Racist Hillary shuns Bill's stepson

[CrusaderFrank]

Unbelievable!

She got CNN to shut down their coverage of this young man

 

[mdk]

My god! I'm seeing double! lol

 

[JoeB131]

Um, yeah, this was debunked 20 years ago.

 

[gipper]

Bubba has a son that Obama can say, "If I had a son, he would look like Bubba's son."

 

[gipper]

Um, yeah, this was debunked 20 years ago.

No wonder you adore Cankles...you lie more than she does.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Um, yeah, this was debunked 20 years ago.

Doesn't matter, it's all they got.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Um, yeah, this was debunked 20 years ago.

Doesn't matter, it's all they got.

Wheres the DNA test against the blue dress?

 

[Fenton Lum]

Um, yeah, this was debunked 20 years ago.

Doesn't matter, it's all they got.

Wheres the DNA test against the blue dress?

I will never vote for Bill.

 

[LaDexter]

Hillary has no bio relationship with the kid.

There are 14 other (illegitimate Bill kids), reportedly...

 

[Pogo]

Um, yeah, this was debunked 20 years ago.

No wonder you adore Cankles...you lie more than she does.

OK, seventeen years ago in the final stage.

>> Despite failing to attract mainstream media attention in its first outing, the Clinton love child melodrama was revisited in the late '90s by the conservative web site Newsmax, whose dogged coverage (amid claims of being strong-armed by Clinton operatives) led to the commissioning of a DNA paternity test by another weekly tabloid, Star magazine. Drudge Report picked up the story at this point, claiming the revelations had "rocked the White House" and would lead to a "paternity showdown."

But no showdown occurred. Contrary to expectations, the paternity test determined that Bill Clinton was not Danney Williams' father, Time magazine reported on 18 July 1999:

Using the Starr Report's FBI analysis of Clinton's DNA as its reference, Star paid former prostitute Bobbie Ann Williams, the source for the Globe article, and her 13-year-old son for their story and blood samples. And the result: "There was no match. Not even close," says a Star source. (The Starr Report contains sufficient data to make a valid DNA comparison to rule out paternity.) << Snopes​

So it's a bullshit story that was made up twenty-four years ago, died, was resurrected on the turd day and ascended into a DNA test where it was finally condemned to burn in Hell.

And yet you asshats keep bringing it up, expecting different results. Not unlike Donald Rump continuing to accuse the so-called "Central Park Five" of gang rape even after they've already been exonerated -- again by DNA evidence, which can't be faked.

It's like facts and reality don't even matter to you lot. You just toss bullshit on the wall hoping something will stick.

Where the fuck do y'all get the idea that's gonna work?

 

[Fenton Lum]

Hillary has no bio relationship with the kid.

There are 14 other (illegitimate Bill kids), reportedly...

"reportedly" is all it takes anymore thanks in large part to Fux News' endless "some people say blah blah blah" bullshit.

 

[LaDexter]

How many do you think exist, Fenton?

Do you think Bill doesn't have any kids at all?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Unbelievable!

She got CNN to shut down their coverage of this young man

He points to Drudge as Proof of CNN doing something? LMAO

Did he not have the USMB website to point too?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Hillary has no bio relationship with the kid.

There are 14 other (illegitimate Bill kids), reportedly...

"reportedly" is all it takes anymore thanks in large part to Fux News' endless "some people say blah blah blah" bullshit.

CNN has been accused of....

Nope, wont fly here

 

[gipper]

Um, yeah, this was debunked 20 years ago.

No wonder you adore Cankles...you lie more than she does.

OK, seventeen years ago in the final stage.

>> Despite failing to attract mainstream media attention in its first outing, the Clinton love child melodrama was revisited in the late '90s by the conservative web site Newsmax, whose dogged coverage (amid claims of being strong-armed by Clinton operatives) led to the commissioning of a DNA paternity test by another weekly tabloid, Star magazine. Drudge Report picked up the story at this point, claiming the revelations had "rocked the White House" and would lead to a "paternity showdown."

But no showdown occurred. Contrary to expectations, the paternity test determined that Bill Clinton was not Danney Williams' father, Time magazine reported on 18 July 1999:

Using the Starr Report's FBI analysis of Clinton's DNA as its reference, Star paid former prostitute Bobbie Ann Williams, the source for the Globe article, and her 13-year-old son for their story and blood samples. And the result: "There was no match. Not even close," says a Star source. (The Starr Report contains sufficient data to make a valid DNA comparison to rule out paternity.) << Snopes​

So it's a bullshit story that was made up twenty-four years ago, died, was resurrected on the turd day and ascended into a DNA test where it was finally condemned to burn in Hell.

And yet you asshats keep bringing it up, expecting different results. Not unlike Donald Rump continuing to accuse the so-called "Central Park Five" of gang rape even after they've already been exonerated -- again by DNA evidence, which can't be faked.

It's like facts and reality don't even matter to you lot. You just toss bullshit on the wall hoping something will stick.

Where the fuck do y'all get the idea that's gonna work?

The DNA test was never done. Will you never learn? The Clinton's lie 24/7, but libs and progs still believe them. CRAZY!!!

 

[Fenton Lum]

Um, yeah, this was debunked 20 years ago.

No wonder you adore Cankles...you lie more than she does.

OK, seventeen years ago in the final stage.

>> Despite failing to attract mainstream media attention in its first outing, the Clinton love child melodrama was revisited in the late '90s by the conservative web site Newsmax, whose dogged coverage (amid claims of being strong-armed by Clinton operatives) led to the commissioning of a DNA paternity test by another weekly tabloid, Star magazine. Drudge Report picked up the story at this point, claiming the revelations had "rocked the White House" and would lead to a "paternity showdown."

But no showdown occurred. Contrary to expectations, the paternity test determined that Bill Clinton was not Danney Williams' father, Time magazine reported on 18 July 1999:

Using the Starr Report's FBI analysis of Clinton's DNA as its reference, Star paid former prostitute Bobbie Ann Williams, the source for the Globe article, and her 13-year-old son for their story and blood samples. And the result: "There was no match. Not even close," says a Star source. (The Starr Report contains sufficient data to make a valid DNA comparison to rule out paternity.) << Snopes​

So it's a bullshit story that was made up twenty-four years ago, died, was resurrected on the turd day and ascended into a DNA test where it was finally condemned to burn in Hell.

And yet you asshats keep bringing it up, expecting different results. Not unlike Donald Rump continuing to accuse the so-called "Central Park Five" of gang rape even after they've already been exonerated -- again by DNA evidence, which can't be faked.

It's like facts and reality don't even matter to you lot. You just toss bullshit on the wall hoping something will stick.

Where the fuck do y'all get the idea that's gonna work?

The DNA test was never done. Will you never learn? The Clinton's lie 24/7, but libs and progs still believe them. CRAZY!!!

america is a lie 24/7, but partisanshitheads can only deal with half of reality at a time.

 

[Pogo]

Um, yeah, this was debunked 20 years ago.

No wonder you adore Cankles...you lie more than she does.

OK, seventeen years ago in the final stage.

>> Despite failing to attract mainstream media attention in its first outing, the Clinton love child melodrama was revisited in the late '90s by the conservative web site Newsmax, whose dogged coverage (amid claims of being strong-armed by Clinton operatives) led to the commissioning of a DNA paternity test by another weekly tabloid, Star magazine. Drudge Report picked up the story at this point, claiming the revelations had "rocked the White House" and would lead to a "paternity showdown."

But no showdown occurred. Contrary to expectations, the paternity test determined that Bill Clinton was not Danney Williams' father, Time magazine reported on 18 July 1999:

Using the Starr Report's FBI analysis of Clinton's DNA as its reference, Star paid former prostitute Bobbie Ann Williams, the source for the Globe article, and her 13-year-old son for their story and blood samples. And the result: "There was no match. Not even close," says a Star source. (The Starr Report contains sufficient data to make a valid DNA comparison to rule out paternity.) << Snopes​

So it's a bullshit story that was made up twenty-four years ago, died, was resurrected on the turd day and ascended into a DNA test where it was finally condemned to burn in Hell.

And yet you asshats keep bringing it up, expecting different results. Not unlike Donald Rump continuing to accuse the so-called "Central Park Five" of gang rape even after they've already been exonerated -- again by DNA evidence, which can't be faked.

It's like facts and reality don't even matter to you lot. You just toss bullshit on the wall hoping something will stick.

Where the fuck do y'all get the idea that's gonna work?

The DNA test was never done. Will you never learn? The Clinton's lie 24/7, but libs and progs still believe them. CRAZY!!!

Cool story bruh. I understand the moon landing didn't happen either.

 

[Pogo]

Um, yeah, this was debunked 20 years ago.

Doesn't matter, it's all they got.

Wheres the DNA test against the blue dress?

Where's the one that proves the OP?

ooops.

 

[LaDexter]

America is certainly lost in a sea of lies... in order of importance

1. 911
2. Global Warming
3. "christian" preachers who are really Zionist Jews, like Billy Graham

 

[Seawytch]

OP can't even get his fake story's title right. Stepsons are not related, they are the children of your legal spouse.