don’t call it real," begins the ruthless piece by columnist Kyle Whitmire.

The editorial appeared on AL.com, the website for the publisher of The Birmingham News and The Huntsville Times.

"The junior Senator from Alabama gave up being genuine a while back, and on Thursday night, her phoniness rose to the surface in full view of millions of Americans," Whitmire went on.

He explained that there is no single quote from Britt's disastrous speech that "can convey the strangeness of it" but said that "the mismatched emotions, the smiles in the wrong places, the jaw clenched when it shouldn’t have been" came together to create an "indescribable weirdness."

Whitmire went on to say that that it felt like "postmodernism, avant-garde performance art" or even "an involuntary behavioral science experiment."

"Katie Britt glitched out on national television and left millions of Americans asking what the heck they just watched," he wrote, perfectly encapsulating what many of us felt watching last night.

"All she had to do was look into the camera and read, but she tried to do more. Too much more," he went on, slamming the disturbing attempt to turn her into "America's mom."

Instead, wrote Whitmire, Britt ended up coming across as "the aunt who’s been spending too much time on Facebook, and if you don’t change the subject soon, she’s going to tell you about sex dungeons beneath the pizza parlor."

And it wasn't just the deeply off-putting delivery of the speech that felt wrong, it was the content itself, which Whitmire compared to something "written by ChatGPT."

Whitmire then pivoted to slamming Britt for whining about "illegal immigration and the border," observing that it was "as phony as her smile" because in reality she voted to kill the bipartisan border bill because Trump ordered her to.

He then by ripped into her for pretending to care about sex trafficking while supporting an avowed sexual predator for the presidency.

Whitmire then capped it all off with a simple question that crystalized just how fake Britt came across: "Was she ever real?
Incredibly well said!

May be an image of 1 person

Plus, she LIED.
 

Forum List

Back
Top