Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, but civilians breaking a blockade is.
Really?
Please provide proof of this.
I already did, go back and look.
Civilians sending aid to civilians. Is that listed as a "belligerent act?" Oh the horror of it all.
No, but civilians breaking a blockade is.
Really?
Please provide proof of this.
No, but civilians breaking a blockade is.
Really?
Please provide proof of this.
Holy fuck you are a sad whiny ****. That's been posted a few times and even you admitted a blockade applies to civilian ships. You're the kind of anal retentive fuckwad that would say "Look at that obese person" then turn around and claim you didn't say the person is fat. Fuck you.
Civilians sending aid to civilians. Is that listed as a "belligerent act?" Oh the horror of it all.
No, but civilians breaking a blockade is.
Really?
Please provide proof of this.
If a Japanese ship is thought to breach the Israeli blockade, can Israel nuke Japan in response?
If not, why not?
Please do explain CL.
No, but civilians breaking a blockade is.
Really?
Please provide proof of this.
If a Japanese ship is thought to breach the Israeli blockade, can Israel nuke Japan in response?
If not, why not?
Please do explain CL.
You can't even comprehend simple laws regarding a blockade but you want to enter the arena of nuclear weapons....rotfl!
Really?
Please provide proof of this.
Holy fuck you are a sad whiny ****. That's been posted a few times and even you admitted a blockade applies to civilian ships. You're the kind of anal retentive fuckwad that would say "Look at that obese person" then turn around and claim you didn't say the person is fat. Fuck you.
Do you know the difference between a blockade applying to civilian ships and a civilian ship breaking a blockade becoming a belligerent because it tries to break the blockade?
Belligerent is a term of art in international law. Just because you looked it up at dictionary.com doesn't mean you know what the fuck you are talking about.
Fucking hell. You make me weep for humanity.
Are you really this fucking ignorant?
JUST BECAUSE IT IS TREATED AS BREAKING A BLOCKADE DOES NOT MEAN YOU CAN BREAK OTHER INTERNATIONAL LAWS TO STOP IT.
Oh, well, its breaking a blockade. Does that mean you can nuke Japan in response? NO. OTHER INTERNATIONAL LAWS APPLY. One of those laws is you CANNOT INVADE THE SOVEREIGN TERRITORY OF A NEUTRAL STATE.
Christ. Its as if you think any law exists in a vacuum where no other laws apply.
Okay you crybaby twat. One last time. Explain what this means:
"It is immaterial that the vessel or aircraft is at the time of visit bound to a neutral port or airfield, if its ultimate destination is the blockaded area, or if the goods found in its cargo are to be trans-shipped through the blockaded area"
2. Capture. Vessels and aircraft are liable to capture for breach of blockade and attempted breach of blockade"
Oh my god.
It means that you are thought to be in breach of blockade as soon as you do that. Vessels and aircraft are liable to capture for breach of blockade and attempted breach of blockade...AS LONG AS YOU ARE NOT VIOLATING OTHER INTERNATIONAL LAW.
Holy fuck you are a sad whiny ****. That's been posted a few times and even you admitted a blockade applies to civilian ships. You're the kind of anal retentive fuckwad that would say "Look at that obese person" then turn around and claim you didn't say the person is fat. Fuck you.
Do you know the difference between a blockade applying to civilian ships and a civilian ship breaking a blockade becoming a belligerent because it tries to break the blockade?
Belligerent is a term of art in international law. Just because you looked it up at dictionary.com doesn't mean you know what the fuck you are talking about.
Fucking hell. You make me weep for humanity.
Okay you crybaby twat. One last time. Explain what this means:
"It is immaterial that the vessel or aircraft is at the time of visit bound to a neutral port or airfield, if its ultimate destination is the blockaded area, or if the goods found in its cargo are to be trans-shipped through the blockaded area"
2. Capture. Vessels and aircraft are liable to capture for breach of blockade and attempted breach of blockade"
Oh my god.
It means that you are thought to be in breach of blockade as soon as you do that. Vessels and aircraft are liable to capture for breach of blockade and attempted breach of blockade...AS LONG AS YOU ARE NOT VIOLATING OTHER INTERNATIONAL LAW.
I get it now.....you're just fucking stoopid. Pay close attention:
"It is immaterial that the vessel or aircraft is at the time of visit bound to a neutral port or airfield, if its ultimate destination is the blockaded area, or if the goods found in its cargo are to be trans-shipped through the blockaded area"
2. Capture. Vessels and aircraft are liable to capture for breach of blockade and attempted breach of blockade"
If they are liable for capture while being in a neutral port that means it is not breaking international law to seize the vessel you dumbfuck. If the blockade enforcers had to wait until the vessels reached international water it would not say:
"It is immaterial that the vessel or aircraft is at the time of visit bound to a neutral port or airfield..."
Blimy fucks o' lickn' dumbass rednecks like you are an embarrassment to common sense.
Really?
Please provide proof of this.
If a Japanese ship is thought to breach the Israeli blockade, can Israel nuke Japan in response?
If not, why not?
Please do explain CL.
You can't even comprehend simple laws regarding a blockade but you want to enter the arena of nuclear weapons....rotfl!
Way to dodge the question.
You can't even comprehend simple laws regarding a blockade but you want to enter the arena of nuclear weapons....rotfl!
Way to dodge the question.
Except.....I just demonstrated you are too fuxxing stoopid to comprehend the blockade laws.....what'd the barber say?
Next!
Do you know the difference between a blockade applying to civilian ships and a civilian ship breaking a blockade becoming a belligerent because it tries to break the blockade?
Belligerent is a term of art in international law. Just because you looked it up at dictionary.com doesn't mean you know what the fuck you are talking about.
Fucking hell. You make me weep for humanity.
Oh my god.
It means that you are thought to be in breach of blockade as soon as you do that. Vessels and aircraft are liable to capture for breach of blockade and attempted breach of blockade...AS LONG AS YOU ARE NOT VIOLATING OTHER INTERNATIONAL LAW.
I get it now.....you're just fucking stoopid. Pay close attention:
"It is immaterial that the vessel or aircraft is at the time of visit bound to a neutral port or airfield, if its ultimate destination is the blockaded area, or if the goods found in its cargo are to be trans-shipped through the blockaded area"
2. Capture. Vessels and aircraft are liable to capture for breach of blockade and attempted breach of blockade"
If they are liable for capture while being in a neutral port that means it is not breaking international law to seize the vessel you dumbfuck. If the blockade enforcers had to wait until the vessels reached international water it would not say:
"It is immaterial that the vessel or aircraft is at the time of visit bound to a neutral port or airfield..."
Blimy fucks o' lickn' dumbass rednecks like you are an embarrassment to common sense.
Yeah. I read it. And explained it.
Now explain this.
The general area within which the naval forces of belligerents are permitted to conduct operations includes: the high seas, the territorial sea and internal waters of belligerents, the territory of belligerents accessible to naval forces, and the air space over such waters and territory.
Good luck with that.
I get it now.....you're just fucking stoopid. Pay close attention:
"It is immaterial that the vessel or aircraft is at the time of visit bound to a neutral port or airfield, if its ultimate destination is the blockaded area, or if the goods found in its cargo are to be trans-shipped through the blockaded area"
2. Capture. Vessels and aircraft are liable to capture for breach of blockade and attempted breach of blockade"
If they are liable for capture while being in a neutral port that means it is not breaking international law to seize the vessel you dumbfuck. If the blockade enforcers had to wait until the vessels reached international water it would not say:
"It is immaterial that the vessel or aircraft is at the time of visit bound to a neutral port or airfield..."
Blimy fucks o' lickn' dumbass rednecks like you are an embarrassment to common sense.
Yeah. I read it. And explained it.
Now explain this.
The general area within which the naval forces of belligerents are permitted to conduct operations includes: the high seas, the territorial sea and internal waters of belligerents, the territory of belligerents accessible to naval forces, and the air space over such waters and territory.
Good luck with that.
You've never explained it you lying useless ****.
Link the post where you explained you unbelievably whiny bitch.
And this.
As a general rule, all acts of hostility in neutral jurisdiction are forbidden. This includes both visit and search and capture or destruction.
Guess thats enough, since you are probably crying like a bitch at this point.
Way to dodge the question.
Except.....I just demonstrated you are too fuxxing stoopid to comprehend the blockade laws.....what'd the barber say?
Next!
Right. I'm too stupid to comprehend the blockade laws that say that acts of hostility are forbidden in neutral ports?
God damned you are fucking stupid.
Way to dodge the question.
Except.....I just demonstrated you are too fuxxing stoopid to comprehend the blockade laws.....what'd the barber say?
Next!
Right. I'm too stupid to comprehend the blockade laws that say that acts of hostility are forbidden in neutral ports?
God damned you are fucking stupid.
And this.
As a general rule, all acts of hostility in neutral jurisdiction are forbidden. This includes both visit and search and capture or destruction.
Guess thats enough, since you are probably crying like a bitch at this point.
Is that better for you, dumbshit?
Yeah. I read it. And explained it.
Now explain this.
The general area within which the naval forces of belligerents are permitted to conduct operations includes: the high seas, the territorial sea and internal waters of belligerents, the territory of belligerents accessible to naval forces, and the air space over such waters and territory.
Good luck with that.
You've never explained it you lying useless ****.
Link the post where you explained you unbelievably whiny bitch.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-m...e-attacked-by-flotilla-mob-8.html#post2378498
Now. Going to respond to any of the quotes I posted? Or are you such an unbelievably dishonest fuck that you will just continue to ignore them?
Maybe I need to make them red as well to get them to sink into your incredibly small brain?
Except.....I just demonstrated you are too fuxxing stoopid to comprehend the blockade laws.....what'd the barber say?
Next!
Right. I'm too stupid to comprehend the blockade laws that say that acts of hostility are forbidden in neutral ports?
God damned you are fucking stupid.
Now you are straight up lying. The laws stated in paragraph 632 make it clear it is "immaterial" if a vessel is in a neutral port because it is still guilty of attempting to breach a blockade. You are purposefully trying to conflate different laws because you are a dishonest whiny ****.
Except.....I just demonstrated you are too fuxxing stoopid to comprehend the blockade laws.....what'd the barber say?
Next!
Right. I'm too stupid to comprehend the blockade laws that say that acts of hostility are forbidden in neutral ports?
God damned you are fucking stupid.
You've never explained it you lying useless ****.
Link the post where you explained you unbelievably whiny bitch.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-m...e-attacked-by-flotilla-mob-8.html#post2378498
Now. Going to respond to any of the quotes I posted? Or are you such an unbelievably dishonest fuck that you will just continue to ignore them?
Maybe I need to make them red as well to get them to sink into your incredibly small brain?
It is not a violation of international law to inspect a ship in a neutral port in attempt of breaching a blockade you dumb ****. That is why the law says it is immaterial......fuck. It's been posted several times you dumb ****.
Were you one of the dumb twats that claimed israel couldn't inspect the flotillas because it was in international water?