geauxtohell
Choose your weapon.
is the way
read and learn
Peace and love
Jah live
Hulu - Saturday Night Live: Digital Short: Ras Trent
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
is the way
read and learn
Peace and love
Jah live
If guns don't kill people, but people kill people, why do they send soldiers off to war with guns, shouldn't they send just the people?
Well, let's see, I wonder how the Romans killed so many people without guns?
Maybe we ought to ban fire too. After all, you never can ban enough things ya know.
And don't forget about those evil swimming pools. How many people in the U.S. die every year from drowning in a swimming pool? Looks like we better ban those evil swimming pools right away. Hmm?
cars are not designed to kill people
the second ammendment is outdated, today it's for trailer trash morons who need to compensate
cars are not designed to kill people
That makes them even scarier.
the second ammendment is outdated, today it's for trailer trash morons who need to compensate
Maybe you could explain to me why it is outdated? That would of course demand an original intent for them. Do you know what this original intent was by chance?
cars are not designed to kill people
That makes them even scarier.
the second ammendment is outdated, today it's for trailer trash morons who need to compensate
Maybe you could explain to me why it is outdated? That would of course demand an original intent for them. Do you know what this original intent was by chance?
The original intent was so that folks could protect themselves from indians, red coats... and also be able to hunt for food before supermarkets were invented. Now you just need guns to protect yourselves from other US citizens.
As for banning pools... maybe the US should ban computers, apparently not everyone is intelligent enough to use them properly.
Indians still around? Maybe it's time to hand out some more free blankets.
Sure there was an original intent.... in 1787!!!!!!!!!!!! Times have changed. It's like the muslims, they're stuck in the 12th century. People need to evolve a little and not be so stuck on some piece of paper written hundreds of years ago, in different times that don't apply to today.
Let everyone buy guns but don't sell anymore bullets, and since Yanks can't resist shooting at each other, you're eventually going to run out.
If the indians attack, just distribute bullets and they're toast.
There's something like 10,000+ deaths in the US by guns every year. You'd all be safer living in Iraq.
Indians still around? Maybe it's time to hand out some more free blankets.
Sure there was an original intent.... in 1787!!!!!!!!!!!! Times have changed. It's like the muslims, they're stuck in the 12th century. People need to evolve a little and not be so stuck on some piece of paper written hundreds of years ago, in different times that don't apply to today.
Let everyone buy guns but don't sell anymore bullets, and since Yanks can't resist shooting at each other, you're eventually going to run out.
If the indians attack, just distribute bullets and they're toast.
I don't know, people ate back then and people ate today. Eating hasn't gone outdated. Some things just don't.
The point is that you are still missing the intent. If you knew what the intent really was, you would know that the factors involved haven't changed since 1787 and since the beginning of this world for that matter.
There's something like 10,000+ deaths in the US by guns every year. You'd all be safer living in Iraq.
And there are far more automobile accident deaths in the US every year. You'd be safer living in Uganda.
Interesting that guns weren't killing 10,000 people per year back in 1787 or 1887, etc.
The reason: plain and simple... It AIN'T the guns it's the people. Maybe we need to be bitching about the violent cartoons, movies, and video games we allow our children to be programmed by. Perhaps we need to place the Bible first in our lives as it was back in the 1700's when there were guns but far fewer murders due to the guns.
Indians still around? Maybe it's time to hand out some more free blankets.
Sure there was an original intent.... in 1787!!!!!!!!!!!! Times have changed. It's like the muslims, they're stuck in the 12th century. People need to evolve a little and not be so stuck on some piece of paper written hundreds of years ago, in different times that don't apply to today.
Let everyone buy guns but don't sell anymore bullets, and since Yanks can't resist shooting at each other, you're eventually going to run out.
If the indians attack, just distribute bullets and they're toast.
I don't know, people ate back then and people ate today. Eating hasn't gone outdated. Some things just don't.
The point is that you are still missing the intent. If you knew what the intent really was, you would know that the factors involved haven't changed since 1787 and since the beginning of this world for that matter.
There's something like 10,000+ deaths in the US by guns every year. You'd all be safer living in Iraq.
And there are far more automobile accident deaths in the US every year. You'd be safer living in Uganda.
Interesting that guns weren't killing 10,000 people per year back in 1787 or 1887, etc.
The reason: plain and simple... It AIN'T the guns it's the people. Maybe we need to be bitching about the violent cartoons, movies, and video games we allow our children to be programmed by. Perhaps we need to place the Bible first in our lives as it was back in the 1700's when there were guns but far fewer murders due to the guns.
Back then people couldn't go to a supermarket. Like people use handguns to hunt for food. And anyways, the vast majority of people with guns don't have them to hunt for food.
EPIC FAIL! Now use your gun what it was intended for and go shoot a human.
We're talking about guns not cars, but the simple solution for cars is to have everyone pass an IQ test and have a fairly high cut-off. That would eliminate most of the tards from the road.
They were meant for hunting animals and defending against red coats and injuns. And I think to defend against corrupt government or some shit like that. None of which is relevant today.
They were meant for hunting animals and defending against red coats and injuns. And I think to defend against corrupt government or some shit like that. None of which is relevant today.
One quick glance around the world today would prove that statement an epic fail.
They were meant for hunting animals and defending against red coats and injuns. And I think to defend against corrupt government or some shit like that. None of which is relevant today.
One quick glance around the world today would prove that statement an epic fail.
We're talking about the US only, none of which is relevant today.
One quick glance around the world today would prove that statement an epic fail.
We're talking about the US only, none of which is relevant today.
No, we are talking about mankind which is who the founding fathers had in mind.
We're talking about the US only, none of which is relevant today.
No, we are talking about mankind which is who the founding fathers had in mind.
The constitution applies to the whole world?
What an epic fail of an argument.
No, we are talking about mankind which is who the founding fathers had in mind.
The constitution applies to the whole world?
What an epic fail of an argument.
No, the constitution applies to mankind in America of which came from every other country in the world BUT North America.
The constitution applies to the whole world?
What an epic fail of an argument.
No, the constitution applies to mankind in America of which came from every other country in the world BUT North America.
So how is it relevant today to need weapons to fight of injuns, red coats and get food as your only source of meat?