Report. Obama protected Hezbollah to appease Iran.

Mindful

Diamond Member
Sep 5, 2014
59,054
39,452
2,635
Here, there, and everywhere.
Investigation reveals that Obama administration barred prosecution of Hezbollah operations, shielded terror group in bid to appease Iran.

The Obama administration shielded one of the world’s most notorious Islamic terror groups from prosecution, derailing a years-long investigation of the group in an effort to curry favor with Tehran in an effort to secure a nuclear deal with the rogue regime, a new investigative report claims.

In 2008, the Drug Enforcement Administration launched what was dubbed “Project Cassandra”, a secret criminal investigation into the Lebanon-based Shi’ite terror group Hezbollah.

According to an investigative report published by Politico Monday, a team of DEA agents aided by dozens of US and foreign security and law enforcement agencies spent eight years mapping out Hezbollah’s intricate web of organized crime operations and other money-making schemes around the globe aimed at funding the terror group’s operations in the Middle East.


Report: Obama protected Hezbollah to appease Iran
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
:: Hezbollah, an Iranian proxy in Lebanon, was responsible for terror attacks against Israeli forces during the 1980s and 1990s, and was responsible for the 1983 bombing of a US Marine Corps barracks in Beirut which left 305 people dead, including 241 American servicemen.

In 2006, Hezbollah carried out an unprovoked attack on Israeli forces inside Israeli territory, killing three, and taking two captive. The attack sparked a month-long war between Israel and the Shi’ite terror group, which pounded northern Israel with missiles, rockets, and mortar fire.

But the Lebanese terror group has also demonstrated a global reach, aiding the perpetrators of the 1992 suicide bombing of the Israeli embassy in Argentina which killed 29, and being widely suspected of carrying out the 1994 bombing of a Jewish center in Buenos Aires, killing 85.

Hezbollah also funneled weapons to Muslim militias in the Balkans during the breakup of Yugoslavia in the 1990s, and killed six people, including five Israelis, in a bombing attack in Bulgaria in 2012.::
 
Already a thread on this.. But when you are watching and surveling you don't expose yourself by prosecuting members of the organizations....The AG does the prosecution not the president....
The article didn't really show any proof of any orders just someone who thinks it came from the top...Which is inconclusive as evidence goes...
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
Already a thread on this.. But when you are watching and surveling you don't expose yourself by prosecuting members of the organizations....The AG does the prosecution not the president....
The article didn't really show any proof of any orders just someone who thinks it came from the top...Which is inconclusive as evidence goes...

Obama was an appeaser, no doubt about it.

Though held a strange hostility towards Great Britain.
 
Already a thread on this.. But when you are watching and surveling you don't expose yourself by prosecuting members of the organizations....The AG does the prosecution not the president....
The article didn't really show any proof of any orders just someone who thinks it came from the top...Which is inconclusive as evidence goes...
Orders come from the top. Flunkies don't make the decisions.
 
Already a thread on this.. But when you are watching and surveling you don't expose yourself by prosecuting members of the organizations....The AG does the prosecution not the president....
The article didn't really show any proof of any orders just someone who thinks it came from the top...Which is inconclusive as evidence goes...
Orders come from the top. Flunkies don't make the decisions.
Then why has Sessions not prosecuted?
 
Already a thread on this.. But when you are watching and surveling you don't expose yourself by prosecuting members of the organizations....The AG does the prosecution not the president....
The article didn't really show any proof of any orders just someone who thinks it came from the top...Which is inconclusive as evidence goes...

Obama was an appeaser, no doubt about it.

Though held a strange hostility towards Great Britain.
Reagan was no different...
 
Already a thread on this.. But when you are watching and surveling you don't expose yourself by prosecuting members of the organizations....The AG does the prosecution not the president....
The article didn't really show any proof of any orders just someone who thinks it came from the top...Which is inconclusive as evidence goes...

Obama was an appeaser, no doubt about it.

Though held a strange hostility towards Great Britain.
Reagan was no different...

To whom?
 
Already a thread on this.. But when you are watching and surveling you don't expose yourself by prosecuting members of the organizations....The AG does the prosecution not the president....
The article didn't really show any proof of any orders just someone who thinks it came from the top...Which is inconclusive as evidence goes...

Obama was an appeaser, no doubt about it.

Though held a strange hostility towards Great Britain.
Reagan was no different...

To whom?
Iran. He sold them military hardware parts and missiles that were illegal to sell to Iran .......
 
Already a thread on this.. But when you are watching and surveling you don't expose yourself by prosecuting members of the organizations....The AG does the prosecution not the president....
The article didn't really show any proof of any orders just someone who thinks it came from the top...Which is inconclusive as evidence goes...

Obama was an appeaser, no doubt about it.

Though held a strange hostility towards Great Britain.
Reagan was no different...

To whom?
Iran. He sold them military hardware parts and missiles that were illegal to sell to Iran .......

So Obama's off the hook now? With the moral relativism?
 
Already a thread on this.. But when you are watching and surveling you don't expose yourself by prosecuting members of the organizations....The AG does the prosecution not the president....
The article didn't really show any proof of any orders just someone who thinks it came from the top...Which is inconclusive as evidence goes...

Obama was an appeaser, no doubt about it.

Though held a strange hostility towards Great Britain.
Reagan was no different...

To whom?
Iran. He sold them military hardware parts and missiles that were illegal to sell to Iran .......

So Obama's off the hook now? With the moral relativism?
Not that I said that.. It is inconclusive with what they claim about Oblama, not so much for Reagan because of jurisprudence....There was no conclusive evidence in the story to inform the reader of all actions as to what really occurred during the investigation....If it is such a secret and an issue why has the AG not followed up on it?
 
Already a thread on this.. But when you are watching and surveling you don't expose yourself by prosecuting members of the organizations....The AG does the prosecution not the president....
The article didn't really show any proof of any orders just someone who thinks it came from the top...Which is inconclusive as evidence goes...
Orders come from the top. Flunkies don't make the decisions.
Then why has Sessions not prosecuted?
Because he's putting all the shit into one pile. Like Perry Mason. Then he'll pounce. Watch and wait.
 
Already a thread on this.. But when you are watching and surveling you don't expose yourself by prosecuting members of the organizations....The AG does the prosecution not the president....
The article didn't really show any proof of any orders just someone who thinks it came from the top...Which is inconclusive as evidence goes...

Obama was an appeaser, no doubt about it.

Though held a strange hostility towards Great Britain.

But you have no evidence
 
Already a thread on this.. But when you are watching and surveling you don't expose yourself by prosecuting members of the organizations....The AG does the prosecution not the president....
The article didn't really show any proof of any orders just someone who thinks it came from the top...Which is inconclusive as evidence goes...

Obama was an appeaser, no doubt about it.

Though held a strange hostility towards Great Britain.

But you have no evidence

What kind of evidence did you want?
 
Hezbollah is the army of Lebanon no different than the IDF. The arab league hates Iran due to they want to be the boss of the arab area, and of course Israel hates them. Maybe Israel and SA should stay out of their country (Lebanon) and Syria.
 
Already a thread on this.. But when you are watching and surveling you don't expose yourself by prosecuting members of the organizations....The AG does the prosecution not the president....
The article didn't really show any proof of any orders just someone who thinks it came from the top...Which is inconclusive as evidence goes...

Obama was an appeaser, no doubt about it.

Though held a strange hostility towards Great Britain.

But you have no evidence

What kind of evidence did you want?

Documents signed by Obama directly ordering a halt to prosecutions of Hezbollah.
 
It was a dream of his fathers
It was also the Audacity of the Dope to act like a fucking drug dealing money launderer and ship 150 billion in cash to to the terrorist Islamists Mullahs of Iran.
 

Forum List

Back
Top